[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

There hasn’T been ... a single updaTe To This siTe --- since I joined.

"This Is Not What Authoritarianism Looks Like"

America Erupts… ICE Raids Takeover The Streets

AC/DC- Riff Raff + Go Down [VH1 Uncut, July 5, 1996]

Why is Peter Schiff calling Bitcoin a ‘giant cult’ and how does this impact market sentiment?

Esso Your Butt Buddy Horseshit jacks off to that shit

"The Addled Activist Mind"

"Don’t Stop with Harvard"

"Does the Biden Cover-Up Have Two Layers?"

"Pete Rose, 'Shoeless' Joe Reinstated by MLB, Eligible for HOF"

"'Major Breakthrough': Here Are the Details on the China Trade Deal"

Freepers Still Love war

Parody ... Jump / Trump --- van Halen jump

"The Democrat Meltdown Continues"

"Yes, We Need Deportations Without Due Process"

"Trump's Tariff Play Smart, Strategic, Working"

"Leftists Make Desperate Attempt to Discredit Photo of Abrego Garcia's MS-13 Tattoos. Here Are Receipts"

"Trump Administration Freezes $2 Billion After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands"on After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands

"Doctors Committing Insurance Fraud to Conceal Trans Procedures, Texas Children’s Whistleblower Testifies"

"Left Using '8647' Symbol for Violence Against Trump, Musk"

KawasakiÂ’s new rideable robohorse is straight out of a sci-fi novel

"Trade should work for America, not rule it"

"The Stakes Couldn’t Be Higher in Wisconsin’s Supreme Court Race – What’s at Risk for the GOP"

"How Trump caught big-government fans in their own trap"

‘Are You Prepared for Violence?’

Greek Orthodox Archbishop gives President Trump a Cross, tells him "Make America Invincible"

"Trump signs executive order eliminating the Department of Education!!!"

"If AOC Is the Democratic Future, the Party Is Even Worse Off Than We Think"

"Ending EPA Overreach"

Closest Look Ever at How Pyramids Were Built

Moment the SpaceX crew Meets Stranded ISS Crew

The Exodus Pharaoh EXPLAINED!

Did the Israelites Really Cross the Red Sea? Stunning Evidence of the Location of Red Sea Crossing!

Are we experiencing a Triumph of Orthodoxy?

Judge Napolitano with Konstantin Malofeev (Moscow, Russia)

"Trump Administration Cancels Most USAID Programs, Folds Others into State Department"

Introducing Manus: The General AI Agent

"Chinese Spies in Our Military? Straight to Jail"

Any suggestion that the USA and NATO are "Helping" or have ever helped Ukraine needs to be shot down instantly

"Real problem with the Palestinians: Nobody wants them"

ACDC & The Rolling Stones - Rock Me Baby

Magnus Carlsen gives a London System lesson!

"The Democrats Are Suffering Through a Drought of Generational Talent"

7 Tactics Of The Enemy To Weaken Your Faith

Strange And Biblical Events Are Happening

Every year ... BusiesT casino gambling day -- in Las Vegas

Trump’s DOGE Plan Is Legally Untouchable—Elon Musk Holds the Scalpel

Palestinians: What do you think of the Trump plan for Gaza?

What Happens Inside Gaza’s Secret Tunnels? | Unpacked

Hamas Torture Bodycam Footage: "These Monsters Filmed it All" | IDF Warfighter Doron Keidar, Ep. 225


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: Ann Coulter To Headline 'Homocon' Event For Gay Conservatives
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/ ... er-to-headline-a_n_673313.html
Published: Aug 6, 2010
Author: Nick Wing
Post Date: 2010-08-06 18:42:53 by Skip Intro
Keywords: None
Views: 166881
Comments: 275

Ann Coulter To Headline 'Homocon' Event For Gay Conservatives

Conservative pundit and unlikely gay ally Ann Coulter is set to headline the first annual Homocon, "a party to celebrate gay conservatives" put on by GOProud, the "only national organization representing gay conservatives." The festivities are scheduled to take place in New York City on September 25.

"The gay left has done their best to take all the fun out of politics, with their endless list of boycotts and protests. Homocon is going to be our annual effort to counter the 'no fun police' on the left," said Christopher Barron, Chairman of the Board of GOProud, in a statement. "I can't think of any conservative more fun to headline our inaugural party then the self-professed 'right-wing Judy Garland' - Ann Coulter."

