[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

America Erupts… ICE Raids Takeover The Streets

AC/DC- Riff Raff + Go Down [VH1 Uncut, July 5, 1996]

Why is Peter Schiff calling Bitcoin a ‘giant cult’ and how does this impact market sentiment?

Esso Your Butt Buddy Horseshit jacks off to that shit

"The Addled Activist Mind"

"Don’t Stop with Harvard"

"Does the Biden Cover-Up Have Two Layers?"

"Pete Rose, 'Shoeless' Joe Reinstated by MLB, Eligible for HOF"

"'Major Breakthrough': Here Are the Details on the China Trade Deal"

Freepers Still Love war

Parody ... Jump / Trump --- van Halen jump

"The Democrat Meltdown Continues"

"Yes, We Need Deportations Without Due Process"

"Trump's Tariff Play Smart, Strategic, Working"

"Leftists Make Desperate Attempt to Discredit Photo of Abrego Garcia's MS-13 Tattoos. Here Are Receipts"

"Trump Administration Freezes $2 Billion After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands"on After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands

"Doctors Committing Insurance Fraud to Conceal Trans Procedures, Texas Children’s Whistleblower Testifies"

"Left Using '8647' Symbol for Violence Against Trump, Musk"

KawasakiÂ’s new rideable robohorse is straight out of a sci-fi novel

"Trade should work for America, not rule it"

"The Stakes Couldn’t Be Higher in Wisconsin’s Supreme Court Race – What’s at Risk for the GOP"

"How Trump caught big-government fans in their own trap"

‘Are You Prepared for Violence?’

Greek Orthodox Archbishop gives President Trump a Cross, tells him "Make America Invincible"

"Trump signs executive order eliminating the Department of Education!!!"

"If AOC Is the Democratic Future, the Party Is Even Worse Off Than We Think"

"Ending EPA Overreach"

Closest Look Ever at How Pyramids Were Built

Moment the SpaceX crew Meets Stranded ISS Crew

The Exodus Pharaoh EXPLAINED!

Did the Israelites Really Cross the Red Sea? Stunning Evidence of the Location of Red Sea Crossing!

Are we experiencing a Triumph of Orthodoxy?

Judge Napolitano with Konstantin Malofeev (Moscow, Russia)

"Trump Administration Cancels Most USAID Programs, Folds Others into State Department"

Introducing Manus: The General AI Agent

"Chinese Spies in Our Military? Straight to Jail"

Any suggestion that the USA and NATO are "Helping" or have ever helped Ukraine needs to be shot down instantly

"Real problem with the Palestinians: Nobody wants them"

ACDC & The Rolling Stones - Rock Me Baby

Magnus Carlsen gives a London System lesson!

"The Democrats Are Suffering Through a Drought of Generational Talent"

7 Tactics Of The Enemy To Weaken Your Faith

Strange And Biblical Events Are Happening

Every year ... BusiesT casino gambling day -- in Las Vegas

Trump’s DOGE Plan Is Legally Untouchable—Elon Musk Holds the Scalpel

Palestinians: What do you think of the Trump plan for Gaza?

What Happens Inside Gaza’s Secret Tunnels? | Unpacked

Hamas Torture Bodycam Footage: "These Monsters Filmed it All" | IDF Warfighter Doron Keidar, Ep. 225

EXPOSED: The Dark Truth About the Hostages in Gaza

New Task Force Ready To Expose Dark Secrets


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

LEFT WING LOONS
See other LEFT WING LOONS Articles

Title: Afghan Wikileaks 'could put lives at risk'
Source: abc.net.au
URL Source: http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/07/27/2964951.htm
Published: Jul 28, 2010
Author: Kim Landers
Post Date: 2010-07-28 17:44:47 by WhiteSands
Ping List: *WikiLeak - Jon Pollard Fans*     Subscribe to *WikiLeak - Jon Pollard Fans*
Keywords: WikiLeaks, Jonatan Pollard, Spies
Views: 1227
Comments: 2

The United States says the release of tens of thousands of secret documents about the Afghanistan war breaches federal law and potentially threatens national security.

