[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"International court’s attack on Israel a sign of the free world’s moral collapse"

"Pete Hegseth Is Right for the DOD"

"Why Our Constitution Secures Liberty, Not Democracy"

Woodworking and Construction Hacks

"CNN: Reporters Were Crying and Hugging in the Hallways After Learning of Matt Gaetz's AG Nomination"

"NEW: Democrat Officials Move to Steal the Senate Race in Pennsylvania, Admit to Breaking the Law"

"Pete Hegseth Is a Disruptive Choice for Secretary of Defense. That’s a Good Thing"

Katie Britt will vote with the McConnell machine

Battle for Senate leader heats up — Hit pieces coming from Thune and Cornyn.

After Trump’s Victory, There Can Be No Unity Without A Reckoning

Vivek Ramaswamy, Dark-horse Secretary of State Candidate

Megyn Kelly has a message for Democrats. Wait for the ending.

Trump to choose Tom Homan as his “Border Czar”

"Trump Shows Demography Isn’t Destiny"

"Democrats Get a Wake-Up Call about How Unpopular Their Agenda Really Is"

Live Election Map with ticker shows every winner.

Megyn Kelly Joins Trump at His Final PA Rally of 2024 and Explains Why She's Supporting Him

South Carolina Lawmaker at Trump Rally Highlights Story of 3-Year-Old Maddie Hines, Killed by Illegal Alien

GOP Demands Biden, Harris Launch Probe into Twice-Deported Illegal Alien Accused of Killing Grayson Davis

Previously-Deported Illegal Charged With Killing Arkansas Children’s Hospital Nurse in Horror DUI Crash

New Data on Migrant Crime Rates Raises Eyebrows, Alarms

Thousands of 'potentially fraudulent voter registration applications' Uncovered, Stopped in Pennsylvania

Michigan Will Count Ballot of Chinese National Charged with Voting Illegally

"It Did Occur" - Kentucky County Clerk Confirms Voting Booth 'Glitch'' Shifted Trump Votes To Kamala

Legendary Astronaut Buzz Aldrin 'wholeheartedly' Endorses Donald Trump

Liberal Icon Naomi Wolf Endorses Trump: 'He's Being More Inclusive'

(Washed Up Has Been) Singer Joni Mitchell Screams 'F*** Trump' at Hollywood Bowl

"Analysis: The Final State of the Presidential Race"

He’ll, You Pieces of Garbage

The Future of Warfare -- No more martyrdom!

"Kamala’s Inane Talking Points"

"The Harris Campaign Is Testament to the Toxicity of Woke Politics"

Easy Drywall Patch

Israel Preparing NEW Iran Strike? Iran Vows “Unimaginable” Response | Watchman Newscast

In Logansport, Indiana, Kids are Being Pushed Out of Schools After Migrants Swelled County’s Population by 30%: "Everybody else is falling behind"

Exclusive — Bernie Moreno: We Spend $110,000 Per Illegal Migrant Per Year, More than Twice What ‘the Average American Makes’

Florida County: 41 of 45 People Arrested for Looting after Hurricanes Helene and Milton are Noncitizens

Presidential race: Is a Split Ticket the only Answer?

hurricanes and heat waves are Worse

'Backbone of Iran's missile industry' destroyed by IAF strikes on Islamic Republic

Joe Rogan Experience #2219 - Donald Trump

IDF raids Hezbollah Radwan Forces underground bases, discovers massive cache of weapons

Gallant: ‘After we strike in Iran,’ the world will understand all of our training

The Atlantic Hit Piece On Trump Is A Psy-Op To Justify Post-Election Violence If Harris Loses

Six Al Jazeera journalists are Hamas, PIJ terrorists

Judge Aileen Cannon, who tossed Trump's classified docs case, on list of proposed candidates for attorney general

Iran's Assassination Program in Europe: Europe Goes Back to Sleep

Susan Olsen says Brady Bunch revival was cancelled because she’s MAGA.

