United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: 2010 Hottest Year On Record
Source:
Sustainability Ninja
URL Source: http://www.sustainabilityninja.com/ ... -hottest-year-on-record-94781/
Published: Jul 7, 2010
Author: Sarah Forbes
Post Date: 2010-07-07 09:14:04 by war
Keywords: None
Views: 41281
Comments: 68
NOAA reports that May, the period from March to May, and from January to May all have had the hottest combined global land and ocean surface temperatures since records began in 1880. May’s combined global land and ocean surface temperature was 0.69°C above the 20th century average of 14.8°C, with land temps being 1.04°C above the average. Ocean temperatures were the second warmest on record, coming in behind the 1998 record, with global ocean temps being 0.55°C above the average for the past century of 16.3°C.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-27) not displayed.
.
.
.
#28. To: eskimo (#26)
How is it that every successive year is "the hottest on record." Shouldn't it be like a thousand degrees on average by now?
Not to worry. Once the statists ram crap and trade down our throats, the whole climate thingy will be solved . . . . . . and we'll move on to the next crisis.
If I could, I would. I'm not sure where you are getting that from. 2008 and 2009 were cooler than 2007. Like the explanation for why 9/11 has not been investigated, why the Top 50 000 have 40% of the wealth, and why we invaded Iraq. Science is hard, let's go shopping. :-)
Is that fact or Padlock creating a straw man?
Science is hard, let's go shopping. :-) 8D Lindsey Lohan's Lawyer quits!
No. Hyperbole maybe. Fact is each DECADE is the Hottest ever.
Hello!! Go read the article I gave you in #26.
First half of 2006 is hottest on record. http://thinkprogress.org/2006/07/19/first-half-of-2006-is-hottest-on-record/ 2007: Hottest Year on Record So Far http://climateprogress.org/2007/05/18/2007-hottest-year-on-record-so-far/ NOAA says October 2008 hottest on record http://www.thorntonweather.com/blog/climate-change/noaa-says-october-hottest-on-record-%E2%80%93-oops-%E2%80%93-maybe-not/ August 2009 was hottest on record: experts http://news.brisbanetimes.com.au/breaking-news-national/august-was-hottest-on-record-experts-20090901-f63n.html May 2010: Earth’s Hottest on Record http://blogs.kxan.com/2010/06/22/may-2010-earths-hottest-on-record/
Debunked in 28...
None of those links are about the full year.
Thank you. ;}
That's why it's best to go with decades. The 'Naughts' was the Hottest Decade ever. # And Thus Ends the Hottest Decade on Record . . . : TreeHugger Dec 31, 2009 ... Photo via the Portland Mercury Yup, the aughts or naughts or naughties ... so every decade this century isn't the hottest decade on record, ... www.treehugger.com › Business & Politics - Cached Groundhog Decade: We're stuck in a bad movie, where it's always ... Feb 2, 2010 ... And he keeps waking up in the hottest decade on record, until he gains ... That's the most dumb-assed thing that I've ever read on a climate ... climateprogress.org/.../groundhogs-day-movie-global-warming-where-its-always-the-hottest-decade-on-record/ - Cached - Similar And gotta love how google pulls in the sex sites from this: 'Naughts' was the Hottest Decade ever. 8D The Ten Hottest Actresses of the Decade « Notes from the Bartender Nov 14, 2009 ... She got her big break in one of the best TV shows of the decade, Battlestar Galactica (2003). Hottest robot ever! **********. olivia_wilde ... notesfromthebartender.wordpress.com/.../the-ten-hottest-actresses-of-the-decade/
And I'm not Even opening a pdf! You can do better, Inuit. ;} wattsupwiththat for instance: [2; Older posts Aliens Cause Global Warming: A Caltech Lecture by Michael Crichton LMFAO.
No worries. How you doin' today, James?
How you doin' today, James? Super. Looking for some new tires. Flash flood warning. But like a good republican I'm on a hill and the ditches are cleaned. BDI's crashing below 1900, heading to below 1000. BP's cash flow is a lie. Just like their reserves: Why else stop checks to fishermen? Abu Dhabi not paying up? ;} BP p.l.c. Common Stock (NYSE: BP) Real-Time: 33.11 Down 0.63 (1.87%) 12:12PM EDT How's New York w/o LeBron? ;} Bloomberg's doin' everything but strait out cussing him.
I went from Michelins to Continentals on the Passat. Very happy with them.
See, Inuit, keep it simple. Like this: Ashley Ballantyne at the University of Colorado, Boulder, and colleagues analysed 4-million-year-old Pliocene peat samples from Ellesmere Island in the Arctic archipelago to find out what the climate was like when the peat formed. At that time, CO2 levels are thought to have been close to current levels – around 390 parts per million – but global temperatures were around 2 to 3°C warmer than today. It was the last warm period before the onset of the Pleistocene glaciation, and is used by climate researchers as a model for our future climate. Previous studies using computer models have suggested that the Pliocene Arctic was also warmer than it is today – up to 10°C warmer. A little warming can trigger a lot more in the Arctic because the loss of light-reflecting sea ice and the spread of plants across the land increase the amount of solar energy that is absorbed.
