[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

There hasn’T been ... a single updaTe To This siTe --- since I joined.

"This Is Not What Authoritarianism Looks Like"

America Erupts… ICE Raids Takeover The Streets

AC/DC- Riff Raff + Go Down [VH1 Uncut, July 5, 1996]

Why is Peter Schiff calling Bitcoin a ‘giant cult’ and how does this impact market sentiment?

Esso Your Butt Buddy Horseshit jacks off to that shit

"The Addled Activist Mind"

"Don’t Stop with Harvard"

"Does the Biden Cover-Up Have Two Layers?"

"Pete Rose, 'Shoeless' Joe Reinstated by MLB, Eligible for HOF"

"'Major Breakthrough': Here Are the Details on the China Trade Deal"

Freepers Still Love war

Parody ... Jump / Trump --- van Halen jump

"The Democrat Meltdown Continues"

"Yes, We Need Deportations Without Due Process"

"Trump's Tariff Play Smart, Strategic, Working"

"Leftists Make Desperate Attempt to Discredit Photo of Abrego Garcia's MS-13 Tattoos. Here Are Receipts"

"Trump Administration Freezes $2 Billion After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands"on After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands

"Doctors Committing Insurance Fraud to Conceal Trans Procedures, Texas Children’s Whistleblower Testifies"

"Left Using '8647' Symbol for Violence Against Trump, Musk"

KawasakiÂ’s new rideable robohorse is straight out of a sci-fi novel

"Trade should work for America, not rule it"

"The Stakes Couldn’t Be Higher in Wisconsin’s Supreme Court Race – What’s at Risk for the GOP"

"How Trump caught big-government fans in their own trap"

‘Are You Prepared for Violence?’

Greek Orthodox Archbishop gives President Trump a Cross, tells him "Make America Invincible"

"Trump signs executive order eliminating the Department of Education!!!"

"If AOC Is the Democratic Future, the Party Is Even Worse Off Than We Think"

"Ending EPA Overreach"

Closest Look Ever at How Pyramids Were Built

Moment the SpaceX crew Meets Stranded ISS Crew

The Exodus Pharaoh EXPLAINED!

Did the Israelites Really Cross the Red Sea? Stunning Evidence of the Location of Red Sea Crossing!

Are we experiencing a Triumph of Orthodoxy?

Judge Napolitano with Konstantin Malofeev (Moscow, Russia)

"Trump Administration Cancels Most USAID Programs, Folds Others into State Department"

Introducing Manus: The General AI Agent

"Chinese Spies in Our Military? Straight to Jail"

Any suggestion that the USA and NATO are "Helping" or have ever helped Ukraine needs to be shot down instantly

"Real problem with the Palestinians: Nobody wants them"

ACDC & The Rolling Stones - Rock Me Baby

Magnus Carlsen gives a London System lesson!

"The Democrats Are Suffering Through a Drought of Generational Talent"

7 Tactics Of The Enemy To Weaken Your Faith

Strange And Biblical Events Are Happening

Every year ... BusiesT casino gambling day -- in Las Vegas

Trump’s DOGE Plan Is Legally Untouchable—Elon Musk Holds the Scalpel

Palestinians: What do you think of the Trump plan for Gaza?

What Happens Inside Gaza’s Secret Tunnels? | Unpacked

Hamas Torture Bodycam Footage: "These Monsters Filmed it All" | IDF Warfighter Doron Keidar, Ep. 225


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: Ann Coulter To Headline 'Homocon' Event For Gay Conservatives
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/ ... er-to-headline-a_n_673313.html
Published: Aug 6, 2010
Author: Nick Wing
Post Date: 2010-08-06 18:42:53 by Skip Intro
Keywords: None
Views: 166495
Comments: 275

Ann Coulter To Headline 'Homocon' Event For Gay Conservatives

Conservative pundit and unlikely gay ally Ann Coulter is set to headline the first annual Homocon, "a party to celebrate gay conservatives" put on by GOProud, the "only national organization representing gay conservatives." The festivities are scheduled to take place in New York City on September 25.

