Opinions/Editorials
See other Opinions/Editorials Articles
Title: Liberals Are Evil, Wrong and Nuts! (Part I)
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.worldviewweekend.com/wor ... imes/article.php?articleid=795
Published: Jul 23, 2010
Author: Raply C. Barker
Post Date: 2010-07-23 17:34:08 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 5329
Comments: 13
Ann Coulter took some heavy artillery from the left this past week. Her new book, Godless: The Church of Liberalism, has ignited the outrage of liberals. You go girl! The media particularly has overreacted to such an extent it is almost comical. When NBC, as only one example, reported the release of her book on June 6, 2006, (666) they painted her with the same colors that a rational person would paint Adolf Hitler, Osama bin Ladin, or Jeffrey Dahmer. If I had not known what I was watching I might have guessed that I was watching a Saturday Night Live skit. This type of reaction is actually normal for liberals. When Ann Coulter in the spirit of a Toto pulls back the curtain and exposes the real wizard they know the game is up. They cannot stand being seen for who they are. They cannot tolerate having opposing viewpoints and they are terrified of truth when it doesn't line up with their worldview.[1] Trust me, truth has no place in the liberal worldview. If you don't believe me then just watch the liberal of your choice over time. Match up what they say with what they do. You'll be convinced sooner rather than later. Liberals have adopted some of the same tactics that communists have used for years. They don't have a pure philosophy of law. Right and wrong are not the focus of concern. It is only what advances their cause that counts. This is why when the popular votes goes against them on an issue they often circumvent the will of the people and get a liberal judge to rule in their favor. Californians are well aware of this practice in their state. I stated in my headline that liberals are evil, wrong, and nuts. Let me address these charges one by one. My points are aimed at radical liberals who, by the way, dominate the leadership of all the major institutions in this nation. Their influence reaches far beyond the political sphere where we seem to focus most of our attention. We need to look in the bushes too. Liberals dominate the media. They rule the schools. Liberals stack the leadership of the American Medical Association and the American Bar Association. They control most of the major foundations and they manage some of the most influential companies in America. Liberals line the ranks of the environmental groups, animal rights groups, and anti-war organizations. And don't forget Hollywood which cannot turn out a movie, it seems, without an anti-war message, a gratuitous homosexual theme, or an end-of –the world scenario caused by global warming. We must remember that liberalism is not just a system of bad ideas. It is a religion with its priests, creeds, confessions, and dogmas. Liberals worship the system, their church. They gladly sacrifice themselves and anyone else, friend or foe, who gets in the way of the cause. They are more religious than most Christians. They are more dedicated than most Christians. I'm sorry, it's just a fact and I'll bet 99% of pastors will agree with me. I truly believe with all my heart that liberals are our enemies. They are enemies of what is good. They are God's enemies. Now before anyone starts judging me let me finish building my case. My standard is going to be Scripture and hopefully you will agree with my reasoning. Can we agree up front that if God calls something evil, then it is? Can we agree that if God says don't do something, then we shouldn't do it? And finally, if God says we should do something then there is no other option? If we can agree on these basics, let's see if my charges are valid. My first charge is that liberals are evil. Isaiah 5:20 says: Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil, who put darkness for light, and light for darkness. Scripture also says we can judge a tree (or a person) by their fruit. A good tree bears good fruit and a bad tree bad fruit. This is simple enough. Since we don't use the word "evil" much anymore I want to submit a definition for my purposes here. This comes from Webster's 1828 Dictionary. E'VIL, n. Evil is natural or moral. Natural evil is any thing which produces pain, distress, loss or calamity, or which in any way disturbs the peace, impairs the happiness, or destroys the perfection of natural beings. Moral evil is any deviation of a moral agent from the rules of conduct prescribed to him by God, or by legitimate human authority; or it is any violation of the plain principles of justice and rectitude. There are also evils called civil, which affect injuriously the peace or prosperity of a city or state; and political evils, which injure a nation, in its public capacity. Modern liberalism in America qualifies as evil under every part of the above definition. It is disturbing that we don't see it as such. God says murder is evil. The essence of murder is striking out at the image of God found in man. It is the worst of human crimes. In fact, God thinks murder so heinous He determined that the only satisfaction for the crime is the death of the perpetrator.