[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Cult Watch Title: ORLY TAITZ CALLS FOR SCOTUS TO ALLOW HER TO INVESTIGATE SCOTUS (And copies half the UN to boot) Motion -request for verification of signature of Justice Thomas was submitted to Chief Justice Roberts Posted on | July 20, 2010 | 8 Comments No. In The Supreme Court of the United States Rhodes v. MacDonald REQUEST FOR VERIFICATION OF SIGNATURE OF JUSTICE THOMAS AND MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION IN RE APPLICATION FOR EMERGENCY STAY AND/OR INJUNCTION AS TO THE sanctions originally submitted to Justice Clarence Thomas Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ 29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688 949-683-5411 ADDRESSED TO THE HONORABLE CHIEF JUSTICE JOHN ROBERTS REQUEST FOR VERIFICATION OF SIGNATURE OF JUSTICE THOMAS AND MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION IN RE APPLICATION FOR EMERGENCY STAY AND/OR INJUNCTION AS TO THE sanctions originally submitted to Justice Clarence Thomas Background of the request and statement of facts 1 On July 8 2010 Application for stay of sanctions 10A524 was docketed with the Supreme Court and addressed to Honorable Justice Clarence Thomas. 2. On July 16, Friday 2010, around 9PM EST Applicant Attorney Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq (hereinafter Taitz) checked the electronic docket of the Supreme court, it showed no answer from Clarence Thomas. 3. On the same day Taitz has issued a press release, stating that there is no answer from Justice Thomas. Above press release was sent to some 28,000 media outlets and some 300,000 individuals. 4. On Saturday July 17, 2010 Taitz started getting comments on her website from some Obama supporters gloating about the fact that Justice Thomas dismissed her application. Originally, Taitz dismissed those as a dumb joke, but as those comments continued, she checked the electronic docket of the Supreme Court and to her amazement found, that somebody made a new entry on Saturday July 17, 2010, and backdated it for Thursday the 15th of July, stating that Justice Thomas dismissed her application. 5. On Saturday the court was closed, Justices and clerks were not there, therefore the applicant has reasonable belief and suspicion, that above entry was not authorized. 6. There appears to be a pattern of docket entries made or deletions of entries from the docket done when the Supreme Court is closed. 7. On January 7, 2009 Your Honor reviewed another application for stay filed by Taitz on behalf of her clients: 08A524 Lightfoot v Bowen. Your Honor distributed above application to be heard in the conference of the full court on January 23, 2010. 8. This case was followed by a number of citizens with great interest, as it dealt with Barack Hussein Obama’s illegitimacy to US presidency. 9. Some 360,000 US citizens have filed a petition by Net world Daily magazine, that was addressed to Justices, asking them to hear the case on the merits. 10. Before inauguration, on January 19, 2010 Aplication 08A524 was on the docket of the Supreme Court. 11. On January 21, 2009, when Supreme Court was reopened for business after inauguration, and two days before the scheduled conference, application was not there, it was deleted by someone, as if it never existed. 12. Numerous outraged citizens, including members of the media and state representatives, called the Supreme Court and demanded to re-enter the application on the docket. 13. On January 22, 2009 Taitz received a phone call from a stays clerk, Danny Bickel, who asked Taitz to tell her supporters not to contact the Supreme Court, he stated that application was never deleted. Taitz responded that she has affidavits and screen shots from her supporters, showing that the case disappeared. At that time Mr. Bickel stated that it was a computer problem, that affected all the cases. Taitz responded, that this statement is not true either, as she has an affidavit from Attorney Theresa Ward, ESq, member of the bar of the Supreme Court, who could see other cases on the docket, but Taitz case was not there. Ms. Ward called the Supreme Court and complained. At that point Mr. Bickel stated that the case will be re-entered within an hour and asked Taitz to contact her supporters and ask them not to contact the Supreme Court, as the problem was fixed. Above conversation happened on January 22, at the end of the day, while the conference of all nine justices was supposed to be the next morning. 14. On January 23, 2009 all nine justices supposedly discussed the case. 15. On January 26, 2009 it was announced that the justices decided not to proceed with oral argument. 16. On March 9, 2009 Justice Scalia was giving a lecture and signing his books in Los Angeles. 