[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"This Is How We Win a New Cold War With China"

"How Europe Fell Behind"

"The Epstein Conspiracy in Plain Sight"

Saint Nicholas The Real St. Nick

Will Atheists in China Starve Due to No Fish to Eat?

A Thirteen State Solution for the Holy Land?

US Sends new Missle to a Pacific ally, angering China and Russia Moscow and Peoking

DeaTh noTice ... Freerepublic --- lasT Monday JR died

"‘We Are Not the Crazy Ones’: AOC Protests Too Much"

"Rep. Comer to Newsmax: No Evidence Biden Approved Autopen Use"

"Donald Trump Has Broken the Progressive Ratchet"

"America Must Slash Red Tape to Make Nuclear Power Great Again!!"

"Why the DemocRATZ Activist Class Couldn’t Celebrate the Cease-Fire They Demanded"

Antifa Calls for CIVIL WAR!

British Police Make an Arrest...of a White Child Fishing in the Thames

"Sanctuary" Horde ASSAULTS Chicago... ELITE Marines SMASH Illegals Without Mercy

Trump hosts roundtable on ANTIFA

What's happening in Britain. Is happening in Ireland. The whole of Western Europe.

"The One About the Illegal Immigrant School Superintendent"

CouldnÂ’t believe he let me pet him at the end (Rhino)

Cops Go HANDS ON For Speaking At Meeting!

POWERFUL: Charlie Kirk's final speech delivered in South Korea 9/6/25

2026 in Bible Prophecy

2.4 Billion exposed to excessive heat

🔴 LIVE CHICAGO PORTLAND ICE IMMIGRATION DETENTION CENTER 24/7 PROTEST 9/28/2025

Young Conservative Proves Leftist Protesters Wrong

England is on the Brink of Civil War!

Charlie Kirk Shocks Florida State University With The TRUTH

IRL Confronting Protesters Outside UN Trump Meeting

The UK Revolution Has Started... Brit's Want Their Country Back

Inside Paris Dangerous ANTIFA Riots

Rioters STORM Chicago ICE HQ... "Deportation Unit" SCRAPES Invaders Off The Sidewalk

She Decoded A Specific Part In The Bible

Muslim College Student DUMBFOUNDED as Charlie Kirk Lists The Facts About Hamas

Charlie Kirk EVISCERATES Black Students After They OPENLY Support “Anti-White Racism” HEATED DEBATE

"Trump Rips U.N. as Useless During General Assembly Address: ‘Empty Words’"

Charlie Kirk VS the Wokies at University of Tennessee

Charlie Kirk Takes on 3 Professors & a Teacher

British leftist student tells Charlie Kirk facts are unfair

The 2 Billion View Video: Charlie Kirk's Most Viewed Clips of 2024

Antifa is now officially a terrorist organization.

The Greatness of Charlie Kirk: An Eyewitness Account of His Life and Martyrdom

Charlie Kirk Takes on Army of Libs at California's UCR

DR. ALVEDA KING: REST IN PEACE CHARLIE KIRK

Steven Bonnell wants to murder Americans he disagrees with

What the fagots LGBTQ really means

I watched Charlie Kirk get assassinated. This is my experience.

Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March (Tommy Robinson)

"Transcript: Mrs. Erika Kirk Delivers Public Address: ‘His Movement Will Go On’"

"Victor Davis Hanson to Newsmax: Kirk Slaying Crosses Rubicon"


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: Ann Coulter To Headline 'Homocon' Event For Gay Conservatives
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/ ... er-to-headline-a_n_673313.html
Published: Aug 6, 2010
Author: Nick Wing
Post Date: 2010-08-06 18:42:53 by Skip Intro
Keywords: None
Views: 168669
Comments: 275

Ann Coulter To Headline 'Homocon' Event For Gay Conservatives

Conservative pundit and unlikely gay ally Ann Coulter is set to headline the first annual Homocon, "a party to celebrate gay conservatives" put on by GOProud, the "only national organization representing gay conservatives." The festivities are scheduled to take place in New York City on September 25.

