[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

There hasn’T been ... a single updaTe To This siTe --- since I joined.

"This Is Not What Authoritarianism Looks Like"

America Erupts… ICE Raids Takeover The Streets

AC/DC- Riff Raff + Go Down [VH1 Uncut, July 5, 1996]

Why is Peter Schiff calling Bitcoin a ‘giant cult’ and how does this impact market sentiment?

Esso Your Butt Buddy Horseshit jacks off to that shit

"The Addled Activist Mind"

"Don’t Stop with Harvard"

"Does the Biden Cover-Up Have Two Layers?"

"Pete Rose, 'Shoeless' Joe Reinstated by MLB, Eligible for HOF"

"'Major Breakthrough': Here Are the Details on the China Trade Deal"

Freepers Still Love war

Parody ... Jump / Trump --- van Halen jump

"The Democrat Meltdown Continues"

"Yes, We Need Deportations Without Due Process"

"Trump's Tariff Play Smart, Strategic, Working"

"Leftists Make Desperate Attempt to Discredit Photo of Abrego Garcia's MS-13 Tattoos. Here Are Receipts"

"Trump Administration Freezes $2 Billion After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands"on After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands

"Doctors Committing Insurance Fraud to Conceal Trans Procedures, Texas Children’s Whistleblower Testifies"

"Left Using '8647' Symbol for Violence Against Trump, Musk"

KawasakiÂ’s new rideable robohorse is straight out of a sci-fi novel

"Trade should work for America, not rule it"

"The Stakes Couldn’t Be Higher in Wisconsin’s Supreme Court Race – What’s at Risk for the GOP"

"How Trump caught big-government fans in their own trap"

‘Are You Prepared for Violence?’

Greek Orthodox Archbishop gives President Trump a Cross, tells him "Make America Invincible"

"Trump signs executive order eliminating the Department of Education!!!"

"If AOC Is the Democratic Future, the Party Is Even Worse Off Than We Think"

"Ending EPA Overreach"

Closest Look Ever at How Pyramids Were Built

Moment the SpaceX crew Meets Stranded ISS Crew

The Exodus Pharaoh EXPLAINED!

Did the Israelites Really Cross the Red Sea? Stunning Evidence of the Location of Red Sea Crossing!

Are we experiencing a Triumph of Orthodoxy?

Judge Napolitano with Konstantin Malofeev (Moscow, Russia)

"Trump Administration Cancels Most USAID Programs, Folds Others into State Department"

Introducing Manus: The General AI Agent

"Chinese Spies in Our Military? Straight to Jail"

Any suggestion that the USA and NATO are "Helping" or have ever helped Ukraine needs to be shot down instantly

"Real problem with the Palestinians: Nobody wants them"

ACDC & The Rolling Stones - Rock Me Baby

Magnus Carlsen gives a London System lesson!

"The Democrats Are Suffering Through a Drought of Generational Talent"

7 Tactics Of The Enemy To Weaken Your Faith

Strange And Biblical Events Are Happening

Every year ... BusiesT casino gambling day -- in Las Vegas

Trump’s DOGE Plan Is Legally Untouchable—Elon Musk Holds the Scalpel

Palestinians: What do you think of the Trump plan for Gaza?

What Happens Inside Gaza’s Secret Tunnels? | Unpacked

Hamas Torture Bodycam Footage: "These Monsters Filmed it All" | IDF Warfighter Doron Keidar, Ep. 225


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: Controversial 'Ground Zero Mosque' Gets Green Light From NYC Landmarks Commission
Source: ABC NEWS
URL Source: http://abcnews.go.com/US/controvers ... s-commission/story?id=11312791
Published: Aug 3, 2010
Author: AARON KATERSKY and SARAH NETTER
Post Date: 2010-08-03 12:07:28 by Brian S
Keywords: None
Views: 74263
Comments: 103

The controversial Islamic center proposed to be built near the site of the 9/11 terrorist attacks won a major victory today when a New York City board voted unanimously to allow the demolition of a building to make way for construction. New York landmark commission expected to reject proposal to designate building.

