LEFT WING LOONS
See other LEFT WING LOONS Articles
Title: Charles Rangel, Maxine Waters and the House culture of entitlement
Source:
Washington Post
URL Source: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dy ... 884_2.html?sid=ST2010080306444
Published: Aug 4, 2010
Author: Ruth Marcus
Post Date: 2010-08-04 01:06:52 by WhiteSands
Keywords: Demcrats, Blue city DNC
Views: 2583
Comments: 3
By Ruth Marcus Wednesday, August 4, 2010 My favorite part of the ethics report on Charlie Rangel involves his efforts to "close" a $10 million gift "to create AIG Hall" as part of the Rangel Center at the City College of New York. Yes, that AIG. At a meeting in April 2008, the New York Democrat, then chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, "asked AIG, at least twice, what was necessary to get this done," according to the report. The insurance giant wasn't so sure about writing the check, citing the "potential headline risk." When AIG -- the company that paid out hundreds of millions in bonuses after being rescued by a government bailout -- recognizes an appearance issue, you know you've got a problem. Unless, that is, you're Charlie Rangel. Or, for that matter, Maxine Waters, the California Democrat who this week joined Rangel in being charged with ethics violations and in awaiting a public trial by the House ethics committee. Which gets to my favorite part of the ethics report on Waters. Fast-forward a few months after Rangel's meeting with AIG, to the first weeks of September 2008. This was, to put it mildly, a rather busy time for then-Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson. The economy was tanking. Lehman Brothers was about to go down. But when a senior member of the Financial Services Committee calls, the Treasury secretary tends to listen. Waters said she had "some people in town who were important to her," Paulson recalled, and asked for a meeting with Treasury officials to discuss their concerns. How important to her? As Waters told the Office of Congressional Ethics, which conducted the preliminary investigation of her activities, "You don't use your chits for nothing. You call when there is an important issue." The issue broadly involved the government takeover of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and its impact on minority-owned banks. But when Paulson's aides got to the meeting, they discovered that all but one of the banking industry participants were from one such institution: OneUnited. ad_icon On whose board Waters's husband had served until a few months earlier. In which he continued to have investments worth $500,000 to $1 million. A fact Waters somehow neglected to mention to Paulson -- although she was most certainly aware of it. As the report notes, Waters mentioned to Congressman A -- better known as Massachusetts Democrat Barney Frank -- that "Sydney's been on the board." Frank twice advised Waters to "stay out of it." The obvious question is: What is wrong with these people? The tempting answer: They're members of Congress. This may sound both harsh and glib. I'm certainly not suggesting that most lawmakers are as heedless of ethics rules as Rangel and Waters appear to have been -- although many members of the public appear disposed to believe so, and the seemingly endless stream of ethics revelations reinforces this misperception. But there is something in the congressional atmosphere of compliant aides and fawning courtiers that enables and encourages their sense of ordinary-rules-don't-apply-to-me entitlement. The longer they stay -- nearly 40 years in Rangel's case, going on 20 in Waters's -- and the safer their seats, the sloppier they tend to get, and the more there tends to be a unseemly merger of the personal and the official. In Rangel's defense, his conduct appears less directly self-serving than Waters's. But to read the lengthy ethics report is to wonder how Rangel has refused to cop a plea -- especially when the recommended punishment took the relatively mild form of a reprimand. Rangel failed to pay taxes on rental income from his Caribbean villa. He neglected to report $600,000 in income on his financial disclosure forms. He hit up companies with business before the Ways and Means Committee for donations as high as $30 million to the Rangel Center -- improperly using official letterhead and directly soliciting corporate lobbyists. You might think he would be inclined to make it all go away as quickly as possible. But contrition does not come naturally to politicians, certainly not to Rangel. "If they're so confused after 18 months that they can't find anything, then that is a story," Rangel said in June. Several days earlier, Rangel had received the precise charges against him. Speaking of the "very troubling" allegations against Rangel, President Obama told CBS News, "I'm sure that what he wants is to be able to end his career with dignity." It may be too late for that.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: WhiteSands (#0)
Their arrogance doesn't stem from the simple fact that they are congresscritters,it comes from them being BLACK congresscritters. They are so used to being given special treatment because of their ability to play the race card and the general tendency to hold blacks to MUCH lower standards than anyone else that they are shocked to the point of disbelieving when called on their actions. They have never in their entire lives even been held to the same standards as white congresscritters,never mind white citizens. It is starting to look like the worm is turning on them,though. The race card has been played to the point now where almost everybody is getting tired of seeing it. Or at least the BLACK race card. It seems to me that the His and Her Panic race card is taking senior status now,and the blacks are being sent to the back of the Dim bus. It's a damn shame the anti-Semite card is still in play. I seriously doubt there is a more corrupt member of congress than Senator Diane Fineswine. Her husband has "earned" hundreds of millions from the Chinese thanks to his connections to her and the insider information he passes on to the Chinese.
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
On the scales of justice in the new USSA, the fact that Waters and Rangel are both black congresscritters does not outweigh the fact that they both committed the cardinal sin of supporting Hillary. Dictator wannabes like Il Douchebag (aka Zero the First) DO NOT tolerate competition. AND they have looooooooooong memories . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Meet the new elephant boss The last gasp of a dying Republic is a "living, breathing Constitution."
They did? I didn't know that,but it explains a lot. The Dims are starting the 2012 infighting early. I am convinced that General McChrystal's outing of Barry Soetoro as a uninvolved and uncomprehending dummy were the opening shots of Bubbette's 2012 presidential campaign,and now that you have explained what is going on with these two,the cards are falling into place. Notice that Barry wasn't invited to the Howdy Doody wedding,and neither was Manchelle? Hell,she is flying off to an exclusive resort in Spain with one daughter and a bunch of friends (on the taxpayers dime,of course) to relax after her hard labors in the WH garden and to do a little shopping in preparation for the family vacation at Martha's Vineyard next month. Evidentially you have to train in order to prepare yourself for luxury vacations in elitist areas.
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
#2. To: WhiteSands, sneakypete (#0)
Same as the old jackass boss
#3. To: Ignore Amos (#2)
On the scales of justice in the new USSA, the fact that Waters and Rangel are both black congresscritters does not outweigh the fact that they both committed the cardinal sin of supporting Hillary.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]