[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

There hasn’T been ... a single updaTe To This siTe --- since I joined.

"This Is Not What Authoritarianism Looks Like"

America Erupts… ICE Raids Takeover The Streets

AC/DC- Riff Raff + Go Down [VH1 Uncut, July 5, 1996]

Why is Peter Schiff calling Bitcoin a ‘giant cult’ and how does this impact market sentiment?

Esso Your Butt Buddy Horseshit jacks off to that shit

"The Addled Activist Mind"

"Don’t Stop with Harvard"

"Does the Biden Cover-Up Have Two Layers?"

"Pete Rose, 'Shoeless' Joe Reinstated by MLB, Eligible for HOF"

"'Major Breakthrough': Here Are the Details on the China Trade Deal"

Freepers Still Love war

Parody ... Jump / Trump --- van Halen jump

"The Democrat Meltdown Continues"

"Yes, We Need Deportations Without Due Process"

"Trump's Tariff Play Smart, Strategic, Working"

"Leftists Make Desperate Attempt to Discredit Photo of Abrego Garcia's MS-13 Tattoos. Here Are Receipts"

"Trump Administration Freezes $2 Billion After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands"on After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands

"Doctors Committing Insurance Fraud to Conceal Trans Procedures, Texas Children’s Whistleblower Testifies"

"Left Using '8647' Symbol for Violence Against Trump, Musk"

KawasakiÂ’s new rideable robohorse is straight out of a sci-fi novel

"Trade should work for America, not rule it"

"The Stakes Couldn’t Be Higher in Wisconsin’s Supreme Court Race – What’s at Risk for the GOP"

"How Trump caught big-government fans in their own trap"

‘Are You Prepared for Violence?’

Greek Orthodox Archbishop gives President Trump a Cross, tells him "Make America Invincible"

"Trump signs executive order eliminating the Department of Education!!!"

"If AOC Is the Democratic Future, the Party Is Even Worse Off Than We Think"

"Ending EPA Overreach"

Closest Look Ever at How Pyramids Were Built

Moment the SpaceX crew Meets Stranded ISS Crew

The Exodus Pharaoh EXPLAINED!

Did the Israelites Really Cross the Red Sea? Stunning Evidence of the Location of Red Sea Crossing!

Are we experiencing a Triumph of Orthodoxy?

Judge Napolitano with Konstantin Malofeev (Moscow, Russia)

"Trump Administration Cancels Most USAID Programs, Folds Others into State Department"

Introducing Manus: The General AI Agent

"Chinese Spies in Our Military? Straight to Jail"

Any suggestion that the USA and NATO are "Helping" or have ever helped Ukraine needs to be shot down instantly

"Real problem with the Palestinians: Nobody wants them"

ACDC & The Rolling Stones - Rock Me Baby

Magnus Carlsen gives a London System lesson!

"The Democrats Are Suffering Through a Drought of Generational Talent"

7 Tactics Of The Enemy To Weaken Your Faith

Strange And Biblical Events Are Happening

Every year ... BusiesT casino gambling day -- in Las Vegas

Trump’s DOGE Plan Is Legally Untouchable—Elon Musk Holds the Scalpel

Palestinians: What do you think of the Trump plan for Gaza?

What Happens Inside Gaza’s Secret Tunnels? | Unpacked

Hamas Torture Bodycam Footage: "These Monsters Filmed it All" | IDF Warfighter Doron Keidar, Ep. 225


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: Ousted USDA Employee Sherrod Plans To Sue Breitbart
Source: ASSOCIATED PRESS
URL Source: http://rawstory.com/rs/2010/0729/ou ... e-sherrod-plans-sue-breitbart/
Published: Jul 29, 2010
Author: ASSOCIATED PRESS
Post Date: 2010-07-29 12:43:00 by Brian S
Keywords: None
Views: 49866
Comments: 88

Ousted USDA employee Shirley Sherrod says she will sue conservative blogger over edited video

Ousted Agriculture Department employee Shirley Sherrod said Thursday she will sue a conservative blogger who posted an edited video of her making racially tinged remarks last week.

Sherrod made the announcement in San Diego at the National Association of Black Journalists annual convention.

