Corrupt Government
See other Corrupt Government Articles
Title: Explosive New Evidence Shows Ruling of Arizona Judge (Susan Bolton) Illegal
Source:
Examiner
URL Source: http://www.examiner.com/x-37620-Con ... ows-ruling-of-AZ-judge-illegal
Published: Aug 2, 2010
Author: Anthony G. Martin
Post Date: 2010-08-02 05:09:13 by Murron
Keywords: None
Views: 144857
Comments: 184
Explosive New Evidence Shows Ruling of Arizona Judge (Susan Bolton) Illegal In a stunning development that could potentially send the nation into a Constitutional crisis, an astute attorney who is well-versed in Constitutional law states that the ruling against the state of Arizona by Judge Susan Bolton concerning its new immigration law is illegal. (Daniel Bayer/CBS News via Getty Images). The inept U.S. Attorney-General Eric Holder. The attorney in question submitted her assertion in a special article in the Canada Free Press. Her argument states in part, "Does anyone read the U.S. Constitution these days? American lawyers don’t read it. Federal Judge Susan R. Bolton apparently has never read it. Same goes for our illustrious Attorney General Eric Holder. But this lawyer has read it and she is going to show you something in Our Constitution which is as plain as the nose on your face. "Article III, Sec. 2, clause 2 says: "In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction." In other words, the Judge in the Arizona case has absolutely no Constitutional jurisdiction over the matter upon which she ruled. As the Constitution makes abundantly clear, only the U.S. Supreme Court can issue rulings that involve a state. This means that neither Judge Bolton nor the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco, to which the case is being appealed, have any legal standing whatsoever to rule on the issue. Thus, U.S. Attorney-General Eric Holder filed the federal government's lawsuit against the state of Arizona in a court that has no authority to hear the case. The attorney whose heads-up thinking concerning the Constitution provides the legal remedy for dealing with this blatant disregard for Constitutional law in the article at Canada Free Press, which can be accessed at the link above. In a related development, another explosive discovery was made by those who actually take the Constitution seriously. The Constitution specifically allows an individual state to wage war against a neighboring country in the event of an invasion, should there be a dangerous delay or inaction on the part of the federal government. This information was cited by United Patriots of America. From Article I, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution, we find these words: "No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay." No one who is actually familiar with the crisis at the southern border can deny that Arizona is endangered by the relentless assault of lawless Mexican invaders who ignore our laws, inundate our schools and medical facilities with unpaid bills, and even endanger the very lives of citizens with criminal drug cartels that engage in kidnapping, murder, human trafficking, and other mayhem, including aiming missile and grenade launchers directly at U.S. border cities from just across the Mexican border. This is every bit as much of an invasion as the nation of Iran sending in a fleet of warships to the Port of Charleston. The Constitution that forms the basis of the rule of law in this country says that Arizona has legal right to protect itself in the case of inaction or delay on the part of the federal government, including waging war in its self-defense. This, when coupled with the clear Constitutional mandate that only the Supreme Court hear cases involving the states, should be ample legal basis for attorneys representing Arizona to go after the federal government with a vengeance. Governor Jan Brewer and the stalwart members of the Arizona legislature have ample legal reason to stand firm against the illegal bullying of an arrogant, lawless federal government.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-130) not displayed.
.
.
.
#131. To: A K A Stone (#129)
any possibility to permanently change his name to "spinner?" God knows, the jerkwad earned it...
Circular reasoning again, LunchPail? Again, I did what you asked. Now you do what you're asked: Defend those numbers as valid.
GOLDI!!! Help me GOLDI!!!! [snicker]
Liar. I didn't say 1963 was significant. The stats weren't altered in the 60's, you pathetic government WHORE. Maybe you should go back and actually READ it, now... And you'd get that you were just caught... AGAIN. Keep this up, and I'll just bozo you. Choose.
Because I really don't give a fuck what you say... You're easily seen for what you are...
ROFL
oops, looks like eric is getting his ass handed to him again, can the bozo be far off.