"The gay left has done their best to take all the fun out of politics, with their endless list of boycotts and protests. Homocon is going to be our annual effort to counter the 'no fun police' on the left," said Christopher Barron, Chairman of the Board of GOProud, in a statement. "I can't think of any conservative more fun to headline our inaugural party then the self-professed 'right-wing Judy Garland' - Ann Coulter."

"I can promise you, Homocon 2010 will be a hell of a lot more fun than chaining yourself to the White House fence," Baron pledged, making light of an incident earlier this year where gay soldiers protesting the military's "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy chained themselves to the gates of the White House.

In choosing Coulter, the organizers of GOProud appear willing to ignore her past transgressions against the gay community. The conservative pundit was condemned by gay-rights groups in 2007 when she notoriously called then-Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards a "faggot."

And earlier this year, Coulter railed against "irritating lesbian" Constance McMillen for challenging the sanctimony of heterosexual-only proms.

But Coulter's selection probably won't be surprising to many gay rights groups who have pointed out that GOProud sometimes exhibits self-destructive behavior. Earlier this year, the gay conservative group planned a fundraiser with Doug Manchester, a California businessman and hotelier who donated $125,000 to anti-gay marriage Proposition 8.

That fundraiser was held earlier this month in an event that GOProud called an effort by Manchester to "make financial amends with the gay community," which had mounted a boycott of Manchester's hotels and accused him of treating his gay employees poorly.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-84) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#85. To: A K A Stone (#47)

People destroying our culture are the enemy.

In the name of "freedom."

(eyeball roll)

Liberator  posted on  2010-08-08   17:46:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#86. To: Liberator (#82)
(Edited)

NATURE "recognizes" marriage between male and female.

Then let nature deal with it, not the government.

Nature has a great punishment for homosexuality -- your gene pool dies because you can't have kids.

Why is this any of your business or the government's?

It's not.

jwpegler  posted on  2010-08-08   17:46:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#87. To: jwpegler (#80)

The country largely never had marriage licenses until the 1920s so there was nothing "official" to recognize, and

People weren't that stupid back then. It was called common sense. They knew what the second amendment meant too.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-08-08   17:48:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#88. To: mininggold (#48)

Heh..when the last king is strangled with the entrails from the last priest (or preacher) and all that. lol

Leaving you with whom to guide your secular humanist atheistic Commie-Fascist society?

Chyeah, you'll be a valued member of that society.

Liberator  posted on  2010-08-08   17:49:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#89. To: A K A Stone (#87)

It was called common sense.

Which the government has destroyed with its control over marriage, education, and just about everything else in our lives.

jwpegler  posted on  2010-08-08   17:50:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#90. To: jwpegler (#86)

Why is this any of your business or the government's?

It's not.

Sticking "gay" in front of "marriage" requires Governmental redefinition, regulation, and licensing. GET THAT??

Liberator  posted on  2010-08-08   17:52:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#91. To: jwpegler (#89)

In your pro faggot view. Does an employer have to offer benefits go faqgots who claim to be married (they never will be), if the offer benefits to normal people?

Since when is it the govts job to change the definition of words for the mentally ill?

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-08-08   17:55:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#92. To: mininggold, A K A Stone (#49) (Edited)

Typical of your way of thinking that culture is also monolithic. So far it has evolved to the point where you can call people vile names and make false accusations without being shunned or lynched.

Would you like to shun Stone? Or would you rather he be lynched?

You don't seem all that tolerant of his free speech OR respect his views. You've devolved into a drunken slug (hiccup.)

Liberator  posted on  2010-08-08   17:55:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#93. To: Liberator (#90)

Sticking "gay" in front of "marriage" requires Governmental redefinition, regulation, and licensing. GET THAT??

You're the one who doesn't GET IT because your head is stuck so far up the government's ass that you haven't had a breath of fresh air in your entire life.

The government doesn't have to to redefine anything. It just has to get out of the way and let people live their lives.

