United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Ann Coulter To Headline 'Homocon' Event For Gay Conservatives
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/ ... er-to-headline-a_n_673313.html
Published: Aug 6, 2010
Author: Nick Wing
Post Date: 2010-08-06 18:42:53 by Skip Intro
Keywords: None
Views: 158614
Comments: 275
Ann Coulter To Headline 'Homocon' Event For Gay Conservatives Conservative pundit and unlikely gay ally Ann Coulter is set to headline the first annual Homocon, "a party to celebrate gay conservatives" put on by GOProud, the "only national organization representing gay conservatives." The festivities are scheduled to take place in New York City on September 25. "The gay left has done their best to take all the fun out of politics, with their endless list of boycotts and protests. Homocon is going to be our annual effort to counter the 'no fun police' on the left," said Christopher Barron, Chairman of the Board of GOProud, in a statement. "I can't think of any conservative more fun to headline our inaugural party then the self-professed 'right-wing Judy Garland' - Ann Coulter." "I can promise you, Homocon 2010 will be a hell of a lot more fun than chaining yourself to the White House fence," Baron pledged, making light of an incident earlier this year where gay soldiers protesting the military's "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy chained themselves to the gates of the White House. In choosing Coulter, the organizers of GOProud appear willing to ignore her past transgressions against the gay community. The conservative pundit was condemned by gay-rights groups in 2007 when she notoriously called then-Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards a "faggot." And earlier this year, Coulter railed against "irritating lesbian" Constance McMillen for challenging the sanctimony of heterosexual-only proms. But Coulter's selection probably won't be surprising to many gay rights groups who have pointed out that GOProud sometimes exhibits self-destructive behavior. Earlier this year, the gay conservative group planned a fundraiser with Doug Manchester, a California businessman and hotelier who donated $125,000 to anti-gay marriage Proposition 8. That fundraiser was held earlier this month in an event that GOProud called an effort by Manchester to "make financial amends with the gay community," which had mounted a boycott of Manchester's hotels and accused him of treating his gay employees poorly.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-95) not displayed.
.
.
.
#96. To: A K A Stone (#91)
If you rephrase your legitimate question without the hateful language I will answer it. Otherwise, there's no point.
You ARE aware this very issue was already decided upon in California by its citizenry via Issue & Referendum, right? ONE single GAY Judge stepped in and negated millions of those legal votes. Do you know this?
Your point is where it's always been - at the top of your sharp, pointy head
But people are supposed to believe you're a political "Independent"?
ONE single GAY Judge stepped in and negated millions of those legal votes. "A democracy is nothing more than mob rule, where fifty-one percent of the people may take away the rights of the other forty-nine." -- Thomas Jefferson We don't live in a Democracy, we live a Republic where people have inalienable rights to their life, liberty and pursuit of happiness. This is not up to the government, congressmen, governors, presidents, judges, the voters, or anyone else except the people who want to marry, their families, and their church. That's the bottom line. To me you are a socialist who wants the government to control everything, no different than Obama or Barney Frank.
The US Constitution is the supreme law of the land. If 100% of Californians voted to pass a law that was in conflict with the Constitution, that law would be null. In 1963 California's prop 14 allowing housing discrimination based on race, religion, gender, marital status, age was struck down by the SCOTUS because it violated equal rights and protections as set out in the US Constitution.
Why is it you fundies are so interested in marrying your daughters,sisters,mothers,and grannies? It has never occurred to the rest of us that anybody would even want to,yet you must or you wouldn't be trying to push for laws to put people in jail for doing it.
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
AMEN! It's so funny to me to hear so-called "conservatives" argue that the state should be able to usurp the power of people, families, and churches. Quite frankly, the primary problem with this country is the almost none of the people who call themselves "conservative" are actually conservative. Yup. It almost seems like somebody keeps moving the goalposts further and further to the left,doesn't it?
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
Yukie,yukie,yukie. Shouldn't you be changing the irritable puppy's diaper,or something? Maybe fitting your livestock with strapless heels and fishnet stockings?
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
BullBush! What government doesn't have is the authority to determine WHO gets married.
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
No,I don't. I do know a lot of them played that game in public because they grew up in a system where admitting you were a non-believer could get all your property seized and yourself thrown into prison,though. Gays already have the "rights" and "freedom" to be with whomever they want (providing they're not Priests) till the day they die and call it whatever they want. Yeah,they can call it whatever they want,but without a marriage certificate one partner can be denied inheritance in some cases,or access to the hospital room where their mate lays dying. The rest of us oppose a law demanding that we consider it "marriage." BullBush! What you are demanding is un-Constitutional laws remain in place that denies a segment of our population the same basic RIGHTS that the rest of us have,all because of your religious superstitions. You are no different than the Muslims that want to install Sharia law.