The city's Landmarks Preservation Commission's vote rejected the landmarking of a 19th century building with its Italian Renaissance Palazzo style that most recently served as a Burlington Coat Factory. That designation would have prevented its demolition and foiled plans to build a 13-story Islamic community center that includes a prayer room.

Critics have called the proposed facility a mosque and said construction so close to the site of the World Trade Center where 3,000 people died in an attack by mililtant Muslims was insensitive and an insult.

"I've come to the conclusion 45-47 Park Place does not rise to the level of a city landmark," commission Chairman Robert Tierney said today.

Commission members were careful to consider only the building's historical significance and not become entrenched in the heated debate over the center's proximity to Ground Zero, a sore spot for many New Yorkers that has also drawn opposition from some politicans and the Anti-Defamation League, a prominent Jewish organization.

There were a mix of supporters and opponents in the audience as the commission voted.

One woman held signs reading, "Islam builds mosques at the sites of their conquests and victories" and "Don't glorify murders of 3000. No 9/11 victory mosque."

Supporters wore buttons bearing the slogan, "pro Israel pro peace."

New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg didn't immediately comment on the ruling, but tweeted that he would later speak from the city's Roosevelt Island, which he called the "site of America's 1st religiously tolerant settlement."

The commission's vote was one of the first major hurdles for the proposed complex, called the Cordoba Initiative, which has been met with fierce resistance from many to its construction plans.

The center, which has been called everything from an insult to a "house of evil" by protestors, has already been through several approvals, including the a community financial district and an advisory board.

New Yorkers told ABCNews.com that the idea of a mosque is not the problem, but the Cordoba Initiatve is just too close to the city's most painful scar and has struck many as insensitive and cruel.

Robert Engel's office on Church Street, would look right into the proposed center. It's not a prospect he or many of his co-workers are looking forward to, he said.

"I don't think they should do it. It's too close," Engel said. "It's a slap in the face."

As Debate Rages, Another Nearby Mosque Has Operated Quietly for Years

While the Cordoba's plans have become a lightning rod for politicians from Buffalo to Alaska, a blink-and-you'll-miss-it mosque a few blocks away draws worshipers instead of critics.

The Web site of the Masjid Manhattan even includes a disclaimer that it is not affiliated with the Cordoba plans.

"Please be advised that we are by no means affiliated with any other organization trying to build anything new in the area of downtown Manhattan."

"Our members are city, state and federal employees, as well as professional employees of the financial area who come to our Masjid to perform their daily prayers," the statement continued. "Masjid Manhattan and its members condemn any type of terrorist acts."

For more than an hour Monday, men wearing everything from neatly pressed suits and corporate ID cards to jeans and T-shirts came to pray at Masjid Manhattan. Three women also quietly made their way in, slipping silently into the women's section separated by two thick curtains.

The mosque has operated in the neighborhood for years, moving in 2008 to its cramped basement space after their previous building was sold in 2008 and they were forced out.

Engel, 36, also said that he's never had any problem with Masjid Manhattan, often passing worshippers on his way to eat in the restaurant above their prayer space.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 88.

#1. To: Brian S, war (#0)

The controversial Islamic center proposed to be built near the site of the 9/11 terrorist attacks won a major victory today when a New York City board voted unanimously to allow the demolition of a building to make way for construction.

Maybe they could fly a symbolic plane into it in order to symbolize the historic event that made the mosque possible?

war,you must be sooo proud!

sneakypete  posted on  2010-08-03   12:10:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: sneakypete (#1)

Maybe they could fly a symbolic plane into it in order to symbolize the historic event that made the mosque possible?

war,you must be sooo proud!

I really can't see how anyone can find fault with a building that represents just another branch of the same jewish mythology whose adherents bring us continuous peace and love.

Too bad they have to demolish a nice old building to do it. Such is 'progress'. Think of all of those almighty jobs. I think it will be property tax exempt though.

mininggold  posted on  2010-08-03   12:19:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: mininggold (#2)

I really can't see how anyone can find fault with a building that represents just another branch of the same jewish mythology whose adherents bring us continuous peace and love.

