United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Ann Coulter To Headline 'Homocon' Event For Gay Conservatives
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/ ... er-to-headline-a_n_673313.html
Published: Aug 6, 2010
Author: Nick Wing
Post Date: 2010-08-06 18:42:53 by Skip Intro
Keywords: None
Views: 158625
Comments: 275
Ann Coulter To Headline 'Homocon' Event For Gay Conservatives Conservative pundit and unlikely gay ally Ann Coulter is set to headline the first annual Homocon, "a party to celebrate gay conservatives" put on by GOProud, the "only national organization representing gay conservatives." The festivities are scheduled to take place in New York City on September 25. "The gay left has done their best to take all the fun out of politics, with their endless list of boycotts and protests. Homocon is going to be our annual effort to counter the 'no fun police' on the left," said Christopher Barron, Chairman of the Board of GOProud, in a statement. "I can't think of any conservative more fun to headline our inaugural party then the self-professed 'right-wing Judy Garland' - Ann Coulter." "I can promise you, Homocon 2010 will be a hell of a lot more fun than chaining yourself to the White House fence," Baron pledged, making light of an incident earlier this year where gay soldiers protesting the military's "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy chained themselves to the gates of the White House. In choosing Coulter, the organizers of GOProud appear willing to ignore her past transgressions against the gay community. The conservative pundit was condemned by gay-rights groups in 2007 when she notoriously called then-Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards a "faggot." And earlier this year, Coulter railed against "irritating lesbian" Constance McMillen for challenging the sanctimony of heterosexual-only proms. But Coulter's selection probably won't be surprising to many gay rights groups who have pointed out that GOProud sometimes exhibits self-destructive behavior. Earlier this year, the gay conservative group planned a fundraiser with Doug Manchester, a California businessman and hotelier who donated $125,000 to anti-gay marriage Proposition 8. That fundraiser was held earlier this month in an event that GOProud called an effort by Manchester to "make financial amends with the gay community," which had mounted a boycott of Manchester's hotels and accused him of treating his gay employees poorly.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-109) not displayed.
.
.
.
#110. To: A K A Stone (#81)
According to who,The Reverend Ted Haggard,spiritual adviser to the Bush White House,and client of drug dealers and homo escort services?
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
Hey dumbass. Words have meanings. Marriage is between a man and a woman. Any man can marry any woman and vice versa. Assuming they both consent. Two men cannot be married any more then 2 plus 2 equalling 354.
Really? You sent nature a letter asking about this,and she said that in her reply? Any more "facts" you would like to provide? I sometimes wonder what it is that pisses you people off so much about this. It it because you thought you had no choice but to marry a woman when you got married,and now you are pissed because the young people of today might get a choice? Is it the,"DAMN! I CUDDA HAD A V8!" syndrome at work?
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
(eyeball roll) Good point! In your ideal world we will all have all the freedom the biggest religious cult (thank you for admitting you are for democracy. Your grandchildren will be Muslims if you get your wish!) in charge of the government decides we need. Who could ask for more than that?
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
If fags can marry. Then normal people can exercise their first amendment right to kill them. Can't make no law respecting religion..... or prohibiting free exercise. Read leviticus it says kill the fags. You fag lovers go down this path someday the 1st amendment will be interpreted that way and it will be open season.
I could give a shit what people on the internet ***think*** of me.
That you could have all the guns the government says you could have?
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
No so you can exercise your first amemdment right to kill faggots. You want to play word games with the constitution. Then I can too.
NOBODY is more of a Commie-Fascist than a Bible Thumper! Hell,prison isn't a good enough punishment for wrongdoers according to you people. You worship a Big Ranger in the Sky that promises to torture wrongdoers forever and ever,and it gives you wood.
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
Never mind HIS view. This is the view the Catholic Church agreed to in San Francisco. If you don't like it,you need to talk to Liberator about this because he thinks the biggest cult gets to rule,and there are more Catholics in this country than any other cult at the present time. Of course,with his love of theocracy,that will change when the Muslims take over. Majority rule,and all dat.
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
Of course, that's not true, unless maybe if you live in Ohio, Rhodes Island or New Jersey. All other states have prohibitions against sexual relationships by first cousins or closer relatives. Some states even have laws prohibiting non-blood relations including with step- parents, step-siblings, and in-laws. Again, I'm just keeping the conversation accurate.
Fair enough.
Ruh,ROH! You have done it now! His head may explode at the outrage of it all.
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
Why don't you just come out and say what you really mean? Just go ahead and say "We don't need no stinking Constitution! We got mob rule!" Have you applied for a job with the new Office of Reich Security yet? You seem to be a natural for the Thought Crimes Division.
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
100 percent correct! I am waiting for the day when the Civil Wrongs Act of 1964 is given the boot,and we once again live in a free country!
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
More importantly, private companies and specifically technology companies like Apple, Microsoft, and even stodgy old IBM were the ones who got the ball rolling on spousal benefits for gay employees. Why did they do it? They were facing a shortage of qualified people in the late 90s and they thought they could attract educated gays to come work for them. Apple took a lot of political heat for this in places like Texas, where they had sales offices. They stuck to their guns and did it anyway. AFTER the tech companies led on this, you started to see city and then state governments mandating it. I am NOT for the government mandates. The private companies took the lead out of their own self-interest. Capitalism. What a concept.
