[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"The 2nd Impeachment: Trump’s Popularity Still Scares Them to Death"

"President Badass"

"Jasmine Crockett's Train Wreck Interview Was a Disaster"

"How Israel Used Spies, Smuggled Drones and AI to Stun and Hobble Iran"

There hasn’T been ... a single updaTe To This siTe --- since I joined.

"This Is Not What Authoritarianism Looks Like"

America Erupts… ICE Raids Takeover The Streets

AC/DC- Riff Raff + Go Down [VH1 Uncut, July 5, 1996]

Why is Peter Schiff calling Bitcoin a ‘giant cult’ and how does this impact market sentiment?

Esso Your Butt Buddy Horseshit jacks off to that shit

"The Addled Activist Mind"

"Don’t Stop with Harvard"

"Does the Biden Cover-Up Have Two Layers?"

"Pete Rose, 'Shoeless' Joe Reinstated by MLB, Eligible for HOF"

"'Major Breakthrough': Here Are the Details on the China Trade Deal"

Freepers Still Love war

Parody ... Jump / Trump --- van Halen jump

"The Democrat Meltdown Continues"

"Yes, We Need Deportations Without Due Process"

"Trump's Tariff Play Smart, Strategic, Working"

"Leftists Make Desperate Attempt to Discredit Photo of Abrego Garcia's MS-13 Tattoos. Here Are Receipts"

"Trump Administration Freezes $2 Billion After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands"on After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands

"Doctors Committing Insurance Fraud to Conceal Trans Procedures, Texas Children’s Whistleblower Testifies"

"Left Using '8647' Symbol for Violence Against Trump, Musk"

KawasakiÂ’s new rideable robohorse is straight out of a sci-fi novel

"Trade should work for America, not rule it"

"The Stakes Couldn’t Be Higher in Wisconsin’s Supreme Court Race – What’s at Risk for the GOP"

"How Trump caught big-government fans in their own trap"

‘Are You Prepared for Violence?’

Greek Orthodox Archbishop gives President Trump a Cross, tells him "Make America Invincible"

"Trump signs executive order eliminating the Department of Education!!!"

"If AOC Is the Democratic Future, the Party Is Even Worse Off Than We Think"

"Ending EPA Overreach"

Closest Look Ever at How Pyramids Were Built

Moment the SpaceX crew Meets Stranded ISS Crew

The Exodus Pharaoh EXPLAINED!

Did the Israelites Really Cross the Red Sea? Stunning Evidence of the Location of Red Sea Crossing!

Are we experiencing a Triumph of Orthodoxy?

Judge Napolitano with Konstantin Malofeev (Moscow, Russia)

"Trump Administration Cancels Most USAID Programs, Folds Others into State Department"

Introducing Manus: The General AI Agent

"Chinese Spies in Our Military? Straight to Jail"

Any suggestion that the USA and NATO are "Helping" or have ever helped Ukraine needs to be shot down instantly

"Real problem with the Palestinians: Nobody wants them"

ACDC & The Rolling Stones - Rock Me Baby

Magnus Carlsen gives a London System lesson!

"The Democrats Are Suffering Through a Drought of Generational Talent"

7 Tactics Of The Enemy To Weaken Your Faith

Strange And Biblical Events Are Happening

Every year ... BusiesT casino gambling day -- in Las Vegas


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: USDA reconsiders firing of Ga. official over speech on race
Source: Atantic Journal Constitution
URL Source: http://www.ajc.com/news/usda-reconsiders-firing-of-574027.html
Published: Jul 21, 2010
Author: Marcus K. Garner and Christian Boone
Post Date: 2010-07-21 08:42:18 by war
Keywords: None
Views: 405
Comments: 22

Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack said today he is reconsidering his department's decision to fire a Georgia official in wake of new details about her controversial speech to the NAACP.

Vilsack said in a statement early Wednesday morning that he will "conduct a thorough review and consider additional facts" about his decision to ask Shirley Sherrod to resign. Washington's apparent reversal came hours after a video of Sherrod's full speech was released, and the director of rural development in Georgia was defended by the white couple at the center of the controversy.

The full, uncut video of a federal agricultural official's NAACP speech purporting racial scheming, told a different story than the barely-three-minute snippet that cost Sherrod her job.

Despite admitting in the edited version of the taping that she once withheld help to the couple on the basis of race, Sherrod was defended Tuesday by the wife of a white Georgia farmer.

Sherrod, "kept us out of bankruptcy," said Eloise Spooner, 82, of Iron City in southwest Georgia. Spooner, in an interview with The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, added she considers Sherrod a "friend for life." She and her husband, Roger Spooner, approached Sherrod for help in 1986 when Sherrod worked for a nonprofit that assisted farmers.