"I can promise you, Homocon 2010 will be a hell of a lot more fun than chaining yourself to the White House fence," Baron pledged, making light of an incident earlier this year where gay soldiers protesting the military's "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy chained themselves to the gates of the White House.

In choosing Coulter, the organizers of GOProud appear willing to ignore her past transgressions against the gay community. The conservative pundit was condemned by gay-rights groups in 2007 when she notoriously called then-Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards a "faggot."

And earlier this year, Coulter railed against "irritating lesbian" Constance McMillen for challenging the sanctimony of heterosexual-only proms.

But Coulter's selection probably won't be surprising to many gay rights groups who have pointed out that GOProud sometimes exhibits self-destructive behavior. Earlier this year, the gay conservative group planned a fundraiser with Doug Manchester, a California businessman and hotelier who donated $125,000 to anti-gay marriage Proposition 8.

That fundraiser was held earlier this month in an event that GOProud called an effort by Manchester to "make financial amends with the gay community," which had mounted a boycott of Manchester's hotels and accused him of treating his gay employees poorly.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 244.

#3. To: Skip Intro (#0)

No such thing as a conservative faggot. That is like having a pro choice pro lifer. An oxymoron.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-08-06   19:34:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: A K A Stone (#3)

No such thing as a conservative faggot. That is like having a pro choice pro lifer. An oxymoron.

WRONG! There is no such thing as a politically conservative bible thumper.

Being a conservative means that you are for individual freedoms and reducing government control over the private lives of individual citizens. That is 180 degrees off from what bible thumpers want.

sneakypete  posted on  2010-08-07   6:16:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: sneakypete, A K A Stone (#13)

No such thing as a conservative faggot. That is like having a pro choice pro lifer. An oxymoron.

There is no such thing as a politically conservative bible thumper.

Being a conservative means that you are for individual freedoms and reducing government control over the private lives of individual citizens. That is 180 degrees off from what bible thumpers want.

Wrong.

You've just described a libertarian.

There are social constraints that have always be "conservative" which is defined by the lack of change or a status quo within a social standing.

Stone happens to be right with respect to "oxymorons." A few of the primary tenets of political "conservatism" within the context of American politics are "pro-life, "pro-marriage" (between man & woman), and "pro-gun."

Individual queers may have conservative leanings, but as a demographic they are as liberal/fascist as any group in the US.

Liberator  posted on  2010-08-07   10:17:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: Liberator (#21)

Being a conservative means that you are for individual freedoms and reducing government control over the private lives of individual citizens. That is 180 degrees off from what bible thumpers want.

Wrong.

You've just described a libertarian.

Which is what a conservative really is. The Founding Fathers were all libertarians,and being a conservative means holding to the traditional values and thoughts of the people who established our form of government.

Individual queers may have conservative leanings, but as a demographic they are as liberal/fascist as any group in the US.

Gee,I wonder why? It's not like anybody that CLAIMS to be a conservative is making them feel unwelcome by wanting government to treat them like second class citizens,or wishing they would die.

sneakypete  posted on  2010-08-07   10:32:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: sneakypete (#27) (Edited)

[A liberatarian] Which is what a conservative really is. The Founding Fathers were all libertarians,and being a conservative means holding to the traditional values and thoughts of the people who established our form of government.

And if you noticed, there we no homosexual "marriages" during the time of the Founders. WHY NOT?

YES - being a conservative DOES mean "holding to the traditional values and thought of a people who established out gubmint" - THE FOUNDERS.

Minimal gubmint. Representative gubmint and consent by and for the People. But that's all now apparently a past "tradition."

Anybody that CLAIMS to be a conservative is making them [queers] feel unwelcome by wanting government to treat them like second class citizens,or wishing they would die.

Who are you kidding?

Queers now have "special rights." Affirmative action. Corrupt judges. Look at them wrong and you can be arrested for "Hate Crimes."

Man, you are waaay off base on this issue.

Liberator  posted on  2010-08-07   10:48:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#41. To: Liberator (#29)

And if you noticed, there we no homosexual "marriages" during the time of the Founders. WHY NOT?