I would rather admit you are a fucking Nazi because you don't want all citizens to have the same rights. Also,I am not a queer.
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
Is that what you horses asses do for entertainment, sneaky? Aren't you a little old for dress-up?
I'm not the dumbass. I understand perfectly that we have freedom of and FROM religion in this country,and we have a Constitution that demands all citizens have the same rights. You seem to have trouble understanding these basic truths.
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
And you call ME a dumb ass? Read leviticus it says kill the fags. You are so freaking ignorant you think we live under the Old Testament instead of the Constitution? Tell me,what is the real difference between you and the Taliban? BTW,Jesus said "Love your fellow man!",so I guess if you had been there to hear him say it you would be screaming to "string the SOB up!".
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
You want to play word games with the constitution. Then I can too. Fine. Just point out to me where it says you can legally murder someone. People like you and Liberator are prime modern day examples of why the Founding Fathers insisted we have freedom of (and FROM) religion. Thank you for reminding people of the reasons.
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
One thing that has always struct me as being odd is that many evangelicals seem to do a much better job at quoting from the punitive god of the Old Testament than the redemptive god of the New Testament. This makes no sense to me.
If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them. There you go. An argument for legal killing of faggots.
They are one in the same.
Note that I don't condone killing faggots. I'm just making a theoretical argument that it is in fact lawful under our constitution.
Yes, but there was a different message prior to Jesus (you have to be perfect) than there was after Jesus (you can be forgiven you imperfections). Too many evangelicals focus on the former when they should be focused on the latter. To me, evangelicals are more like Old Testament Jews than Christians. That's what I don't get.
I think God was always forgiving. What would have happened if Adam and eve had told the truth. Would God have forgiven them. Or even better. What about when Abraham was counted as righteous for his faith.
Let he who is without sin cast the first stone. There goes your right.
Let he who is without sin cast the first stone. There goes your right. Say I'm one of those pick and choose people. I only read the OT. THere you go legal killing of faggots. And remember Lucy I am just having a theoretical argument. That you could in fact make a case for the legal killing of faggots. That is not what I am about or would want. I'm just trying to argue like war does. And others that play word games.
They do that because "putting the fear of GAWD" into their sheeple is where the money is. You have to make people feel both guilty and fearful to make them virtual slaves and get them to open their wallets wide. Make sense now?
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
There you go. An argument for legal killing of faggots. You think that is in the US Constitution? Really? Or is it that you think we live in a police state Christian theocracy? Will you welcome living in a Muslim police state theocracy in 50 years or so when they are a majority?
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
You are out of your fucking mind.
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
Stone and his ilk are leading the charge of the new Talibangelical party.
"How many confirmed NV Mig kills do YOU have general? I only have three." - Mad Dog, the syphilitic psychopath
He does get to testy about consenting adults, yes? My opinion is that if you don't like what two people do with their relationships or behind closed doors, pay it no mind. I have gay and transgendered friends. If what they do in their relationships have no bearing on me, I ignore minor details like who they sleep with, marry, or why.
I don't know about that,but I would be willing to bet they are the main reason there aren't more conservatives voting Republican. Too many people equate devoutly religious people with conservatism,and nothing could be further from the truth.
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
Seems like a simple solution,doesn't it? I guess some people just ain't happy unless they have something to be mad about.
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
-- Police State in Rainbow Gathering The busybody's consternation reminds me of how people freely associating and assembling peaceably and having done and excellent job keeping things safe and peaceful in the woods every summer are blighted with these Law Enforcement Officers (LEOs) who label them 'national incidents,' harassing the snot out of folks as if something horrible is happening. What I see in this video is typical of how these guys are; burning tax dollars taking videos, writing tickets for being in the woods, ignoring the good job Rainbow Hippies do at rehabilitating and caring for the site of these gatherings. Friends of mine just got back lst week after extensive rehab work, and they told the sad story how bad these fascist control freaks screw with people over nothing. Everyone nowadays has to scream, bitch, twist arms and screw with people if they don't do things exactly like they want them too. In this case, the right to peaceably and freely assemble is moot, and people are harassed for leaving urban concentration camps which many cities these days remind me of. People from the top on down to the most rank of the rank and file need to readjust their priorities and get their unwarranted snout out of business that has no bearing on them. In the case of gays, lesbians, bisexuals, transgendered and other people; they have been around as long as there have been people, and the world has not ended, nor would end if people would grow up, and mind their own business.
That's no way to build a law enforcement or political empire! First you have to convince the voters and taxpayers that they are in danger from a specific group of "outsiders",and then you have to come down hard on the "outsiders",busting heads and finding them guilty of various "crimes" to show the taxpayers and voters that you are doing your damnedest to protect them to get them solidly in your corner. Once you do that you can ask for more money and more power to "do more to protect them better". Nobody ever made any money or any careers from leaving people alone. Unless it was from actual criminals paying bribes to authorities to be left alone,that is.