Sherrod, who is African-American, was asked to resign Monday night by a USDA official after videotaped comments she made in March at a local NAACP banquet surfaced on the Web. Recounting her dealings with the Spooners, Sherrod said she didn't help them as much as she could because of their race.

But a review of the entire 43-minute, 15-second speech -- released Tuesday on the NAACP Web site -- showed that Sherrod was giving a cautionary tale about the evils of racial separation.

"When I made that commitment (at age 17 years old to remain in Georgia and help people), I was making that commitment to black people, and to black people only," Sherrod said nearly 15 minutes into the recording, just seconds before the segment that brought her trouble. "But you know, God will ... put things in your path so that you realize that the struggle was really about poor people."

Next, Sherrod would say the words that eventually led to her losing her job.

"[The white farmer] was trying to show me he was superior to me," she said, recalling the day some 24 years ago. "I knew what he was doing, but he had to come to me for help."

Eloise Spooner said as far as she's concerned Sherrod worked tirelessly to help the couple hold onto their land as they faced bankruptcy.

Spooner said she spoke to Sherrod by phone Tuesday morning after the story hit cable news.

"She's very sad about it," Spooner said. "She told me she was so glad we talked. I just can't believe this is happening to her."

Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack issued a statement Tuesday saying the controversy made Sherrod's position as a rural development director, a job she was appointed to last March, untenable. But Vilsack said Wednesday that after learning more about what Sherrod actually said, he would reconsider.

Vilsack said in a statement early Wednesday morning that he will "conduct a thorough review and consider additional facts" about his decision to ask Sherrod to resign.

The NAACP, which had released a statement Monday critical of Sherrod, backtracked Tuesday, saying it was "snookered" by Andrew Breitbart, whose Web site biggovernment.com released the edited video. Breitbart did not respond to a request seeking comment.

"Having reviewed the full tape, spoken to Ms. Sherrod, and most importantly heard the testimony of the white farmers mentioned in this story, we now believe the organization that edited the documents did so with the intention of deceiving millions of Americans," NAACP President Ben Jealous said in a statement. "The tape of Ms. Sherrod’s speech at an NAACP banquet was deliberately edited to create a false impression of racial bias, and to create a controversy where none existed. This just shows the lengths to which extremist elements will go to discredit legitimate opposition."

In the video, Sherrod told the crowd at the NAACP banquet in Douglas, Ga., that she didn't do everything she could to help a white farmer whom she said was condescending when he came to her for aid.

"What he didn't know while he was taking all that time trying to show me he was superior to me was, I was trying to decide just how much help I was going to give him," Sherrod said on the video, recorded "I was struggling with the fact that so many black people had lost their farmland, and here I was faced with having to help a white person save their land. So I didn't give him the full force of what I could do. I did enough."

Sherrod, in her first interview after the clip surfaced, told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution the video was selectively edited.

While she soon admitted as she told her story that she referred the Spooners to a white lawyer so "his own kind would help him," she followed that admission with a revelation that was omitted from the two-minute, 36-second excerpt of the speech posted by Breitbart's group.

Sherrod told the crowd that she discovered the white lawyer she had referred the Spooners to took their money for six months, but did nothing to help them.

"This lawyer told them, ‘ya'll are getting old ... why don't you just let go of the farm,'" she said. "I could not believe he said that to them."

Sherrod said she'd learned her lesson.

"It's about the poor," Sherrod said, just over 20 minutes into the speech. "It made me see it really was about those who have, versus those who don't ... black, white or Hispanic.

"It made me realize that I needed to work to help poor people ... those who don't have access the way others have."

She said the incident helped her get beyond issues of race.

"And I went on to work with many more white farmers," she said. "The story helped me realize that race is not the issue, it's about the people who have and the people who don't."

Sherrod accused the USDA of cowering to right-wing media.

"They were just looking at what the Tea Party and what Fox (News) said, and thought it was too [politically] dangerous for them," Sherrod said of her former employer.

The Sherrod video surfaced a week after the NAACP issued a resolution calling some elements of the National Tea Party racist for comments allegedly made against President Obama and African-American congressmen during the health care debate.

Sherrod said it wouldn't have made any sense for her to espouse racist comments before the NAACP audience.

"There were some white people there. The mayor [of Douglas] was there," Sherrod recalled. "Why would I do something racist if they were there?"

Douglas Mayor Jackie Wilson told the AJC she introduced speakers at the banquet but left before Sherrod's speech.

Wilson said she did not hear of any controversy in the weeks following the banquet, adding she was shocked to learn of Sherrod's resignation.