That's called FREEDOM, which you know nothing about.

jwpegler  posted on  2010-08-08   17:57:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#94. To: Liberator (#90)

Sticking "gay" in front of "marriage" requires Governmental redefinition, regulation, and licensing. GET THAT??

You're the one who doesn't GET IT because your head is stuck so far up the government's ass that you haven't had a breath of fresh air in your entire life.

The government doesn't have to to redefine anything. It just has to get out of the way and let people live their lives.

jwpegler  posted on  2010-08-08   17:57:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#95. To: jwpegler, mininggold (#50)

And you wonder why Christian churches are going belly up

Where is that happening? In your dreams?

Forgive her. She's possessed by the spirit of Ebenezer Beelzebub.

Liberator  posted on  2010-08-08   17:59:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#96. To: A K A Stone (#91)

If you rephrase your legitimate question without the hateful language I will answer it. Otherwise, there's no point.

jwpegler  posted on  2010-08-08   18:00:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#97. To: jwpegler (#94)

The government doesn't have to to redefine anything. It just has to get out of the way and let people live their lives.

You ARE aware this very issue was already decided upon in California by its citizenry via Issue & Referendum, right?

ONE single GAY Judge stepped in and negated millions of those legal votes.

Do you know this?

Liberator  posted on  2010-08-08   18:02:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#98. To: Skip Intro (#53)

My point is that Christians agree on little except calling themselves Christians.

Your point is where it's always been - at the top of your sharp, pointy head

Liberator  posted on  2010-08-08   18:03:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#99. To: war, AKA Stone (#57)

FWIW, I never believed it.

But people are supposed to believe you're a political "Independent"?

Liberator  posted on  2010-08-08   18:05:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#100. To: Liberator (#97) (Edited)

You ARE aware this very issue was already decided upon in California by its citizenry via Issue & Referendum, right?

ONE single GAY Judge stepped in and negated millions of those legal votes.

"A democracy is nothing more than mob rule, where fifty-one percent of the people may take away the rights of the other forty-nine." -- Thomas Jefferson

We don't live in a Democracy, we live a Republic where people have inalienable rights to their life, liberty and pursuit of happiness.

This is not up to the government, congressmen, governors, presidents, judges, the voters, or anyone else except the people who want to marry, their families, and their church. That's the bottom line.

To me you are a socialist who wants the government to control everything, no different than Obama or Barney Frank.

jwpegler  posted on  2010-08-08   18:10:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#101. To: Liberator (#97)

You ARE aware this very issue was already decided upon in California by its citizenry via Issue & Referendum, right?

The US Constitution is the supreme law of the land. If 100% of Californians voted to pass a law that was in conflict with the Constitution, that law would be null.

In 1963 California's prop 14 allowing housing discrimination based on race, religion, gender, marital status, age was struck down by the SCOTUS because it violated equal rights and protections as set out in the US Constitution.

lucysmom  posted on  2010-08-08   18:13:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#102. To: Liberator (#71)

That was my bad; I meant polygamy. What's to stop everyone from "marrying" everyone else - including their own two grandmothers?

Why is it you fundies are so interested in marrying your daughters,sisters,mothers,and grannies?

It has never occurred to the rest of us that anybody would even want to,yet you must or you wouldn't be trying to push for laws to put people in jail for doing it.

"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)

sneakypete  posted on  2010-08-08   18:30:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#103. To: jwpegler (#72)

Real conservatives have historically viewed the family, church, business, and charitable institutions as bulwarks against the creeping authoritarianism of the state.

AMEN!

It's so funny to me to hear so-called "conservatives" argue that the state should be able to usurp the power of people, families, and churches. Quite frankly, the primary problem with this country is the almost none of the people who call themselves "conservative" are actually conservative.

Yup. It almost seems like somebody keeps moving the goalposts further and further to the left,doesn't it?

"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)

sneakypete  posted on  2010-08-08   18:32:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#104. To: Ibluafartsky (#73)

Sneaky may be a product of that coupling, a horse's ass!

Yukie,yukie,yukie. Shouldn't you be changing the irritable puppy's diaper,or something?

