U.S. Constitution
See other U.S. Constitution Articles
Title: Judge Blocks Parts Of Arizona Immigration Law
Source:
ASSOCIATED PRESS
URL Source: http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/storie ... AULT&CTIME=2010-07-28-13-16-54
Published: Jul 28, 2010
Author: ASSOCIATED PRESS
Post Date: 2010-07-28 13:20:25 by Brian S
Keywords: None
Views: 36722
Comments: 70
PHOENIX (AP) -- A judge has blocked the most controversial sections of Arizona's new immigration law from taking effect Thursday, handing a major legal victory to opponents of the crackdown. The law will still take effect Thursday, but without many of the provisions that angered opponents - including sections that required officers to check a person's immigration status while enforcing other laws. The judge also put on hold a part of the law that required immigrants to carry their papers at all times, and made it illegal for undocumented workers to solicit employment in public places. U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton put those controversial sections on hold until the courts resolve the issues. Opponents say the law will lead to racial profiling and is trumped by federal immigration law.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Brian S (#0)
This judge was a Klintoon nominee, enough said. We need to start disbarment against these judges and half the Supreme Court.
Is it time to take out the trash? Post Date: 2010-07-14 11:48:27 by A K A Stone We know who you mean.
Typical Clinton Appointee ignoramus. Federal law has for decades required all immigrants to carry their immigration papers on them and present them to LEOs upon request. What a dumb bitch this woman is.
Being a Democratic shill means you check your humanity at the door.
Arizona is simply going to rewrite and reenact those portions of the law struck down.
I hate to tell you this but most are, just don't tell them, it gets in the way of getting laid.
Is it time to take out the trash? Post Date: 2010-07-14 11:48:27 by A K A Stone We know who you mean.
Saw this one coming. Not good news, though.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Meet the new boss The last gasp of a dying Republic is a "living, breathing Constitution."
Can Arizona pass the federal budget?
How do the LEOs tell the difference between immigrants the citizens without seeing papers?
Such sage advice from such an obvious smoker of pole...
Can a state LEO make an arrest for a violation of a federal law such as a Class III firearm?
Being a Democratic shill means you check your humanity at the door.
Yep. Do you know why?
Do you know why? Because it's against the law? Why not share with us, okay?
Being a Democratic shill means you check your humanity at the door.
Provisions under the US Code pertaining to firearms allow local authorities to enforce criminal provisions of it. No such empowerment exists in immigration law. Nor is it a "crime" for someone to be here undocumented. It does make them subject to detention and deportation.
Apparently not because a friend's Native American co-worker carries a copy of his military discharge papers on the dashboard of his car for just those special occasions. According to him the law isn't aimed at immigrants per se, but at people who look Indian. Do LEOs have a right to demand papers from natural born US citizens while hoping to nail an illegal immigrant?
It's a misdemeanor. You know that. I bring your attention to this pdf: http://trac.syr.edu/immigration/library/P48.pdf Their contention is that it is permissible for local LEOs to inquire about immigration status.
Being a Democratic shill means you check your humanity at the door.
Illegal entry is a misdemeanor. Being here is a civil/adminstrative violation.
I don't know about that. I know in California there is a law which says when you go out you have to present ID, immigrant or citizen to a LEO. This sounds like the Judge had a political axe to grind like Felzer did in 1994. To do so in California (not have id) means you go to jail.
Being a Democratic shill means you check your humanity at the door.
(chuckle) You on the Left are going to pay a terrific price for this insanity come November.
Obama's first all-by-his-lonesome budget, btw, calls for a $1.17 trillion deficit.
You have to have ID just about every where... Freedom...
The DNC has to have open borders in order to survive.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Yup,although you can't disbar or remove a sitting judge from the SC unless you have evidence enough to convict him or her of treason or some other serious federal felony. Lifetime appointments.
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
Yes, the Democrats and Republicans will be severely punished in the upcoming elections. They'll eventually merge into one open borders, globalist, anti-American, neo-liberal party.
Wow! I hope he doesn't say this in front of the His and Her Panics because if he does they will jump him. "Hispanic" is a word that means "Direct descendent of a Castillian Don and don't have the tiniest speck of Indian blood in me,dammit!"
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
A president can be impeached and removed from office for "high crimes or misdemeanors", which the second part means lack of character. Klintoon was impeached and should have been removed for this reason. The RATS said they wouldn't vote for conviction if he was caught raping a Boy Scout on the front lawn of the WH. Happy 100th to the BS.