The 91,000 classified documents, released by the self-described whistleblower organisation Wikileaks, paint a grim picture of the conflict and the apparent double-dealing of the Pakistan military.

Spanning a six-year period, they reveal details of assassination plots, field intelligence, Pakistan's alleged support for the Taliban, and previously unreported civilian deaths during the period George W Bush was in office.

There is reportedly even a reference to a plot to poison Western troops' beer supplies.

The US has condemned the leaks, with the White House saying they could threaten national security and endanger American lives. The source of the leaks has not been confirmed and the Pentagon says it could take days or weeks to assess the damage that has been caused.

The previously secret documents also include several references to Australian forces.

They include: A July 2006 attack where an Australian and Danish soldier were injured, possibly by friendly fire, when their fortified position collapsed; A December 2008 mortar engagement with insurgents that left an Australian soldier wounded; and an account of children being taken to hospital after Australian soldiers fired at a car at a checkpoint.

There is also a report that in early April 2007, a senior Australian Defence official advised that the then-Howard government was planning to nearly double the number of Australian defence personnel in Uruzgan province from 500 to 1,000.

The report mentions that the Australian government was not planning to announce the new deployment for another five days, and the Australian official asks the US not to publicly mention it.

Wikileaks founder Julian Assange says another reference to Australia involves an escalation of force by Australian troops.

"A shooting passing a convoy as an example, but I haven't looked at that material in detail so I'm not qualified to speak about it, but there are a number of reports that concern Australian troops," he said.

The files cover many different aspects of the almost nine-year-old war, including the Taliban's use of heat-seeking anti-aircraft missiles.

Mr Assange says there are another 15,000 files on Afghanistan which are still being vetted by his organisation.

The Obama administration is furious.

"It poses a very real and potential threat to those that are working hard every day to keep us safe," White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said.

Mr Gibbs says the release is illegal and a breach of national security, and insists there is nothing new in the documents.

"What generally governs the classification of these documents are names, operations, personnel, people that are cooperating, all of which, if it's compromised, has a compromising effect on our security," he said.

The Pentagon is scrambling to assess the damage done caused by the leak.

A spokesman says the review could take "days if not weeks". Subscribe to *WikiLeak - Jon Pollard Fans*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: WhiteSands (#0)

Hopefully, the lives put at risk are the demented neo-commies who agitated for war in the middle east long before 9/11.

jwpegler  posted on  2010-07-28   18:01:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: WhiteSands (#0)

Bullshit. Cheney/SS/NORAD(STILL no comprehensive TimeLine;}/Mossad put lives at risk.

IRaq/Afghanistan had NOTHING to do with 911.

Appealing to national traditions of fair play in the conduct of news reporting misunderstands what Wikileaks is about: the release of information without regard for national interest. In media history up to now, the press is free to report on what the powerful wish to keep secret because the laws of a given nation protect it. But Wikileaks is able to report on what the powerful wish to keep secret because the logic of the Internet permits it. This is new. Just as the Internet has no terrestrial address or central office, neither does Wikileaks.

5. And just as government doesn’t know what to make of Wikileaks (“we’re gonna hunt you down/hey, you didn’t contact us!”) the traditional press isn’t used to this, either. As Glenn Thrush noted on Politico.com:

The WikiLeaks report presented a unique dilemma to the three papers given advance copies of the 92,000 reports included in the Afghan war logs — the New York Times, Germany’s Der Speigel and the UK’s Guardian.

The editors couldn’t verify the source of the reports — as they would have done if their own staffers had obtained them — and they couldn’t stop WikiLeaks from posting it, whether they wrote about it or not.

So they were basically left with proving veracity through official sources and picking through the pile for the bits that seemed to be the most truthful.

Notice how effective this combination is.

mcgowanjm  posted on  2010-07-29   9:15:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com