Maybe fitting your livestock with strapless heels and fishnet stockings?

"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)

sneakypete  posted on  2010-08-08   18:34:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#105. To: A K A Stone (#74)

Marriage is between a man and a woman. Govt doesn't have the authority to change that.

BullBush! What government doesn't have is the authority to determine WHO gets married.

"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)

sneakypete  posted on  2010-08-08   18:36:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#106. To: Liberator (#75)

Btw Pete - you DO know 98% of the Founders either believed in God or were Christians, right?

No,I don't.

I do know a lot of them played that game in public because they grew up in a system where admitting you were a non-believer could get all your property seized and yourself thrown into prison,though.

Gays already have the "rights" and "freedom" to be with whomever they want (providing they're not Priests) till the day they die and call it whatever they want.

Yeah,they can call it whatever they want,but without a marriage certificate one partner can be denied inheritance in some cases,or access to the hospital room where their mate lays dying.

The rest of us oppose a law demanding that we consider it "marriage."

BullBush! What you are demanding is un-Constitutional laws remain in place that denies a segment of our population the same basic RIGHTS that the rest of us have,all because of your religious superstitions.

You are no different than the Muslims that want to install Sharia law.

"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)

sneakypete  posted on  2010-08-08   18:42:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#107. To: Liberator (#77)

He and Pete and libertarians want government to stay out of the lives of people, yet they support the government infringing on the legal definition of "marriage."

That alleged "logic" is so bizarre I don't even know how to address it. It's like you are posting from Superman's "Bizarro World",where yes means no and up is down.

THERE IS NO LEGAL DEFINITION OF MARRIAGE,YOU CRETIN! You want to establish one to suit your cult beliefs and force them on others.

A consensus opposes IT.

Now you are going to claim majority rule like in a democracy?

You are a bigger hypocrite than Goober Gore. The one thing you ain't is a conservative. You are a religious statist,and should identify yourself as one from now on.

"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)

sneakypete  posted on  2010-08-08   18:48:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#108. To: sneakypete (#106)

Just come out and admit you are a flaming faggot. You like Barneys frank.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-08-08   18:49:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#109. To: Liberator (#78)

Statistically speaking - in 99.99% of ALL cases - the history of mankind has defined "marriage" as between a MAN & WOMAN.

Figures don't lie,but liars figure.

"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)

sneakypete  posted on  2010-08-08   18:50:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#110. To: A K A Stone (#81)

That isn't true. It is 99.999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999percent

According to who,The Reverend Ted Haggard,spiritual adviser to the Bush White House,and client of drug dealers and homo escort services?

"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)

sneakypete  posted on  2010-08-08   18:52:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#111. To: sneakypete (#105)

BullBush! What government doesn't have is the authority to determine WHO gets married.

Hey dumbass. Words have meanings. Marriage is between a man and a woman. Any man can marry any woman and vice versa. Assuming they both consent.

Two men cannot be married any more then 2 plus 2 equalling 354.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-08-08   18:53:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#112. To: Liberator (#82)

A. NATURE "recognizes" marriage between male and female. !

Really? You sent nature a letter asking about this,and she said that in her reply?

Any more "facts" you would like to provide?

I sometimes wonder what it is that pisses you people off so much about this. It it because you thought you had no choice but to marry a woman when you got married,and now you are pissed because the young people of today might get a choice?

Is it the,"DAMN! I CUDDA HAD A V8!" syndrome at work?

"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)

sneakypete  posted on  2010-08-08   18:55:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#113. To: Liberator (#85)

In the name of "freedom."

(eyeball roll)

Good point! In your ideal world we will all have all the freedom the biggest religious cult (thank you for admitting you are for democracy. Your grandchildren will be Muslims if you get your wish!) in charge of the government decides we need.

Who could ask for more than that?

"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)

sneakypete  posted on  2010-08-08   18:58:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#114. To: sneakypete (#112)

If fags can marry. Then normal people can exercise their first amendment right to kill them. Can't make no law respecting religion..... or prohibiting free exercise.