Is it time to take out the trash? Post Date: 2010-07-14 11:48:27 by A K A Stone We know who you mean.
No it doesn't.
For all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God.
Freedom... So citizens have to prove their identity, but illegals don't. Thanks for the clarification.
Being a Democratic shill means you check your humanity at the door.
Can a President be impeached for lying to the American people?
Being a Democratic shill means you check your humanity at the door.
No.
Identity and immigration/citizenship status are two different issues. But you know that.
You're kidding, right? You're saying that you can't be impeached for lying to the American public????
Being a Democratic shill means you check your humanity at the door.
Yep. That's what I am saying.
Yes,but as Clinton/Bush 2.0 proved beyond all doubt,it ain't going to happen. Besides,we were talking about appointees with life time appointments,not a term- limited elected official.
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
Yup. Did you know that convicted felons can't be charged with lying when they fill out the federal form to buy a weapons because if they told the truth they would be giving evidence against themselves? Yet,you or I would go to jail for lying on Form 4473.
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
war is playing his typical Di......,er,"Independent" games. ALL presidents lie to the American people. It's even a job requirement. They have to lie to protect national interests at times. This does NOT mean they can lie under oath. That IS an impeachable offense. The above does not apply to Dim presidents. They can lie under oath all they want.
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
You're so wrong it's laughable. You had better go back and study US Civics 101 War because you either slept through class or smoked a lot of pot.
Being a Democratic shill means you check your humanity at the door.
The grounds for impeachment were debated in Annapolis. If you believe that "lying" is grounds for impeachment, do you care to explain why "malfeasance", which is far more egregious behavior than simply lying, was specifically rejected as grounds for impeachment?
War. You're pretty worthless. If they have the votes they can impeach for any reason they want. No one can do anything about it.
There is a reason why impeachment is in the House and the trial is in the Senate. And we saw what happened to House members who impeached for any reason they wanted. Almost all of them got their asses thrown out in 2000.
Clinton deserved to be impeached and removed. Your description of what happened afterward is not accurate. The whole house voted against him. More then half kept their jobs. Almost all of them did. Honesty isn't in you.
The prosecutors couldn't even pin down exactly WHERE he committed perjury. Was it in the Jones case or before the Grand Jury? Without looking it up, I'll bet you don't even know.
Honesty isn't in you. Fuck you, asswipe.
You did lie. Or admit you are stupid. You said most people who voted for impeachment were defeated. So that would mean that in 2000 the R's would have lost at least half their seats plus one and the same in the senate. It didn't happen. Were you lying or are you stupid or are you really stupid and still deny the obvious?
It was a misstatement...I meant House managers...not members... But fuck you anyway.
Clinton was impeached on December 19, 1998, by the House of Representatives on grounds of perjury to a grand jury (by a 228-206 vote) and obstruction of justice (by a 221-212 vote). Two other articles of impeachment failed — a second count of perjury in the Jones case (by a 205-229 vote) and one accusing Clinton of abuse of power (by a 148- 285 vote). That hardly constitutes the entire House voting against him.
Are you sure you don't want the spinner name back? Hmm spinner?
All of the R's I mean. Or all minus 1 or something like that.
No gnu taxes claimed the other day that Bobby Jindal had a PhD by the age of 20. That was an obvious lie. What was also obvious is that you were nowhere to be found to call him out on the lie.
Liar.
That was an obvious lie. What was also obvious is that you were nowhere to be found to call him out on the lie. It wasn't an obvious lie. I don't even know that it was a lie. I don't know if he had one at age 20 or has one now or never had one. I don't care either. But I did know something about the impeachment vote.
Not from anything that you've posted here is that apparent.
I don't see THAT happening, not yet anyway.
Obama's first all-by-his-lonesome budget, btw, calls for a $1.17 trillion deficit.
Someone tells you that a person has a PhD by age 20 and you're not even slightly skeptical? I have this bridge...
Truthfully war? You have a bridge? Honestly?
Yep...and my colleague from Senagal will be sending you an offering letter very, very soon.
Article 1's impeachment proceedings against Richard Nixon. 8.making or causing to be made false or misleading public statements for the purpose of deceiving the people of the United States into believing that a thorough and complete investigation had been conducted with respect to allegations of misconduct on the part of personnel of the executive branch of the United States and personnel of the Committee for the Re-election of the President, and that there was no involvement of such personnel in such misconduct: or Nixon lied, so the Democrats were going to impeach him for that.