Probably because nobody ever tried it. Mostly because the superstitious fundies that controlled local governments would have murdered them.

There were also laws against blacks and whites marrying. Do you think THOSE laws were based on Constitutional principles?

Queers now have "special rights." Affirmative action. Corrupt judges. Look at them wrong and you can be arrested for "Hate Crimes."

Yeah,all because people like you are singling them out for special treatment and denying them their rights as citizens.

Man, you are waaay off base on this issue.

No,I'm not. All I am doing is saying ALL citizens should be treated equally by the government,and their rights and freedoms as individuals need to be respected.

What's wrong with that?

sneakypete  posted on  2010-08-07   13:34:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#75. To: sneakypete (#41)

And if you noticed, there we no homosexual "marriages" during the time of the Founders. WHY NOT?

Probably because nobody ever tried it. Mostly because the superstitious fundies that controlled local governments would have murdered them.

I think it's because they were too ugly and practiced bad hygiene back then. Washington had wooden teeth - giving a different meaning to "woodies" - NOT attractive to obvious deist (but not atheist) gays, Jefferson and Adams.

Btw Pete - you DO know 98% of the Founders either believed in God or were Christians, right?

There were also laws against blacks and whites marrying. Do you think THOSE laws were based on Constitutional principles?

Obviously not.

[White] people like you are singling them [blacks] out for special treatment and denying them their rights as citizens.

*LMAO* Yeah, I've been the one forcing them to drink from the 'Colt 45 - BLACKS ONLY' fountain.

All I am doing is saying ALL citizens should be treated equally by the government,and their rights and freedoms as individuals need to be respected.

Gays already have the "rights" and "freedom" to be with whomever they want (providing they're not Priests) till the day they die and call it whatever they want. The rest of us oppose a law demanding that we consider it "marriage."

Liberator  posted on  2010-08-08   17:18:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#106. To: Liberator (#75)

Btw Pete - you DO know 98% of the Founders either believed in God or were Christians, right?

No,I don't.

I do know a lot of them played that game in public because they grew up in a system where admitting you were a non-believer could get all your property seized and yourself thrown into prison,though.

Gays already have the "rights" and "freedom" to be with whomever they want (providing they're not Priests) till the day they die and call it whatever they want.

Yeah,they can call it whatever they want,but without a marriage certificate one partner can be denied inheritance in some cases,or access to the hospital room where their mate lays dying.

The rest of us oppose a law demanding that we consider it "marriage."

BullBush! What you are demanding is un-Constitutional laws remain in place that denies a segment of our population the same basic RIGHTS that the rest of us have,all because of your religious superstitions.

You are no different than the Muslims that want to install Sharia law.

sneakypete  posted on  2010-08-08   18:42:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#157. To: sneakypete (#106)

You are no different than the Muslims that want to install Sharia law.

BWAAAHAAA!

Liberator  posted on  2010-08-09   7:34:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#160. To: Liberator, sneakypete (#157)

Why can only women go into the womens restroom. Someone should file an equal protection lawsuit. It's a bunch of bullshit men can't go into the womens restroom.

Also why can't men be girl scout leaders. Equal protection violation.

It's also bullshit that playboy wont publish my picture in its magazine. Equal protection you know.

It is also bullshit that Mrs America is always a woman. Do you approve of that discrimination? Bigot

I have a friend who is really good at basketball. He wants to play on the womens olympic team but the assholes wont let him. You think he should file and equal protection lawsuit? I mean he can make the team. Why are they discriminating against him?

Again why can't my son go into the womens restroom. He likes looking you know.

What you don't support those just fags redefining and ruining our culture.

You like Obama aren't a cultural American.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-08-09   7:41:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#205. To: A K A Stone (#160) (Edited)

Why can only women go into the womens restroom. Someone should file an equal protection lawsuit. It's a bunch of bullshit men can't go into the womens restroom. Also why can't men be girl scout leaders. Equal protection violation. It's also bullshit that playboy wont publish my picture in its magazine. Equal protection you know. It is also bullshit that Mrs America is always a woman. Do you approve of that discrimination? Bigot I have a friend who is really good at basketball. He wants to play on the womens olympic team but the assholes wont let him. You think he should file and equal protection lawsuit? I mean he can make the team. Why are they discriminating against him?

