[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

AI is exhausting the power grid. Tech firms are seeking a miracle solution.

Rare Van Halen Leicestershire, Donnington Park August 18, 1984 Valerie Bertinelli Cameo

If you need a Good Opening for black, use this.

"Arrogant Hunter Biden has never been held accountable — until now"

How Republicans in Key Senate Races Are Flip-Flopping on Abortion

Idaho bar sparks fury for declaring June 'Heterosexual Awesomeness Month' and giving free beers and 15% discounts to straight men

Son of Buc-ee’s co-owner indicted for filming guests in the shower and having sex. He says the law makes it OK.

South Africa warns US could be liable for ICC prosecution for supporting Israel

Today I turned 50!

San Diego Police officer resigns after getting locked in the backseat with female detainee

Gazan Refugee Warns the World about Hamas

Iranian stabbed for sharing his faith, miraculously made it across the border without a passport!

Protest and Clashes outside Trump's Bronx Rally in Crotona Park

Netanyahu Issues Warning To US Leaders Over ICC Arrest Warrants: 'You're Next'

Will it ever end?

Did Pope Francis Just Call Jesus a Liar?

Climate: The Movie (The Cold Truth) Updated 4K version

There can never be peace on Earth for as long as Islamic Sharia exists

The Victims of Benny Hinn: 30 Years of Spiritual Deception.

Trump Is Planning to Send Kill Teams to Mexico to Take Out Cartel Leaders

The Great Falling Away in the Church is Here | Tim Dilena

How Ridiculous? Blade-Less Swiss Army Knife Debuts As Weapon Laws Tighten

Jewish students beaten with sticks at University of Amsterdam

Terrorists shut down Park Avenue.

Police begin arresting democrats outside Met Gala.

The minute the total solar eclipse appeared over US

Three Types Of People To Mark And Avoid In The Church Today

Are The 4 Horsemen Of The Apocalypse About To Appear?

France sends combat troops to Ukraine battlefront

Facts you may not have heard about Muslims in England.

George Washington University raises the Hamas flag. American Flag has been removed.

Alabama students chant Take A Shower to the Hamas terrorists on campus.

In Day of the Lord, 24 Church Elders with Crowns Join Jesus in His Throne

In Day of the Lord, 24 Church Elders with Crowns Join Jesus in His Throne

Deadly Saltwater and Deadly Fresh Water to Increase

Deadly Cancers to soon Become Thing of the Past?

Plague of deadly New Diseases Continues

[FULL VIDEO] Police release bodycam footage of Monroe County District Attorney Sandra Doorley traffi

Police clash with pro-Palestine protesters on Ohio State University campus

Joe Rogan Experience #2138 - Tucker Carlson

Police Dispersing Student Protesters at USC - Breaking News Coverage (College Protests)

What Passover Means For The New Testament Believer

Are We Closer Than Ever To The Next Pandemic?

War in Ukraine Turns on Russia

what happened during total solar eclipse

Israel Attacks Iran, Report Says - LIVE Breaking News Coverage

Earth is Scorched with Heat

Antiwar Activists Chant ‘Death to America’ at Event Featuring Chicago Alderman

Vibe Shift

A stream that makes the pleasant Rain sound.


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: Ousted USDA Employee Sherrod Plans To Sue Breitbart
Source: ASSOCIATED PRESS
URL Source: http://rawstory.com/rs/2010/0729/ou ... e-sherrod-plans-sue-breitbart/
Published: Jul 29, 2010
Author: ASSOCIATED PRESS
Post Date: 2010-07-29 12:43:00 by Brian S
Keywords: None
Views: 47859
Comments: 88

Ousted USDA employee Shirley Sherrod says she will sue conservative blogger over edited video

Ousted Agriculture Department employee Shirley Sherrod said Thursday she will sue a conservative blogger who posted an edited video of her making racially tinged remarks last week.

Sherrod made the announcement in San Diego at the National Association of Black Journalists annual convention.

The edited video posted by Andrew Breitbart led Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack to ask her to resign, a decision he reconsidered after seeing the entire video of her March speech to a local NAACP group. In the full speech, Sherrod spoke of racial reconciliation and lessons she learned after initially hesitating to help a white farmer save his home.