Being a Democratic shill means you check your humanity at the door.
That's not all that was in Article I...obstructing justice, bribery, subourning perjury...
He also destroyed evidence of his self admitted interference with the opposing party's ability to conduct their election campaigns. I wish gramps had dropped him on his head.
"See in my line of work, you got to keep repeating things over and over and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the propaganda." --- George W. Bush (Rochester NY, 5-24-2005)
Since Nixon left office. There has been one better president. Reagan.
You obviously had not come of age under Nixon. Let's just say that he gave a boost to the role of blatant liars in politics, and hiding the actions of much of our foreign and military policy from those who directly pay for it. A policy Reagan and the rest have continued and the so called 'conservatives' now demand as SOP as seen by their response to the Wikileaks. He also is directly responsible for most of our manufacturing going overseas to chase the lowest labor cost. Wage and price controls. Heh we now have the London Broil cut due to that. I wish gramps had dropped him on his head. Edit: I forgot to add he put us on the permanent fiat monetary system.
"See in my line of work, you got to keep repeating things over and over and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the propaganda." --- George W. Bush (Rochester NY, 5-24-2005)
Blame NAFTA etc on Clinton and the stupid R's who went along with it. Including Newt. Nixon isn't to blame for that one. I never said Nixon was perfect. I just said his successors sucked even worse. Except Reagan who was the greatest president of the 20th century. Hands down, not even close.
NAFTA was passed and signed by Poppy Bush and ratified by Clinton and that congress. Newt wasn't speaker yet. Why do you think Poppy really didn't want to run again?
"See in my line of work, you got to keep repeating things over and over and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the propaganda." --- George W. Bush (Rochester NY, 5-24-2005)
You're uninformed. Nafta passed after the 94 elections. Newt wasn't speaker yet but he voted for it and didn't try to block it. Listen to me and you will never go wrong. You will be informed and not look like a fool and make stupid statements like that.
Of course he didn't, he and Limbaugh would never go against a Bush. POPPY Bush negotiated and signed the original NAFTA agreement. Feel free to inform yourself. Look it up.
"See in my line of work, you got to keep repeating things over and over and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the propaganda." --- George W. Bush (Rochester NY, 5-24-2005)
Liar. NAFTA passed and was signed into law before the end of 1993.
Presidnets can't sign a bill until it passes.
Look it up. Agreements and treaties are not bills.
"See in my line of work, you got to keep repeating things over and over and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the propaganda." --- George W. Bush (Rochester NY, 5-24-2005)
It took effect Jan 1, 1994, before the November 1994 elections even took place. Stone makes up lots of crap to suit his way of thinking.
"See in my line of work, you got to keep repeating things over and over and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the propaganda." --- George W. Bush (Rochester NY, 5-24-2005)
NAFTA wasn't a bill it was a treaty and it was signed into law in December of 1993. Most people believe that the year 1993 came prior to 1994. Then there's you.
So when are you going to apologize for your name calling, Mr Uber Christian? And how many commandments have you already intentionally broke today?
"See in my line of work, you got to keep repeating things over and over and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the propaganda." --- George W. Bush (Rochester NY, 5-24-2005)
#2. To: Brian S (#0)
The judge also put on hold a part of the law that required immigrants to carry their papers at all times,
#3. To: Brian S (#0)
#4. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#2)
What a dumb bitch this woman is.
#5. To: Brian S (#0)
Same as the old boss
#6. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#2)
Federal law has for decades required all immigrants to carry their immigration papers on them and present them to LEOs upon request.
#7. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#2)
Federal law has for decades required all immigrants to carry their immigration papers on them and present them to LEOs upon request.
#8. To: Pan-Z-Boy (#4)
I hate to tell you this but most are, just don't tell them, it gets in the way of getting laid.
#9. To: war (#6)
Federal law has for decades required all immigrants to carry their immigration papers on them and present them to LEOs upon request.
#10. To: lucysmom, *Border Invasion* (#7)
How do the LEOs tell the difference between immigrants the citizens without seeing papers?
It's so easy, even a liberal could figure it out.
#11. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#9)
#12. To: war (#11)
Yep.
#13. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#12)
(Edited)
Because it's against the law?