Foreign Invaders crisis cost $150B in 2023, forcing some areas to cut police and fire services: report

Israel kills head of Hezbollah Intelligence.


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

U.S. Constitution
See other U.S. Constitution Articles

Title: Judge Blocks Parts Of Arizona Immigration Law
Source: ASSOCIATED PRESS
URL Source: http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/storie ... AULT&CTIME=2010-07-28-13-16-54
Published: Jul 28, 2010
Author: ASSOCIATED PRESS
Post Date: 2010-07-28 13:20:25 by Brian S
Keywords: None
Views: 38021
Comments: 70

PHOENIX (AP) -- A judge has blocked the most controversial sections of Arizona's new immigration law from taking effect Thursday, handing a major legal victory to opponents of the crackdown.

The law will still take effect Thursday, but without many of the provisions that angered opponents - including sections that required officers to check a person's immigration status while enforcing other laws. The judge also put on hold a part of the law that required immigrants to carry their papers at all times, and made it illegal for undocumented workers to solicit employment in public places.

U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton put those controversial sections on hold until the courts resolve the issues.

Opponents say the law will lead to racial profiling and is trumped by federal immigration law.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Brian S (#0)

This judge was a Klintoon nominee, enough said.

We need to start disbarment against these judges and half the Supreme Court.

Is it time to take out the trash? Post Date: 2010-07-14 11:48:27 by A K A Stone We know who you mean.

reaganisright  posted on  2010-07-28   13:33:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Brian S (#0)

The judge also put on hold a part of the law that required immigrants to carry their papers at all times,

Typical Clinton Appointee ignoramus.

Federal law has for decades required all immigrants to carry their immigration papers on them and present them to LEOs upon request.

What a dumb bitch this woman is.

Being a Democratic shill means you check your humanity at the door.

Nebuchadnezzar  posted on  2010-07-28   13:34:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Brian S (#0)

Arizona is simply going to rewrite and reenact those portions of the law struck down.

no gnu taxes  posted on  2010-07-28   13:39:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#2)

What a dumb bitch this woman is.

I hate to tell you this but most are, just don't tell them, it gets in the way of getting laid.

Is it time to take out the trash? Post Date: 2010-07-14 11:48:27 by A K A Stone We know who you mean.

reaganisright  posted on  2010-07-28   13:40:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Brian S (#0)

Saw this one coming.

Not good news, though.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Meet the new boss Same as the old boss

The last gasp of a dying Republic is a "living, breathing Constitution."

Ignore Amos  posted on  2010-07-28   13:43:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#2)

Federal law has for decades required all immigrants to carry their immigration papers on them and present them to LEOs upon request.

Can Arizona pass the federal budget?

war  posted on  2010-07-28   13:46:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#2)

Federal law has for decades required all immigrants to carry their immigration papers on them and present them to LEOs upon request.

How do the LEOs tell the difference between immigrants the citizens without seeing papers?

lucysmom  posted on  2010-07-28   13:47:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Pan-Z-Boy (#4)

I hate to tell you this but most are, just don't tell them, it gets in the way of getting laid.

Such sage advice from such an obvious smoker of pole...

war  posted on  2010-07-28   13:49:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: war (#6)

Federal law has for decades required all immigrants to carry their immigration papers on them and present them to LEOs upon request.

Can a state LEO make an arrest for a violation of a federal law such as a Class III firearm?

Being a Democratic shill means you check your humanity at the door.

Nebuchadnezzar  posted on  2010-07-28   14:02:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: lucysmom, *Border Invasion* (#7)

How do the LEOs tell the difference between immigrants the citizens without seeing papers?


It's so easy, even a liberal could figure it out.

Hondo68  posted on  2010-07-28   14:02:42 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#9)

Yep.

Do you know why?

war  posted on  2010-07-28   14:03:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: war (#11)

Yep.

Do you know why?