The edited video posted by Andrew Breitbart led Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack to ask her to resign, a decision he reconsidered after seeing the entire video of her March speech to a local NAACP group. In the full speech, Sherrod spoke of racial reconciliation and lessons she learned after initially hesitating to help a white farmer save his home.

Vilsack and President Barack Obama later called Sherrod to apologize for her hasty ouster. Vilsack has offered her a new job at the department, which she is still considering.

Obama said Thursday morning on ABC's daytime talk show "The View" that the incident shows racial tensions still exist in America.

"There are still inequalities out there. There's still discrimination out there," Obama said. "But we've made progress."

Obama pinned much of the blame for the incident on a media culture that he said seeks out conflict and doesn't always get the facts right. But he added, "A lot of people overreacted, including people in my administration."

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 87.

#1. To: Brian S (#0)

This is good news.Breitbart is claiming he didn't edit the video,and nobody is paying any attention to his claims. This way we get to find out in court if he is lying,and if he isn't,we will find out which Dim and which Dim organization is responsible for planting the doctored footage with him.

sneakypete  posted on  2010-07-29   12:46:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: sneakypete (#1)

I agree. Sunshine on this issue is a good thing.

One troubling thing I heard Bitemark claim on Savage a couple of days ago was that he received the video in edited form because the entire 45 mins of the event was to large to send to him in unedited form.

Bullshit I say. A 45 min video should top out at somewhere around 1 gig.

Brian S  posted on  2010-07-29   12:55:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Brian S (#2)

Bullshit I say. A 45 min video should top out at somewhere around 1 gig.

That and he did the same thing with his ACORN video.

I hope Sherrod wins big enough to put this piece of trash permanently out of business.

lucysmom  posted on  2010-07-29   13:05:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: lucysmom (#3)

That and he did the same thing with his ACORN video.

I hope Sherrod wins big enough to put this piece of trash permanently out of business.

ROFLMAO! Somebody that supports trash like Barry Soetoro has no business passing judgement on anyone else.

sneakypete  posted on  2010-07-29   16:50:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: sneakypete (#5)

Its a ridiculous nusance lawsuit with no merit. She said what she said.

Badeye  posted on  2010-07-29   17:07:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Badeye (#6)

Its a ridiculous nusance lawsuit with no merit. She said what she said.

She did NOT say what the tape implied that she said.

Brietbart is in deep doo-doo if he can't prove he received the tape already edited.

Even if he can,he may be liable for slander for publishing it as her words and actions without first checking to see if it were true.

sneakypete  posted on  2010-07-29   18:00:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: sneakypete, Badeye (#7)

She did NOT say what the tape implied that she said.

Brietbart is in deep doo-doo if he can't prove he received the tape already edited.

Even if he can,he may be liable for slander for publishing it as her words and actions without first checking to see if it were true.

LOL!

You really are an ignorant fool petey.

"Slander is the oral communication of false statements that are harmful to a person's reputation. If the statements are proven to be true, it is a complete defense to a charge of slander. Oral opinions that don't contain statements of fact don't constitute slander. Slander is an act of communication that causes someone to be shamed, ridiculed, held in contempt, lowered in the estimation of the community, or to lose employment status or earnings or otherwise suffer a damaged reputation. Slander is a subcategory of defamation.

The basic elements of a claim of slander include; a defamatory statement; published to third parties; and which the speaker or publisher knew or should have known was false.

Slander is primarily covered under state law, but is subject to First Amendment guarantees of free speech. The scope of constitutional protection extends to statements of opinion on matters of public concern that do not contain or imply a provable factual assertion. If the slander unjustly accused you of a crime or reflected on your profession, the court or jury can assess the damages. For other types of slander you generally must prove some actual damage to be able to recover.

Slander of title is a common law tort involving a disparaging remark regarding ownership of property. It affects the owner's ability to transfer the property, resulting in a monetary loss."

definitions.uslegal.com/s/slander/

Mad Dog  posted on  2010-07-30   16:48:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Mad Dog (#10)

You really are an ignorant fool petey.

Maybe,but at least I am not insane.