#14. To: hondo68 (#10)
It's so easy, even a liberal could figure it out.
#15. To: war (#13)
No such empowerment exists in immigration law. Nor is it a "crime" for someone to be here undocumented. It does make them subject to detention and deportation.
#16. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#15)
(Edited)
It's a misdemeanor. You know that.
#17. To: war (#16)
Illegal entry is a misdemeanor. Being here is a civil/adminstrative violation.
#18. To: Brian S (#0)
#19. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#17)
#20. To: Brian S (#0)
Toss: ADL,CAIR and the Vatican into the pit they belong in.
#21. To: reaganisright (#1)
We need to start disbarment against these judges and half the Supreme Court.
#22. To: Badeye (#18)
You on the Left are going to pay a terrific price for this insanity come November.
#23. To: lucysmom (#14)
According to him the law isn't aimed at immigrants per se, but at people who look Indian.
#24. To: sneakypete (#21)
#25. To: Pan-Z-Boy (#24)
...which the second part means lack of character.
#26. To: reaganisright (#24)
A president can be impeached and removed from office for "high crimes or misdemeanors", which the second part means lack of character.
#27. To: war (#19)
You have to have ID just about every where...
#28. To: war (#25)
No it doesn't.
#29. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#28)
#30. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#27)
So citizens have to prove their identity, but illegals don't.
#31. To: war (#29)
No.
#32. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#31)
#33. To: reaganisright (#24)
A president can be impeached and removed from office for "high crimes or misdemeanors", which the second part means lack of character.
#34. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#27)
So citizens have to prove their identity, but illegals don't.
#35. To: Nebuchadnezzar, war (#31)
You're kidding, right? You're saying that you can't be impeached for lying to the American public????
#36. To: war (#32)
Yep. That's what I am saying.
#37. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#36)
(Edited)
You're so wrong it's laughable.
#38. To: war (#37)
#39. To: A K A Stone (#38)
If they have the votes they can impeach for any reason they want.
#40. To: war (#39)
#41. To: A K A Stone (#40)
Clinton deserved to be impeached and removed.
#42. To: A K A Stone (#40)
#43. To: war (#42)
#44. To: A K A Stone (#43)
(Edited)
You said most people who voted for impeachment were defeated.
#45. To: A K A Stone (#40)
The whole house voted against him.
#46. To: war (#44)
#47. To: Bartcoprules (#45)
#48. To: A K A Stone (#46)
#49. To: A K A Stone (#40)
The whole house voted against him.
#50. To: war (#48)
No gnu taxes claimed the other day that Bobby Jindal had a PhD by the age of 20.
#51. To: A K A Stone (#50)
But I did know something about the impeachment vote.
#52. To: hondo68 (#22)
#53. To: A K A Stone (#50)
(Edited)
It wasn't an obvious lie.
#54. To: war (#53)
I have this bridge...
#55. To: A K A Stone (#54)
#56. To: war (#37)
The grounds for impeachment were debated in Annapolis. If you believe that "lying" is grounds for impeachment, do you care to explain why "malfeasance", which is far more egregious behavior than simply lying, was specifically rejected as grounds for impeachment?
#57. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#56)
#58. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#56)
Nixon lied, so the Democrats were going to impeach him for that.
#59. To: mininggold (#58)
#60. To: A K A Stone (#59)
(Edited)
Since Nixon left office. There has been one better president. Reagan.
#61. To: mininggold (#60)
He also is directly responsible for most of our manufacturing going overseas to chase the lowest labor cost.
#62. To: A K A Stone (#61)
Blame NAFTA etc on Clinton and the stupid R's who went along with it. Including Newt.
#63. To: mininggold (#62)
(Edited)
#64. To: A K A Stone (#63)
You're uninformed. Nafta passed after the 94 elections. Newt wasn't speaker yet but he voted for it and didn't try to block it.
#65. To: Asswipe (#63)
Nafta passed after the 94 elections.
#66. To: mininggold (#64)
#67. To: A K A Stone (#66)
Presidnets can't sign a bill until it passes.
#68. To: Spinner (#65)
(Edited)
NAFTA passed and was signed into law before the end of 1993.
#69. To: Asswipe (#66)
Presidnets [sic] can't sign a bill until it passes.
#70. To: A K A Stone (#66)
(Edited)
Presidnets can't sign a bill until it passes.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]