Vilsack and President Barack Obama later called Sherrod to apologize for her hasty ouster. Vilsack has offered her a new job at the department, which she is still considering.

Obama said Thursday morning on ABC's daytime talk show "The View" that the incident shows racial tensions still exist in America.

"There are still inequalities out there. There's still discrimination out there," Obama said. "But we've made progress."

Obama pinned much of the blame for the incident on a media culture that he said seeks out conflict and doesn't always get the facts right. But he added, "A lot of people overreacted, including people in my administration."

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-9) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#10. To: sneakypete, Badeye (#7)

She did NOT say what the tape implied that she said.

Brietbart is in deep doo-doo if he can't prove he received the tape already edited.

Even if he can,he may be liable for slander for publishing it as her words and actions without first checking to see if it were true.

LOL!

You really are an ignorant fool petey.

"Slander is the oral communication of false statements that are harmful to a person's reputation. If the statements are proven to be true, it is a complete defense to a charge of slander. Oral opinions that don't contain statements of fact don't constitute slander. Slander is an act of communication that causes someone to be shamed, ridiculed, held in contempt, lowered in the estimation of the community, or to lose employment status or earnings or otherwise suffer a damaged reputation. Slander is a subcategory of defamation.

The basic elements of a claim of slander include; a defamatory statement; published to third parties; and which the speaker or publisher knew or should have known was false.

Slander is primarily covered under state law, but is subject to First Amendment guarantees of free speech. The scope of constitutional protection extends to statements of opinion on matters of public concern that do not contain or imply a provable factual assertion. If the slander unjustly accused you of a crime or reflected on your profession, the court or jury can assess the damages. For other types of slander you generally must prove some actual damage to be able to recover.

Slander of title is a common law tort involving a disparaging remark regarding ownership of property. It affects the owner's ability to transfer the property, resulting in a monetary loss."

definitions.uslegal.com/s/slander/

Quoted by PDS insane assholes every where.

Mad Dog  posted on  2010-07-30   16:48:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Mad Dog (#10)

You really are an ignorant fool petey.

Maybe,but at least I am not insane.

I'm not even so delusional that I think editing a tape to reflect that someone committed a crime when the truth is they didn't isn't a criminal offense in itself. She was and is not a public personality like someone in the entertainment industry,so there are limits to the lies you can publish about her.

"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)

sneakypete  posted on  2010-07-31   8:35:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Brian S (#2)

Who cares if he did edit it. It is not against the law the edit a video and distribute it. If it was then every news organization except CSpan should be sued. There is more of a case against war then Breitbart.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-31   10:02:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: sneakypete (#11)

Did you ever watch the whole video or did you just buy into the media double spin?

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-31   10:03:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: sneakypete (#11)

I'm not even so delusional that I think editing a tape to reflect that someone committed a crime when the truth is they didn't isn't a criminal offense in itself.

It is the text that introduces the edited tape stating that Sherrod committed a crime that is problematic.

lucysmom  posted on  2010-07-31   10:20:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: A K A Stone (#13)

Did you ever watch the whole video or did you just buy into the media double spin?

I not only watched the video,I watched a video of the white farmer saying she is responsible for him saving his farm and that she did everything she could do to help him.

BTW,it is NOT against the law to be a racist,regardless of what race you are. Which is a good thing,but we are all racists at one level or another. It is a perfectly natural human reaction.

What is illegal and unethical is allowing your private thoughts to influence your public actions if you are a government employee.

Individuals can be as racist as they want to be for any reason or for no reason at all. Government isn't allowed this freedom because they are supposed to represent all of us equally.

"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)

sneakypete  posted on  2010-07-31   10:53:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: sneakypete (#11)

Md; You really are an ignorant fool petey.

petey; Maybe,but at least I am not insane.

I'm not even so delusional that I think editing a tape to reflect that someone committed a crime when the truth is they didn't isn't a criminal offense in itself. She was and is not a public personality like someone in the entertainment industry,so there are limits to the lies you can publish about her.