Yet here you are stomping your feet and threatening to hold your breath until your face turns blue. Meanwhile, back in Adultville, you still haven't a) explained why Shadow Stats' information is valid and b) why 1983 is an important year.
You mean me? LOL. Only YOU would try to spin the word "lunch." Moron. Heh! Dontcha know? We're supposed to hang out and hang on while war cuts and pastes all afternoon. How dare you not wait baited breathe and forego lunch!
I know you're a hypocrite. You demand that my argument conform to YOUR standards while yourself adhering to no standards whatsoever.
Chuckles...do you ***think*** you're helping him by bumping this up? What you're really doing is making the environment even MORE target rich.
Okay...I typo'd sue me. So explain why 1983 was significant.
Chuckles...
Adultville??? My, you DO think highly of yourself... LMAO. Where did I ever say on this thread, that 1963 was significant? Hmmmm?????????????????????????? Didn't read the primer, DID you? Didn't actually UNDERSTAND what was said, DID you? Can't find your ass with both hands, and a set of written instructions, CAN you??? Psssttt.... Hey, dummy.... you're BUSTED!!!!!!! You've demonstrated you're a lying sack of shit.... and it only took... I don't know, 20 minutes to trap you. Easy-peezy, as they say. Now that I've made my point- that you're a lying government shill, I'm done with you. You're also an attention-whore... So, I'll take away, what you want most: attention. Buh-BYE,
What you're really doing is making the environment even MORE target rich. As usual, you see things not as they are, but as you fantasize they are. Outposting Eric with petty BS only means you're trying to convince yourself that you've "won" the debate. He's laughing...HELLO.
Hey man, good call!
"Lets [sic] rent a room." ~ Jethro Tull to Rotara
Chuckles... This TOTAL MELTDOWN was brought to you by Hostess Twinkies. Twinkies!!! No Lunchpail should be without them... Guys...welcome...some things are just too important NOT to share...
Hmmmm...so it's actually Captain Erica...
Then why is everyone laughing WITH me, Libby? Except YOU of course.
I missed that memo. commentary by war, could be boiled down to the following: It is a tale Shakespeare,
Alllow me to retort in kind: The fool doth think he is wise, but the wise man knows himself to be a fool.
Oh, and for the record, I've got back-to-back meetings the rest of the afternoon... Just in case anyone else tries to "spin" my leaving...
It is a tale Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, Signifying nothing. Shakespeare, Macbeth, Act 5, scene 5, Sometimes he goes off the rails. Like on this thread.
he lasted longer then i thought he would, usually he hides behind the bozo as fast as possible.
LOL... NO excuse. Tether your iPad to your ear...
The vice-principal and the guidance counselor?
He caught me in a typo...he won!!!!!
Just in case anyone else tries to "spin" my leaving... whatever erica, everyone knows you're a big pussy and hiding from war just confirms it even more.
If I'm off the rails, Libby, why has he left the station?
You've got some brown stuff hanging off your nose...
He has back to back meetings, give the guy a break.
"Lets [sic] rent a room." ~ Jethro Tull to Rotara
You cooked for Freddie?
Is that euphemistic for a double session?
He predicted it ten minutes before it happened. Eric has calcon on bozo so he didn't know the call was hanging right there. It was a good call!
"Lets [sic] rent a room." ~ Jethro Tull to Rotara
It was a good call! As much as I don't like to bozo anyone, sometimes it cuts out on needless distractions. CE at least adds to the site, calcon disrupts...jmo
I think I invited CE here awhile back. I don't follow his every thought but we seem to be on the same wavelength. Kind of like you and I used to...(grin)
"Lets [sic] rent a room." ~ Jethro Tull to Rotara
funny, i remember your foul mouth rants at LP
That gives you something in common...