I'm not even so delusional that I think editing a tape to reflect that someone committed a crime when the truth is they didn't isn't a criminal offense in itself. She was and is not a public personality like someone in the entertainment industry,so there are limits to the lies you can publish about her.

sneakypete  posted on  2010-07-31   8:35:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: sneakypete (#11)

Md; You really are an ignorant fool petey.

petey; Maybe,but at least I am not insane.

I'm not even so delusional that I think editing a tape to reflect that someone committed a crime when the truth is they didn't isn't a criminal offense in itself. She was and is not a public personality like someone in the entertainment industry,so there are limits to the lies you can publish about her.

LOL! You really are pitiful and ignorant petey.

1.) You don't even know what "slander" is.

2.) Breitbart didn't edit the tape in any way.

3.) It isn't a crime, or illegal in any way, to be a "racist" in the USA fool. If it was Sherrod and her husband and the NACCLP would be in jail not Breitbart. She was FIRED by the whitehouse without any investigation or process at all. She said so at the time fool.

4.) What "lies" FOOL?

A little hint petey, what you see on the leftstream media is usually all LIES.

IF you had the ability to think your way out of a wet paper bag you'd understand that. But you buy their cr@p hook line and sinker.

Maybe you should consider watching less TV?

Pitiful.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

"Was Shirley Sherrod Fired from USDA for Other Reasons Than Race Speech?

By Lachlan Markay

Fri, 07/30/2010 - 17:34 ET

Is there more to the Shirley Sherrod story than the White House has let on - and the media has discovered? While the mainstream media continues to focus on the more sensationalistic, scandalous aspects of the story, a number of bloggers have unearthed facts that suggest further effort is needed to figure out Sherrod's dealings with the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Sherrod's involvement is not at all clear, nor is there definitive evidence of any wrongdoing. But Sherrod's sudden presence in the spotlight has led to investigations that turn up some strange numbers.

In short, the 2008 farm bill earmarked $1.25 billion to compensate a predicted total of 86,000 African American farmers for discriminatory practices against them. But according to the Census Bureau, there are were 39,697 African American farmers in the nation in 2007, and even fewer in previous years.

This week the Obama administration announced it does not have the funds to pay that $1.25 billion. Yet the administration also announced that it will pay $1.5 billion in relief to farmers in Arkansas, leaving some wondering whether the recall of the $1.25 billion was more a matter of choice than necessity. Story Continues Below Ad [5;

But first, some background. In 1997, 400 African American farmers sued the USDA, alleging discrimination in subsidy policy, and a range of other areas over the preceding 15 years. In the resulting court case, Pigford v. Glickman, the USDA agreed to pay $50,000 to each farmer. By then, the suit had become a class action, and USDA expected to have to pay roughly 2,000 farmers. 22,505 joined the suit.

Two years later, the USDA agreed to pay 16,000 of those farmers the agreed-upon $50,000 in compensation - just over $1 billion in total. But according to the USDA, a full 70,000 additional farmers claimed that they had submitted petitions for damages, but that those petitions were received late due to bureaucratic incompetence or poor legal representation.

The matter remained unresolved until 2008, when Sens. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and Barack Obama, D-Ill., teamed up to earmark $1.25 billion in that years farm bill to pay the outstanding claims.

But the 70,000 farmers who say they were wrongly denied damages plus the 16,000 who received $50,000 from the federal government exceeds the total 26,785 African American farmers present in the United States in 1999, and the 39,697 present today.

Then this week, seemingly out of the blue, the administration announced that it does not have the funds to pay out that $1.25 billion. Members of the Congressional Black Caucus are outraged, claiming that "if the administration can find $1.5 billion within its administrative funds to pay mostly white farmers in Arkansas and other states, it should be able to pay black farmers who suffered discrimination."

They have a point. Something sketchy is going on here.

As for Sherrod's role in the case, the farm cooperative owned by her and her husband was awarded a $13 million settlement last year, shortly before she was appointed to her post at the USDA. In addition, each of the Sherrods was paid over $150,000 for their "pain and suffering" - more than triple what was given to any other farmer, total.

All of these facts point to some sketchy practices at the USDA. Those practices, it seems, only came to light due to increased public attention given Sherrod and the USDA. Still, the mainstream media is fixated on the more sensationalist aspects of the story. It should turn its attention towards what could be a serious case of political malfeasance.

