[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

DeaTh noTice ... Freerepublic --- lasT Monday JR died

"‘We Are Not the Crazy Ones’: AOC Protests Too Much"

"Rep. Comer to Newsmax: No Evidence Biden Approved Autopen Use"

"Donald Trump Has Broken the Progressive Ratchet"

"America Must Slash Red Tape to Make Nuclear Power Great Again!!"

"Why the DemocRATZ Activist Class Couldn’t Celebrate the Cease-Fire They Demanded"

Antifa Calls for CIVIL WAR!

British Police Make an Arrest...of a White Child Fishing in the Thames

"Sanctuary" Horde ASSAULTS Chicago... ELITE Marines SMASH Illegals Without Mercy

Trump hosts roundtable on ANTIFA

What's happening in Britain. Is happening in Ireland. The whole of Western Europe.

"The One About the Illegal Immigrant School Superintendent"

CouldnÂ’t believe he let me pet him at the end (Rhino)

Cops Go HANDS ON For Speaking At Meeting!

POWERFUL: Charlie Kirk's final speech delivered in South Korea 9/6/25

2026 in Bible Prophecy

2.4 Billion exposed to excessive heat

🔴 LIVE CHICAGO PORTLAND ICE IMMIGRATION DETENTION CENTER 24/7 PROTEST 9/28/2025

Young Conservative Proves Leftist Protesters Wrong

England is on the Brink of Civil War!

Charlie Kirk Shocks Florida State University With The TRUTH

IRL Confronting Protesters Outside UN Trump Meeting

The UK Revolution Has Started... Brit's Want Their Country Back

Inside Paris Dangerous ANTIFA Riots

Rioters STORM Chicago ICE HQ... "Deportation Unit" SCRAPES Invaders Off The Sidewalk

She Decoded A Specific Part In The Bible

Muslim College Student DUMBFOUNDED as Charlie Kirk Lists The Facts About Hamas

Charlie Kirk EVISCERATES Black Students After They OPENLY Support “Anti-White Racism” HEATED DEBATE

"Trump Rips U.N. as Useless During General Assembly Address: ‘Empty Words’"

Charlie Kirk VS the Wokies at University of Tennessee

Charlie Kirk Takes on 3 Professors & a Teacher

British leftist student tells Charlie Kirk facts are unfair

The 2 Billion View Video: Charlie Kirk's Most Viewed Clips of 2024

Antifa is now officially a terrorist organization.

The Greatness of Charlie Kirk: An Eyewitness Account of His Life and Martyrdom

Charlie Kirk Takes on Army of Libs at California's UCR

DR. ALVEDA KING: REST IN PEACE CHARLIE KIRK

Steven Bonnell wants to murder Americans he disagrees with

What the fagots LGBTQ really means

I watched Charlie Kirk get assassinated. This is my experience.

Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March (Tommy Robinson)

"Transcript: Mrs. Erika Kirk Delivers Public Address: ‘His Movement Will Go On’"

"Victor Davis Hanson to Newsmax: Kirk Slaying Crosses Rubicon"

Rest In Peace Charlie Kirk

Charlotte train murder: Graphic video captures random fatal stabbing of young Ukrainian refugee

Berlin in July 1945 - Probably the best restored film material you'll watch from that time!

Ok this is Funny

Walking Through 1980s Los Angeles: The City That Reinvented Cool

THE ZOMBIES OF AMERICA

THE OLDEST PHOTOS OF NEW YORK YOU'VE NEVER SEEN


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

LEFT WING LOONS
See other LEFT WING LOONS Articles

Title: Afghan Wikileaks 'could put lives at risk'
Source: abc.net.au
URL Source: http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/07/27/2964951.htm
Published: Jul 28, 2010
Author: Kim Landers
Post Date: 2010-07-28 17:44:47 by WhiteSands
Ping List: *WikiLeak - Jon Pollard Fans*     Subscribe to *WikiLeak - Jon Pollard Fans*
Keywords: WikiLeaks, Jonatan Pollard, Spies
Views: 1368
Comments: 2

The United States says the release of tens of thousands of secret documents about the Afghanistan war breaches federal law and potentially threatens national security.

