[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"There’s a Word for the West’s Appeasement of Militant Islam"

"The Bondi Beach Jihad: Sharia Supremacism and Jew Hatred, Again"

"This Is How We Win a New Cold War With China"

"How Europe Fell Behind"

"The Epstein Conspiracy in Plain Sight"

Saint Nicholas The Real St. Nick

Will Atheists in China Starve Due to No Fish to Eat?

A Thirteen State Solution for the Holy Land?

US Sends new Missle to a Pacific ally, angering China and Russia Moscow and Peoking

DeaTh noTice ... Freerepublic --- lasT Monday JR died

"‘We Are Not the Crazy Ones’: AOC Protests Too Much"

"Rep. Comer to Newsmax: No Evidence Biden Approved Autopen Use"

"Donald Trump Has Broken the Progressive Ratchet"

"America Must Slash Red Tape to Make Nuclear Power Great Again!!"

"Why the DemocRATZ Activist Class Couldn’t Celebrate the Cease-Fire They Demanded"

Antifa Calls for CIVIL WAR!

British Police Make an Arrest...of a White Child Fishing in the Thames

"Sanctuary" Horde ASSAULTS Chicago... ELITE Marines SMASH Illegals Without Mercy

Trump hosts roundtable on ANTIFA

What's happening in Britain. Is happening in Ireland. The whole of Western Europe.

"The One About the Illegal Immigrant School Superintendent"

CouldnÂ’t believe he let me pet him at the end (Rhino)

Cops Go HANDS ON For Speaking At Meeting!

POWERFUL: Charlie Kirk's final speech delivered in South Korea 9/6/25

2026 in Bible Prophecy

2.4 Billion exposed to excessive heat

🔴 LIVE CHICAGO PORTLAND ICE IMMIGRATION DETENTION CENTER 24/7 PROTEST 9/28/2025

Young Conservative Proves Leftist Protesters Wrong

England is on the Brink of Civil War!

Charlie Kirk Shocks Florida State University With The TRUTH

IRL Confronting Protesters Outside UN Trump Meeting

The UK Revolution Has Started... Brit's Want Their Country Back

Inside Paris Dangerous ANTIFA Riots

Rioters STORM Chicago ICE HQ... "Deportation Unit" SCRAPES Invaders Off The Sidewalk

She Decoded A Specific Part In The Bible

Muslim College Student DUMBFOUNDED as Charlie Kirk Lists The Facts About Hamas

Charlie Kirk EVISCERATES Black Students After They OPENLY Support “Anti-White Racism” HEATED DEBATE

"Trump Rips U.N. as Useless During General Assembly Address: ‘Empty Words’"

Charlie Kirk VS the Wokies at University of Tennessee

Charlie Kirk Takes on 3 Professors & a Teacher

British leftist student tells Charlie Kirk facts are unfair

The 2 Billion View Video: Charlie Kirk's Most Viewed Clips of 2024

Antifa is now officially a terrorist organization.

The Greatness of Charlie Kirk: An Eyewitness Account of His Life and Martyrdom

Charlie Kirk Takes on Army of Libs at California's UCR

DR. ALVEDA KING: REST IN PEACE CHARLIE KIRK

Steven Bonnell wants to murder Americans he disagrees with

What the fagots LGBTQ really means

I watched Charlie Kirk get assassinated. This is my experience.

Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March (Tommy Robinson)


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: Newt Gingrich for president? I'd rather not
Source: Washington Examiner
URL Source: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/o ... nt-Id-rather-not-98321584.html
Published: Jul 14, 2010
Author: Rob Port
Post Date: 2010-07-14 10:27:44 by Badeye
Keywords: None
Views: 1258
Comments: 13

Newt Gingrich for president? I'd rather not By: Rob Port Special to The Examiner 07/13/10 10:58 AM EDT Newt Gingrich is making noises about running for President. Again. Which is becoming a staple of presidential election cycles. One almost as predictable as exit polling and those red state/blue state electoral maps on election night.

But let’s face it, as much as Newt may have accomplished for the limited government cause while leading Republcians in Congress back in the 1990’s, he’d be a terrible candidate for President.

First, he’s old news. If there’s anything that could throw a wet blanket on the flames of the tea party movement it’s a national ticket headed by a Republican retread from a bygone era. There’s no doubt that Republicans have the momentum going into these midterms, and that the momentum will probably continue into the 2012 elections with President Obama (who I’m assuming will be as unpopular then as he is now, if not more so) at the top of the ticket. But Republicans should also keep in mind that what is killing Democrats now could also be their swift downfall.

In 2006 and 2008, American voters weren’t voting for Democrats. They were voting against duplicitous, scandal-plagued Republicans. Democrats won by default, and carried on as though they had a national mandate to pursue a far-left liberal agenda. They didn’t, and now the piper is calling for his bill to be paid.

But that doesn’t mean that electorate is ready to resurrect the old Republican majorities that were first won by Newt Gingrich and company. What’s driving the tea party movement isn’t a desire to see Republicans back in power. What’s driving the movement is more than just any group of issues. The movement is being drive by dissatisfaction over the way we’re being governed.

Candidate Newt would only be seen as a throwback to a previous age of dissatisfaction.

Second, Newt has a lot of personal baggage. He divorced his first wife (also his former geometry teacher) after starting an affair with another woman. He negotiated some of the details of their divorce while his first wife was in the hospital with cancer. Gingrich then cheated on his second wife with the woman who would eventually be his third wife (and who is nearly 20 years younger than he is) in an affair that took place during the Clinton impeachment hearings.