"She's not someone I know extremely well, but I respected her and thought she was doing a good job. And she seemed to be a fair person," said Wilson. "I just hate that this kind of thing happened in Douglas."

Eloise Spooner said she'll stand up for her friend.

"She helped us and we're going to help them," she said.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: All (#0)

Looks like the Tea Party fucked with the wrong "nigger".

[snicker]

war  posted on  2010-07-21   8:44:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: war (#1)

Sorry for going off topic, but I have a question for you.

Criticize the "Tea Party" all you want. They're adults - they can take it. But they do seem to want to hold elected officials' feet to the fire.

So my question - Do you EVER believe in holding an elected official accountable? Or only when said elected official has an (R) after their name?

-----------------------------------------------------------
The last gasp of a dying republic is a living, breathing Constitution.

Meet the new boss (Lindsey Graham) - same as the old boss (Zerobama)

Ignore Amos  posted on  2010-07-21   8:54:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Ignore Amos (#2)

Do you EVER believe in holding an elected official accountable?

I vote my conscience every election. We are not a democracy. We elect representatives to use their own judgements. My advice is run people who have better judgement but until you get money out of politics good luck.

The Tea Party would gladly get my support had they done one thing...channelled their energy over the moronic Citizens United decision which is the greatest affront to Liberty since the War on Drugs.

war  posted on  2010-07-21   8:58:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: war (#1)

$5 million easy.

Note the Total Cone of Silence from the MSM.

mcgowanjm  posted on  2010-07-21   9:12:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: war (#3)

Tea partiers support the constitution. Not its destruction as you do.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-21   9:51:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: war (#3)

until you get money out of politics good luck.

I stopped believing in Santa Claus when I was 5 . . .

How about this - let's recognize that "money" (i.e. power in the hands of the few) will ALWAYS find its way into politics.

And go the other way - FULL DISCLOSURE. George Soros, Sarah Palin, SEIU or the UAW can contribute however the hell much they want to contribute to a candidate and/or political party.

They just have to do it on the books.

-----------------------------------------------------------
The last gasp of a dying republic is a living, breathing Constitution.

Meet the new boss (Lindsey Graham) - same as the old boss (Zerobama)

Ignore Amos  posted on  2010-07-21   10:06:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Ignore Amos (#6)

What the liberals want is no one powerful except their messiah. That is why they hate that corporations have free speech too. They can't stand it. So they twist the constitution to try and make it say things it doesn't. You see if they get rid of the powerful people in our society it will be easy for Obama to roll over us regular folks. They don't want anyone able to challenge him. They even want to control the internet to shut me and you off. Resist the bastard president.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-21   10:12:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: A K A Stone (#7)

Resist the bastard president.

. . . and his statist minions.

-----------------------------------------------------------
The last gasp of a dying republic is a living, breathing Constitution.

Meet the new boss (Lindsey Graham) - same as the old boss (Zerobama)

Ignore Amos  posted on  2010-07-21   10:37:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Ignore Amos (#6)

How about this - let's recognize that "money" (i.e. power in the hands of the few) will ALWAYS find its way into politics.

How about this...pass a law that corporations aren't people and can thus be regulated as they are supposed to be regulated.

war  posted on  2010-07-21   10:38:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Ignore Amos (#8)

The last gasp of a dying republic is a living, breathing Constitution.

Then the founders killed their creation.

Look at the Pyramid on the Great Seal...why is it left unfinished?

war  posted on  2010-07-21   10:39:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: A K A Stone (#7)

What the liberals want is no one powerful except their messiah. That is why they hate that corporations have free speech too. They can't stand it. So they twist the constitution to try and make it say things it doesn't. You see if they get rid of the powerful people in our society it will be easy for Obama to roll over us regular folks. They don't want anyone able to challenge him. They even want to control the internet to shut me and you off.

Well said, and 100% on the money.

btw, anyone check this article for accuracy? Editing?

Obama's first all-by-his-lonesome budget, btw, calls for a $1.17 trillion deficit.

Badeye  posted on  2010-07-21   11:01:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: war (#10)

The last gasp of a dying republic is a living, breathing Constitution.

Then the founders killed their creation.

They provided an amendment process.

So I ask (against my better judgment) - How did the founders kill their creation?

-----------------------------------------------------------
The last gasp of a dying republic is a living, breathing Constitution.

Meet the new boss (Lindsey Graham) - same as the old boss (Zerobama)

Ignore Amos  posted on  2010-07-21   11:10:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Ignore Amos (#12) (Edited)

How did the founders kill their creation?

Implied powers are where the life and breath of the USCON lies...

war  posted on  2010-07-21   11:11:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: war (#9)

How about this - let's recognize that "money" (i.e. power in the hands of the few) will ALWAYS find its way into politics.

