[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"International court’s attack on Israel a sign of the free world’s moral collapse"

"Pete Hegseth Is Right for the DOD"

"Why Our Constitution Secures Liberty, Not Democracy"

Woodworking and Construction Hacks

"CNN: Reporters Were Crying and Hugging in the Hallways After Learning of Matt Gaetz's AG Nomination"

"NEW: Democrat Officials Move to Steal the Senate Race in Pennsylvania, Admit to Breaking the Law"

"Pete Hegseth Is a Disruptive Choice for Secretary of Defense. That’s a Good Thing"

Katie Britt will vote with the McConnell machine

Battle for Senate leader heats up — Hit pieces coming from Thune and Cornyn.

After Trump’s Victory, There Can Be No Unity Without A Reckoning

Vivek Ramaswamy, Dark-horse Secretary of State Candidate

Megyn Kelly has a message for Democrats. Wait for the ending.

Trump to choose Tom Homan as his “Border Czar”

"Trump Shows Demography Isn’t Destiny"

"Democrats Get a Wake-Up Call about How Unpopular Their Agenda Really Is"

Live Election Map with ticker shows every winner.

Megyn Kelly Joins Trump at His Final PA Rally of 2024 and Explains Why She's Supporting Him

South Carolina Lawmaker at Trump Rally Highlights Story of 3-Year-Old Maddie Hines, Killed by Illegal Alien

GOP Demands Biden, Harris Launch Probe into Twice-Deported Illegal Alien Accused of Killing Grayson Davis

Previously-Deported Illegal Charged With Killing Arkansas Children’s Hospital Nurse in Horror DUI Crash

New Data on Migrant Crime Rates Raises Eyebrows, Alarms

Thousands of 'potentially fraudulent voter registration applications' Uncovered, Stopped in Pennsylvania

Michigan Will Count Ballot of Chinese National Charged with Voting Illegally

"It Did Occur" - Kentucky County Clerk Confirms Voting Booth 'Glitch'' Shifted Trump Votes To Kamala

Legendary Astronaut Buzz Aldrin 'wholeheartedly' Endorses Donald Trump

Liberal Icon Naomi Wolf Endorses Trump: 'He's Being More Inclusive'

(Washed Up Has Been) Singer Joni Mitchell Screams 'F*** Trump' at Hollywood Bowl

"Analysis: The Final State of the Presidential Race"

He’ll, You Pieces of Garbage

The Future of Warfare -- No more martyrdom!

"Kamala’s Inane Talking Points"

"The Harris Campaign Is Testament to the Toxicity of Woke Politics"

Easy Drywall Patch

Israel Preparing NEW Iran Strike? Iran Vows “Unimaginable” Response | Watchman Newscast

In Logansport, Indiana, Kids are Being Pushed Out of Schools After Migrants Swelled County’s Population by 30%: "Everybody else is falling behind"

Exclusive — Bernie Moreno: We Spend $110,000 Per Illegal Migrant Per Year, More than Twice What ‘the Average American Makes’

Florida County: 41 of 45 People Arrested for Looting after Hurricanes Helene and Milton are Noncitizens

Presidential race: Is a Split Ticket the only Answer?

hurricanes and heat waves are Worse

'Backbone of Iran's missile industry' destroyed by IAF strikes on Islamic Republic

Joe Rogan Experience #2219 - Donald Trump

IDF raids Hezbollah Radwan Forces underground bases, discovers massive cache of weapons

Gallant: ‘After we strike in Iran,’ the world will understand all of our training

The Atlantic Hit Piece On Trump Is A Psy-Op To Justify Post-Election Violence If Harris Loses

Six Al Jazeera journalists are Hamas, PIJ terrorists

Judge Aileen Cannon, who tossed Trump's classified docs case, on list of proposed candidates for attorney general

Iran's Assassination Program in Europe: Europe Goes Back to Sleep

Susan Olsen says Brady Bunch revival was cancelled because she’s MAGA.

Foreign Invaders crisis cost $150B in 2023, forcing some areas to cut police and fire services: report

Israel kills head of Hezbollah Intelligence.


