[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Why will Kamala Harris resign from her occupancy of the Office of Vice President of the USA? Scroll down for records/details

Secret Negotiations! Jill Biden’s Demands for $2B Library, Legal Immunity, and $100M Book Deal to Protect Biden Family Before Joe’s Exit

AI is exhausting the power grid. Tech firms are seeking a miracle solution.

Rare Van Halen Leicestershire, Donnington Park August 18, 1984 Valerie Bertinelli Cameo

If you need a Good Opening for black, use this.

"Arrogant Hunter Biden has never been held accountable — until now"

How Republicans in Key Senate Races Are Flip-Flopping on Abortion

Idaho bar sparks fury for declaring June 'Heterosexual Awesomeness Month' and giving free beers and 15% discounts to straight men

Son of Buc-ee’s co-owner indicted for filming guests in the shower and having sex. He says the law makes it OK.

South Africa warns US could be liable for ICC prosecution for supporting Israel

Today I turned 50!

San Diego Police officer resigns after getting locked in the backseat with female detainee

Gazan Refugee Warns the World about Hamas

Iranian stabbed for sharing his faith, miraculously made it across the border without a passport!

Protest and Clashes outside Trump's Bronx Rally in Crotona Park

Netanyahu Issues Warning To US Leaders Over ICC Arrest Warrants: 'You're Next'

Will it ever end?

Did Pope Francis Just Call Jesus a Liar?

Climate: The Movie (The Cold Truth) Updated 4K version

There can never be peace on Earth for as long as Islamic Sharia exists

The Victims of Benny Hinn: 30 Years of Spiritual Deception.

Trump Is Planning to Send Kill Teams to Mexico to Take Out Cartel Leaders

The Great Falling Away in the Church is Here | Tim Dilena

How Ridiculous? Blade-Less Swiss Army Knife Debuts As Weapon Laws Tighten

Jewish students beaten with sticks at University of Amsterdam

Terrorists shut down Park Avenue.

Police begin arresting democrats outside Met Gala.

The minute the total solar eclipse appeared over US

Three Types Of People To Mark And Avoid In The Church Today

Are The 4 Horsemen Of The Apocalypse About To Appear?

France sends combat troops to Ukraine battlefront

Facts you may not have heard about Muslims in England.

George Washington University raises the Hamas flag. American Flag has been removed.

Alabama students chant Take A Shower to the Hamas terrorists on campus.

In Day of the Lord, 24 Church Elders with Crowns Join Jesus in His Throne

In Day of the Lord, 24 Church Elders with Crowns Join Jesus in His Throne

Deadly Saltwater and Deadly Fresh Water to Increase

Deadly Cancers to soon Become Thing of the Past?

Plague of deadly New Diseases Continues

[FULL VIDEO] Police release bodycam footage of Monroe County District Attorney Sandra Doorley traffi

Police clash with pro-Palestine protesters on Ohio State University campus

Joe Rogan Experience #2138 - Tucker Carlson

Police Dispersing Student Protesters at USC - Breaking News Coverage (College Protests)

What Passover Means For The New Testament Believer

Are We Closer Than Ever To The Next Pandemic?

War in Ukraine Turns on Russia

what happened during total solar eclipse

Israel Attacks Iran, Report Says - LIVE Breaking News Coverage

Earth is Scorched with Heat

Antiwar Activists Chant ‘Death to America’ at Event Featuring Chicago Alderman


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: Ousted USDA Employee Sherrod Plans To Sue Breitbart
Source: ASSOCIATED PRESS
URL Source: http://rawstory.com/rs/2010/0729/ou ... e-sherrod-plans-sue-breitbart/
Published: Jul 29, 2010
Author: ASSOCIATED PRESS
Post Date: 2010-07-29 12:43:00 by Brian S
Keywords: None
Views: 47867
Comments: 88

Ousted USDA employee Shirley Sherrod says she will sue conservative blogger over edited video

Ousted Agriculture Department employee Shirley Sherrod said Thursday she will sue a conservative blogger who posted an edited video of her making racially tinged remarks last week.

Sherrod made the announcement in San Diego at the National Association of Black Journalists annual convention.

The edited video posted by Andrew Breitbart led Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack to ask her to resign, a decision he reconsidered after seeing the entire video of her March speech to a local NAACP group. In the full speech, Sherrod spoke of racial reconciliation and lessons she learned after initially hesitating to help a white farmer save his home.

Vilsack and President Barack Obama later called Sherrod to apologize for her hasty ouster. Vilsack has offered her a new job at the department, which she is still considering.

Obama said Thursday morning on ABC's daytime talk show "The View" that the incident shows racial tensions still exist in America.

"There are still inequalities out there. There's still discrimination out there," Obama said. "But we've made progress."

Obama pinned much of the blame for the incident on a media culture that he said seeks out conflict and doesn't always get the facts right. But he added, "A lot of people overreacted, including people in my administration."