"The gay left has done their best to take all the fun out of politics, with their endless list of boycotts and protests. Homocon is going to be our annual effort to counter the 'no fun police' on the left," said Christopher Barron, Chairman of the Board of GOProud, in a statement. "I can't think of any conservative more fun to headline our inaugural party then the self-professed 'right-wing Judy Garland' - Ann Coulter."

"I can promise you, Homocon 2010 will be a hell of a lot more fun than chaining yourself to the White House fence," Baron pledged, making light of an incident earlier this year where gay soldiers protesting the military's "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy chained themselves to the gates of the White House.

In choosing Coulter, the organizers of GOProud appear willing to ignore her past transgressions against the gay community. The conservative pundit was condemned by gay-rights groups in 2007 when she notoriously called then-Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards a "faggot."

And earlier this year, Coulter railed against "irritating lesbian" Constance McMillen for challenging the sanctimony of heterosexual-only proms.

But Coulter's selection probably won't be surprising to many gay rights groups who have pointed out that GOProud sometimes exhibits self-destructive behavior. Earlier this year, the gay conservative group planned a fundraiser with Doug Manchester, a California businessman and hotelier who donated $125,000 to anti-gay marriage Proposition 8.

That fundraiser was held earlier this month in an event that GOProud called an effort by Manchester to "make financial amends with the gay community," which had mounted a boycott of Manchester's hotels and accused him of treating his gay employees poorly.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 168.

#3. To: Skip Intro (#0)

No such thing as a conservative faggot. That is like having a pro choice pro lifer. An oxymoron.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-08-06   19:34:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: A K A Stone (#3)

No such thing as a conservative faggot.

Apparently, once again you're wrong.

Skip Intro  posted on  2010-08-06   19:41:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Skip Intro (#4)

No I am right as usual. Just like some faggots pretending to be married. You can stomp your feet and have some faggot judge say your married. But two men can't marry. Conservatives can't be faggots. Maybe pretending to be conservative.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-08-06   19:43:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: A K A Stone (#5)

You can stomp your feet and have some faggot judge say your married. But two men can't marry.

I know you are a fundie,but you CAN'T be so ignorant as to think that marriage is tied to religion.

You can marry in a civil ceremony with no representative of any religious cult in attendance.

I will grant you that the state has no right and lacks the power to demand that any religion be forced to conduct a wedding ceremony for homosexuals or anyone else they don't like.

Freedom is a two-way street.

sneakypete  posted on  2010-08-07   6:19:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: sneakypete, A K A Stone (#14)

Freedom is a two-way street.

Queers already possess the freedom to be with whomever they want, and freedom to make a commitment to whomever they want.

They just don't have the right (or social consensus) to redefine the language and the act of "marriage" by dictatorial fiat.

Liberator  posted on  2010-08-07   9:59:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: Liberator (#19)

Queers already possess the freedom to be with whomever they want,and freedom to make a commitment to whomever they want.

No,they don't. They don't have the freedom to marry whoever they want.

We are either all free,or none of us are free. A government that has the power to tell you who you can't marry also has the power to tell you who you MUST marry.

sneakypete  posted on  2010-08-07   10:27:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: sneakypete (#26)

They don't have the freedom to marry whoever they want.

Why are you missing this?

"Marriage" is the definition of an official partnership between a man and a woman. Has been forever.

They and you apparently want the "freedom" to arbitrarily redefine both the language and humankind's traditions. Because a bunch of nuts loves their dogs doesn't mean the state must recognize "marriage" it their case, does it? Or monogamy?

Liberator  posted on  2010-08-07   10:40:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: Liberator (#28)

"Marriage" is the definition of an official partnership between a man and a woman. Has been forever.

Not entirely true. I have seen and heard references to a "marriage" of a engine and transmission in a car or truck that didn't come with that engine or transmission.

I have also never seen where the term is LEGALLY limited to a partnership between a man and woman ONLY. WHERE is it restricted to only male and female relationships,other than in the minds of fundies?