Read leviticus it says kill the fags.

You fag lovers go down this path someday the 1st amendment will be interpreted that way and it will be open season.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-08-08   18:59:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#115. To: Liberator (#99)

I could give a shit what people on the internet ***think*** of me.

war  posted on  2010-08-08   18:59:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#116. To: A K A Stone (#87)

They knew what the second amendment meant too.

That you could have all the guns the government says you could have?

"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)

sneakypete  posted on  2010-08-08   18:59:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#117. To: sneakypete (#116)

No so you can exercise your first amemdment right to kill faggots.

You want to play word games with the constitution. Then I can too.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-08-08   19:00:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#118. To: Liberator (#88)

Leaving you with whom to guide your secular humanist atheistic Commie-Fascist society?

NOBODY is more of a Commie-Fascist than a Bible Thumper! Hell,prison isn't a good enough punishment for wrongdoers according to you people. You worship a Big Ranger in the Sky that promises to torture wrongdoers forever and ever,and it gives you wood.

"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)

sneakypete  posted on  2010-08-08   19:01:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#119. To: A K A Stone, jwpegler, liberator (#91)

In your pro faggot view. Does an employer have to offer benefits go faqgots who claim to be married (they never will be), if the offer benefits to normal people?

Never mind HIS view. This is the view the Catholic Church agreed to in San Francisco.

If you don't like it,you need to talk to Liberator about this because he thinks the biggest cult gets to rule,and there are more Catholics in this country than any other cult at the present time.

Of course,with his love of theocracy,that will change when the Muslims take over.

Majority rule,and all dat.

"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)

sneakypete  posted on  2010-08-08   19:05:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#120. To: A K A Stone (#111) (Edited)

Any man can marry any woman and vice versa.

Of course, that's not true, unless maybe if you live in Ohio, Rhodes Island or New Jersey. All other states have prohibitions against sexual relationships by first cousins or closer relatives.

Some states even have laws prohibiting non-blood relations including with step- parents, step-siblings, and in-laws.

Again, I'm just keeping the conversation accurate.

jwpegler  posted on  2010-08-08   19:05:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#121. To: jwpegler (#120)

Fair enough.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-08-08   19:06:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#122. To: jwpegler, Liberator (#93)

The government doesn't have to to redefine anything. It just has to get out of the way and let people live their lives.

Ruh,ROH! You have done it now! His head may explode at the outrage of it all.

"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)

sneakypete  posted on  2010-08-08   19:07:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#123. To: Liberator (#97)

You ARE aware this very issue was already decided upon in California by its citizenry via Issue & Referendum, right?

Why don't you just come out and say what you really mean? Just go ahead and say "We don't need no stinking Constitution! We got mob rule!"

Have you applied for a job with the new Office of Reich Security yet? You seem to be a natural for the Thought Crimes Division.

"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)

sneakypete  posted on  2010-08-08   19:09:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#124. To: lucysmom (#101)

The US Constitution is the supreme law of the land. If 100% of Californians voted to pass a law that was in conflict with the Constitution, that law would be null.!

100 percent correct! I am waiting for the day when the Civil Wrongs Act of 1964 is given the boot,and we once again live in a free country!

"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)

sneakypete  posted on  2010-08-08   19:11:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#125. To: sneakypete (#119) (Edited)

Never mind HIS view. This is the view the Catholic Church agreed to in San Francisco.

More importantly, private companies and specifically technology companies like Apple, Microsoft, and even stodgy old IBM were the ones who got the ball rolling on spousal benefits for gay employees.

Why did they do it? They were facing a shortage of qualified people in the late 90s and they thought they could attract educated gays to come work for them.

Apple took a lot of political heat for this in places like Texas, where they had sales offices. They stuck to their guns and did it anyway.

AFTER the tech companies led on this, you started to see city and then state governments mandating it.

I am NOT for the government mandates. The private companies took the lead out of their own self-interest.

Capitalism. What a concept.

jwpegler  posted on  2010-08-08   19:12:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (126 - 275) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com