[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"Democratic Overreach on Immigration Beckons"

How to negotiate to buy a car

Trump warns of a 'massive Armada' headed towards Iran

End Times Prophecy: Trump Says Board of Peace Will Override Every Government & Law – 10 Kings Rising

Maine's legendary 'Lobster Lady' dies after working until she was 103 and waking up at 3am every day

Hannity Says Immigration Raids at Home Depot Are Not ‘A Good Idea’

TREASON: Their PRIVATE CHAT just got LEAKED.

"Homan Plans to Defy Spanberger After ‘Bond Villain’ Blocks ICE Cooperation in VA: ‘Not Going to Stop’"

"DemocRATZ Radical Left-Wing Vision for Virginia"

"Tim Walz Wants the Worst"

Border Patrol Agents SMASH Window and Drag Man from Car in Minnesota Chaos

"Dear White Liberals: Blacks and Hispanics Want No Part of Your Anti-ICE Protests"

"The Silliest Venezuela Take You Will Read Today"

Michael Reagan, Son of Ronald Reagan, Dies at 80

Patel: "Minnesota Fraud Probes 'Buried' Under Biden"

"There’s a Word for the West’s Appeasement of Militant Islam"

"The Bondi Beach Jihad: Sharia Supremacism and Jew Hatred, Again"

"This Is How We Win a New Cold War With China"

"How Europe Fell Behind"

"The Epstein Conspiracy in Plain Sight"

Saint Nicholas The Real St. Nick

Will Atheists in China Starve Due to No Fish to Eat?

A Thirteen State Solution for the Holy Land?

US Sends new Missle to a Pacific ally, angering China and Russia Moscow and Peoking

DeaTh noTice ... Freerepublic --- lasT Monday JR died

"‘We Are Not the Crazy Ones’: AOC Protests Too Much"

"Rep. Comer to Newsmax: No Evidence Biden Approved Autopen Use"

"Donald Trump Has Broken the Progressive Ratchet"

"America Must Slash Red Tape to Make Nuclear Power Great Again!!"

"Why the DemocRATZ Activist Class Couldn’t Celebrate the Cease-Fire They Demanded"

Antifa Calls for CIVIL WAR!

British Police Make an Arrest...of a White Child Fishing in the Thames

"Sanctuary" Horde ASSAULTS Chicago... ELITE Marines SMASH Illegals Without Mercy

Trump hosts roundtable on ANTIFA

What's happening in Britain. Is happening in Ireland. The whole of Western Europe.

"The One About the Illegal Immigrant School Superintendent"

CouldnÂ’t believe he let me pet him at the end (Rhino)

Cops Go HANDS ON For Speaking At Meeting!

POWERFUL: Charlie Kirk's final speech delivered in South Korea 9/6/25

2026 in Bible Prophecy

2.4 Billion exposed to excessive heat

🔴 LIVE CHICAGO PORTLAND ICE IMMIGRATION DETENTION CENTER 24/7 PROTEST 9/28/2025

Young Conservative Proves Leftist Protesters Wrong

England is on the Brink of Civil War!

Charlie Kirk Shocks Florida State University With The TRUTH

IRL Confronting Protesters Outside UN Trump Meeting

The UK Revolution Has Started... Brit's Want Their Country Back

Inside Paris Dangerous ANTIFA Riots

Rioters STORM Chicago ICE HQ... "Deportation Unit" SCRAPES Invaders Off The Sidewalk

She Decoded A Specific Part In The Bible


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

U.S. Constitution
See other U.S. Constitution Articles

Title: Judge Blocks Parts Of Arizona Immigration Law
Source: ASSOCIATED PRESS
URL Source: http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/storie ... AULT&CTIME=2010-07-28-13-16-54
Published: Jul 28, 2010
Author: ASSOCIATED PRESS
Post Date: 2010-07-28 13:20:25 by Brian S
Keywords: None
Views: 41227
Comments: 70

PHOENIX (AP) -- A judge has blocked the most controversial sections of Arizona's new immigration law from taking effect Thursday, handing a major legal victory to opponents of the crackdown.

The law will still take effect Thursday, but without many of the provisions that angered opponents - including sections that required officers to check a person's immigration status while enforcing other laws. The judge also put on hold a part of the law that required immigrants to carry their papers at all times, and made it illegal for undocumented workers to solicit employment in public places.

U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton put those controversial sections on hold until the courts resolve the issues.

Opponents say the law will lead to racial profiling and is trumped by federal immigration law.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 56.

#1. To: Brian S (#0)

This judge was a Klintoon nominee, enough said.

We need to start disbarment against these judges and half the Supreme Court.

reaganisright  posted on  2010-07-28   13:33:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: reaganisright (#1)

We need to start disbarment against these judges and half the Supreme Court.

Yup,although you can't disbar or remove a sitting judge from the SC unless you have evidence enough to convict him or her of treason or some other serious federal felony. Lifetime appointments.

sneakypete  posted on  2010-07-28   15:37:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: sneakypete (#21)

A president can be impeached and removed from office for "high crimes or misdemeanors", which the second part means lack of character.

Klintoon was impeached and should have been removed for this reason. The RATS said they wouldn't vote for conviction if he was caught raping a Boy Scout on the front lawn of the WH.

Happy 100th to the BS.

reaganisright  posted on  2010-07-28   16:07:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: Pan-Z-Boy (#24)

...which the second part means lack of character.

No it doesn't.

war  posted on  2010-07-28   16:10:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: war (#25)

No it doesn't.

Can a President be impeached for lying to the American people?

Nebuchadnezzar  posted on  2010-07-28   18:48:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#28)

No.

war  posted on  2010-07-28   20:08:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: war (#29)

No.

You're kidding, right? You're saying that you can't be impeached for lying to the American public????

Nebuchadnezzar  posted on  2010-07-28   20:32:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#31)

Yep. That's what I am saying.

war  posted on  2010-07-28   20:46:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: war (#32)

Yep. That's what I am saying.

You're so wrong it's laughable.

You had better go back and study US Civics 101 War because you either slept through class or smoked a lot of pot.

Nebuchadnezzar  posted on  2010-07-28   23:14:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#36) (Edited)

You're so wrong it's laughable.

The grounds for impeachment were debated in Annapolis. If you believe that "lying" is grounds for impeachment, do you care to explain why "malfeasance", which is far more egregious behavior than simply lying, was specifically rejected as grounds for impeachment?

war  posted on  2010-07-29   8:13:19 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#56. To: war (#37)

The grounds for impeachment were debated in Annapolis. If you believe that "lying" is grounds for impeachment, do you care to explain why "malfeasance", which is far more egregious behavior than simply lying, was specifically rejected as grounds for impeachment?

Article 1's impeachment proceedings against Richard Nixon.

8.making or causing to be made false or misleading public statements for the purpose of deceiving the people of the United States into believing that a thorough and complete investigation had been conducted with respect to allegations of misconduct on the part of personnel of the executive branch of the United States and personnel of the Committee for the Re-election of the President, and that there was no involvement of such personnel in such misconduct: or

Nixon lied, so the Democrats were going to impeach him for that.

Nebuchadnezzar  posted on  2010-07-29   10:34:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 56.

#57. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#56)

That's not all that was in Article I...obstructing justice, bribery, subourning perjury...

war  posted on  2010-07-29 10:40:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#58. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#56)

Nixon lied, so the Democrats were going to impeach him for that.

He also destroyed evidence of his self admitted interference with the opposing party's ability to conduct their election campaigns. I wish gramps had dropped him on his head.

mininggold  posted on  2010-07-29 10:52:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 56.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com