United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Ann Coulter To Headline 'Homocon' Event For Gay Conservatives
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/ ... er-to-headline-a_n_673313.html
Published: Aug 6, 2010
Author: Nick Wing
Post Date: 2010-08-06 18:42:53 by Skip Intro
Keywords: None
Views: 169129
Comments: 275
Ann Coulter To Headline 'Homocon' Event For Gay Conservatives Conservative pundit and unlikely gay ally Ann Coulter is set to headline the first annual Homocon, "a party to celebrate gay conservatives" put on by GOProud, the "only national organization representing gay conservatives." The festivities are scheduled to take place in New York City on September 25. "The gay left has done their best to take all the fun out of politics, with their endless list of boycotts and protests. Homocon is going to be our annual effort to counter the 'no fun police' on the left," said Christopher Barron, Chairman of the Board of GOProud, in a statement. "I can't think of any conservative more fun to headline our inaugural party then the self-professed 'right-wing Judy Garland' - Ann Coulter." "I can promise you, Homocon 2010 will be a hell of a lot more fun than chaining yourself to the White House fence," Baron pledged, making light of an incident earlier this year where gay soldiers protesting the military's "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy chained themselves to the gates of the White House. In choosing Coulter, the organizers of GOProud appear willing to ignore her past transgressions against the gay community. The conservative pundit was condemned by gay-rights groups in 2007 when she notoriously called then-Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards a "faggot." And earlier this year, Coulter railed against "irritating lesbian" Constance McMillen for challenging the sanctimony of heterosexual-only proms. But Coulter's selection probably won't be surprising to many gay rights groups who have pointed out that GOProud sometimes exhibits self-destructive behavior. Earlier this year, the gay conservative group planned a fundraiser with Doug Manchester, a California businessman and hotelier who donated $125,000 to anti-gay marriage Proposition 8. That fundraiser was held earlier this month in an event that GOProud called an effort by Manchester to "make financial amends with the gay community," which had mounted a boycott of Manchester's hotels and accused him of treating his gay employees poorly.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-225) not displayed.
.
.
.
#226. To: lucysmom (#213)
(Edited)
Ok - so you've just opined that "California Voters Be Damned" - and the process of I & R is a charade (but ONLY when the Left or Gays lose.) Perhaps you think the US Constitution is a "charade". No, but you, US Presidents, and Congress DO.
He used to be...Until he was beamed down from your space ship.
I'm sorry - it's been a while since I've understood Clingon.
What specifically were those "anti-gay" measures? I've had experience seeing others trying to steal someone else's social standing ... Huh? What "social standing" is that? Mine is "citizen." Is there some special designation I'm missing?
(phew!) What a relief that you're only ensconced in a two-piece Spandex cocoon. I don't use homo erotic imagery in every point that I make either. I'll concede your point; There are rare exceptions.
It's not spandex and if you were any kind of an athlete you'd know that.
Perhaps you think its a suicide pact? ROFLMAO! Looks like Boyeye is one of those "living document" peep-pulls!
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
It's not. The Mormon Church really punked out on this one,and bowed to the political power of the mainstream Christian cults. Marriage with children (like Islam)? In some states today you can legally marry at age 13 with your parents permission. Marrying your aunt Tilly and uncle Joe at the same time? Because government has a legitimate interest in banning blood relation marriages to prevent the birth of idiots. For one thing,congress couldn't stand the competition. Hey - my "insistence on calling homos 'gay'" is not only a 1st Amendment right (lol - now you oppose THAT??) Nope. If you want to look like a PC fool getting ready to step out of the closet yourself,go ahead.
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
Yes. Second Class Citizen. Someone with fewer rights than you.
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
Perhaps on day California voters will decide to ban posters calling themselves "Liberator" from the internet.
In some states today you can legally marry at age 13 with your parents permission. In 1880, the age of consent in Delaware was 7, in most states it was 10, while in Turkey it was 15.
Therefore, you can justify Muslim child-marriage because in Delaware in the year 1880 some crackpot decided it was alright? Geez, you ARE a champion moral relativist, aren't you LM? God help your daughter.
Spandex is not part of the uniformed activities of baseball, football, or Karate. Sorry, Vera Wang.
Tssk...Your fascist fangs are showing, Lucy.
Baloney. Queers can even tell people they're "Married." (Except that militant gays and you demand "official" designation.) Btw, if you want me to refer to you as "General Sneakypete," I will. No charge.
Liberator is so very typical of a lot of people. He believes that the world has always been the way he experiences it today and that any deviation from his narrow little corner of the world is an abomination. My ex-mother-in-law was just like him. Insular, myopic, and stubborn to the point that no facts or evidence could make her see the light.
Just noting the reality that a culture's idea of what is moral does change. In the US women activists worked long and hard to raise the age of consent. I wonder which side of the debate you would have been on had you been around in 1880. Would you have defended the age of seven or 10 as being the traditional and thus moral age of consent?
Are you being intentionally ironic or was that an accident?
He doesn't realize that he is a product of his culture and not of thought and choice.
How exactly was an obscure, odd 1880 Delaware marriage law considered a "traditional" moral age of consent in your mind? Your premise is the entire 4 quarts low in oil.
Says the poster calling for a ban of posters she disagrees with. Have you ANY idea that in MY country, there's a 1st Amendment?
Hypothetical is not actual. Have you ANY idea that in MY country, there's a 1st Amendment? You would defend your Constitutional rights and deny Constitutional rights to others - hypocrite!
Thanks for the courtesy ping... He believes that the world has always been the way he experiences it today and that any deviation from his narrow little corner of the world is an abomination. My ex-mother-in-law was just like him. Insular, myopic, and stubborn to the point that no facts or evidence could make her see the light. Cut the crap you pseudo-intellectual elite-wannabe. You're just another moral relativist bending over for the PC "Issue du jour" claiming he's anti-gubmit officiousness.