LOL! You really are pitiful and ignorant petey.

1.) You don't even know what "slander" is.

2.) Breitbart didn't edit the tape in any way.

3.) It isn't a crime, or illegal in any way, to be a "racist" in the USA fool. If it was Sherrod and her husband and the NACCLP would be in jail not Breitbart. She was FIRED by the whitehouse without any investigation or process at all. She said so at the time fool.

4.) What "lies" FOOL?

A little hint petey, what you see on the leftstream media is usually all LIES.

IF you had the ability to think your way out of a wet paper bag you'd understand that. But you buy their cr@p hook line and sinker.

Maybe you should consider watching less TV?

Pitiful.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

"Was Shirley Sherrod Fired from USDA for Other Reasons Than Race Speech?

By Lachlan Markay

Fri, 07/30/2010 - 17:34 ET

Is there more to the Shirley Sherrod story than the White House has let on - and the media has discovered? While the mainstream media continues to focus on the more sensationalistic, scandalous aspects of the story, a number of bloggers have unearthed facts that suggest further effort is needed to figure out Sherrod's dealings with the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Sherrod's involvement is not at all clear, nor is there definitive evidence of any wrongdoing. But Sherrod's sudden presence in the spotlight has led to investigations that turn up some strange numbers.

In short, the 2008 farm bill earmarked $1.25 billion to compensate a predicted total of 86,000 African American farmers for discriminatory practices against them. But according to the Census Bureau, there are were 39,697 African American farmers in the nation in 2007, and even fewer in previous years.

This week the Obama administration announced it does not have the funds to pay that $1.25 billion. Yet the administration also announced that it will pay $1.5 billion in relief to farmers in Arkansas, leaving some wondering whether the recall of the $1.25 billion was more a matter of choice than necessity. Story Continues Below Ad [5;

But first, some background. In 1997, 400 African American farmers sued the USDA, alleging discrimination in subsidy policy, and a range of other areas over the preceding 15 years. In the resulting court case, Pigford v. Glickman, the USDA agreed to pay $50,000 to each farmer. By then, the suit had become a class action, and USDA expected to have to pay roughly 2,000 farmers. 22,505 joined the suit.

Two years later, the USDA agreed to pay 16,000 of those farmers the agreed-upon $50,000 in compensation - just over $1 billion in total. But according to the USDA, a full 70,000 additional farmers claimed that they had submitted petitions for damages, but that those petitions were received late due to bureaucratic incompetence or poor legal representation.

The matter remained unresolved until 2008, when Sens. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and Barack Obama, D-Ill., teamed up to earmark $1.25 billion in that years farm bill to pay the outstanding claims.

But the 70,000 farmers who say they were wrongly denied damages plus the 16,000 who received $50,000 from the federal government exceeds the total 26,785 African American farmers present in the United States in 1999, and the 39,697 present today.

Then this week, seemingly out of the blue, the administration announced that it does not have the funds to pay out that $1.25 billion. Members of the Congressional Black Caucus are outraged, claiming that "if the administration can find $1.5 billion within its administrative funds to pay mostly white farmers in Arkansas and other states, it should be able to pay black farmers who suffered discrimination."

They have a point. Something sketchy is going on here.

As for Sherrod's role in the case, the farm cooperative owned by her and her husband was awarded a $13 million settlement last year, shortly before she was appointed to her post at the USDA. In addition, each of the Sherrods was paid over $150,000 for their "pain and suffering" - more than triple what was given to any other farmer, total.

All of these facts point to some sketchy practices at the USDA. Those practices, it seems, only came to light due to increased public attention given Sherrod and the USDA. Still, the mainstream media is fixated on the more sensationalist aspects of the story. It should turn its attention towards what could be a serious case of political malfeasance.

As San Francisco Chronicle columnist Willie Brown wrote on Sunday, "you don't fire someone without at least hearing their side of the story unless you want them gone in the first place."

Is the administration trying to prevent further investigation of USDA discrimination compensation policies?"

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/lachlan-markay/2010/07/30/was-shirley-sherrod-fired-usda-other- reasons-race-speech

Btw petey "insane" would be a promotion for you.

