[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Kamala Harris, reparations, and guaranteed income

Did Mudboy Slim finally kill this place?

"Why Young Americans Are Not Taught about Evil"

"New Rules For Radicals — How To Reinvent Kamala Harris"

"Harris’ problem: She’s a complete phony"

Hurricane Beryl strikes Bay City (TX)

Who Is ‘Destroying Democracy In Darkness?’

‘Kamalanomics’ is just ‘Bidenomics’ but dumber

Even The Washington Post Says Kamala's 'Price Control' Plan is 'Communist'

Arthur Ray Hines, "Sneakypete", has passed away.

No righT ... for me To hear --- whaT you say !

"Walz’s Fellow Guardsmen Set the Record Straight on Veep Candidate’s Military Career: ‘He Bailed Out’ "

"Kamala Harris Selects Progressive Minnesota Governor Tim Walz as Running Mate"

"The Teleprompter Campaign"

Good Riddance to Ismail Haniyeh

"Pagans in Paris"

"Liberal groupthink makes American life creepy and could cost Democrats the election".

"Enter Harris, Stage Lef"t

Official describes the moment a Butler officer confronted the Trump shooter

Jesse Watters: Don’t buy this excuse from the Secret Service

Video shows Trump shooter crawling into position while folks point him out to law enforcement

Eyewitness believes there was a 'noticeable' difference in security at Trump's rally

Trump Assassination Attempt

We screamed for 3 minutes at police and Secret Service. They couldn’t see him, so they did nothing. EYEWITNESS SPEAKS OUT — I SAW THE ASSASSIN CRAWLING ACROSS THE ROOF.

Video showing the Trump Rally shooter dead on the rooftop

Court Just Nailed Hillary in $6 Million FEC Violation Case, 45x Bigger Than Trump's $130k So-Called Violation

2024 Republican Platform Drops Gun-Rights Promises

Why will Kamala Harris resign from her occupancy of the Office of Vice President of the USA? Scroll down for records/details

Secret Negotiations! Jill Biden’s Demands for $2B Library, Legal Immunity, and $100M Book Deal to Protect Biden Family Before Joe’s Exit

AI is exhausting the power grid. Tech firms are seeking a miracle solution.

If you need a Good Opening for black, use this.

"Arrogant Hunter Biden has never been held accountable — until now"

How Republicans in Key Senate Races Are Flip-Flopping on Abortion

Idaho bar sparks fury for declaring June 'Heterosexual Awesomeness Month' and giving free beers and 15% discounts to straight men

Son of Buc-ee’s co-owner indicted for filming guests in the shower and having sex. He says the law makes it OK.

South Africa warns US could be liable for ICC prosecution for supporting Israel

Today I turned 50!

San Diego Police officer resigns after getting locked in the backseat with female detainee

Gazan Refugee Warns the World about Hamas

Iranian stabbed for sharing his faith, miraculously made it across the border without a passport!

Protest and Clashes outside Trump's Bronx Rally in Crotona Park

Netanyahu Issues Warning To US Leaders Over ICC Arrest Warrants: 'You're Next'

Will it ever end?

Did Pope Francis Just Call Jesus a Liar?

Climate: The Movie (The Cold Truth) Updated 4K version

There can never be peace on Earth for as long as Islamic Sharia exists

The Victims of Benny Hinn: 30 Years of Spiritual Deception.

Trump Is Planning to Send Kill Teams to Mexico to Take Out Cartel Leaders

The Great Falling Away in the Church is Here | Tim Dilena

How Ridiculous? Blade-Less Swiss Army Knife Debuts As Weapon Laws Tighten


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

International News
See other International News Articles

Title: Obama has Royally Fucked Up in Afghanistan
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://partisan.blogs.hopelesslypartisan.com/item_8292.htm
Published: Jul 30, 2010
Author: Ken Berwitz
Post Date: 2010-07-30 13:34:10 by no gnu taxes
Keywords: None
Views: 17482
Comments: 66

Who has "ownership" of the war in Afghanistan? Is it President Bush, who got rid of the taliban government, closed al qaeda's training camps, and kept things that way with a troop total that never got about the high 20,000's?

Or is it Barack Obama, who declared Afghanistan a "war of necessity" (i.e. he agreed it should be fought), has quadrupled the number of our troops there, and is now overseeing dramatically more combat fatalities in that hopeless anal cavity of the world than we ever had under Bush?

Here is the first part of an Associated Press article which gives us the latest situation there. Warning: It is ugly:

KABUL, Afghanistan 33; Three U.S. troops died in blasts in Afghanistan, bringing the death toll for July to at least 63 and surpassing the previous month's record as the deadliest for American forces in the nearly 9-year-old war.

In Kabul, police fired weapons into the air Friday to disperse a crowd of angry Afghans who shouted "death to America," hurled stones and set fire to two vehicles after an SUV was involved in a traffic accident that killed four Afghans on the main airport road, according to the capital's criminal investigations chief, Abdul Ghaafar Sayedzada.

