Primative Weapons
See other Primative Weapons Articles
Title: Goldi: Palin Quitting Was A Brilliamt Move Worthy of George Washington
Source:
Liberty Post
URL Source: http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/ ... .cgi?ArtNum=292788&Disp=14#C14
Published: Jul 19, 2010
Author: Goldi-Lox
Post Date: 2010-07-19 09:16:33 by war
Keywords: None
Views: 81476
Comments: 88
#14. To: GrandIsland (#9)
Those who criticise Palin for quitting the Governorship, should take a look at our Founding Father, George Washington.
He had NO desire to be President, and did so only because he was needed.
Others did the same with regard to service.
Palin realized that by staying she would harm her state, and left. If she was power mad, she would have hung on like the Democrats do...to the bitter end.
However, she chose to leave on a positive note, and has done a LOT to help the conservative cause.
In hindsight, her departure was a brilliant move.
Goldi-Lox posted on 2010-07-16 12:46:35 ET Reply Trace
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: war (#0)
Financially it turned out pretty well for her. Politically, she'll always be a sideshow and never the main event. elPee has slowed down to a crawl, participation-wise that is.
This is why: #15. To: GrandIsland (#10) If we want to restore our nation, we must first purge out all of those people who do not support our Constitution. AKA: Communists. Marxists. We are a house divided among ourselves. We can never win back our Republic until we purge all the Commies. There is simply no other way for restoration to occur. Goldi-Lox posted on 2010-07-16 12:50:44 ET Reply Trace
There are some people who can receive a truth by no other way than to have their understanding shocked and insulted. -Carl Sandburg describing Creationists
What positions of Palins is Obama superior on?
Is she living in the 1950s?
He's a much better teleprompter reader.
What positions does she have? She's long on blather and little else.
She supports the Arizona crackdown. She isn't for murdering babies shortly after birth. She is for keeping the Bush tax cuts. To start.
Did you see Obama lie and say that the healthcare bill is not a tax. Then reverse course and swear it is a tax. He is a liar. Do you like supporting liars?
Are you a muslim like your hero Obama? Because Muslims suck.
How about Jews? Or Catholics? Or Protestants?
To the braindead, just the fact that Zero is a (D) makes him superior to Palin, who is an (R) One need look no further . . .
If I could, I would. The court briefing outted the Owe-bama administration as having been lying about the healthcare nationalization from Day One. No denying it now. Its a matter of public record.
Obama's first all-by-his-lonesome budget, btw, calls for a $1.17 trillion deficit.
Leaving aside the weird fixation the poster has with another website that banned him...has anyone done an accuracy check? We know what this poster does.
Obama's first all-by-his-lonesome budget, btw, calls for a $1.17 trillion deficit.
I call on her to refudiate these remarks.
Obama doesn't ascribe to Palin's socialist belief believe oil is a shared resource.
She is for keeping the Bush tax cuts. She's for expanding DoD spending and sending more troops to Afghanistan.
Only because of the opportunity it gave her to bash Obama. She has no workable solution and promoting unconstitutional laws is a non starter. Abortion is never going away. Ever. It's too much of a money maker for both sides of the issue and no side is willing to give the advantage to the other side. Obama is for keeping Boy Blunder's tax cuts as well with one exception.
Do you still post there?
nope, I quit the site after she banned Floyd. The writing was on the wall. http://libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=278213&Disp=161#C161
Palin supported TARP and McCain's immigration policy.
That's like an alcoholic curing a hangover with another drink.
Aha...now I remember... Also on that thread, Pan-Z-Boy got outtted as a liar...he claimed he'd opus'd too: #233. To: LP MGMT NOTICE - POSTER BANNED (#228) [:Comment Pulled: banned ] reaganisright posted on 2009-11-15 4:45:55 ET Reply Trace
So much for your knowledge on economic matters, or deficits.
Obama's first all-by-his-lonesome budget, btw, calls for a $1.17 trillion deficit.
You really shouldn't be lecturing others until you read this: http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&id=966 You should look up the word 'lecture'...(chuckle)
Obama's first all-by-his-lonesome budget, btw, calls for a $1.17 trillion deficit.