You're an absurd cartoon character.

You find "no fault" in a Mosque near the WTC, while at the same time absurdly connecting Judaism with Islam? Why aren't I surprised?

Liberator  posted on  2010-08-03   12:52:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Liberator (#6)

You find "no fault" in a Mosque near the WTC, while at the same time absurdly connecting Judaism with Islam? Why aren't I surprised?

Judaism, Islam and Christianity are all branches of the same tree and claim Abraham as spiritual father.

I guess you have no objection to being held responsible for every terrorist act carried out by a Christian, KKK for example.

lucysmom  posted on  2010-08-03   13:17:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: lucysmom (#10)

Judaism, Islam and Christianity are all branches of the same tree and claim Abraham as spiritual father.

Loo-see, Loo-see...

Mininggold:

["Islam is] another branch of the same jewish mythology whose adherents bring us continuous peace and love."

You do know there's pure water content blended in urine and fecal matter, right?

I guess you have no objection to being held responsible for every terrorist act carried out by a Christian, KKK for example.

So you're making the equivocation between ubiquitous Islamic terror in the name of Allah, and WHAT or WHO AGAIN?? Christians and the KKK "in the name of Jesus Christ"?

What the hell is wrong with you? No, seriously? I appreciate your courtesy and civility, but you are soooo far out on the ledge of rationality and sanity, I'd be worried if I were your daughter...or Counselor. YOURS is the face (or mindset) of the Left. Distorted and warped beyond belief.

Liberator  posted on  2010-08-03   13:36:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Liberator (#11)

The Crusades were done in the name of Jesus Christ.

The KKK most CERTAINLY did their acts in the name of Jesus Christ.

war  posted on  2010-08-03   13:39:16 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: war, lucysmom (#12)

The KKK most CERTAINLY did their acts in the name of Jesus Christ.

You mean the KKK lynched blacks and burned crosses in accordance to the gospel of Jesus Christ? Or actually made said pronouncement as they performed their deeds?

Come on you two - stop the absurd claims. It's bullsh*t, and you know it (well, I think war knows it.)

Comparing a microscopic anomaly of Christian rogues to millions of adherents of Allah's own words and Koran is beyond ridiculous. It's garbage not really worthy of honest, intellectual discussion.

Liberator  posted on  2010-08-03   14:00:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: Liberator (#14)

Comparing a microscopic anomaly of Christian rogues to millions of adherents of Allah's own words and Koran is beyond ridiculous. It's garbage not really worthy of honest, intellectual discussion.

Micah 4:13 "Rise and thresh, O Daughter of Zion, for I will give you horns of iron; I will give you hoofs of bronze and you will break to pieces many nations." You will devote their ill-gotten gains to the LORD, their wealth to the Lord of all the earth.

You might want to read this article:

www.boston.com/bostonglob...2009/03/08/dark_passages/

But in terms of ordering violence and bloodshed, any simplistic claim about the superiority of the Bible to the Koran would be wildly wrong. In fact, the Bible overflows with "texts of terror," to borrow a phrase coined by the American theologian Phyllis Trible. The Bible contains far more verses praising or urging bloodshed than does the Koran, and biblical violence is often far more extreme, and marked by more indiscriminate savagery. The Koran often urges believers to fight, yet it also commands that enemies be shown mercy when they surrender. Some frightful portions of the Bible, by contrast, go much further in ordering the total extermination of enemies, of whole families and races - of men, women, and children, and even their livestock, with no quarter granted. One cherished psalm (137) begins with the lovely line, "By the rivers of Babylon we sat and wept"; it ends by blessing anyone who would seize Babylon's infants and smash their skulls against the rocks.

lucysmom  posted on  2010-08-03   14:35:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: lucysmom (#23)

You might want to read this article:

www.boston.com/bostonglob...2009/03/08/dark_passages/

But in terms of ordering violence and bloodshed, any simplistic claim about the superiority of the Bible to the Koran would be wildly wrong.