As San Francisco Chronicle columnist Willie Brown wrote on Sunday, "you don't fire someone without at least hearing their side of the story unless you want them gone in the first place."

Is the administration trying to prevent further investigation of USDA discrimination compensation policies?"

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/lachlan-markay/2010/07/30/was-shirley-sherrod-fired-usda-other- reasons-race-speech

Btw petey "insane" would be a promotion for you.

Mad Dog  posted on  2010-07-31   16:24:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: Mad Dog (#16)

LOL! You really are pitiful and ignorant petey.

Shouldn't you be out in a boat shooting down airplanes?

1.) You don't even know what "slander" is.

Sure I do. If someone were to say I am you,that would be slander.

2.) Breitbart didn't edit the tape in any way.

If he can prove that,he is in good shape. If he can't,he is in trouble. Both personally and professionally. The right doesn't need a Hay-Raldo.

3.) It isn't a crime, or illegal in any way, to be a "racist" in the USA fool.

Speaking of fools,show us all where I said it was.

sneakypete  posted on  2010-07-31   17:49:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: sneakypete (#17)

LOL!

As usual, you have nothing FACTUAL do you little "man"? As usual.

LOL

1.) They are called "ships" you wannabe lubber a$$wipe. Shouldn't you be out making necklaces of ears and eating babies?

2.) LMAOAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! you insipid libTURD tool! Turn that TV off.

3.) No problem little "man", little "man"; "I'm not even so delusional that I think editing a tape to reflect that someone committed a crime when the truth is they didn't isn't a criminal offense in itself."

Btw little "man" double negatives make your sentences absurd and meaningless, but that's you in a nut shell isn't it little "man"?

Mad Dog  posted on  2010-07-31   18:13:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: Mad Dog (#19)

1.) They are called "ships" you wannabe lubber a$$wipe.

Boat,ship,same thing. Not that it matters because I seriously doubt you made it that far in the Navy.

sneakypete  posted on  2010-07-31   20:41:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: sneakypete (#23)

LOL!

Spoken as the truly little "man" wannabe lubber that I already know you to be petey.

You had to say something didn't you little "man" after I just b!tch slapped your ignorant a$$ down with your own words.

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Mad Dog  posted on  2010-07-31   22:20:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: Mad Dog (#29)

When are you going to learn to accept yourself as you really are and come out of the closet? You will be much happier and probably even be able to get off the meds for good,but you will be able to quit overcompensating for not being a "manly man".

It ain't like you have anybody fooled.

sneakypete  posted on  2010-08-01   5:25:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#71. To: sneakypete (#31)

LOL!

LOL!

Spoken as the truly little "man" wannabe lubber that I already know you to be petey.

You had to say something didn't you little "man" after I just b!tch slapped your ignorant a$$ down with your own words.

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Mad Dog  posted on  2010-08-01   23:47:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#72. To: Mad Dog (#71)

MD, you're a joke here, and a joke at LP.

Shouldn't you be boasting over there, hero?

Wood_Chopper  posted on  2010-08-01   23:57:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#74. To: Wood_Chopper, Mad Dog (#72)

MD, you're a joke here, and a joke at LP.

The sad part is that he is a really bright guy once you get him off his macho war hero posing bullshit and focusing on something other than himself.

He really doesn't seem to realize that he is the only one that cares if he is a war hero or someone who was put out of the service during boot camp. His insecurities makes him overcompensate,and the result is the Mad Dog that everybody hates and ridicules.

sneakypete  posted on  2010-08-02   5:30:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#79. To: sneakypete (#74)

LOL!

You really are a VILE sniveling little COWARD LIAR b!tch stinky boy.

I've NEVER claimed to be a "hero", EVER.

All that I have done is to defend the entire NAV from little cunts like you, you, who accused the NAV of being a bunch of cowards who joined to avoid WAR, and who never did anything dangerous or worthwhile in Vietnam anyhow, you miserable little LYING hypocrite c^nt.

You are a foul dishonorable LYING little "big" "man" c^nt petey boy.

I didn't, wouldn't, and WON'T, EVER; let little self appointed "hero" chicken hawk c^nts such as you slur the NAV, or the 7 th fleet, or DesRon 15, or the Horne or the Parsons or ANY squid, or ANY US armed forces members who served with honor, without fighting your COWARDLY LIES and SLURS to my last breath, with passion and the simple TRUTH, you little simpering LYING chicken hawk c^nt.