People forget that the Laffer Curve is a Bell Curve. Just cutting taxes to any old rate doesn't guarantee maximum revenues.
And then there's this, from the head of George W. Bush's council of economic advisors, Greg Mankiw (Economics Professor at Harvard) -- Yes, folks forget about the "curve" part of it. If it were linear, then cutting income tax rates to say .00000001% should raise trillions in revenue.
As soon as I'm done finding "refudiate" But here's a lecture for you from the guy who architected the Bush tax cuts: http://gregmankiw.blogspot.com/2007/07/on-charlatons-and-cranks.html I know it takes a real dunce to cut income, increase deficit spending and claim growth will take care of debt.
I don't pay attention to those that require 'tenure' on such matters.
Obama's first all-by-his-lonesome budget, btw, calls for a $1.17 trillion deficit.
Bush's own economic team argued that the tax cuts would recoup 25% of the cost of income tax cuts and 50% of the cost of capital gains tax cuts. He seems to have missed that. If there's one thing I couldn't stand in graduate school it was a professor who came to class unprepared for his lecture. :-)
I'm not in the least impressed.
Obama's first all-by-his-lonesome budget, btw, calls for a $1.17 trillion deficit.
I'll take 'Whats Owe-bama and the Democrat Controlled Congress for $500' Alex....(laughing)
Obama's first all-by-his-lonesome budget, btw, calls for a $1.17 trillion deficit.
Again, with each passing post you demonstrate your ignorance. Now if you want to argue that you know more about tax policy and its effects then the former chairman of Bush's council of economic advisors, be my guest. We'll all have a nice laugh at your expense.
He seems to have missed that. If there's one thing I couldn't stand in graduate school it was a professor who came to class unprepared for his lecture. If not for the entire financial/economic system being undermined by Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, plus (to be fair) the insane deficit spending by the Bush Whitehouse and then GOP controlled congress, it would have worked in my view. All we've done SINCE is triple the deficit, and make America less hospitable to business, and via several pieces of legislation and Executive Orders destroyed existing jobs and company's...and it looks like entire industries. Enough blame to go around. But we aren't about to vote on Bush, or the idiots from the GOP that got their collective asses kicked in 2006 for fiscal stupidity. No matter how much the Left and this Administration wishes we were.
Obama's first all-by-his-lonesome budget, btw, calls for a $1.17 trillion deficit.
“It has been one of the strongest profits recoveries ever,” said David S. Bianco, chief United States equity strategist for Bank of America Merrill Lynch. “You have got to go back to the Depression to find a profits recovery that outpaces this one.”
Three cheers for Bankers? (laughing) Its hilarious you grasp at this straw, goofy.
Obama's first all-by-his-lonesome budget, btw, calls for a $1.17 trillion deficit.
(laughing) Its hilarious you grasp at this straw, goofy. Chipmaker Intel Corp. reported strong earnings and a positive outlook for growth after the market closed Tuesday, a day after Alcoa Inc. and CSX Corp. did the same.
I'm still at a loss as to why you would think "your view" has any credibility.
Doesn't change the fact you cited bankers in the previous comment, goofy. Sheesh, talk about desperate...
Obama's first all-by-his-lonesome budget, btw, calls for a $1.17 trillion deficit.
Comments (42 - 88) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestIn hindsight, her departure was a brilliant move.
#2. To: Fred Mertz (#1)
#3. To: Fred Mertz (#1)
#4. To: war (#2)
We can never win back our Republic until we purge all the Commies.
#5. To: A K A Stone (#3)
#6. To: A K A Stone (#3)
#7. To: war (#6)
#8. To: Fred Mertz (#5)
#9. To: Fred Mertz (#5)
#10. To: A K A Stone (#9)
#11. To: A K A Stone (#3)
What positions of Palins is Obama superior on?
But I can't, so I won't.
#12. To: A K A Stone (#8)
Did you see Obama lie and say that the healthcare bill is not a tax. Then reverse course and swear it is a tax. He is a liar. Do you like supporting liars?
#13. To: all (#0)
#14. To: war (#0)
Being a Republicans means you get to choose your own reality
#15. To: A K A Stone (#3)
What positions of Palins is Obama superior on?