Why would I want to read blatant propaganda and lies that you obvious swallow whole and sideways? My God - the inanity and mushy-minds of some people (like you) of anything they read astonishes me. You are so open and susceptible to the power of suggestion, you're a menace to truth.

Liberator  posted on  2010-08-03   14:42:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: Liberator (#25)

You are so open and susceptible to the power of suggestion, you're a menace to truth.

You obviously have made up your mind and have no interest in truth.

A Muslim friend recently said to me "How can people believe that Islam teaches violence. That's just crazy. No religion teaches that."

The difference between you and him is that he recognizes wackos exist everywhere and doesn't judge an entire religion by the minority of wackos using their religion to justify their crazy acts.

lucysmom  posted on  2010-08-03   14:51:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: lucysmom (#27)

You obviously have made up your mind and have no interest in truth.

Welcome to LibbyVille...

war  posted on  2010-08-03   15:02:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: war (#28)

A dark and dangerous place.

lucysmom  posted on  2010-08-03   15:10:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: lucysmom, war (#29)

A dark and dangerous place.

Yeah, almost as "dark and dangerous" a place as the bowels of the World Trade Center on 9/11. Or for Christians in the Sudan. OR on any Saudi street while wearing a crucifix. Or any Muslim dominated land, city, or neighborhood.

You and war oughta get a room. At the Ramada Inn in Detroit.

Liberator  posted on  2010-08-03   15:15:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: Liberator (#32) (Edited)

If you want to gut the first amendment, feel free.

Watch it, tho...there's more agnostics than you ***think***.

war  posted on  2010-08-03   15:17:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#46. To: war (#34)

If you want to gut the first amendment, feel free.

There is nothing in the 1st Amendment that forces a city government to sell land to ANY religion. Freedom of and FROM religion is a two-way street.

The rag heads do have a right to worship their child molester and goat raper if they want,but they don't have a right to do it anywhere they want.

Anymore than that loon fundie judge had to place the 10 commandments in his courtroom.

sneakypete  posted on  2010-08-03   21:18:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#48. To: sneakypete (#46)

There is nothing in the 1st Amendment that forces a city government to sell land to ANY religion.

The First Amendment does, however, estop a government from DENYING land BECAUSE of religion.

war  posted on  2010-08-03   21:22:19 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#53. To: war (#48)

The First Amendment does, however, estop a government from DENYING land BECAUSE of religion.

No it doesn't. It forbitd CONGRESS. CONGRESS shall make no law...

Not talking about the states.

There should be no mosques in America.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-08-03   22:46:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#72. To: A K A Stone (#53) (Edited)

No it doesn't. It forbitd CONGRESS. CONGRESS shall make no law...

NY State Constitution:

The free exercise and enjoyment of religious profession and worship, without discrimination or preference, shall forever be allowed in this state to all humankind; and no person shall be rendered incompetent to be a witness on account of his or her opinions on matters of religious belief; but the liberty of conscience hereby secured shall not be so construed as to excuse acts of licentiousness, or justify practices inconsistent with the peace or safety of this state.

That said:

Does East Bumblebee Ohio have the power to close down your religious shack?

war  posted on  2010-08-04   8:28:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#83. To: war (#72)

NY State Constitution:

That isn't the first amendment. My point holds.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-08-04   8:54:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#86. To: A K A Stone (#83)

That isn't the first amendment. My point holds.

NY was the back up.

Any power that any commission may have to grant or deny anything is created legislatively. Legislatures may not create laws that are in conflict with the US Constitution.

war  posted on  2010-08-04   8:58:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#88. To: war (#86)

Legislatures may not create laws that are in conflict with the US Constitution.

A prohibition against congress is not a prohibitoin against states. Remember CONGRESS SHALL MAKE NO LAW...

CONGRESS

CONGRESS

Does Congress have a meaning? It does. THEY SHALL MAKE NO LAW.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-08-04   9:06:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 88.

#89. To: A K A Stone (#88)

A prohibition against congress is not a prohibitoin [sic] against states.

The intent of the first amendment is not to empower states to do what the federal government can not.

war  posted on  2010-08-04 09:13:53 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 88.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com