I hope you took advantage of the link I provided and read not just the couple of paragraphs above, but the entire story.

Tell me: Does this look like the Obama model is working? Does this look like it is yielding better results than President Bush attained with a fraction of the troops and a fraction of the casualties?

Are you pleased with what President Obama has done regarding Afghanistan, and think it is superior to President Bush's strategies? Or do you wish that we could go back in time and revert to how Mr. Bush handled things?

Finally, do you have any doubt whatsoever that, if our wonderful "neutral" media starts attacking President Obama for his conduct of the war (how's that for a big "if"?), Mr. Obama will find a way to blame it all on President Bush?

And whose fault is this? Ultimately, it is ours. We voted this unqualified, incompetent Chicago machine politician into the White House, along with a huge Democratic majority in both houses to second his actions. Now we are paying for it. Full price.

The 2010 elections cannot come soon enough. And that goes double for 2012.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 40.

#10. To: no gnu taxes (#0)

Its Owe-bama's Vietnam now.

Badeye  posted on  2010-07-30   15:04:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Badeye (#10) (Edited)

Its Owe-bama's Vietnam now.

So Vietnam must have been Nixon's war. LOLOL

mininggold  posted on  2010-07-30   15:08:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: mininggold (#13)

Its Owe-bama's Vietnam now. So Vietnam must have been Nixon's war. LOLOL

Only a kook finds 50 thousand plus Americans dead funny. And nope, it was JFK and LBJ's 'war'.

Owe-bama is doing the same thing LBJ did.

Badeye  posted on  2010-08-02   8:48:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Badeye (#17) (Edited)

Only a kook finds 50 thousand plus Americans dead funny. And nope, it was JFK and LBJ's 'war'. Owe-bama is doing the same thing LBJ did.

No one said anything was funny about American dead and you know it. I was laughing at you and your changeable 'logic'.

Vietnam is now Nixon's war.

mininggold  posted on  2010-08-02   11:53:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: mininggold (#18)

Vietnam is now Nixon's war.

In my opinion it will always be Gen. Westmoreland's war.

Thunderbird  posted on  2010-08-03   9:35:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: Thunderbird (#25)

In my opinion it will always be Gen. Westmoreland's war.

Funny...I've always viewed it as Nixon's war. Even going back into the 50's. It was Nixon who set up SEATO and, I'm sure, he thought that he was going to be POTUS in 1961.

war  posted on  2010-08-03   9:57:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: war, mininggold (#26)

Funny...I've always viewed it as Nixon's war.

That's just plain "funny." Or embarrassing.

Corrupt Dem-Rat LBJ OWNED that war.

Liberator  posted on  2010-08-03   13:03:56 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: Liberator (#28) (Edited)

There is no doubt that Nixon, in the 1950's, was posturing the US for all out war in VietNam.

None.

But I should add that I believe LBJ is a war criminal. Ditto Kissinger.

war  posted on  2010-08-03   13:21:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: war (#30) (Edited)

There is no doubt that Nixon, in the 1950's, was posturing the US for all out war in VietNam.

Anti-Communist, yes. "Posturing"?? How do you define it? As VP, he certainly had minimal influence at the State Dept. There is NO way he's to blame for a war seeded by JFK and escalated beyond belief by LBJ and fought NOT to win.

But I should add that I believe LBJ is a war criminal. Ditto Kissinger.

I'll drink to that.

Liberator  posted on  2010-08-03   13:25:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: Liberator (#31)

As VP, he certainly had minimal influence at the State Dept

He was Ike's point man on Viet Nam.

war  posted on  2010-08-03   13:27:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: war (#33)

He was Ike's point man on Viet Nam.

Yes, to monitor the situation; NOT to create WWIII. IKE was sick of war.

We don't know what Nixon might have done in Nam or elsewhere had he properly been President in 1961-1965.

Liberator  posted on  2010-08-03   13:40:16 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: Liberator (#35)

We don't know what Nixon might have done in Nam or elsewhere had he properly been President in 1961-1965.

"Properly"?

It would have escalated sooner.

war  posted on  2010-08-03   13:43:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: war (#38)

"Properly"?

Yes. He really won the '60 election, but was stolen for JFK.

It would have escalated sooner.

Maybe.

Nixon did have a chip on his shoulder for Commies. But there would have arguably been a right way and wrong way to have gone about it. Republicans generally goes for the throat more than Dems during war - not that I'm saying I would have supported it in Nam either way.

Liberator  posted on  2010-08-03   13:48:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 40.

#42. To: Liberator (#40)

Yes. He really won the '60 election, but was stolen for JFK.

Bull...taking IL out of the equation, JFK still wins. Then you have the mysterious flip in CA from JFK to Nixon. Three days AFTER all votes were supposedly counted.

war  posted on  2010-08-03 14:06:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 40.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com