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

U.S. Constitution
See other U.S. Constitution Articles

Title: Judge Blocks Parts Of Arizona Immigration Law
Source: ASSOCIATED PRESS
URL Source: http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/storie ... AULT&CTIME=2010-07-28-13-16-54
Published: Jul 28, 2010
Author: ASSOCIATED PRESS
Post Date: 2010-07-28 13:20:25 by Brian S
Keywords: None
Views: 37947
Comments: 70

PHOENIX (AP) -- A judge has blocked the most controversial sections of Arizona's new immigration law from taking effect Thursday, handing a major legal victory to opponents of the crackdown.

The law will still take effect Thursday, but without many of the provisions that angered opponents - including sections that required officers to check a person's immigration status while enforcing other laws. The judge also put on hold a part of the law that required immigrants to carry their papers at all times, and made it illegal for undocumented workers to solicit employment in public places.

U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton put those controversial sections on hold until the courts resolve the issues.

Opponents say the law will lead to racial profiling and is trumped by federal immigration law.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-21) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#22. To: Badeye (#18)

You on the Left are going to pay a terrific price for this insanity come November.

Yes, the Democrats and Republicans will be severely punished in the upcoming elections.

They'll eventually merge into one open borders, globalist, anti-American, neo-liberal party.

Hondo68  posted on  2010-07-28   15:41:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: lucysmom (#14)

According to him the law isn't aimed at immigrants per se, but at people who look Indian.

Wow! I hope he doesn't say this in front of the His and Her Panics because if he does they will jump him. "Hispanic" is a word that means "Direct descendent of a Castillian Don and don't have the tiniest speck of Indian blood in me,dammit!"

"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)

sneakypete  posted on  2010-07-28   15:42:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: sneakypete (#21)

A president can be impeached and removed from office for "high crimes or misdemeanors", which the second part means lack of character.

Klintoon was impeached and should have been removed for this reason. The RATS said they wouldn't vote for conviction if he was caught raping a Boy Scout on the front lawn of the WH.

Happy 100th to the BS.

Is it time to take out the trash? Post Date: 2010-07-14 11:48:27 by A K A Stone We know who you mean.

reaganisright  posted on  2010-07-28   16:07:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: Pan-Z-Boy (#24)

...which the second part means lack of character.

No it doesn't.

war  posted on  2010-07-28   16:10:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: reaganisright (#24)

A president can be impeached and removed from office for "high crimes or misdemeanors", which the second part means lack of character.

For all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God.

lucysmom  posted on  2010-07-28   17:14:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: war (#19)

You have to have ID just about every where...

Freedom...

So citizens have to prove their identity, but illegals don't.

Thanks for the clarification.

Being a Democratic shill means you check your humanity at the door.

Nebuchadnezzar  posted on  2010-07-28   17:31:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: war (#25)

No it doesn't.

Can a President be impeached for lying to the American people?

Being a Democratic shill means you check your humanity at the door.

Nebuchadnezzar  posted on  2010-07-28   18:48:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#28)

No.

war  posted on  2010-07-28   20:08:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#27)

So citizens have to prove their identity, but illegals don't.

Identity and immigration/citizenship status are two different issues.

But you know that.

war  posted on  2010-07-28   20:09:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: war (#29)

No.

You're kidding, right? You're saying that you can't be impeached for lying to the American public????

Being a Democratic shill means you check your humanity at the door.

Nebuchadnezzar  posted on  2010-07-28   20:32:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#31)

Yep. That's what I am saying.

war  posted on  2010-07-28   20:46:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: reaganisright (#24)

A president can be impeached and removed from office for "high crimes or misdemeanors", which the second part means lack of character.

Yes,but as Clinton/Bush 2.0 proved beyond all doubt,it ain't going to happen.

Besides,we were talking about appointees with life time appointments,not a term- limited elected official.

"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)

sneakypete  posted on  2010-07-28   21:00:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#27)

So citizens have to prove their identity, but illegals don't.

Yup.

Did you know that convicted felons can't be charged with lying when they fill out the federal form to buy a weapons because if they told the truth they would be giving evidence against themselves?

Yet,you or I would go to jail for lying on Form 4473.

