[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

There hasn’T been ... a single updaTe To This siTe --- since I joined.

"This Is Not What Authoritarianism Looks Like"

America Erupts… ICE Raids Takeover The Streets

AC/DC- Riff Raff + Go Down [VH1 Uncut, July 5, 1996]

Why is Peter Schiff calling Bitcoin a ‘giant cult’ and how does this impact market sentiment?

Esso Your Butt Buddy Horseshit jacks off to that shit

"The Addled Activist Mind"

"Don’t Stop with Harvard"

"Does the Biden Cover-Up Have Two Layers?"

"Pete Rose, 'Shoeless' Joe Reinstated by MLB, Eligible for HOF"

"'Major Breakthrough': Here Are the Details on the China Trade Deal"

Freepers Still Love war

Parody ... Jump / Trump --- van Halen jump

"The Democrat Meltdown Continues"

"Yes, We Need Deportations Without Due Process"

"Trump's Tariff Play Smart, Strategic, Working"

"Leftists Make Desperate Attempt to Discredit Photo of Abrego Garcia's MS-13 Tattoos. Here Are Receipts"

"Trump Administration Freezes $2 Billion After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands"on After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands

"Doctors Committing Insurance Fraud to Conceal Trans Procedures, Texas Children’s Whistleblower Testifies"

"Left Using '8647' Symbol for Violence Against Trump, Musk"

KawasakiÂ’s new rideable robohorse is straight out of a sci-fi novel

"Trade should work for America, not rule it"

"The Stakes Couldn’t Be Higher in Wisconsin’s Supreme Court Race – What’s at Risk for the GOP"

"How Trump caught big-government fans in their own trap"

‘Are You Prepared for Violence?’

Greek Orthodox Archbishop gives President Trump a Cross, tells him "Make America Invincible"

"Trump signs executive order eliminating the Department of Education!!!"

"If AOC Is the Democratic Future, the Party Is Even Worse Off Than We Think"

"Ending EPA Overreach"

Closest Look Ever at How Pyramids Were Built

Moment the SpaceX crew Meets Stranded ISS Crew

The Exodus Pharaoh EXPLAINED!

Did the Israelites Really Cross the Red Sea? Stunning Evidence of the Location of Red Sea Crossing!

Are we experiencing a Triumph of Orthodoxy?

Judge Napolitano with Konstantin Malofeev (Moscow, Russia)

"Trump Administration Cancels Most USAID Programs, Folds Others into State Department"

Introducing Manus: The General AI Agent

"Chinese Spies in Our Military? Straight to Jail"

Any suggestion that the USA and NATO are "Helping" or have ever helped Ukraine needs to be shot down instantly

"Real problem with the Palestinians: Nobody wants them"

ACDC & The Rolling Stones - Rock Me Baby

Magnus Carlsen gives a London System lesson!

"The Democrats Are Suffering Through a Drought of Generational Talent"

7 Tactics Of The Enemy To Weaken Your Faith

Strange And Biblical Events Are Happening

Every year ... BusiesT casino gambling day -- in Las Vegas

Trump’s DOGE Plan Is Legally Untouchable—Elon Musk Holds the Scalpel

Palestinians: What do you think of the Trump plan for Gaza?

What Happens Inside Gaza’s Secret Tunnels? | Unpacked

Hamas Torture Bodycam Footage: "These Monsters Filmed it All" | IDF Warfighter Doron Keidar, Ep. 225


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: Ann Coulter To Headline 'Homocon' Event For Gay Conservatives
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/ ... er-to-headline-a_n_673313.html
Published: Aug 6, 2010
Author: Nick Wing
Post Date: 2010-08-06 18:42:53 by Skip Intro
Keywords: None
Views: 166576
Comments: 275

Ann Coulter To Headline 'Homocon' Event For Gay Conservatives

Conservative pundit and unlikely gay ally Ann Coulter is set to headline the first annual Homocon, "a party to celebrate gay conservatives" put on by GOProud, the "only national organization representing gay conservatives." The festivities are scheduled to take place in New York City on September 25.