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
He and Pete and libertarians want government to stay out of the lives of people, yet they support the government infringing on the legal definition of "marriage." That alleged "logic" is so bizarre I don't even know how to address it. It's like you are posting from Superman's "Bizarro World",where yes means no and up is down. THERE IS NO LEGAL DEFINITION OF MARRIAGE,YOU CRETIN! You want to establish one to suit your cult beliefs and force them on others. A consensus opposes IT. Now you are going to claim majority rule like in a democracy? You are a bigger hypocrite than Goober Gore. The one thing you ain't is a conservative. You are a religious statist,and should identify yourself as one from now on.
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
Just come out and admit you are a flaming faggot. You like Barneys frank.
Figures don't lie,but liars figure.
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
According to who,The Reverend Ted Haggard,spiritual adviser to the Bush White House,and client of drug dealers and homo escort services?
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
Hey dumbass. Words have meanings. Marriage is between a man and a woman. Any man can marry any woman and vice versa. Assuming they both consent. Two men cannot be married any more then 2 plus 2 equalling 354.
Really? You sent nature a letter asking about this,and she said that in her reply? Any more "facts" you would like to provide? I sometimes wonder what it is that pisses you people off so much about this. It it because you thought you had no choice but to marry a woman when you got married,and now you are pissed because the young people of today might get a choice? Is it the,"DAMN! I CUDDA HAD A V8!" syndrome at work?
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
(eyeball roll) Good point! In your ideal world we will all have all the freedom the biggest religious cult (thank you for admitting you are for democracy. Your grandchildren will be Muslims if you get your wish!) in charge of the government decides we need. Who could ask for more than that?
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
If fags can marry. Then normal people can exercise their first amendment right to kill them. Can't make no law respecting religion..... or prohibiting free exercise. Read leviticus it says kill the fags. You fag lovers go down this path someday the 1st amendment will be interpreted that way and it will be open season.
I could give a shit what people on the internet ***think*** of me.
That you could have all the guns the government says you could have?
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
No so you can exercise your first amemdment right to kill faggots. You want to play word games with the constitution. Then I can too.
NOBODY is more of a Commie-Fascist than a Bible Thumper! Hell,prison isn't a good enough punishment for wrongdoers according to you people. You worship a Big Ranger in the Sky that promises to torture wrongdoers forever and ever,and it gives you wood.
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
Never mind HIS view. This is the view the Catholic Church agreed to in San Francisco. If you don't like it,you need to talk to Liberator about this because he thinks the biggest cult gets to rule,and there are more Catholics in this country than any other cult at the present time. Of course,with his love of theocracy,that will change when the Muslims take over. Majority rule,and all dat.
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
Of course, that's not true, unless maybe if you live in Ohio, Rhodes Island or New Jersey. All other states have prohibitions against sexual relationships by first cousins or closer relatives. Some states even have laws prohibiting non-blood relations including with step- parents, step-siblings, and in-laws. Again, I'm just keeping the conversation accurate.
Fair enough.
Ruh,ROH! You have done it now! His head may explode at the outrage of it all.
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
Why don't you just come out and say what you really mean? Just go ahead and say "We don't need no stinking Constitution! We got mob rule!" Have you applied for a job with the new Office of Reich Security yet? You seem to be a natural for the Thought Crimes Division.
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
100 percent correct! I am waiting for the day when the Civil Wrongs Act of 1964 is given the boot,and we once again live in a free country!
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
More importantly, private companies and specifically technology companies like Apple, Microsoft, and even stodgy old IBM were the ones who got the ball rolling on spousal benefits for gay employees. Why did they do it? They were facing a shortage of qualified people in the late 90s and they thought they could attract educated gays to come work for them. Apple took a lot of political heat for this in places like Texas, where they had sales offices. They stuck to their guns and did it anyway. AFTER the tech companies led on this, you started to see city and then state governments mandating it. I am NOT for the government mandates. The private companies took the lead out of their own self-interest. Capitalism. What a concept.
I would rather admit you are a fucking Nazi because you don't want all citizens to have the same rights. Also,I am not a queer.
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
Is that what you horses asses do for entertainment, sneaky? Aren't you a little old for dress-up?
I'm not the dumbass. I understand perfectly that we have freedom of and FROM religion in this country,and we have a Constitution that demands all citizens have the same rights. You seem to have trouble understanding these basic truths.
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
And you call ME a dumb ass? Read leviticus it says kill the fags. You are so freaking ignorant you think we live under the Old Testament instead of the Constitution? Tell me,what is the real difference between you and the Taliban? BTW,Jesus said "Love your fellow man!",so I guess if you had been there to hear him say it you would be screaming to "string the SOB up!".
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
You want to play word games with the constitution. Then I can too. Fine. Just point out to me where it says you can legally murder someone. People like you and Liberator are prime modern day examples of why the Founding Fathers insisted we have freedom of (and FROM) religion. Thank you for reminding people of the reasons.