They and you apparently want the "freedom" to arbitrarily redefine both the language and humankind's traditions.

I have no interest in redefining anything. It is people like YOU that want to redefine it to meet your religious beliefs.

Because a bunch of nuts loves their dogs doesn't mean the state must recognize "marriage" it their case, does it?

Dogs get married. I read of one case where a man married his horse. In neither case does your religious cult have to recognize the marriages. Or monogamy?

What does monogamy have to do with it? The subject was marriage,and WELL over 50% of the marriages in this country are not monogamous. Some were never intended to be monogamous from the beginning,and in others at least one partner is stepping out on the other.

sneakypete  posted on  2010-08-07   13:29:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#71. To: sneakypete (#40)

"Marriage" is the definition of an official partnership between a man and a woman. Has been forever.

Not entirely true. I have seen and heard references to a "marriage" of a engine and transmission in a car or truck that didn't come with that engine or transmission.

Heh...A Ford 5.0 engine with the tranny of a '75 Chevy Nova. What were they thinkin'??

I have also never seen where the term is LEGALLY limited to a partnership between a man and woman ONLY. WHERE is it restricted to only male and female relationships,other than in the minds of fundies?

It's always been so obvious that man + woman = legal, it's expressed. "Fundie" authorization has nothing to do with historical sanity in this case; It's natural.

Dogs get married. I read of one case where a man married his horse. In neither case does your religious cult have to recognize the marriages. Or monogamy?

One bizarro-world case here and there is irrelevant. Only in yours and Rosie O'Donnell's cartoon world is she and another dyke, and Dick and Big Richard actually considered "married."

What does monogamy have to do with it? The subject was marriage,and WELL over 50% of the marriages in this country are not monogamous. Some were never intended to be monogamous from the beginning,and in others at least one partner is stepping out on the other.

That was my bad; I meant polygamy. What's to stop everyone from "marrying" everyone else - including their own two grandmothers?

Liberator  posted on  2010-08-08   17:03:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#102. To: Liberator (#71)

That was my bad; I meant polygamy. What's to stop everyone from "marrying" everyone else - including their own two grandmothers?

Why is it you fundies are so interested in marrying your daughters,sisters,mothers,and grannies?

It has never occurred to the rest of us that anybody would even want to,yet you must or you wouldn't be trying to push for laws to put people in jail for doing it.

sneakypete  posted on  2010-08-08   18:30:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#152. To: sneakypete (#102)

Why is it you fundies are so interested in marrying your daughters,sisters,mothers,and grannies?

No, that would be you Queer-enabling, marry-anything-that-frickin-moves dictatorial brownshirt tyrant-wannabes.

It has never occurred to the rest of us that anybody would even want to,yet you must or you wouldn't be trying to push for laws to put people in jail for doing it.

It has still not yet occurred to you that "Gay Marriage" is a figment of yours and Meguro's imagination. Any "law" being shoved down our throats (pun intended) that the majority of us reject such absurdity is facilitated by you and your tyrannical ilk.

Admit it; You're wearing a black robe while posting, Judge Pete.

Liberator  posted on  2010-08-09   7:23:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#168. To: Liberator (#152)

Why is it you fundies are so interested in marrying your daughters,sisters,mothers,and grannies?

No, that would be you Queer-enabling, marry-anything-that-frickin-moves dictatorial brownshirt tyrant-wannabes.

Wrong once again,Buckwheat! *I* ain't the one that is worried about that because it has never once occurred to me that sane people would even want to do that sort of thing.

Yet you and others like you worry about it night and day. Almost like you want the government to protect you from yourselves.

Any "law" being shoved down our throats (pun intended) that the majority of us reject such absurdity is facilitated by you and your tyrannical ilk.

I never realized you were such a big fan of mob rule. Banning guns,smoking in the privacy of your home,etc,etc,etc should make you absolutely orgasmic because they are all supported by a majority of people in various areas of the country.

sneakypete  posted on  2010-08-09   7:51:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 168.

        There are no replies to Comment # 168.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 168.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com