"The gay left has done their best to take all the fun out of politics, with their endless list of boycotts and protests. Homocon is going to be our annual effort to counter the 'no fun police' on the left," said Christopher Barron, Chairman of the Board of GOProud, in a statement. "I can't think of any conservative more fun to headline our inaugural party then the self-professed 'right-wing Judy Garland' - Ann Coulter."

"I can promise you, Homocon 2010 will be a hell of a lot more fun than chaining yourself to the White House fence," Baron pledged, making light of an incident earlier this year where gay soldiers protesting the military's "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy chained themselves to the gates of the White House.

In choosing Coulter, the organizers of GOProud appear willing to ignore her past transgressions against the gay community. The conservative pundit was condemned by gay-rights groups in 2007 when she notoriously called then-Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards a "faggot."

And earlier this year, Coulter railed against "irritating lesbian" Constance McMillen for challenging the sanctimony of heterosexual-only proms.

But Coulter's selection probably won't be surprising to many gay rights groups who have pointed out that GOProud sometimes exhibits self-destructive behavior. Earlier this year, the gay conservative group planned a fundraiser with Doug Manchester, a California businessman and hotelier who donated $125,000 to anti-gay marriage Proposition 8.

That fundraiser was held earlier this month in an event that GOProud called an effort by Manchester to "make financial amends with the gay community," which had mounted a boycott of Manchester's hotels and accused him of treating his gay employees poorly.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 39.

#3. To: Skip Intro (#0)

No such thing as a conservative faggot. That is like having a pro choice pro lifer. An oxymoron.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-08-06   19:34:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: A K A Stone (#3)

No such thing as a conservative faggot. That is like having a pro choice pro lifer. An oxymoron.

WRONG! There is no such thing as a politically conservative bible thumper.

Being a conservative means that you are for individual freedoms and reducing government control over the private lives of individual citizens. That is 180 degrees off from what bible thumpers want.

sneakypete  posted on  2010-08-07   6:16:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: sneakypete, A K A Stone (#13)

No such thing as a conservative faggot. That is like having a pro choice pro lifer. An oxymoron.

There is no such thing as a politically conservative bible thumper.

Being a conservative means that you are for individual freedoms and reducing government control over the private lives of individual citizens. That is 180 degrees off from what bible thumpers want.

Wrong.

You've just described a libertarian.

There are social constraints that have always be "conservative" which is defined by the lack of change or a status quo within a social standing.

Stone happens to be right with respect to "oxymorons." A few of the primary tenets of political "conservatism" within the context of American politics are "pro-life, "pro-marriage" (between man & woman), and "pro-gun."

Individual queers may have conservative leanings, but as a demographic they are as liberal/fascist as any group in the US.

Liberator  posted on  2010-08-07   10:17:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: Liberator (#21)

Being a conservative means that you are for individual freedoms and reducing government control over the private lives of individual citizens. That is 180 degrees off from what bible thumpers want.

Wrong.

You've just described a libertarian.

Which is what a conservative really is. The Founding Fathers were all libertarians,and being a conservative means holding to the traditional values and thoughts of the people who established our form of government.

Individual queers may have conservative leanings, but as a demographic they are as liberal/fascist as any group in the US.

Gee,I wonder why? It's not like anybody that CLAIMS to be a conservative is making them feel unwelcome by wanting government to treat them like second class citizens,or wishing they would die.

sneakypete  posted on  2010-08-07   10:32:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: sneakypete (#27) (Edited)

[A liberatarian] Which is what a conservative really is. The Founding Fathers were all libertarians,and being a conservative means holding to the traditional values and thoughts of the people who established our form of government.

And if you noticed, there we no homosexual "marriages" during the time of the Founders. WHY NOT?

YES - being a conservative DOES mean "holding to the traditional values and thought of a people who established out gubmint" - THE FOUNDERS.

Minimal gubmint. Representative gubmint and consent by and for the People. But that's all now apparently a past "tradition."

Anybody that CLAIMS to be a conservative is making them [queers] feel unwelcome by wanting government to treat them like second class citizens,or wishing they would die.

Who are you kidding?

Queers now have "special rights." Affirmative action. Corrupt judges. Look at them wrong and you can be arrested for "Hate Crimes."

Man, you are waaay off base on this issue.