17. Taitz attended the lecture, asked Justice Scalia questions during Q and A and later at the book signing asked Justice Scalia, why the case was not heard in oral argument, why wasn’t it heard on the merits. To her amazement, Justice Scalia had no clue the case even existed, he could not remember one word, one thing about the case. When Taitz asked Justice Scalia about other similar cases, he could not remember a thing either, even though he was supposedly the Justice, who referred some of those cases to the conference in the first place, which means that he supposedly read those cases more than once. Argument Currently, there is a clear pattern of entries being made on the docket of the Supreme Court, or entries or even cases deleted, when the court is closed and the Justices and the clerks are not there. While it is not uncommon for the clerks to make entries a day or two after the order was made, it is uncommon to do it when the court is closed. It is more unlikely for such entry to be made on an inauguration day, when all the Justices were not there and could be seen on TV attending the inauguration. Supreme Court is not a city bus, when one can go in and out any time he feels like. Supreme Court has tight security, and there were situations where cases were held for nearly a month, when it was told to the applicants, that the documents are undergoing Anthrax scan. It is highly imptobable, that someone would be working in the Supreme Court, when it is closed, particularly on inauguration day. It is also of concern, that Justice Scalia could not remember any of the cases dealing with legitimacy of Barack Obama, particularly in light of the fact that at the lecture he gave on March 9, 2009 he stated that the Justices pick for oral argument cases not based on beauty of writing or legal argument, but based on importance to the country. What can be more important than legitimacy of a person sitting in the position of the president and Commander in Chief? Of Additional concern is the fact that in both cases unexplained activity happened, when the cases were to the detriment of Mr. Obama, stating that he was not eligible to the presidency due to the fact that he had foreign allegiance and citizenship and due to the fact that he refused and still refuses to unseal his original birth certificate, and the short version received does not show the name of the hospital or doctor or signatures. Taitz also provided information, that the social security number used by Mr. Obama, 042-68-4425, was issued in the state of CT, while he resided in Hi, and it was issued to an elderly individual, born in 1890. Points and authorities Taitz cannot provide any points and authorities, as nothing like that ever happened in the Supreme Court and Taitz is requesting your Honor to review the above Motion as the matter of first impression. Relief requested 1. Taitz is requesting an appointment to visit the Supreme Court with a forensic document expert (to be identified at a later date) and view the orders pertaining to her cases and verify and clarify, that there is a valid signature of Justice Thomas and his clerk on the denial of application 10A56, entered on the Docket on Saturday 17, 2010. 2. Taitz is requesting an appointment to visit the Supreme Court with a forensic document expert and verify that there genuine signatures of all nine Justices on the denial of her case 08A524 discussed in conference on January 23, 2009. 3. Taitz is requesting your Honor to grant her and her computer security expert (to be identified at a later date) access to the electronic docket of the cases pertaining to her and her clients, in order to ascertain who made an entry in the docket 10A56 on Saturday, July 17, 2010 and who deleted the Application 08A 524 from the docket of the Supreme Court and whether such person was authorized to make such changes to the docket. Respectfully submitted /s/ Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ 07.20.10. Certification I certify that true and correct copy of the above was served on Kumar Neal Katyal Acting Solicitor General of the United States United States Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania ave, N.W. Washington DC 20530-0001 Hugh Randolph Aderhold, JR Assistant US Attorney P.O.Box 1702 Macon, GA 31202-1702 US Commission on Civil Rights 624 Ninth Street, NW Washington, DC 20425 C Public Integrity Section Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Ave, NW Washington DC 20530-0001 Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) Special Rapporteur on the Situation of Human Rights Defenders The Honorable Mrs. Margaret Sekaggya Palais des Nations CH-1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland International Criminal bar Hague BPI-ICB-CAPI Head Office Neuhuyskade 94 2596 XM The Hague The Netherlands Tel : 0031 (70) 3268070 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting 0031 (70) 3268070 end_of_the_skype_highlighting Fax : 0031 (70) 3353531 Email: info@bpi-icb.org Website: www.bpi-icb.org Regional Office – Americas / Bureau régional – Amériques / Oficina regional – Américas 137, rue St-Pierre Montréal, Québec, Canada, H2Y 3T5 Tel : 001 (514) 289-8757 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting 001 (514) 289-8757 end_of_the_skype_highlighting Fax : 001 (514) 289-8590 Email: admin@bpi-icb.org Website: www.bpi-icb.org Laura Vericat Figarola BPI-ICB-CAPI Secretaria Barcelona laura_bpi@icab.es Address: Avenida Diagonal 529 1º2ª 08029 Barcelona, España tel/fax 0034 93 405 14 24 United Nations Commission for Civil Rights Defenders Orsolya Toth (Ms) Human Rights Officer Civil and Political Rights Section Special Procedures Division Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights tel: + 41 22 917 91 51 email: ototh@ohchr.org Signed /s/ Orly Taitz Dr Orly Taitz, ESQ 29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, ste 100 Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 7.
#7. To: Skip Intro (#0)
She screwed up by not playing the race card. Justice Thomas is BLACK, so the other justices on the Supreme KKKourt threw his answer out. Don't wanna hear from no uppity Negro!
There are no replies to Comment # 7. End Trace Mode for Comment # 7.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|