[2] Liberals believe in abortion and abortion is the cold-blooded murder of babies, the most innocent among us.[3] You tell me, are liberals evil? Call it what you will, terminating a pregnancy, dilation and evacuation, or premature delivery. It's still murder. A wig by any other name is still a wig. By the way liberals disagree with God's use of the death penalty. They routinely support murderers and ignore their victims. Regardless of the crime or the number of dead bodies, liberals side with the criminal. God says stealing is wrong. The eighth commandment says, "You shall not steal." No interpretation needed here. Therefore, stealing is wrong, evil. Liberals believe in stealing. Theft is the very foundation of their corrupt socialistic worldview. They take (steal) from the rich and give to the poor. The more one makes, the more liberals want to take and redistribute. Liberals fight any attempt at tax relief. They are still crying over the Bush tax cuts. They continue to claim it only benefits the rich. I got my tax cut and I'm not rich. Did you ever think the time would come, as it has, when the President of the United States would have to tour the nation in order to convince Americans that they should keep their money? He actually had to sell us on a tax cut. What is wrong with us? Liberal thinking is so far gone on this that they actually promised tax increases as part of their platform in the last two presidential elections. You would think they would at least take the lead from Bill Clinton and lie. He promised a middle-class tax cut and then reneged a few days after he was elected. Thank God they lost. In the name of compassion,[4] liberals steal the quality and dignity of life from the poorest among us. They do this by hooking them on the welfare system and then writing rules which make it nearly impossible for them to escape. Liberals rob employers of the benefit of offering apprenticeships and young workers from learning a valuable skill. This is done through the minimum wage laws and employment rules. They also cause more unemployment. Minimum wage laws force employers to pay some workers more than they are worth. They must make up the difference by eliminating workers, reducing hours, or raising prices. People are robbed on all levels. In the First Commandment, God says, "You shall have no other gods before Me." Liberals like any god but the true on. Those in the liberal establishment, especially those in organizations like the ACLU and American's United for the Separation of Church and State, have worked feverishly to eject God permanently out of public consciousness. They are succeeding. Who was it that got Bible reading in government schools halted? Who was it that had prayer in government schools banished? Thanks to liberal efforts, every god known to man is now welcomed into our children's classrooms. The devil himself has been given a hall pass and our God is shamelessly declared persona non grata. Are liberals evil? You tell me. Liberals support evil people too. Jimmy Carter went to Havana to dine with Fidel Castro. Rush Limbaugh said some years ago that there wasn't a dictator that Jimmy Carter didn't like. Hillary Clinton commended Saddam Hussein on his treatment of women while condemning the U.S. for the Iraq war. Bill Clinton helped restore Haiti dictator Jean-Bertrand Aristide to power. Those who wield brutal power apparently fascinate Liberals. Col. Oliver North reports on his website, www.freedomalliance.org: "Castro was one of the few tyrants who failed to grace William Jefferson Blythe Clinton's social calendar, though Mr. Clinton made it a habit to meet regularly with the Dictator-of-the-Month while in office. Yasser Arafat visited 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue no less than eleven times. Be it Fidel Castro, Yasser Arafat or former Soviet dictator Mikhail Gorbachev, it seems American liberals crave the affection of brutal authoritarians whose regimes have brought nothing but agony and cruelty to their people." Are you with me so far? Part II, coming soon…. Ralph C. Barker
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: A K A Stone (#0)
There are two kinds of liberals: Idiots and Tyrants. The Idiots actually think that big government is helpful. The Tyrants exploit the idiot's beliefs to gain power for themselves.