Liberator  posted on  2010-08-07   10:48:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: Liberator (#29) (Edited)

if you noticed, there we no homosexual "marriages" during the time of the Founders...

They just don't have the right (or social consensus) to redefine the language and the act of "marriage" by dictatorial fiat...

More importantly, there weren't any government marriage licenses at the time of the founders.

Of course the government has already changed the act of "marriage" by dictatorial fiat.

Historically, marriage was a contract between two families, usually under the auspices of a religious authority.

At the beginning of the progressive era in the late 19th century, state governments starting to nullify common law marriages and began to exert more control over marriage. By the 1920s, 38 states had laws prohibiting whites from marrying blacks, mulattos, Japanese, Chinese, Indians, Mongolians, Malays or Filipinos.

In the 1960s, governments started using their power over marriage to force "no- fault" divorce laws on all of us.

As is the case with everything government touches, it has destroyed the institution of marriage. 50% of Americans between 25 to 29 are unmarried. Almost 40 percent of children are born to unmarried parents.

The government has no business regulating who can get married. They certainly have no business requiring a license to validate that a couple is married.

jwpegler  posted on  2010-08-07   11:43:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: jwpegler (#31)

The government has no business regulating who can get married. They certainly have no business requiring a license to validate that a couple is married.

As long as there are certain rights, benefits, and protections that go along with marriage, the government does have an interest in who is married.

lucysmom  posted on  2010-08-07   12:33:19 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: lucysmom (#32) (Edited)

As long as there are certain rights, benefits, and protections that go along with marriage, the government does have an interest in who is married.

Absolute bullshit. You are displaying exactly the kind of warped logic that has allowed the government to grow into the Leviathan behemoth that it is today.

Legally, marriage is a contract. The government has one role in contracts -- that of the arbitrator of last resort in a contractual dispute. In many cases, the government doesn't even perform this role anymore. When I went through my divorce we used private arbitration. The government's only role was register the agreement about assets and children that came out of the private arbitration.

The government certainly has no legitimate power whatsoever to bestow any special "rights" or "benefits" to married people. The government's only legitimate role in society is to protect the natural rights that all humans have as a result of being human.

jwpegler  posted on  2010-08-07   12:46:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: jwpegler (#35)

When I went through my divorce we used private arbitration. The government's only role was register the agreement about assets and children that came out of the private arbitration.

You made a new contract and it was blessed by the court. If a dispute arises, the court will enforce the contract, or bless its modification. If human beings were always rational and fair, there would be no need for the courts to get involved.

A benefit of marriage is the right to inherit. A friend recently discovered what a mess that can be when the union is not blessed by the state. Her partner's family did decide that she could keep the entire mortgage on the house since more was owed than it is now worth - everything else however, the family decided belonged to them.

lucysmom  posted on  2010-08-07   13:10:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: lucysmom (#38)

You made a new contract and it was blessed by the court. If a dispute arises, the court will enforce the contract, or bless its modification.

Which is what I said -- their only role is the arbitrator of last resort.

A benefit of marriage is the right to inherit. A friend recently discovered what a mess that can be when the union is not blessed by the state.

ROTFLMAO. People inherited long before there was a central state "blessing" marriages. Of course, people can inherit from unmarried individuals too. Even within state's "blessing" (you crack me up), the government has screwed this up as well.

A Will is public instrument that is published when you die and can be challenged by any schmuck with a shyster lawyer. Did you know that? Most people don't understand this. The only way to make your death and inheritance a private affair is by creating a trust (I know this because I've done it at the advice of my attorney). The normal way that people handle their estate, with a Will, enables the government to leave them open for all kinds of trouble in the courts.

Nothing that you've said is a legitimate argument for government control and licensing of marriage. In fact, just the opposite is true.

jwpegler  posted on  2010-08-07   13:28:59 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 39.

#55. To: jwpegler (#39)

Nothing that you've said is a legitimate argument for government control and licensing of marriage. In fact, just the opposite is true.

Her partner of 16 years was young and dropped dead of a heart attack. Foolishly they had neither a will nor a trust.

lucysmom  posted on  2010-08-07 15:18:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 39.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com