[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Netanyahu Issues Warning To US Leaders Over ICC Arrest Warrants: 'You're Next'

Will it ever end?

Did Pope Francis Just Call Jesus a Liar?

Climate: The Movie (The Cold Truth) Updated 4K version

There can never be peace on Earth for as long as Islamic Sharia exists

The Victims of Benny Hinn: 30 Years of Spiritual Deception.

Trump Is Planning to Send Kill Teams to Mexico to Take Out Cartel Leaders

The Great Falling Away in the Church is Here | Tim Dilena

How Ridiculous? Blade-Less Swiss Army Knife Debuts As Weapon Laws Tighten

Jewish students beaten with sticks at University of Amsterdam

Terrorists shut down Park Avenue.

Police begin arresting democrats outside Met Gala.

The minute the total solar eclipse appeared over US

Three Types Of People To Mark And Avoid In The Church Today

Are The 4 Horsemen Of The Apocalypse About To Appear?

France sends combat troops to Ukraine battlefront

Facts you may not have heard about Muslims in England.

George Washington University raises the Hamas flag. American Flag has been removed.

Alabama students chant Take A Shower to the Hamas terrorists on campus.

In Day of the Lord, 24 Church Elders with Crowns Join Jesus in His Throne

In Day of the Lord, 24 Church Elders with Crowns Join Jesus in His Throne

Deadly Saltwater and Deadly Fresh Water to Increase

Deadly Cancers to soon Become Thing of the Past?

Plague of deadly New Diseases Continues

[FULL VIDEO] Police release bodycam footage of Monroe County District Attorney Sandra Doorley traffi

Police clash with pro-Palestine protesters on Ohio State University campus

Joe Rogan Experience #2138 - Tucker Carlson

Police Dispersing Student Protesters at USC - Breaking News Coverage (College Protests)

What Passover Means For The New Testament Believer

Are We Closer Than Ever To The Next Pandemic?

War in Ukraine Turns on Russia

what happened during total solar eclipse

Israel Attacks Iran, Report Says - LIVE Breaking News Coverage

Earth is Scorched with Heat

Antiwar Activists Chant ‘Death to America’ at Event Featuring Chicago Alderman

Vibe Shift

A stream that makes the pleasant Rain sound.

Older Men - Keep One Foot In The Dark Ages

When You Really Want to Meet the Diversity Requirements

CERN to test world's most powerful particle accelerator during April's solar eclipse

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

U.S. Constitution
See other U.S. Constitution Articles

Title: Judge Blocks Parts Of Arizona Immigration Law
Source: ASSOCIATED PRESS
URL Source: http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/storie ... AULT&CTIME=2010-07-28-13-16-54
Published: Jul 28, 2010
Author: ASSOCIATED PRESS
Post Date: 2010-07-28 13:20:25 by Brian S
Keywords: None
Views: 36747
Comments: 70

PHOENIX (AP) -- A judge has blocked the most controversial sections of Arizona's new immigration law from taking effect Thursday, handing a major legal victory to opponents of the crackdown.

The law will still take effect Thursday, but without many of the provisions that angered opponents - including sections that required officers to check a person's immigration status while enforcing other laws. The judge also put on hold a part of the law that required immigrants to carry their papers at all times, and made it illegal for undocumented workers to solicit employment in public places.

U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton put those controversial sections on hold until the courts resolve the issues.

Opponents say the law will lead to racial profiling and is trumped by federal immigration law.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-16) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#17. To: war (#16)

Illegal entry is a misdemeanor. Being here is a civil/adminstrative violation.

I don't know about that. I know in California there is a law which says when you go out you have to present ID, immigrant or citizen to a LEO.

This sounds like the Judge had a political axe to grind like Felzer did in 1994.

To do so in California (not have id) means you go to jail.

Being a Democratic shill means you check your humanity at the door.

Nebuchadnezzar  posted on  2010-07-28   14:57:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Brian S (#0)

(chuckle)

You on the Left are going to pay a terrific price for this insanity come November.

Obama's first all-by-his-lonesome budget, btw, calls for a $1.17 trillion deficit.

Badeye  posted on  2010-07-28   15:17:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#17)

You have to have ID just about every where...

Freedom...

war  posted on  2010-07-28   15:27:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Brian S (#0)

The DNC has to have open borders in order to survive.

-----------------------------------------------------------
Toss: ADL,CAIR and the Vatican into the pit they belong in.

WhiteSands  posted on  2010-07-28   15:34:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: reaganisright (#1)

We need to start disbarment against these judges and half the Supreme Court.

Yup,although you can't disbar or remove a sitting judge from the SC unless you have evidence enough to convict him or her of treason or some other serious federal felony. Lifetime appointments.