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 34.

#1. To: Brian S (#0)

This is good news.Breitbart is claiming he didn't edit the video,and nobody is paying any attention to his claims. This way we get to find out in court if he is lying,and if he isn't,we will find out which Dim and which Dim organization is responsible for planting the doctored footage with him.

sneakypete  posted on  2010-07-29   12:46:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: sneakypete (#1)

I agree. Sunshine on this issue is a good thing.

One troubling thing I heard Bitemark claim on Savage a couple of days ago was that he received the video in edited form because the entire 45 mins of the event was to large to send to him in unedited form.

Bullshit I say. A 45 min video should top out at somewhere around 1 gig.

Brian S  posted on  2010-07-29   12:55:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Brian S (#2)

Bullshit I say. A 45 min video should top out at somewhere around 1 gig.

That and he did the same thing with his ACORN video.

I hope Sherrod wins big enough to put this piece of trash permanently out of business.

lucysmom  posted on  2010-07-29   13:05:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: lucysmom (#3)

That and he did the same thing with his ACORN video.

I hope Sherrod wins big enough to put this piece of trash permanently out of business.

ROFLMAO! Somebody that supports trash like Barry Soetoro has no business passing judgement on anyone else.

sneakypete  posted on  2010-07-29   16:50:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: sneakypete (#5)

Its a ridiculous nusance lawsuit with no merit. She said what she said.

Badeye  posted on  2010-07-29   17:07:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Badeye (#6)

Its a ridiculous nusance lawsuit with no merit. She said what she said.

She did NOT say what the tape implied that she said.

Brietbart is in deep doo-doo if he can't prove he received the tape already edited.

Even if he can,he may be liable for slander for publishing it as her words and actions without first checking to see if it were true.

sneakypete  posted on  2010-07-29   18:00:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: sneakypete, Badeye (#7)

She did NOT say what the tape implied that she said.

Brietbart is in deep doo-doo if he can't prove he received the tape already edited.

Even if he can,he may be liable for slander for publishing it as her words and actions without first checking to see if it were true.

LOL!

You really are an ignorant fool petey.

"Slander is the oral communication of false statements that are harmful to a person's reputation. If the statements are proven to be true, it is a complete defense to a charge of slander. Oral opinions that don't contain statements of fact don't constitute slander. Slander is an act of communication that causes someone to be shamed, ridiculed, held in contempt, lowered in the estimation of the community, or to lose employment status or earnings or otherwise suffer a damaged reputation. Slander is a subcategory of defamation.

The basic elements of a claim of slander include; a defamatory statement; published to third parties; and which the speaker or publisher knew or should have known was false.

Slander is primarily covered under state law, but is subject to First Amendment guarantees of free speech. The scope of constitutional protection extends to statements of opinion on matters of public concern that do not contain or imply a provable factual assertion. If the slander unjustly accused you of a crime or reflected on your profession, the court or jury can assess the damages. For other types of slander you generally must prove some actual damage to be able to recover.

Slander of title is a common law tort involving a disparaging remark regarding ownership of property. It affects the owner's ability to transfer the property, resulting in a monetary loss."

definitions.uslegal.com/s/slander/

Mad Dog  posted on  2010-07-30   16:48:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Mad Dog (#10)

You really are an ignorant fool petey.

Maybe,but at least I am not insane.

I'm not even so delusional that I think editing a tape to reflect that someone committed a crime when the truth is they didn't isn't a criminal offense in itself. She was and is not a public personality like someone in the entertainment industry,so there are limits to the lies you can publish about her.

sneakypete  posted on  2010-07-31   8:35:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: sneakypete (#11)

Md; You really are an ignorant fool petey.

petey; Maybe,but at least I am not insane.

I'm not even so delusional that I think editing a tape to reflect that someone committed a crime when the truth is they didn't isn't a criminal offense in itself. She was and is not a public personality like someone in the entertainment industry,so there are limits to the lies you can publish about her.

LOL! You really are pitiful and ignorant petey.

1.) You don't even know what "slander" is.

2.) Breitbart didn't edit the tape in any way.

3.) It isn't a crime, or illegal in any way, to be a "racist" in the USA fool. If it was Sherrod and her husband and the NACCLP would be in jail not Breitbart. She was FIRED by the whitehouse without any investigation or process at all. She said so at the time fool.

4.) What "lies" FOOL?

A little hint petey, what you see on the leftstream media is usually all LIES.

IF you had the ability to think your way out of a wet paper bag you'd understand that. But you buy their cr@p hook line and sinker.

Maybe you should consider watching less TV?

Pitiful.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

"Was Shirley Sherrod Fired from USDA for Other Reasons Than Race Speech?