"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)

sneakypete  posted on  2010-07-28   21:02:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: Nebuchadnezzar, war (#31)

You're kidding, right? You're saying that you can't be impeached for lying to the American public????

war is playing his typical Di......,er,"Independent" games.

ALL presidents lie to the American people. It's even a job requirement. They have to lie to protect national interests at times. This does NOT mean they can lie under oath. That IS an impeachable offense.

The above does not apply to Dim presidents. They can lie under oath all they want.

"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)

sneakypete  posted on  2010-07-28   21:06:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: war (#32)

Yep. That's what I am saying.

You're so wrong it's laughable.

You had better go back and study US Civics 101 War because you either slept through class or smoked a lot of pot.

Being a Democratic shill means you check your humanity at the door.

Nebuchadnezzar  posted on  2010-07-28   23:14:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#36) (Edited)

You're so wrong it's laughable.

The grounds for impeachment were debated in Annapolis. If you believe that "lying" is grounds for impeachment, do you care to explain why "malfeasance", which is far more egregious behavior than simply lying, was specifically rejected as grounds for impeachment?

war  posted on  2010-07-29   8:13:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: war (#37)

War. You're pretty worthless. If they have the votes they can impeach for any reason they want. No one can do anything about it.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-29   8:16:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: A K A Stone (#38)

If they have the votes they can impeach for any reason they want.

There is a reason why impeachment is in the House and the trial is in the Senate.

And we saw what happened to House members who impeached for any reason they wanted. Almost all of them got their asses thrown out in 2000.

war  posted on  2010-07-29   8:28:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: war (#39)

Clinton deserved to be impeached and removed. Your description of what happened afterward is not accurate. The whole house voted against him. More then half kept their jobs. Almost all of them did. Honesty isn't in you.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-29   8:38:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#41. To: A K A Stone (#40)

Clinton deserved to be impeached and removed.

The prosecutors couldn't even pin down exactly WHERE he committed perjury. Was it in the Jones case or before the Grand Jury? Without looking it up, I'll bet you don't even know.

war  posted on  2010-07-29   8:41:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#42. To: A K A Stone (#40)

Honesty isn't in you.

Fuck you, asswipe.

war  posted on  2010-07-29   8:42:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#43. To: war (#42)

You did lie. Or admit you are stupid. You said most people who voted for impeachment were defeated. So that would mean that in 2000 the R's would have lost at least half their seats plus one and the same in the senate. It didn't happen. Were you lying or are you stupid or are you really stupid and still deny the obvious?

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-29   8:48:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#44. To: A K A Stone (#43) (Edited)

You said most people who voted for impeachment were defeated.

It was a misstatement...I meant House managers...not members...

But fuck you anyway.

war  posted on  2010-07-29   8:50:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#45. To: A K A Stone (#40)

The whole house voted against him.

Clinton was impeached on December 19, 1998, by the House of Representatives on grounds of perjury to a grand jury (by a 228-206 vote) and obstruction of justice (by a 221-212 vote). Two other articles of impeachment failed — a second count of perjury in the Jones case (by a 205-229 vote) and one accusing Clinton of abuse of power (by a 148- 285 vote).

That hardly constitutes the entire House voting against him.

Bartcoprules  posted on  2010-07-29   8:51:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#46. To: war (#44)

Are you sure you don't want the spinner name back? Hmm spinner?

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-29   8:51:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#47. To: Bartcoprules (#45)

All of the R's I mean. Or all minus 1 or something like that.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-29   8:52:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#48. To: A K A Stone (#46)

No gnu taxes claimed the other day that Bobby Jindal had a PhD by the age of 20.

That was an obvious lie.

What was also obvious is that you were nowhere to be found to call him out on the lie.

war  posted on  2010-07-29   8:52:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#49. To: A K A Stone (#40)

The whole house voted against him.

Liar.

war  posted on  2010-07-29   8:53:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#50. To: war (#48)

No gnu taxes claimed the other day that Bobby Jindal had a PhD by the age of 20.

That was an obvious lie.

What was also obvious is that you were nowhere to be found to call him out on the lie.

It wasn't an obvious lie. I don't even know that it was a lie. I don't know if he had one at age 20 or has one now or never had one. I don't care either.