Quoted by PDS insane assholes every where.

Mad Dog  posted on  2010-07-31   16:24:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: Mad Dog (#16)

LOL! You really are pitiful and ignorant petey.

Shouldn't you be out in a boat shooting down airplanes?

1.) You don't even know what "slander" is.

Sure I do. If someone were to say I am you,that would be slander.

2.) Breitbart didn't edit the tape in any way.

If he can prove that,he is in good shape. If he can't,he is in trouble. Both personally and professionally. The right doesn't need a Hay-Raldo.

3.) It isn't a crime, or illegal in any way, to be a "racist" in the USA fool.

Speaking of fools,show us all where I said it was.

"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)

sneakypete  posted on  2010-07-31   17:49:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: sneakypete (#17)

If Breitbart edited the tape. Which I don't believe he did. How exactly is that illegal?

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-31   17:59:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: sneakypete (#17)

LOL!

As usual, you have nothing FACTUAL do you little "man"? As usual.

LOL

1.) They are called "ships" you wannabe lubber a$$wipe. Shouldn't you be out making necklaces of ears and eating babies?

2.) LMAOAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! you insipid libTURD tool! Turn that TV off.

3.) No problem little "man", little "man"; "I'm not even so delusional that I think editing a tape to reflect that someone committed a crime when the truth is they didn't isn't a criminal offense in itself."

Btw little "man" double negatives make your sentences absurd and meaningless, but that's you in a nut shell isn't it little "man"?

Quoted by PDS insane assholes every where.

Mad Dog  posted on  2010-07-31   18:13:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: sneakypete (#7)

Brietbart is in deep doo-doo if he can't prove he received the tape already edited.

Even if he can,he may be liable for slander for publishing it as her words and actions without first checking to see if it were true.

Don't see it that way at all.

Tapes are released of ALL public figures ALL the time without threat of suits. That's whether it's in OR out of "context."

Sherrod's an uppity lawsuit freak and professional extortionist who deserves getting a PR pounding even more.

She is also a nasty racist; We may all be "racists," by NOT while working for gubmint.

Liberator  posted on  2010-07-31   18:21:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: A K A Stone (#18) (Edited)

If Breitbart edited the tape. Which I don't believe he did. How exactly is that illegal?

It'd have to be proven Breitbart's tape was "malicious." Not even F. Lee Bailey could prove that.

She is afterall a public figure in any case.

Liberator  posted on  2010-07-31   18:23:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: A K A Stone (#18)

If Breitbart edited the tape. Which I don't believe he did. How exactly is that illegal?

Editing the tape (any tape) isn't illegal. However,it is illegal to edit a tape in a manner that the makes it seem like the person in the tape committed a crime when the truth is they didn't.

"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)

sneakypete  posted on  2010-07-31   20:39:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: Mad Dog (#19)

1.) They are called "ships" you wannabe lubber a$$wipe.

Boat,ship,same thing. Not that it matters because I seriously doubt you made it that far in the Navy.

"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)

sneakypete  posted on  2010-07-31   20:41:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: Liberator (#20)

Tapes are released of ALL public figures ALL the time without threat of suits. That's whether it's in OR out of "context."

That's true,but they are not edited in a manner intended to defame an innocent person and make them look like they committed a federal crime. Or I guess two federal crimes,since abusing a office is a crime in itself.

She is also a nasty racist;

I agree,but so what? She rose above her personal views to do the right thing. We should all strive to do that in our lives.

"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)

sneakypete  posted on  2010-07-31   20:44:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: sneakypete (#22)

Editing the tape (any tape) isn't illegal. However,it is illegal to edit a tape in a manner that the makes it seem like the person in the tape committed a crime when the truth is they didn't.

I don't think that is illegal either. If so MSNBC should be sued for editing a tape saying tea partiers are racists. Anyhow can you shed some light on the subject by showing me the law you are talking about?

Now if someone doctored a video and presented it under oath falsely. I would agree with you.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-31   20:52:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: A K A Stone (#25)

If so MSNBC should be sued for editing a tape saying tea partiers are racists.