What laws say that you can't use the woman's bathroom, lead a girl scout troop, pose for Playboy, compete in the Mrs America Pageant, or pay basketball in the NBA?

What laws? There aren't any laws that say this.

You've brilliantly articulated the problem with so-called "conservatives" -- today's "conservatives" are not conservative.

You agree with the left that the edicts of the state should overrule the authority of the family, church, business, and property owners in general. This is NOT a conservative view. It's a neo-conservative view. Neo-conservatism was started by ex-Trotskyites and other assorted 1960s leftists. Even though some of their ends have changed, their means remain the same -- they want to use the power of government to force their views on others. Just like the left. Just like you and "Liberator".

jwpegler  posted on  2010-08-09   9:43:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#211. To: jwpegler, A K A Stone, sneakypete (#205)

What laws say that you can't use the woman's bathroom, lead a girl scout troop, pose for Playboy, compete in the Mrs America Pageant, or pay basketball in the NBA?

What laws? There aren't any laws that say this.

Wrong analogies.

Affirmative Action, "Hate Laws," and "Gay" marriage are just a few examples of over-officious Federal overreach and violations of common sense and logic.

A liberal-Left SCOTUS (which includes two lesbians) will guarantee far more tyranny.

Liberator  posted on  2010-08-09   16:14:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#221. To: Liberator (#211)

Affirmative Action, "Hate Laws," and "Gay" marriage are just a few examples of over-officious Federal overreach and violations of common sense and logic.

No argument there,except for homosexual marriages not being any business of the government one way or the other,and your insistence on calling homosexuals "gay". There may be some gay ones,but the ones I have met and known don't seem to be all that happy to me.

sneakypete  posted on  2010-08-09   20:51:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#225. To: sneakypete (#221)

Homosexual marriages [aren't] any business of the government one way or the other,and your insistence on calling homosexuals "gay". There may be some gay ones,but the ones I have met and known don't seem to be all that happy to me.

If queer "marriage" isn't the business of government, than why isn't polygamy? Marriage with children (like Islam)? Marrying your aunt Tilly and uncle Joe at the same time?

Hey - my "insistence on calling homos 'gay'" is not only a 1st Amendment right (lol - now you oppose THAT??), but homos are the ones who call themselves "gay." And no wonder they aren't "gay" (in a happy sense) - who would be getting poked with a pecker so much that they've got to wear Depends for the rest of their lives?

Liberator  posted on  2010-08-10   11:05:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#233. To: Liberator (#225)

If queer "marriage" isn't the business of government, than why isn't polygamy?

It's not. The Mormon Church really punked out on this one,and bowed to the political power of the mainstream Christian cults.

Marriage with children (like Islam)?

In some states today you can legally marry at age 13 with your parents permission.

Marrying your aunt Tilly and uncle Joe at the same time?

Because government has a legitimate interest in banning blood relation marriages to prevent the birth of idiots. For one thing,congress couldn't stand the competition.

Hey - my "insistence on calling homos 'gay'" is not only a 1st Amendment right (lol - now you oppose THAT??)

Nope. If you want to look like a PC fool getting ready to step out of the closet yourself,go ahead.

sneakypete  posted on  2010-08-10   11:37:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#236. To: sneakypete, Liberator (#233)

Marriage with children (like Islam)?

In some states today you can legally marry at age 13 with your parents permission.

In 1880, the age of consent in Delaware was 7, in most states it was 10, while in Turkey it was 15.

lucysmom  posted on  2010-08-10   12:27:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#241. To: lucysmom (#236)

Liberator is so very typical of a lot of people. He believes that the world has always been the way he experiences it today and that any deviation from his narrow little corner of the world is an abomination. My ex-mother-in-law was just like him. Insular, myopic, and stubborn to the point that no facts or evidence could make her see the light.

jwpegler  posted on  2010-08-10   12:48:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#244. To: jwpegler (#241)

He believes that the world has always been the way he experiences it today and that any deviation from his narrow little corner of the world is an abomination.

He doesn't realize that he is a product of his culture and not of thought and choice.

lucysmom  posted on  2010-08-10   13:04:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 244.

        There are no replies to Comment # 244.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 244.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com