By Lachlan Markay

Fri, 07/30/2010 - 17:34 ET

Is there more to the Shirley Sherrod story than the White House has let on - and the media has discovered? While the mainstream media continues to focus on the more sensationalistic, scandalous aspects of the story, a number of bloggers have unearthed facts that suggest further effort is needed to figure out Sherrod's dealings with the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Sherrod's involvement is not at all clear, nor is there definitive evidence of any wrongdoing. But Sherrod's sudden presence in the spotlight has led to investigations that turn up some strange numbers.

In short, the 2008 farm bill earmarked $1.25 billion to compensate a predicted total of 86,000 African American farmers for discriminatory practices against them. But according to the Census Bureau, there are were 39,697 African American farmers in the nation in 2007, and even fewer in previous years.

This week the Obama administration announced it does not have the funds to pay that $1.25 billion. Yet the administration also announced that it will pay $1.5 billion in relief to farmers in Arkansas, leaving some wondering whether the recall of the $1.25 billion was more a matter of choice than necessity. Story Continues Below Ad [5;

But first, some background. In 1997, 400 African American farmers sued the USDA, alleging discrimination in subsidy policy, and a range of other areas over the preceding 15 years. In the resulting court case, Pigford v. Glickman, the USDA agreed to pay $50,000 to each farmer. By then, the suit had become a class action, and USDA expected to have to pay roughly 2,000 farmers. 22,505 joined the suit.

Two years later, the USDA agreed to pay 16,000 of those farmers the agreed-upon $50,000 in compensation - just over $1 billion in total. But according to the USDA, a full 70,000 additional farmers claimed that they had submitted petitions for damages, but that those petitions were received late due to bureaucratic incompetence or poor legal representation.

The matter remained unresolved until 2008, when Sens. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and Barack Obama, D-Ill., teamed up to earmark $1.25 billion in that years farm bill to pay the outstanding claims.

But the 70,000 farmers who say they were wrongly denied damages plus the 16,000 who received $50,000 from the federal government exceeds the total 26,785 African American farmers present in the United States in 1999, and the 39,697 present today.

Then this week, seemingly out of the blue, the administration announced that it does not have the funds to pay out that $1.25 billion. Members of the Congressional Black Caucus are outraged, claiming that "if the administration can find $1.5 billion within its administrative funds to pay mostly white farmers in Arkansas and other states, it should be able to pay black farmers who suffered discrimination."

They have a point. Something sketchy is going on here.

As for Sherrod's role in the case, the farm cooperative owned by her and her husband was awarded a $13 million settlement last year, shortly before she was appointed to her post at the USDA. In addition, each of the Sherrods was paid over $150,000 for their "pain and suffering" - more than triple what was given to any other farmer, total.

All of these facts point to some sketchy practices at the USDA. Those practices, it seems, only came to light due to increased public attention given Sherrod and the USDA. Still, the mainstream media is fixated on the more sensationalist aspects of the story. It should turn its attention towards what could be a serious case of political malfeasance.

As San Francisco Chronicle columnist Willie Brown wrote on Sunday, "you don't fire someone without at least hearing their side of the story unless you want them gone in the first place."

Is the administration trying to prevent further investigation of USDA discrimination compensation policies?"

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/lachlan-markay/2010/07/30/was-shirley-sherrod-fired-usda-other- reasons-race-speech

Btw petey "insane" would be a promotion for you.

Mad Dog  posted on  2010-07-31   16:24:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: Mad Dog (#16)

LOL! You really are pitiful and ignorant petey.

Shouldn't you be out in a boat shooting down airplanes?

1.) You don't even know what "slander" is.

Sure I do. If someone were to say I am you,that would be slander.

2.) Breitbart didn't edit the tape in any way.

If he can prove that,he is in good shape. If he can't,he is in trouble. Both personally and professionally. The right doesn't need a Hay-Raldo.

3.) It isn't a crime, or illegal in any way, to be a "racist" in the USA fool.

Speaking of fools,show us all where I said it was.

sneakypete  posted on  2010-07-31   17:49:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: sneakypete (#17)

If Breitbart edited the tape. Which I don't believe he did. How exactly is that illegal?

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-31   17:59:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: A K A Stone (#18) (Edited)

Not only did he edit it, he misrepresented WHEN she made the remarks. He represented that the remarks were made about an event that occurred WHILE she worked for USDA.

As a result of his act, she suffered a material loss of employment which would be a tort of defamation.

war  posted on  2010-08-01   9:39:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: war (#32)

There you go lying again. You don't know if he edited it. You have no fucking clue. Start being honest. Say something like if he edited it. Or I think he edited it.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-08-01   9:44:16 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: A K A Stone (#33)

There you go lying again.

Fuck you asswipe.

war  posted on  2010-08-01   9:58:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 34.

#35. To: war (#34)

You were lying. You have no knowledge if he edited the tape or not. You are not an honest person.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-08-01 10:00:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 34.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com