How about this...pass a law that corporations aren't people and can thus be regulated as they are supposed to be regulated.

Do my proposal first, and yours won't matter.

-----------------------------------------------------------
The last gasp of a dying republic is a living, breathing Constitution.

Meet the new boss (Lindsey Graham) - same as the old boss (Zerobama)

Ignore Amos  posted on  2010-07-21   11:11:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: war (#13)

Implied powers are where the life and breath of the USCON lies...

And it's okay with you if an imperial president (as long as he's a D) gets to DECIDE what those implied powers are.

Got it.

-----------------------------------------------------------
The last gasp of a dying republic is a living, breathing Constitution.

Meet the new boss (Lindsey Graham) - same as the old boss (Zerobama)

Ignore Amos  posted on  2010-07-21   11:13:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Ignore Amos (#15) (Edited)

It's why there are checks and balances between the branches. It's why we have an independent judiciary. It's why we're bicameral. It's why the House and 1/3 of the Senate get purged every two years and the Executive affirmed or veto'd after four. The USCON shows its life EvERY TIME we have a peacefull transfer of power.

The problem is, a typical Senator or Rep's natural constituency is no longer his/her district or state or commonwealth. It's the money that gets him or her there.

Why is over a hundred million dollars spent for a job that pays $400K a year?

war  posted on  2010-07-21   11:34:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: war (#16)

It's why there are checks and balances between the branches.
Congress is becoming more irrelevant by the day.
It's why we have an independent judiciary.
The Executive gets to appoint, and (as long as the Executive is a D) the Senate rubberstamps. So the "independent" judiciary has become an extension of the Executive branch.
It's why we're bicameral.
Rome after Caesar had a Senate, too.
It's why the House and 1/3 of the Senate get purged every two years
With what - a 98% re-election rate?
and the Executive affirmed or veto'd after four.
No it doesn't. We get to choose the flavor du joir between statist A and statist B
The problem is, a typical Senator or Rep's natural constituency is no longer his/her district or state or commonwealth. It's the money that gets him or her there.

Why is over a hundred million dollars spent for a job that pays $400K a year?

Short answer? Original sin.

Accept that there is no perfect system. Allow contributions of any amount, but require full disclosure.

-----------------------------------------------------------
The last gasp of a dying republic is a living, breathing Constitution.

Meet the new boss (Lindsey Graham) - same as the old boss (Zerobama)

Ignore Amos  posted on  2010-07-21   11:46:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Ignore Amos (#17) (Edited)

The Executive gets to appoint, and (as long as the Executive is a D) the Senate rubberstamps. So the "independent" judiciary has become an extension of the Executive branch.

Your issue then is in construction, not practice.

With what - a 98% re-election rate?

Whose fault is that? While we are a republic, the democratic process ensures we get the government most of us want.

Allow contributions of any amount, but require full disclosure.

Because both sides of this is repugnant to the First Amendment.

war  posted on  2010-07-21   11:52:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: war (#18)

With what - a 98% re-election rate?

Whose fault is that?

Don't get me started - LOL!

Dumbed down public schools that do not teach US History? Or if they do, it's a bullshit politically correct version?

An apathetic public? An irresponsible political system?

Plenty of blame to go around.

-----------------------------------------------------------
The last gasp of a dying republic is a living, breathing Constitution.

Meet the new boss (Lindsey Graham) - same as the old boss (Zerobama)

Ignore Amos  posted on  2010-07-21   12:02:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: war (#18)

Allow contributions of any amount, but require full disclosure.

Because both sides of this is repugnant to the First Amendment.

How?

-----------------------------------------------------------
The last gasp of a dying republic is a living, breathing Constitution.

Meet the new boss (Lindsey Graham) - same as the old boss (Zerobama)

Ignore Amos  posted on  2010-07-21   12:03:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: Ignore Amos (#20) (Edited)

I should be free to associate with whomever I want to associate free from "registering".

And the other side is, a corporation is not human; it is an artificial creation of the law and therefore it has no inherent rights.

And, btw, Madison #10 speaks directly to this issue and underscores how the court got it wrong.

war  posted on  2010-07-21   12:07:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: war (#21) (Edited)

I should be free to associate with whomever I want to associate free from "registering".

Are you against all election laws then? How about placing signs within X number of feet of polling places? Doesn't that infringe upon 1A?

What do you think of McClown/Feingold?

-----------------------------------------------------------
The last gasp of a dying republic is a living, breathing Constitution.

Meet the new boss (Lindsey Graham) - same as the old boss (Zerobama)

Ignore Amos  posted on  2010-07-21   13:13:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com