This implies three things: that there are other gods, you can believe in them, but the Jewish god wants to be number one.
Not only that,but they're not even liberals. They are statists. Which is about as far from being liberal as it is possible to get.
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
Bravo! Those who are today referred to as "liberals" have more in common with V.I.Lenin than T. Jefferson.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- You're going to have to study a little harder skippy. Let me give you a clue. To some people Obama is god. Don't put Obama before God. For example. Omessiah says kill your babies if you want to, God was wrong. The real God says thou shall not murder. I'll stick with God. You can have your little g god Obama. Or Also talking about people who worship graven images and statues etc. I don't think you have ears to hear or eyes to see. Seek God and repent and you will be accepted.
They are despicable, hateful, deceivers and censors.
I know what you are saying. I think the article is just using what has become the modern definition of liberal. Not a classical liberal like Thomas Jefferson.
I agree. The thing is words DO have meanings and symbolism,and we can NOT afford to let the left win the word game without putting up a fight. It's the same deal with the word "Progressive". People who don't know it's political meaning tend to think it means "forward looking" instead of communist. Another is the word "gay". We can NOT allow the homosexuals and the leftist media win this word war by going along with this without protest. A homosexual may or may not be "gay",but he or she is most definitely a homosexual. Calling them "gay" is stating BY IMPLICATION that heterosexuals are sad (Hey! They are not "gay",right?),who wouldn't rather be gay than be sad? While we are at it,how about we start pointing out that the word "Republican" does NOT equate to the word "conservative"? It is possible to be a conservative who is also a Republican,but being a Republican does NOT mean you are a conservative.
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
I have studied Stone. It's you who doesn't have a clue about your own religion.
A poster on another forum calls him a Haggeeistian. I think that says it all.
"See in my line of work, you got to keep repeating things over and over and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the propaganda." --- George W. Bush (Rochester NY, 5-24-2005)
Stone has serious comprehension problems.
I know the type well, as my family is full of them. They think they can pray their way through any situation. Introspection is not in their vocabulary. Just strong willed and wrong minded with God able to deliver them from themselves. In my relative's case God is not stopping the foreclosure. So they are praying hard to persuade my feeble minded mother to lend them money to continue with their foolish spending habits.
"See in my line of work, you got to keep repeating things over and over and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the propaganda." --- George W. Bush (Rochester NY, 5-24-2005)
Jefferson was for a system of public schools that would be 100% free of religion. He was for government promoting the arts and sciences through subsidizing higher education. He had no use for rdlgious leader or money'd interests.
#2. To: A K A Stone (#0)
"You shall have no other gods before Me."
"To suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous liberals,
or to quit halfterm, and by opposing, rake in speaking fees." - ShakesPalin
#3. To: A K A Stone (#0)
Liberals Are Evil, Wrong and Nuts! (Part I)
#4. To: sneakypete (#3)
Not only that,but they're not even liberals. They are statists. Which is about as far from being liberal as it is possible to get.
Wooo-Hooo!! Republicans are poised to win in November.
#5. To: Skip Intro (#2)
#6. To: A K A Stone (#0)
Liberals Are Evil, Wrong and Nuts! (Part I)
#7. To: sneakypete (#3)
Not only that,but they're not even liberals.
#8. To: A K A Stone (#7)
I know what you are saying. I think the article is just using what has become the modern definition of liberal. Not a classical liberal like Thomas Jefferson.
#9. To: A K A Stone (#5)
You're going to have to study a little harder skippy.
"To suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous liberals,
or to quit halfterm, and by opposing, rake in speaking fees." - ShakesPalin
#10. To: Skip Intro (#9)
I have studied Stone. It's you who doesn't have a clue about your own religion.
#11. To: mininggold (#10)
"To suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous liberals,
or to quit halfterm, and by opposing, rake in speaking fees." - ShakesPalin
#12. To: Skip Intro (#11)
Stone has serious comprehension problems.
#13. To: Ignore Amos (#4)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]