United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Republicans Had Best Have A Compelling Message.
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://skipmaclure.blogspot.com/201 ... -had-best-have-compelling.html
Published: Jul 8, 2010
Author: Skip MacLure
Post Date: 2010-07-08 04:34:26 by Skip MacLure
Keywords: Republican leadership, filibuster, Elena Kagan
Views: 1946
Comments: 6
Despite the DeMarxists headlong rush to oblivion in November, we cannot count on our Republican leadership not to blow it. They need to show something that has been sadly missing thus far, in my opinion… leadership. To date, they’ve failed in the first big test of whether they have the intestinal fortitude to be the majority in 2011. Elena Kagan should have been stonewalled out the gate. She has zero qualification for the Supreme Court. She’s an Obama creation. A political hack. A statist mouthpiece. Did the Republican leadership stand as one and say ‘hell no’? Of course not. They went immediately into accommodation mode, giving Kagan all the wiggle room she needed to play cutesy games and not give one substantive answer to any of the really weak-kneed, almost pandering, questions by the committee. They’ve displayed themselves as indecisive and fragmented, when they should show the American Patriots, whose favor they curry, that they can stand for what we believe in. Conservative opinion was unmistakeably against Elena Kagan’s appointment. We told the leadership from the outset that we wanted her appointment filibustered. There were comments such as ‘Obama deserves his appointments’. Flashback to Lindsey (I’ll go which ever way the wind blows) Gramnesty… and the Sotomayor hearings. As I recall, the nomination proceedings were scarcely under way and Graham was telling her, in front of the open hearing, that she ‘is going to be confirmed’. That’s enough to make a skunk gag. Sotomayor is far to left of anyone on the Court, and Kagan is to the left of her. Somehow, the Republicans have gotten the idea that if we don’t make nice with the DeMarxist nominees, we can’t get our own through when the time comes. In the Marine Corps we’d call it ‘cowardice in the face of the enemy’. In the case of the so-called Republican leadership, it’s ‘folding before the enemy is engaged’. I see that John McCain has come to the party late… a little like his new-found religion on illegal amnesty and border security. The point is that if the Republicans can’t show leadership on this, can we trust them to lead? We still remember, all too well, the pathetic Republican performance of the Bush years. It’s one of the reasons incumbents have been dropping like flies. There will be more! You cannot expect us to get behind an incoherent and fragmented message. We’ve been there and done that. There’s too much at risk this time. We have to stop and derail this DeMarxist rush to tyranny at any cost, and we have to do it now! Here is a golden opportunity for the Republicans to articulate a clear, simple message. We have to return to the Reagan model. The conservative message resonates every time that it’s clearly defined… and every time it’s followed, it’s a success. Semper Vigilans, Semper Fidelis © Skip MacLure 2010
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Skip MacLure (#0)
I certainly wish they would have fillibustered that sex pervert.
Hell, the republican "leadership" (sic) is IN on it. This country's ailments WILL NOT be cured by elections. Sorry.
If I could, I would. Wouldn't it make more sense to ban this guy? He just uses your site for distributing his less-than-excellent column. He's never responded once to any post to him. Out for a couple days. Ta ta
... your mother and sister both thought I was a great fuck. And eagerly accepted the two dollar tip on top of the five dollars they charge for the 'twofer' ... Badeye
Enjoy
Out for a couple days. Ta ta ... your mother and sister both thought I was a great fuck. And eagerly accepted the two dollar tip on top of the five dollars they charge for the 'twofer' ... Badeye Has anyone heard of a normal man using the term "ta ta"? ?? ... But then this is Ahl Doafew Boners so of course it fits:)
Death to everybody who does not get outta my way. Below is positively the most hilariously BS overflowing comment from the resident obamunist spent-condom EVER:) "This is WHY I left the GOP in the mid 90's. ." Dwarf
?? ... But then this is Ahl Doafew Boners so of course it fits:) Nope. According to the Bathhouse Lingo encyclopedia, "Ta ta" was first coined by Charles Nelson Reilly...and means, "Take me, you brute!!"
#2. To: Skip MacLure (#0)
we cannot count on our Republican leadership not to blow it.
But I can't, so I won't.
#3. To: A K A Stone (#1)
#4. To: Abu el Banat (#3)
#5. To: Liberator (#3)
(Edited)
Wouldn't it make more sense to ban this guy? He just uses your site for distributing his less-than-excellent column. He's never responded once to any post to him.
#6. To: e_type_jag, Abu Doo el Boner (#5)
Has anyone heard of a normal man using the term "ta ta"?
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]