I agree,but they didn't do that. They aired a tape where somebody else said Tea Partiers are racists. Not the same thing. They didn't create the content.

Anyhow can you shed some light on the subject by showing me the law you are talking about?

I could if I were willing to spend a lot of time doing searches for slander trials and the US Code for misuse of office,but I have better things to do with my time. You aren't stupid and you KNOW people have been successfully sued for slander (BTW,the case of Carol Burnette comes to mind,and she was and is a actual celebrity/public person) and other cases where state and feral employees have actually gone to jail for misusing their office.

"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)

sneakypete  posted on  2010-07-31   21:03:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: sneakypete (#26)

I agree,but they didn't do that. They aired a tape where somebody else said Tea Partiers are racists.

I'll just have to disagree with you on this one. I still consider you one of the good guys though.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-31   21:12:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: sneakypete (#26)

I still don't see how this would be slander. Just because he only played part of the tape. He didn't put any words in her mouth. She spoke it.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-31   21:15:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: sneakypete (#23)

LOL!

Spoken as the truly little "man" wannabe lubber that I already know you to be petey.

You had to say something didn't you little "man" after I just b!tch slapped your ignorant a$$ down with your own words.

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Quoted by PDS insane assholes every where.

Mad Dog  posted on  2010-07-31   22:20:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: A K A Stone (#28)

I still don't see how this would be slander. Just because he only played part of the tape. He didn't put any words in her mouth. She spoke it.

Because the context made it seem like she had committed a crime.

For example,saying "Yo mama is a ho!" is not the same thing as saying "Yo mama is a ho,and you pimped her out."

"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)

sneakypete  posted on  2010-08-01   5:22:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: Mad Dog (#29)

When are you going to learn to accept yourself as you really are and come out of the closet? You will be much happier and probably even be able to get off the meds for good,but you will be able to quit overcompensating for not being a "manly man".

It ain't like you have anybody fooled.

"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)

sneakypete  posted on  2010-08-01   5:25:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: A K A Stone (#18) (Edited)

Not only did he edit it, he misrepresented WHEN she made the remarks. He represented that the remarks were made about an event that occurred WHILE she worked for USDA.

As a result of his act, she suffered a material loss of employment which would be a tort of defamation.

war  posted on  2010-08-01   9:39:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: war (#32)

There you go lying again. You don't know if he edited it. You have no fucking clue. Start being honest. Say something like if he edited it. Or I think he edited it.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-08-01   9:44:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: A K A Stone (#33)

There you go lying again.

Fuck you asswipe.

war  posted on  2010-08-01   9:58:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: war (#34)

You were lying. You have no knowledge if he edited the tape or not. You are not an honest person.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-08-01   10:00:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: sneakypete (#24)

But they are not edited in a manner intended to defame an innocent person and make them look like they committed a federal crime. Or I guess two federal crimes,since abusing a office is a crime in itself.

Sherrod's words are her own words though, aren't they? If she's abusing her office, any indictment of a "crime" is up to an investigation by the DoJ. She or other people can't just arbitrarily claim she's been "defamed," "slandered," or "libeled"....well...actually they can claim anything they want.

I agree [she's a racist] ,but so what? She rose above her personal views to do the right thing. We should all strive to do that in our lives.

My only point about that is that gubmint officials usually have to repudiate it or be fired/quit. But I guess that only applies to whites.

Liberator  posted on  2010-08-01   10:01:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: sneakypete (#30)

For example,saying "Yo mama is a ho!" is not the same thing as saying "Yo mama is a ho,and you pimped her out."

LOL...

OR, "Your mama is a ho, and you pimped her our, but she paid me."

Liberator  posted on  2010-08-01   10:08:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: war, A K A Stone (#32)

He represented that the remarks were made about an event that occurred WHILE she worked for USDA.

Nice try, Counselor. Really.

Did Sherrod work for the USDA? Was she referencing her deed and opinion to the NAACP while working for the USDA?

Um...YEP.

As a result of his act, she suffered a material loss of employment which would be a tort of defamation.