Because it's against the law? Why not share with us, okay?

Being a Democratic shill means you check your humanity at the door.

Nebuchadnezzar  posted on  2010-07-28   14:08:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#12) (Edited)

Because it's against the law?

Provisions under the US Code pertaining to firearms allow local authorities to enforce criminal provisions of it.

No such empowerment exists in immigration law. Nor is it a "crime" for someone to be here undocumented. It does make them subject to detention and deportation.

war  posted on  2010-07-28   14:15:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: hondo68 (#10)

It's so easy, even a liberal could figure it out.

Apparently not because a friend's Native American co-worker carries a copy of his military discharge papers on the dashboard of his car for just those special occasions. According to him the law isn't aimed at immigrants per se, but at people who look Indian.

Do LEOs have a right to demand papers from natural born US citizens while hoping to nail an illegal immigrant?

lucysmom  posted on  2010-07-28   14:20:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: war (#13)

No such empowerment exists in immigration law. Nor is it a "crime" for someone to be here undocumented. It does make them subject to detention and deportation.

It's a misdemeanor. You know that.

I bring your attention to this pdf:

http://trac.syr.edu/immigration/library/P48.pdf

Their contention is that it is permissible for local LEOs to inquire about immigration status.

Being a Democratic shill means you check your humanity at the door.

Nebuchadnezzar  posted on  2010-07-28   14:26:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#15) (Edited)

It's a misdemeanor. You know that.

Illegal entry is a misdemeanor. Being here is a civil/adminstrative violation.

war  posted on  2010-07-28   14:40:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: war (#16)

Illegal entry is a misdemeanor. Being here is a civil/adminstrative violation.

I don't know about that. I know in California there is a law which says when you go out you have to present ID, immigrant or citizen to a LEO.

This sounds like the Judge had a political axe to grind like Felzer did in 1994.

To do so in California (not have id) means you go to jail.

Being a Democratic shill means you check your humanity at the door.

Nebuchadnezzar  posted on  2010-07-28   14:57:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Brian S (#0)

(chuckle)

You on the Left are going to pay a terrific price for this insanity come November.

Obama's first all-by-his-lonesome budget, btw, calls for a $1.17 trillion deficit.

Badeye  posted on  2010-07-28   15:17:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#17)

You have to have ID just about every where...

Freedom...

war  posted on  2010-07-28   15:27:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Brian S (#0)

The DNC has to have open borders in order to survive.

-----------------------------------------------------------
Toss: ADL,CAIR and the Vatican into the pit they belong in.

WhiteSands  posted on  2010-07-28   15:34:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: reaganisright (#1)

We need to start disbarment against these judges and half the Supreme Court.

Yup,although you can't disbar or remove a sitting judge from the SC unless you have evidence enough to convict him or her of treason or some other serious federal felony. Lifetime appointments.

"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)

sneakypete  posted on  2010-07-28   15:37:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: Badeye (#18)

You on the Left are going to pay a terrific price for this insanity come November.

Yes, the Democrats and Republicans will be severely punished in the upcoming elections.

They'll eventually merge into one open borders, globalist, anti-American, neo-liberal party.

Hondo68  posted on  2010-07-28   15:41:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: lucysmom (#14)

According to him the law isn't aimed at immigrants per se, but at people who look Indian.

Wow! I hope he doesn't say this in front of the His and Her Panics because if he does they will jump him. "Hispanic" is a word that means "Direct descendent of a Castillian Don and don't have the tiniest speck of Indian blood in me,dammit!"

"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)

sneakypete  posted on  2010-07-28   15:42:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: sneakypete (#21)

A president can be impeached and removed from office for "high crimes or misdemeanors", which the second part means lack of character.

Klintoon was impeached and should have been removed for this reason. The RATS said they wouldn't vote for conviction if he was caught raping a Boy Scout on the front lawn of the WH.

Happy 100th to the BS.