"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)

sneakypete  posted on  2010-07-28   15:37:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: Badeye (#18)

You on the Left are going to pay a terrific price for this insanity come November.

Yes, the Democrats and Republicans will be severely punished in the upcoming elections.

They'll eventually merge into one open borders, globalist, anti-American, neo-liberal party.

Hondo68  posted on  2010-07-28   15:41:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: lucysmom (#14)

According to him the law isn't aimed at immigrants per se, but at people who look Indian.

Wow! I hope he doesn't say this in front of the His and Her Panics because if he does they will jump him. "Hispanic" is a word that means "Direct descendent of a Castillian Don and don't have the tiniest speck of Indian blood in me,dammit!"

"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)

sneakypete  posted on  2010-07-28   15:42:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: sneakypete (#21)

A president can be impeached and removed from office for "high crimes or misdemeanors", which the second part means lack of character.

Klintoon was impeached and should have been removed for this reason. The RATS said they wouldn't vote for conviction if he was caught raping a Boy Scout on the front lawn of the WH.

Happy 100th to the BS.

Is it time to take out the trash? Post Date: 2010-07-14 11:48:27 by A K A Stone We know who you mean.

reaganisright  posted on  2010-07-28   16:07:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: Pan-Z-Boy (#24)

...which the second part means lack of character.

No it doesn't.

war  posted on  2010-07-28   16:10:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: reaganisright (#24)

A president can be impeached and removed from office for "high crimes or misdemeanors", which the second part means lack of character.

For all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God.

lucysmom  posted on  2010-07-28   17:14:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: war (#19)

You have to have ID just about every where...

Freedom...

So citizens have to prove their identity, but illegals don't.

Thanks for the clarification.

Being a Democratic shill means you check your humanity at the door.

Nebuchadnezzar  posted on  2010-07-28   17:31:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: war (#25)

No it doesn't.

Can a President be impeached for lying to the American people?

Being a Democratic shill means you check your humanity at the door.

Nebuchadnezzar  posted on  2010-07-28   18:48:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#28)

No.

war  posted on  2010-07-28   20:08:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#27)

So citizens have to prove their identity, but illegals don't.

Identity and immigration/citizenship status are two different issues.

But you know that.

war  posted on  2010-07-28   20:09:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: war (#29)

No.

You're kidding, right? You're saying that you can't be impeached for lying to the American public????

Being a Democratic shill means you check your humanity at the door.

Nebuchadnezzar  posted on  2010-07-28   20:32:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#31)

Yep. That's what I am saying.

war  posted on  2010-07-28   20:46:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: reaganisright (#24)

A president can be impeached and removed from office for "high crimes or misdemeanors", which the second part means lack of character.

Yes,but as Clinton/Bush 2.0 proved beyond all doubt,it ain't going to happen.

Besides,we were talking about appointees with life time appointments,not a term- limited elected official.

"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)

sneakypete  posted on  2010-07-28   21:00:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#27)

So citizens have to prove their identity, but illegals don't.

Yup.

Did you know that convicted felons can't be charged with lying when they fill out the federal form to buy a weapons because if they told the truth they would be giving evidence against themselves?

Yet,you or I would go to jail for lying on Form 4473.

"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)

sneakypete  posted on  2010-07-28   21:02:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: Nebuchadnezzar, war (#31)

You're kidding, right? You're saying that you can't be impeached for lying to the American public????

war is playing his typical Di......,er,"Independent" games.

ALL presidents lie to the American people. It's even a job requirement. They have to lie to protect national interests at times. This does NOT mean they can lie under oath. That IS an impeachable offense.

The above does not apply to Dim presidents. They can lie under oath all they want.

"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)

sneakypete  posted on  2010-07-28   21:06:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: war (#32)

Yep. That's what I am saying.

You're so wrong it's laughable.

You had better go back and study US Civics 101 War because you either slept through class or smoked a lot of pot.

Being a Democratic shill means you check your humanity at the door.

Nebuchadnezzar  posted on  2010-07-28   23:14:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#36) (Edited)

You're so wrong it's laughable.

The grounds for impeachment were debated in Annapolis. If you believe that "lying" is grounds for impeachment, do you care to explain why "malfeasance", which is far more egregious behavior than simply lying, was specifically rejected as grounds for impeachment?

war  posted on  2010-07-29   8:13:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: war (#37)

War. You're pretty worthless. If they have the votes they can impeach for any reason they want. No one can do anything about it.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-29   8:16:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: A K A Stone (#38)

If they have the votes they can impeach for any reason they want.

There is a reason why impeachment is in the House and the trial is in the Senate.