My "insecurities"? LOL! You simpering c^nt, you want me to be "insecure" about my branch et. al. and the FACT that you can't shake my deeply rooted in FACT, SECURITY is what drives you chicken sh!t c^nts sideways!

You know, when I got home and those dirty hippies tried to give me cr@p, I understood that they had no idea what HONOR is, let alone making any claim to having any of it.

THAT is what makes you so vile, you little dishonorable twat.

IF you are what you CLAIM to be.

Then you should certainly understand what HONOR is, and THAT makes YOU foul beyond words, you little chicken sh!t twat.

Btw moron, "hyperbole" is no substituted for logic and/or intelligence; and LIES and hyperbole is all that you have, boy.

Note to the world; IF stinky pete and the butt boys who REALLY won the Vietnam WAR accuse you, your unit, your branch or whatever of being all COWARDS who joined .... to avoid the WAR, and that you, your unit, your branch, or whatever didn't really do anything of consequence or of value to the troops or American effort, and certainly nothing that was dangerous.

IF you DARE defend yourself and your branch or unit or whatever YOU are obviously a LIAR trying to claim to be "HERO", and there is something obviously WRONG with you if you'd DARE call these chicken hawk scum b!tches on their foul dishonorable bullsh!t.

See how it works?

Stinky boy the HERO gets to say whose service, branch, unit etc. were REALLY of value and whose was NOT!

"Resistance is futile" eh petey boy?

Phuck you petey boy, you dishonorable scum sucking chicken hawk FRAUD b!tch.

"And the horse you rode in on" boy.

Mad Dog  posted on  2010-08-04   19:25:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#80. To: Mad Dog (#79)

All that I have done is to defend the entire NAV from little cunts like you, you, who accused the NAV of being a bunch of cowards who joined to avoid WAR, and who never did anything dangerous or worthwhile in Vietnam anyhow, you miserable little LYING hypocrite c^nt.

Right. You enlisted in the Navy because the USMC and the US Army weren't hiring,right?

You are delusional in more ways that one.

sneakypete  posted on  2010-08-04   21:21:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#81. To: sneakypete (#80)

LOL! YOU really are nothing but vile TRASH petey boy.

You vile little puffed up self important little c^nt.

Unlike YOU little c^nt, I knew when I was six years old that I was going to join the NAVY and serve on DESTROYERS. Unlike YOU you little c^nt, I joined the NAV on my 18 th birthday.

I guess according to the no nuts dishonorable little self aggrandizing c^nt little "man" petey "playbook", I'm NOW supposed to attack service in a couple of the branches?

Oops let me check, ....

Nope, can't do THAT, unlike YOU petey boy I've still got a set of b@lls and HONOR.

And petey boy you never had the brains to even join the NAVY. You could never hack the fleet pussy.

One fine morning you'd be missing at quarters, and so would a dogging wrench, you little b!tch.

LMAOAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Mad Dog  posted on  2010-08-04   21:50:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#83. To: Mad Dog (#81)

I knew when I was six years old that I was going to join the NAVY

I bet there was something else you knew when you were six years old. You liked dolls better than trucks.

Biff Tannen  posted on  2010-08-05   8:25:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#85. To: Abu el Banat (#83)

LOL!

Yabba dabba do! Stinky and war and freddy jerx accept your application!

They happen to NEED a new gerbil.

Your timing is perfect!

Mad Dog  posted on  2010-08-05   16:10:53 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#86. To: Mad Dog (#85)

lol

Someone rings the bell and you run in barking like a fool, pee on the floor and run back out again.

Then someone rings the bell again.

Biff Tannen  posted on  2010-08-05   16:15:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#87. To: Abu el Banat (#86)

LOL!

Somebody mentions "gerbil" and yabba dabba do is THERE!

Won't your husband be jealous?

Which branch did YOU serve in again yabba dabba do?

Jump gerbil boy, JUMP!

LOL!

Mad Dog  posted on  2010-08-05   16:28:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 87.

        There are no replies to Comment # 87.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 87.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com