But I did know something about the impeachment vote.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-29   8:54:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#51. To: A K A Stone (#50)

But I did know something about the impeachment vote.

Not from anything that you've posted here is that apparent.

war  posted on  2010-07-29   8:56:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#52. To: hondo68 (#22)

I don't see THAT happening, not yet anyway.

Obama's first all-by-his-lonesome budget, btw, calls for a $1.17 trillion deficit.

Badeye  posted on  2010-07-29   8:56:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#53. To: A K A Stone (#50) (Edited)

It wasn't an obvious lie.

Someone tells you that a person has a PhD by age 20 and you're not even slightly skeptical?

I have this bridge...

war  posted on  2010-07-29   8:56:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#54. To: war (#53)

I have this bridge...

Truthfully war? You have a bridge? Honestly?

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-29   8:58:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#55. To: A K A Stone (#54)

Yep...and my colleague from Senagal will be sending you an offering letter very, very soon.

war  posted on  2010-07-29   9:03:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#56. To: war (#37)

The grounds for impeachment were debated in Annapolis. If you believe that "lying" is grounds for impeachment, do you care to explain why "malfeasance", which is far more egregious behavior than simply lying, was specifically rejected as grounds for impeachment?

Article 1's impeachment proceedings against Richard Nixon.

8.making or causing to be made false or misleading public statements for the purpose of deceiving the people of the United States into believing that a thorough and complete investigation had been conducted with respect to allegations of misconduct on the part of personnel of the executive branch of the United States and personnel of the Committee for the Re-election of the President, and that there was no involvement of such personnel in such misconduct: or

Nixon lied, so the Democrats were going to impeach him for that.

Being a Democratic shill means you check your humanity at the door.

Nebuchadnezzar  posted on  2010-07-29   10:34:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#57. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#56)

That's not all that was in Article I...obstructing justice, bribery, subourning perjury...

war  posted on  2010-07-29   10:40:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#58. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#56)

Nixon lied, so the Democrats were going to impeach him for that.

He also destroyed evidence of his self admitted interference with the opposing party's ability to conduct their election campaigns. I wish gramps had dropped him on his head.

"See in my line of work, you got to keep repeating things over and over and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the propaganda." --- George W. Bush (Rochester NY, 5-24-2005)

mininggold  posted on  2010-07-29   10:52:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#59. To: mininggold (#58)

Since Nixon left office. There has been one better president. Reagan.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-29   10:54:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#60. To: A K A Stone (#59) (Edited)

Since Nixon left office. There has been one better president. Reagan.

You obviously had not come of age under Nixon. Let's just say that he gave a boost to the role of blatant liars in politics, and hiding the actions of much of our foreign and military policy from those who directly pay for it. A policy Reagan and the rest have continued and the so called 'conservatives' now demand as SOP as seen by their response to the Wikileaks.

He also is directly responsible for most of our manufacturing going overseas to chase the lowest labor cost.

Wage and price controls. Heh we now have the London Broil cut due to that.

I wish gramps had dropped him on his head.

Edit: I forgot to add he put us on the permanent fiat monetary system.

"See in my line of work, you got to keep repeating things over and over and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the propaganda." --- George W. Bush (Rochester NY, 5-24-2005)

mininggold  posted on  2010-07-29   11:07:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#61. To: mininggold (#60)

He also is directly responsible for most of our manufacturing going overseas to chase the lowest labor cost.

Blame NAFTA etc on Clinton and the stupid R's who went along with it. Including Newt.

Nixon isn't to blame for that one. I never said Nixon was perfect. I just said his successors sucked even worse. Except Reagan who was the greatest president of the 20th century. Hands down, not even close.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-29   11:09:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#62. To: A K A Stone (#61)

Blame NAFTA etc on Clinton and the stupid R's who went along with it. Including Newt.

NAFTA was passed and signed by Poppy Bush and ratified by Clinton and that congress. Newt wasn't speaker yet. Why do you think Poppy really didn't want to run again?

"See in my line of work, you got to keep repeating things over and over and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the propaganda." --- George W. Bush (Rochester NY, 5-24-2005)

mininggold  posted on  2010-07-29   11:13:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (63 - 70) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com