And we saw what happened to House members who impeached for any reason they wanted. Almost all of them got their asses thrown out in 2000.

war  posted on  2010-07-29   8:28:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: war (#39)

Clinton deserved to be impeached and removed. Your description of what happened afterward is not accurate. The whole house voted against him. More then half kept their jobs. Almost all of them did. Honesty isn't in you.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-29   8:38:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#41. To: A K A Stone (#40)

Clinton deserved to be impeached and removed.

The prosecutors couldn't even pin down exactly WHERE he committed perjury. Was it in the Jones case or before the Grand Jury? Without looking it up, I'll bet you don't even know.

war  posted on  2010-07-29   8:41:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#42. To: A K A Stone (#40)

Honesty isn't in you.

Fuck you, asswipe.

war  posted on  2010-07-29   8:42:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#43. To: war (#42)

You did lie. Or admit you are stupid. You said most people who voted for impeachment were defeated. So that would mean that in 2000 the R's would have lost at least half their seats plus one and the same in the senate. It didn't happen. Were you lying or are you stupid or are you really stupid and still deny the obvious?

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-29   8:48:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#44. To: A K A Stone (#43) (Edited)

You said most people who voted for impeachment were defeated.

It was a misstatement...I meant House managers...not members...

But fuck you anyway.

war  posted on  2010-07-29   8:50:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#45. To: A K A Stone (#40)

The whole house voted against him.

Clinton was impeached on December 19, 1998, by the House of Representatives on grounds of perjury to a grand jury (by a 228-206 vote) and obstruction of justice (by a 221-212 vote). Two other articles of impeachment failed — a second count of perjury in the Jones case (by a 205-229 vote) and one accusing Clinton of abuse of power (by a 148- 285 vote).

That hardly constitutes the entire House voting against him.

Bartcoprules  posted on  2010-07-29   8:51:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#46. To: war (#44)

Are you sure you don't want the spinner name back? Hmm spinner?

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-29   8:51:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#47. To: Bartcoprules (#45)

All of the R's I mean. Or all minus 1 or something like that.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-29   8:52:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#48. To: A K A Stone (#46)

No gnu taxes claimed the other day that Bobby Jindal had a PhD by the age of 20.

That was an obvious lie.

What was also obvious is that you were nowhere to be found to call him out on the lie.

war  posted on  2010-07-29   8:52:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#49. To: A K A Stone (#40)

The whole house voted against him.

Liar.

war  posted on  2010-07-29   8:53:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#50. To: war (#48)

No gnu taxes claimed the other day that Bobby Jindal had a PhD by the age of 20.

That was an obvious lie.

What was also obvious is that you were nowhere to be found to call him out on the lie.

It wasn't an obvious lie. I don't even know that it was a lie. I don't know if he had one at age 20 or has one now or never had one. I don't care either.

But I did know something about the impeachment vote.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-29   8:54:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#51. To: A K A Stone (#50)

But I did know something about the impeachment vote.

Not from anything that you've posted here is that apparent.

war  posted on  2010-07-29   8:56:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#52. To: hondo68 (#22)

I don't see THAT happening, not yet anyway.

Obama's first all-by-his-lonesome budget, btw, calls for a $1.17 trillion deficit.

Badeye  posted on  2010-07-29   8:56:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#53. To: A K A Stone (#50) (Edited)

It wasn't an obvious lie.

Someone tells you that a person has a PhD by age 20 and you're not even slightly skeptical?

I have this bridge...

war  posted on  2010-07-29   8:56:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#54. To: war (#53)

I have this bridge...

Truthfully war? You have a bridge? Honestly?

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-29   8:58:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#55. To: A K A Stone (#54)

Yep...and my colleague from Senagal will be sending you an offering letter very, very soon.

war  posted on  2010-07-29   9:03:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#56. To: war (#37)

The grounds for impeachment were debated in Annapolis. If you believe that "lying" is grounds for impeachment, do you care to explain why "malfeasance", which is far more egregious behavior than simply lying, was specifically rejected as grounds for impeachment?

Article 1's impeachment proceedings against Richard Nixon.

8.making or causing to be made false or misleading public statements for the purpose of deceiving the people of the United States into believing that a thorough and complete investigation had been conducted with respect to allegations of misconduct on the part of personnel of the executive branch of the United States and personnel of the Committee for the Re-election of the President, and that there was no involvement of such personnel in such misconduct: or

Nixon lied, so the Democrats were going to impeach him for that.

Being a Democratic shill means you check your humanity at the door.

Nebuchadnezzar  posted on  2010-07-29   10:34:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#57. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#56)

That's not all that was in Article I...obstructing justice, bribery, subourning perjury...

war  posted on  2010-07-29   10:40:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (58 - 70) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com