Being a Republicans means you get to choose your own reality
#16. To: A K A Stone (#7)
he supports the Arizona crackdown. She isn't for murdering babies shortly after birth.
Being a Republicans means you get to choose your own reality
#17. To: A K A Stone (#7)
She supports the Arizona crackdown.
#18. To: go65 (#14)
#19. To: war (#18)
Do you still post there?
Being a Republicans means you get to choose your own reality
#20. To: A K A Stone, War (#7)
She supports the Arizona crackdown.
Being a Republicans means you get to choose your own reality
#21. To: A K A Stone (#7)
She is for keeping the Bush tax cuts.
#22. To: go65, Fred Mertz, Pan-Z-Boy (#19)
#23. To: lucysmom (#21)
She is for keeping the Bush tax cuts. That's like an alcoholic curing a hangover with another drink.
#24. To: Badeye (#23)
So much for your knowledge on economic matters, or deficits.
Being a Republicans means you get to choose your own reality
#25. To: go65 (#24)
#26. To: go65 (#24)
#27. To: Badeye, lucysmom (#24)
I used the phrase "charlatans and cranks" in the first edition of my principles textbook to describe some of the economic advisers to Ronald Reagan, who told him that broad-based income tax cuts would have such large supply-side effects that the tax cuts would raise tax revenue. I did not find such a claim credible, based on the available evidence. I never have, and I still don't.
Being a Republicans means you get to choose your own reality
#28. To: war, badeye, lucysmom (#26)
People forget that the Laffer Curve is a Bell Curve. Just cutting taxes to any old rate doesn't guarantee maximum revenues.
Being a Republicans means you get to choose your own reality
#29. To: Badeye (#25)
My other work has remained consistent with this view. In a paper on dynamic scoring, written while I was working at the White House, Matthew Weinzierl and I estimated that a broad-based income tax cut (applying to both capital and labor income) would recoup only about a quarter of the lost revenue through supply-side growth effects. For a cut in capital income taxes, the feedback is larger--about 50 percent--but still well under 100 percent. A chapter on dynamic scoring in the 2004 Economic Report of the President says about the the same thing.
Being a Republicans means you get to choose your own reality
#30. To: Badeye (#23)
So much for your knowledge on economic matters, or deficits.
#31. To: go65 (#27)
(Economics Professor at Harvard)
#32. To: lucysmom, badeye (#30)
I know it takes a real dunce to cut income, increase deficit spending and claim growth will take care of debt.
Being a Republicans means you get to choose your own reality
#33. To: go65 (#29)
#34. To: lucysmom (#30)
I know it takes a real dunce to cut income, increase deficit spending and claim growth will take care of debt.
#35. To: Badeye, lucysmom, war, skip intro, fred mertz, brian s, (#31)
(Edited)
I don't pay attention to those that require 'tenure' on such matters.
Nicholas Gregory "Greg" Mankiw (pronounced /mæKÈkjuÐ/) (born February 3, 1958) is an American macroeconomist. From 2003 to 2005, Mankiw was the chairman of President Bush's Council of Economic Advisors. His publications are ranked among the most influential of the over 22,000 economists registered with RePEc.[1]
Being a Republicans means you get to choose your own reality
#36. To: go65 (#32)
Bush's own economic team argued that the tax cuts would recoup 25% of the cost of income tax cuts and 50% of the cost of capital gains tax cuts.
#37. To: Badeye (#36)
All we've done SINCE is triple the deficit, and make America less hospitable to business, and via several pieces of legislation and Executive Orders destroyed existing jobs and company's...and it looks like entire industries.
#38. To: lucysmom (#37)
“It has been one of the strongest profits recoveries ever,” said David S. Bianco, chief United States equity strategist for Bank of America Merrill Lynch. “You have got to go back to the Depression to find a profits recovery that outpaces this one.”
#39. To: Badeye (#38)
Three cheers for Bankers?
#40. To: Badeye (#36)
it would have worked in my view.
Being a Republicans means you get to choose your own reality
#41. To: lucysmom (#39)
.
.
.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]