So sayeth the "hypothetical" anti-1st Amendment fascist.
Was that from your almanac of fiction and fact? Wilson Lustre Nylon Spandex Football Game Pants are deluxe adult football game pants.
You seem to have taken on the traits of your ex mother-in-law. Was she ignorant like you, also?
Attacking a kid...how special...
I don't wear footballl panties either. And as an ex rubgy and ex football player, football players ARE pussies.
Wilson Lustre Nylon Spandex Football Game Pants are deluxe adult football game pants. I haven't been playing too much "deluxe adult tackle football" in the 21st century or so... But nice try.
ROFL
You know - I really appreciate your humor - however intended...or unintended it is.
The "Mom" is the poster. Lucy is the kid, doof.
More should try to. I crack me up all the time. Fred is better at the subtle stuff than I am tho.
Stop it, dwarf! You are as effeminate as Obama!
I don't know sports, just fabrics.
Okay...there's a topper for sure...
Wrong as usual petey.
Obama's first all-by-his-lonesome budget, btw, calls for a $1.17 trillion deficit.
It was still 7 in Delaware in the 1960's. Maybe even later than that.
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
Yeah,and you can call yourself an intellectual,but that doesn't make you one.
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
Are you being intentionally ironic or was that an accident? He is as blind as a bat,and doesn't know any better. The good news for you is at the rate he is going you should be able to get him to register as a Dim.
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
No,there's not. In YOUR country the Old Testament replaces the Bill of Rights.
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
Comments (267 - 275) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestI'm saying that the voters in an individual state can't override the US Constitution.
#227. To: Ferret Mike, sneakypete (#215)
You are a wise man Pete.
#228. To: Ferret Mike (#216)
As for spandex, I used to race bicycles and had more then one goober with a micro sized brain scream out their car window others and I they saw in bike togs must be 'faggots.'
#229. To: Ferret Mike (#217)
I live in a state that had an evil group called the Oregon Citizen's Alliance (OCA) that always tried to pass anti-gay ballot measures that generally went down in flames.
#230. To: war (#218)
I don't wear jumpsuits...everything is two piece...
#231. To: Liberator (#230)
What a relief that you're only ensconced in a two-piece Spandex cocoon.
#232. To: Badeye, lucysmom (#224)
Perhaps you think the US Constitution is a "charade".
#233. To: Liberator (#225)
If queer "marriage" isn't the business of government, than why isn't polygamy?
#234. To: Liberator (#229)
Huh? What "social standing" is that? Mine is "citizen." Is there some special designation I'm missing?
#235. To: Liberator (#226)
Ok - so you've just opined that "California Voters Be Damned" ...
#236. To: sneakypete, Liberator (#233)
Marriage with children (like Islam)?
#237. To: lucysmom (#236)
In 1880, the age of consent in Delaware was 7, in most states it was 10, while in Turkey it was 15.
#238. To: war (#231)
It's not spandex and if you were any kind of an athlete you'd know that.
#239. To: lucysmom (#235)
Perhaps on day California voters will decide to ban posters calling themselves "Liberator" from the internet.
#240. To: sneakypete (#234)
(Edited)
Yes. Second Class Citizen. Someone with fewer rights than you.
#241. To: lucysmom (#236)
#242. To: Liberator (#237)
Geez, you ARE a champion moral relativist, aren't you LM?
#243. To: Liberator (#239)
Tssk...Your fascist fangs are showing, Lucy.
#244. To: jwpegler (#241)
He believes that the world has always been the way he experiences it today and that any deviation from his narrow little corner of the world is an abomination.
#245. To: lucysmom (#242)
I wonder which side of the debate you would have been on had you been around in 1880. Would you have defended the age of seven or 10 as being the traditional and thus moral age of consent?
#246. To: lucysmom (#243)
Are you being intentionally ironic or was that an accident?
#247. To: Liberator (#246)
Says the poster calling for a ban of posters she disagrees with.
#248. To: jwpegler (#241)
Liberator is so very typical of a lot of people.
#249. To: Sybilsmom (#247)
You would defend your Constitutional rights and deny Constitutional rights to others - hypocrite!
#250. To: Liberator (#238)
Spandex is not part of the uniformed activities of baseball, football, or Karate. Sorry, Vera Wang.
#251. To: jwpegler (#241)
My ex-mother-in-law was just like him. Insular, myopic, and stubborn to the point that no facts or evidence could make her see the light.
#252. To: Liberator (#249)
(Edited)
Sybilsmom
#253. To: lucysmom (#250)
#254. To: lucysmom (#250)
Was that from your almanac of fiction and fact?
#255. To: war (#252)
#256. To: war (#253)
(Edited)
I don't wear footballl panties either. And as an ex rubgy and ex football player, football players ARE pussies.
#257. To: Liberator (#255)
#258. To: Liberator (#256)
(Edited)
I really appreciate your humor
#259. To: war (#253)
as an ex rubgy and ex football player
#260. To: war (#253)
I don't wear footballl panties either. And as an ex rubgy and ex football player, football players ARE pussies.
#261. To: lucysmom (#260)
#262. To: sneakypete (#232)
ROFLMAO! Looks like Boyeye is one of those "living document" peep-pulls!
#263. To: lucysmom (#236)
In 1880, the age of consent in Delaware was 7, in most states it was 10,
#264. To: Liberator (#240)
Baloney. Queers can even tell people they're "Married."
#265. To: lucysmom, Liberator (#243)
Tssk...Your fascist fangs are showing, Lucy.
#266. To: Liberator (#246)
Have you ANY idea that in MY country, there's a 1st Amendment?
.
.
.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]