Let’s be honest about what Newt’s “serious” consideration of a presidential run is. It’s about selling Newt Gingrich books, and stirring up interest in whatever PAC or non-profit Newt is pushing at the moment.

Newt’s flirtations are the political equivalent of an aging professional wrestler promising a comeback match, when really the promise of said match ends up being a lot of talking from sidelines. Nothing more than a ploy to sell tickets and merchandise.

Read more at the Washington Examiner: www.washingtonexaminer.co...321584.html#ixzz0tfdXuQso

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: All (#0)

Posted for the idiot class here at LF, that think stopping to give a speech in a state where a primary is held 'has meaning' two years before a national election cycle.

Obama's first all-by-his-lonesome budget, btw, calls for a $1.17 trillion deficit.

Badeye  posted on  2010-07-14   10:28:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: go65 (#0)

If there’s anything that could throw a wet blanket on the flames of the tea party movement it’s a national ticket headed by a Republican retread from a bygone era.

He could do what Nixon did in 1972 which was to claim that the party had finally caught up with him and Goldwater. He gave Goldwater as much time as he wanted at that convention which was the only unscripted portion of it.

war  posted on  2010-07-14   11:05:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Badeye (#0)

So, who you suggest? RINO Romney with his socialist healthcare system? How about Huckleberry, who pardoned more convicted criminals than the governors of the 6 surrounding states combined???

Gingrich accomplished a lot while he was Speaker. When he became Speaker, federal spending was 22.4% of GDP. When he left, it was 18.4% of GDP. Yes, Clinton deserves credit for going along. But who else has done anything like this? Not Reagan. Both Bushes increased federal spending, especially Junior.

Given his achievements, plus his intellect, and ability to explain things in a clear and concise manner, puts him head and shoulders above anyone else that it likely to run in 2012.

I agree that he's probably not serious. If not, we're going to be stuck with some big government RINO like Romney. Then it will be time for an independent to jump in, like 92.

jwpegler  posted on  2010-07-14   16:04:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: jwpegler (#3)

Gingrich accomplished a lot while he was Speaker. When he became Speaker, federal spending was 22.4% of GDP. When he left, it was 18.4% of GDP.

it was the Peace Dividend.

war  posted on  2010-07-14   16:04:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: war (#4)

it was the Peace Dividend.

That was part of it. They also reformed welfare programs (removing them from entitlement status) and they cut the capital gains tax which helped to ignite the good times we had in the 90s, where economic growth far outpaced government spending.

jwpegler  posted on  2010-07-14   16:10:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: jwpegler (#3)

Gingrich, when faced with an immovable object (a.k.a. Slick Clinton), folded.

As will any of the GOPers you named.

Don't count Zero out - he's got a formidable army of malcontents, government teat suckers, anarchists, socialists and media behind him.

If I could, I would.
But I can't, so I won't.

Ignore Amos  posted on  2010-07-14   16:11:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Ignore Amos (#6)

Gingrich, when faced with an immovable object (a.k.a. Slick Clinton), folded.

HUH?????

Gingrich shut down big portions of the government because Clinton wouldn't cut spending. He also threated to not increase the debt ceiling, which would have put the government in default.

Gingrich has more cajones than the entire Bush and Romney families combined.

jwpegler  posted on  2010-07-14   16:18:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: jwpegler (#7)

Gingrich shut down big portions of the government because Clinton wouldn't cut spending.

He also threated to not increase the debt ceiling, which would have put the government in default.

Clinton shut it down because Gingrich dared him to. As for the debt ceiling, Gingrich knew that it was a hollow threat.

war  posted on  2010-07-14   16:20:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: jwpegler (#7)

Gingrich shut down big portions of the government because Clinton wouldn't cut spending.

And the media had a field day. Remember "The Gingrich Who Stole Christmas"?

Any GOP nominee has to run not only against a dem, but also against the intelligentsia and the media. That's why they always fold.

Gingrich has more cajones than the entire Bush and Romney families combined.
That may be true, but so what? If our problems are to be solved by elections (doubtful), then we need a miracle worker.

Not just another failed politician.

If I could, I would.
But I can't, so I won't.

Ignore Amos  posted on  2010-07-14   16:27:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: jwpegler (#3)

I'm watching Paul Ryan closely these days. I know he's said no, but we will see which way the winds are blowing after the coming election cycle.

I think the media would do everything in its power to stop Gingrich. I'd rather see him behind the throne, not trying to sit upon it.

I never give a lot of thought to nominees for POTUS til after a mid term. Its a waste of time JMHO. This time in 1998 for example, JEB BUSH was the 'name' floating around.

Obama's first all-by-his-lonesome budget, btw, calls for a $1.17 trillion deficit.

Badeye  posted on  2010-07-14   16:55:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Ignore Amos (#9)

There's a big difference between 1995 and today People no longer trust the mainstream media We now have alternatives on cable, internet, and talk radio which were in their infancy in 95

jwpegler  posted on  2010-07-15   12:50:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Badeye (#10)

I'm watching Paul Ryan closely these days. I know he's said no, but we will see which way the winds are blowing after the coming election cycle.

Have you read Ryan's budget plan? It balanced the budget by 2080 by raising taxes on 95% of all Americans.

Good luck running on that platform.


Being a Republicans means you get to choose your own reality

go65  posted on  2010-07-15   19:29:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: go65 (#12)

(laughing)

Democrats are failing, and this is the best you can come up with, huh?

Good luck with THAT.

Obama's first all-by-his-lonesome budget, btw, calls for a $1.17 trillion deficit.

Badeye  posted on  2010-07-16   8:43:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com