Riiiiiiight. My entire life revolves around LF (or LP, or even TOS, for that matter)... Dontcha' know? LOL. What does it say about a man, when his existence is measured by how many banal posts he can put on a forum? My life is very busy, and I've no time for government whores. IMHO, they should be the first ones lined up against a wall, and shot. Until that happy day comes, however, I can be content with putting them on bozo, and calling it "done." Trapping war in a blatant lie, just made it fun for me. And now, given the fact that they keep spouting shit, to entice me to take them off bozo, simply confirms my original point: they're attention-whores, who will lie and argue all day long... just so they can be noticed. That's pretty pathetic, when you think about it.
Comments (172 - 184) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#132. To: Captain LunchPail (#130)
Your statement demonstrates you did NOT read the primer.
#133. To: Capitalist Eric (#131)
(Edited)
#134. To: Captain LunchPail (#131)
(Edited)
#135. To: war (#132)
(Edited)
Again, I did what you asked.
The way it works is YOU state why 1963 is significant.
#136. To: war (#133)
#137. To: Capitalist Eric, Abu el Boner (#127)
If you feel comfortable in your current ignorance, I dig. It's like when my daughter fills her diaper- it gives you a warm and fuzzy feeling, but ultimately, it's bad.
#138. To: Capitalist Eric (#135)
Keep this up, and I'll just bozo you. Choose.
#139. To: Captain LunchPail (#136)
(Edited)
Because I really don't give a fuck what you say...
#140. To: Capitalist Eric, war (#112)
Your buddy is loooong gone. Have you figured out why yet?
#141. To: Captain LunchPail (#126)
#142. To: Liberator (#140)
#143. To: Capitalist Eric (#135)
(Edited)
#144. To: Captain LunchPail (#141)
I didn't say 1963 was significant.
#145. To: calcon (#138)
#146. To: war (#139)
Meanwhile, back in Adultville, you still haven't a) explained why Shadow Stats' information is valid and b) why 1963 is an important year.
#147. To: war, Capitalist Eric (#142)
Chuckles...do you ***think*** you're helping him by bumping this up?
#148. To: calcon (#138)
oops, looks like eric is getting his ass handed to him again, can the bozo be far off.
#149. To: Captain LunchPail, Abu el Banat, calcon, Skip Intro, miningold (#146)
(Edited)
#150. To: Captain LunchPail (#146)
(Edited)
#151. To: Liberator (#147)
Outposting Eric with petty BS only means you're trying to convince yourself that you've "won" the debate. He's laughing...HELLO.
#152. To: Liberator (#140)
Dontcha know? We're supposed to hang out and hang on while war cuts and pastes all afternoon.
Told by an idiot,
full of sound and fury,
Signifying nothing.
Macbeth, Act 5, scene 5,
#153. To: Capitain LunchPail (#152)
#154. To: Liberator (#147)
#155. To: Capitalist Eric (#152)
commentary by war, could be boiled down to the following:
#156. To: war (#149)
#157. To: Capitalist Eric (#154)
#158. To: Capitalist Eric (#154)
Oh, and for the record, I've got back-to-back meetings the rest of the afternoon...
#159. To: calcon (#156)
he lasted longer then i thought he would
#160. To: Capitalist Eric, liberator, war, fred mertz (#154)
Oh, and for the record, I've got back-to-back meetings the rest of the afternoon...
#161. To: Liberator (#155)
Sometimes he goes off the rails. Like on this thread.
#162. To: Fred Mertz (#148)
Hey man, good call!
#163. To: war (#161)
#164. To: Murron (#162)
You've got some brown stuff hanging off your nose...
#165. To: Fred Mertz (#163)
#166. To: Murron, calcon (#162)
#167. To: Fred Mertz (#166)
(Edited)
He predicted it ten minutes before it happened. Eric has calcon on bozo so he didn't know the call was hanging right there.
#168. To: Murron (#167)
#169. To: Murron (#167)
calcon disrupts...jmo
#170. To: Fred Mertz (#168)
(Edited)
I don't follow his every thought
#171. To: Liberator (#157)
NO excuse. Tether your iPad to your ear...
.
.
.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]