The 91,000 classified documents, released by the self-described whistleblower organisation Wikileaks, paint a grim picture of the conflict and the apparent double-dealing of the Pakistan military.

Spanning a six-year period, they reveal details of assassination plots, field intelligence, Pakistan's alleged support for the Taliban, and previously unreported civilian deaths during the period George W Bush was in office.

There is reportedly even a reference to a plot to poison Western troops' beer supplies.

The US has condemned the leaks, with the White House saying they could threaten national security and endanger American lives. The source of the leaks has not been confirmed and the Pentagon says it could take days or weeks to assess the damage that has been caused.

The previously secret documents also include several references to Australian forces.

They include: A July 2006 attack where an Australian and Danish soldier were injured, possibly by friendly fire, when their fortified position collapsed; A December 2008 mortar engagement with insurgents that left an Australian soldier wounded; and an account of children being taken to hospital after Australian soldiers fired at a car at a checkpoint.

There is also a report that in early April 2007, a senior Australian Defence official advised that the then-Howard government was planning to nearly double the number of Australian defence personnel in Uruzgan province from 500 to 1,000.

The report mentions that the Australian government was not planning to announce the new deployment for another five days, and the Australian official asks the US not to publicly mention it.

Wikileaks founder Julian Assange says another reference to Australia involves an escalation of force by Australian troops.

"A shooting passing a convoy as an example, but I haven't looked at that material in detail so I'm not qualified to speak about it, but there are a number of reports that concern Australian troops," he said.

The files cover many different aspects of the almost nine-year-old war, including the Taliban's use of heat-seeking anti-aircraft missiles.

Mr Assange says there are another 15,000 files on Afghanistan which are still being vetted by his organisation.

The Obama administration is furious.

"It poses a very real and potential threat to those that are working hard every day to keep us safe," White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said.

Mr Gibbs says the release is illegal and a breach of national security, and insists there is nothing new in the documents.

"What generally governs the classification of these documents are names, operations, personnel, people that are cooperating, all of which, if it's compromised, has a compromising effect on our security," he said.

The Pentagon is scrambling to assess the damage done caused by the leak.

A spokesman says the review could take "days if not weeks". Subscribe to *WikiLeak - Jon Pollard Fans*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: WhiteSands (#0)

Hopefully, the lives put at risk are the demented neo-commies who agitated for war in the middle east long before 9/11.

jwpegler  posted on  2010-07-28   18:01:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: WhiteSands (#0)

Bullshit. Cheney/SS/NORAD(STILL no comprehensive TimeLine;}/Mossad put lives at risk.

IRaq/Afghanistan had NOTHING to do with 911.

Appealing to national traditions of fair play in the conduct of news reporting misunderstands what Wikileaks is about: the release of information without regard for national interest. In media history up to now, the press is free to report on what the powerful wish to keep secret because the laws of a given nation protect it. But Wikileaks is able to report on what the powerful wish to keep secret because the logic of the Internet permits it. This is new. Just as the Internet has no terrestrial address or central office, neither does Wikileaks.

5. And just as government doesn’t know what to make of Wikileaks (“we’re gonna hunt you down/hey, you didn’t contact us!”) the traditional press isn’t used to this, either. As Glenn Thrush noted on Politico.com:

The WikiLeaks report presented a unique dilemma to the three papers given advance copies of the 92,000 reports included in the Afghan war logs — the New York Times, Germany’s Der Speigel and the UK’s Guardian.

The editors couldn’t verify the source of the reports — as they would have done if their own staffers had obtained them — and they couldn’t stop WikiLeaks from posting it, whether they wrote about it or not.

So they were basically left with proving veracity through official sources and picking through the pile for the bits that seemed to be the most truthful.

Notice how effective this combination is.

mcgowanjm  posted on  2010-07-29   9:15:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com