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
HA! You and Pete want to live in a dictatorship where lone GAY judges overturn Issue & Referendums and consensus of the People - as in California when millions voted REJECT "Gay Marriage"? Curious... Btw, queers presently are afforded EVERY RIGHT to f*** themselves up the ass silly in the pursuit of "happiness" and gaiety any which way they want. Is anyone stopping them or you two from doing so? A democracy is nothing more than mob rule, where fifty-one percent of the people may take away the rights of the other forty-nine." -- Thomas Jefferson Chyeah - MUCH better to have ONE JUDGE take away the rights of millions, you twit.
Really? First amendment. CONGRESS SHALL MAKE NO LAW PROHIBITING THE FREE EXERCISE OF RELIGION. That would be practicing religion.
Are you saying the citizens of California be damned - that any Issue & Referendum in ANY state is a charade? That "gay marriage" is the "Law of the Land" of the USA? Since when??
Comments (151 - 275) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestThat isn't true. It is 99.999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999percent
#111. To: sneakypete (#105)
BullBush! What government doesn't have is the authority to determine WHO gets married.
#112. To: Liberator (#82)
A. NATURE "recognizes" marriage between male and female. !
#113. To: Liberator (#85)
In the name of "freedom."
#114. To: sneakypete (#112)
#115. To: Liberator (#99)
#116. To: A K A Stone (#87)
They knew what the second amendment meant too.
#117. To: sneakypete (#116)
#118. To: Liberator (#88)
Leaving you with whom to guide your secular humanist atheistic Commie-Fascist society?
#119. To: A K A Stone, jwpegler, liberator (#91)
In your pro faggot view. Does an employer have to offer benefits go faqgots who claim to be married (they never will be), if the offer benefits to normal people?
#120. To: A K A Stone (#111)
(Edited)
Any man can marry any woman and vice versa.
#121. To: jwpegler (#120)
#122. To: jwpegler, Liberator (#93)
The government doesn't have to to redefine anything. It just has to get out of the way and let people live their lives.
#123. To: Liberator (#97)
You ARE aware this very issue was already decided upon in California by its citizenry via Issue & Referendum, right?
#124. To: lucysmom (#101)
The US Constitution is the supreme law of the land. If 100% of Californians voted to pass a law that was in conflict with the Constitution, that law would be null.!
#125. To: sneakypete (#119)
(Edited)
Never mind HIS view. This is the view the Catholic Church agreed to in San Francisco.
#126. To: A K A Stone (#108)
Just come out and admit you are a flaming faggot. You like Barneys frank.
#127. To: sneakypete (#104)
Maybe fitting your livestock with strapless heels and fishnet stockings?
#128. To: A K A Stone (#111)
Hey dumbass. Words have meanings. Marriage is between a man and a woman. Any man can marry any woman and vice versa. Assuming they both consent.
#129. To: A K A Stone (#114)
If fags can marry. Then normal people can exercise their first amendment right to kill them.
#130. To: A K A Stone (#117)
No so you can exercise your first amemdment right to kill faggots.
#131. To: sneakypete, A K A Stone, Liberator (#129)
(Edited)
#132. To: sneakypete (#130)
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;
#133. To: jwpegler (#131)
#134. To: sneakypete (#130)
#135. To: A K A Stone (#133)
(Edited)
They are one in the same.
#136. To: jwpegler (#135)
#137. To: A K A Stone (#132)
There you go. An argument for legal killing of faggots.
#138. To: lucysmom (#137)
There you go. An argument for legal killing of faggots.
#139. To: jwpegler (#131)
One thing that has always struct me as being odd is that many evangelicals seem to do a much better job at quoting from the punitive god of the Old Testament than the redemptive god of the New Testament. This makes no sense to me.
#140. To: A K A Stone (#132)
If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.
#141. To: A K A Stone (#134)
Note that I don't condone killing faggots. I'm just making a theoretical argument that it is in fact lawful under our constitution.
#142. To: sneakypete, A K A Stone (#129)
Tell me,what is the real difference between you and the Taliban?
#143. To: sneakypete (#141)
"You are out of your fucking mind."
#144. To: Skip Intro (#142)
Stone and his ilk are leading the charge of the new Talibangelical party.
#145. To: Ferret Mike (#143)
My opinion is that if you don't like what two people do with their relationships or behind closed doors, pay it no mind.
#146. To: sneakypete (#145)
#147. To: Ferret Mike (#146)
People from the top on down to the most rank of the rank and file need to readjust their priorities and get their unwarranted snout out of business that has no bearing on them.
#148. To: jwpegler, sneakypete (#100)
We don't live in a Democracy, we live a Republic where people have inalienable rights to their life, liberty and pursuit of happiness.
#149. To: sneakypete (#140)
You think that is in the US Constitution?
#150. To: lucysmom (#101)
The US Constitution is the supreme law of the land. If 100% of Californians voted to pass a law that was in conflict with the Constitution, that law would be null.
.
.
.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]