Why aren't you indicting 0bama and his Administration for her "suffering" and "material loss of employment," and for "defaming" her reputation erroneously?

Oh that's right - because you are a Kneepadded Knight in the Teabaggery Servitude of 0bama.

Liberator  posted on  2010-08-01   10:16:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: Liberator, sneakypete (#38)

From reading both of your posts. It seems that you have have a lot in common. Why attack each other. Attack the Otards.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-08-01   10:17:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: A K A Stone, dwarf (#35)

You are not an honest person.

He used to be...somewhat.

How he expects anyone not to notice he's been a 100% 0bama shill since 2008 is beyond me. And Dwarf actually claims he's (bwaahaa!) "Independent"?

Liberator  posted on  2010-08-01   10:20:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#41. To: Liberator (#38) (Edited)

Why aren't you indicting 0bama and his Administration for her "suffering" and "material loss of employment," and for "defaming" her reputation erroneously?

Because some posters are not fixated on only one topic. So your meds ran out early again? Well hopefully Monday is a payday for you.

"See in my line of work, you got to keep repeating things over and over and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the propaganda." --- George W. Bush (Rochester NY, 5-24-2005)

mininggold  posted on  2010-08-01   10:20:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#42. To: A K A Stone, sneakypete (#39)

From reading both of your posts. It seems that you have have a lot in common. Why attack each other. Attack the Otards.

Stone, we're not "attacking" each other - we're discussing our respective perspectives. We can disagree while still respecting the other's opinion.

Liberator  posted on  2010-08-01   10:24:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#43. To: mininggold (#41)

Because some posters are not fixated on only one topic.

Let me translate that for you. You think Obama isn't that bad. You think he is better the Reagan. You kind of like him.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-08-01   10:24:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#44. To: mininggold (#41)

I have to give you credit; You've actually interrupted your binge-drinking, chain-smoking, and truck-stop tricks to post this?

My, you do multi-task well.

Liberator  posted on  2010-08-01   10:26:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#45. To: A K A Stone (#39) (Edited)

From reading both of your posts. It seems that you have have a lot in common. Why attack each other. Attack the Otards.

LOLOL Why not find try to find a better solution instead of wasting time attacking anyone? I bet on this Sunday you can even find some Bible quotes backing that up as the better choice too. Even the 'United we stand divided we fall' applies here. You are all for being weak and divided.

"See in my line of work, you got to keep repeating things over and over and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the propaganda." --- George W. Bush (Rochester NY, 5-24-2005)

mininggold  posted on  2010-08-01   10:27:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#46. To: A K A Stone (#43)

Let me translate that for you. You think Obama isn't that bad.

Let me further "translate" MiningGilbey's position; She thinks 0bama is Da Bomb.

Liberator  posted on  2010-08-01   10:29:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#47. To: A K A Stone (#43)

Let me translate that for you. You think Obama isn't that bad. You think he is better the Reagan. You kind of like him.

Let me translate: You are a time waster and are easily duped and manipulated.

"See in my line of work, you got to keep repeating things over and over and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the propaganda." --- George W. Bush (Rochester NY, 5-24-2005)

mininggold  posted on  2010-08-01   10:29:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#48. To: mininggold, A K A Stone (#45)

LOLOL Why not find try to find a better solution instead of wasting time attacking anyone?

You mean....LIKE YOU??

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL....zzzzzz......

Liberator  posted on  2010-08-01   10:30:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#49. To: Liberator (#46)

Let me further "translate" MiningGilbey's position; She thinks 0bama is Da Bomb.

Why don't you find some posts to back that up. Funny, Stone is still looking but like you won't man up.

"See in my line of work, you got to keep repeating things over and over and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the propaganda." --- George W. Bush (Rochester NY, 5-24-2005)

mininggold  posted on  2010-08-01   10:32:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#50. To: mininggold, A K A Stone (#45)

I bet on this Sunday you can even find some Bible quotes backing that up as the better choice too.

"God people" really gall you, don't they? They're not your problem, YOU are your problem.

You possess the values and ethics of a slithering invertebrate.

Liberator  posted on  2010-08-01   10:33:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (51 - 88) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com