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
One thing that has always struct me as being odd is that many evangelicals seem to do a much better job at quoting from the punitive god of the Old Testament than the redemptive god of the New Testament. This makes no sense to me.
If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them. There you go. An argument for legal killing of faggots.
They are one in the same.
Note that I don't condone killing faggots. I'm just making a theoretical argument that it is in fact lawful under our constitution.
Yes, but there was a different message prior to Jesus (you have to be perfect) than there was after Jesus (you can be forgiven you imperfections). Too many evangelicals focus on the former when they should be focused on the latter. To me, evangelicals are more like Old Testament Jews than Christians. That's what I don't get.
I think God was always forgiving. What would have happened if Adam and eve had told the truth. Would God have forgiven them. Or even better. What about when Abraham was counted as righteous for his faith.
Comments (137 - 275) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#97. To: jwpegler (#94)
The government doesn't have to to redefine anything. It just has to get out of the way and let people live their lives.
#98. To: Skip Intro (#53)
My point is that Christians agree on little except calling themselves Christians.
#99. To: war, AKA Stone (#57)
FWIW, I never believed it.
#100. To: Liberator (#97)
(Edited)
You ARE aware this very issue was already decided upon in California by its citizenry via Issue & Referendum, right?
#101. To: Liberator (#97)
You ARE aware this very issue was already decided upon in California by its citizenry via Issue & Referendum, right?
#102. To: Liberator (#71)
That was my bad; I meant polygamy. What's to stop everyone from "marrying" everyone else - including their own two grandmothers?
#103. To: jwpegler (#72)
Real conservatives have historically viewed the family, church, business, and charitable institutions as bulwarks against the creeping authoritarianism of the state.
#104. To: Ibluafartsky (#73)
Sneaky may be a product of that coupling, a horse's ass!
#105. To: A K A Stone (#74)
Marriage is between a man and a woman. Govt doesn't have the authority to change that.
#106. To: Liberator (#75)
Btw Pete - you DO know 98% of the Founders either believed in God or were Christians, right?
#107. To: Liberator (#77)
#108. To: sneakypete (#106)
#109. To: Liberator (#78)
Statistically speaking - in 99.99% of ALL cases - the history of mankind has defined "marriage" as between a MAN & WOMAN.
#110. To: A K A Stone (#81)
That isn't true. It is 99.999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999percent
#111. To: sneakypete (#105)
BullBush! What government doesn't have is the authority to determine WHO gets married.
#112. To: Liberator (#82)
A. NATURE "recognizes" marriage between male and female. !
#113. To: Liberator (#85)
In the name of "freedom."
#114. To: sneakypete (#112)
#115. To: Liberator (#99)
#116. To: A K A Stone (#87)
They knew what the second amendment meant too.
#117. To: sneakypete (#116)
#118. To: Liberator (#88)
Leaving you with whom to guide your secular humanist atheistic Commie-Fascist society?
#119. To: A K A Stone, jwpegler, liberator (#91)
In your pro faggot view. Does an employer have to offer benefits go faqgots who claim to be married (they never will be), if the offer benefits to normal people?
#120. To: A K A Stone (#111)
(Edited)
Any man can marry any woman and vice versa.
#121. To: jwpegler (#120)
#122. To: jwpegler, Liberator (#93)
The government doesn't have to to redefine anything. It just has to get out of the way and let people live their lives.
#123. To: Liberator (#97)
You ARE aware this very issue was already decided upon in California by its citizenry via Issue & Referendum, right?
#124. To: lucysmom (#101)
The US Constitution is the supreme law of the land. If 100% of Californians voted to pass a law that was in conflict with the Constitution, that law would be null.!
#125. To: sneakypete (#119)
(Edited)
Never mind HIS view. This is the view the Catholic Church agreed to in San Francisco.
#126. To: A K A Stone (#108)
Just come out and admit you are a flaming faggot. You like Barneys frank.
#127. To: sneakypete (#104)
Maybe fitting your livestock with strapless heels and fishnet stockings?
#128. To: A K A Stone (#111)
Hey dumbass. Words have meanings. Marriage is between a man and a woman. Any man can marry any woman and vice versa. Assuming they both consent.
#129. To: A K A Stone (#114)
If fags can marry. Then normal people can exercise their first amendment right to kill them.
#130. To: A K A Stone (#117)
No so you can exercise your first amemdment right to kill faggots.
#131. To: sneakypete, A K A Stone, Liberator (#129)
(Edited)
#132. To: sneakypete (#130)
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;
#133. To: jwpegler (#131)
#134. To: sneakypete (#130)
#135. To: A K A Stone (#133)
(Edited)
They are one in the same.
#136. To: jwpegler (#135)
.
.
.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]