Is it time to take out the trash? Post Date: 2010-07-14 11:48:27 by A K A Stone We know who you mean.

reaganisright  posted on  2010-07-28   16:07:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: Pan-Z-Boy (#24)

...which the second part means lack of character.

No it doesn't.

war  posted on  2010-07-28   16:10:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: reaganisright (#24)

A president can be impeached and removed from office for "high crimes or misdemeanors", which the second part means lack of character.

For all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God.

lucysmom  posted on  2010-07-28   17:14:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: war (#19)

You have to have ID just about every where...

Freedom...

So citizens have to prove their identity, but illegals don't.

Thanks for the clarification.

Being a Democratic shill means you check your humanity at the door.

Nebuchadnezzar  posted on  2010-07-28   17:31:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: war (#25)

No it doesn't.

Can a President be impeached for lying to the American people?

Being a Democratic shill means you check your humanity at the door.

Nebuchadnezzar  posted on  2010-07-28   18:48:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#28)

No.

war  posted on  2010-07-28   20:08:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#27)

So citizens have to prove their identity, but illegals don't.

Identity and immigration/citizenship status are two different issues.

But you know that.

war  posted on  2010-07-28   20:09:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: war (#29)

No.

You're kidding, right? You're saying that you can't be impeached for lying to the American public????

Being a Democratic shill means you check your humanity at the door.

Nebuchadnezzar  posted on  2010-07-28   20:32:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#31)

Yep. That's what I am saying.

war  posted on  2010-07-28   20:46:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: reaganisright (#24)

A president can be impeached and removed from office for "high crimes or misdemeanors", which the second part means lack of character.

Yes,but as Clinton/Bush 2.0 proved beyond all doubt,it ain't going to happen.

Besides,we were talking about appointees with life time appointments,not a term- limited elected official.

"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)

sneakypete  posted on  2010-07-28   21:00:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#27)

So citizens have to prove their identity, but illegals don't.

Yup.

Did you know that convicted felons can't be charged with lying when they fill out the federal form to buy a weapons because if they told the truth they would be giving evidence against themselves?

Yet,you or I would go to jail for lying on Form 4473.

"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)

sneakypete  posted on  2010-07-28   21:02:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: Nebuchadnezzar, war (#31)

You're kidding, right? You're saying that you can't be impeached for lying to the American public????

war is playing his typical Di......,er,"Independent" games.

ALL presidents lie to the American people. It's even a job requirement. They have to lie to protect national interests at times. This does NOT mean they can lie under oath. That IS an impeachable offense.

The above does not apply to Dim presidents. They can lie under oath all they want.

"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)

sneakypete  posted on  2010-07-28   21:06:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: war (#32)

Yep. That's what I am saying.

You're so wrong it's laughable.

You had better go back and study US Civics 101 War because you either slept through class or smoked a lot of pot.

Being a Democratic shill means you check your humanity at the door.

Nebuchadnezzar  posted on  2010-07-28   23:14:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#36) (Edited)

You're so wrong it's laughable.

The grounds for impeachment were debated in Annapolis. If you believe that "lying" is grounds for impeachment, do you care to explain why "malfeasance", which is far more egregious behavior than simply lying, was specifically rejected as grounds for impeachment?

war  posted on  2010-07-29   8:13:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: war (#37)

War. You're pretty worthless. If they have the votes they can impeach for any reason they want. No one can do anything about it.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-29   8:16:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: A K A Stone (#38)

If they have the votes they can impeach for any reason they want.

There is a reason why impeachment is in the House and the trial is in the Senate.

And we saw what happened to House members who impeached for any reason they wanted. Almost all of them got their asses thrown out in 2000.

war  posted on  2010-07-29   8:28:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: war (#39)

Clinton deserved to be impeached and removed. Your description of what happened afterward is not accurate. The whole house voted against him. More then half kept their jobs. Almost all of them did. Honesty isn't in you.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-29   8:38:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (41 - 70) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com