LOL!! OK, here is another. I am certain if you were really interested in reading some "other opinions" you could find hundreds of others on your own. "http://www.greenworldtrust.org.uk/Science/Scientific/CO2-ice-HS.htm"
We think alike. I can't find Continentals here. I'll look again though. I like the Passat. Reminds me of what the Lincoln Continental could've been. And Michelins are nice. I'm happy with BF Goodrich. For the $ and other bennies from my dealer. ;}
If you own 2003-2006, the next time you change your oil, have them drop the pan. The screen over the pick-up gts clogged with sludge and eventually blocks the flow of oil. VW knows about the problem but will does zip to compensate if you have a blow up...as I did.
I'm not sure what you are arguing here, the list you posted says that 2007 is the hottest year on record, the rest talk about specific months. Again, as I told you earlier, 2007 was indeed the hottest until 2010 while 2008 and 2009 were cooler. Do you want to actually try and refute that, or just keep raising straw men?
That's just it; every year is supposed to be the hottest on record in some kind of way. And it's believable that 2010 is the hottest on record? Record cold in Florida http://weatherarc.com/blog/2010/01/14/record-cold-in-florida/ 2010 Dawned with Record Cold Gripping the Earth http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/2010-dawned-with-record-cold-gripping-the-earth/ Record cold weather roundup – hundreds of new cold and snow records set in the last week http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/01/02/record-cold-weather-roundup-hundreds-of-new-cold-and-snow-records-set-in-the-last-week/ Record cold down under http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/06/30/record-cold-down-under/ U.S. Experiences Record Cold Winter http://www.cbn.com/cbnnews/us/2010/February/US-Experiences-Record-Cold-Winter/ Record cold temperatures recorded in Belize http://www.guardian.bz/component/content/article/53-headlines/1210-record-cold-temperatures-recorded-in-belize Bulgaria Sees Record Cold Temperatures http://www.novinite.com/view_news.php?id=112326
Meanwhile, the glaciers melt and sea level rises.
"The ocean will take care of this on its own if it was left alone and left out there. It's natural. It's as natural as the ocean water is." - Rush Limbaugh
Another IPCC Scandal - Sea levels NOT rising According to expert reviewer for the IPCC 26 Feb 10 - Dr Nils-Axel Mörner, geologist, physicist, and one-time expert reviewer for the IPCC, announced this week that, contrary to IPCC claims, sea levels are not rising. "Sea level is not changing in any way, " said Dr Mörner in an hour-long interview with Kim Greenhouse of "It's Rainmaking Time." Dr. Mörner, who received his PhD in geology in 1969, is one of the greatest - if not the greatest - experts on sea levels in the world today. He has worked with sea level problems for 40 years in areas scattered all over the globe There is no change, says Mörner. There is absolutely no sea-level rise in Tuvalo, there is no change here, and there is zero sea-level rise in Bangladesh. If anything, sea levels have lowered in Bangladesh. We do not need to fear sea-level rise, says Mörner. "(However), we should have a fear of those people who fooled us."
Yet we have more water every year the earth and sun exist. Where does it go?
"See in my line of work, you got to keep repeating things over and over and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the propaganda." --- George W. Bush (Rochester NY, 5-24-2005)
Nerem et al. (2007) Comment on “Estimating future sea level change from past records” by Nils-Axel Mörner, Global and Planetary Change 55 (2007) 358–36 Dear Dr. Osipov: It has come to my attention that Dr. Nils-Axel Mörner gave presentations at the seminar on climate change organized by the Russian Academy of Sciences at the request of President Vladimir Putin earlier this month. Dr. Mörner attacked the science of climate change, while claiming that he is President of the Commission on Sea Level Change of INQUA. I am writing to inform you that Dr. Mörner has misrepresented his position with INQUA. Dr. Mörner was President of the Commission on Sea Level Change until July 2003, but the commission was terminated at that time during a reorganization of the commission structure of INQUA. Dr. Mörner currently has no formal position in INQUA, and I am distressed that he continues to represent himself in his former capacity. Further, INQUA, which is an umbrella organization for hundreds of researchers knowledgeable about past climate, does not subscribe to Mörner’s position on climate change. Nearly all of these researchers agree that humans are modifying Earth’s climate, a position diametrically opposed to Dr. Mörner’s point of view. Sincerely,
Who? I guess everybody else is wrong then. BTW, where do you think all that glacier melt is going?
"The ocean will take care of this on its own if it was left alone and left out there. It's natural. It's as natural as the ocean water is." - Rush Limbaugh
It it supposed to come as a surprise that the moonbats would be defending their myths?
You ought to be all for that. After all, the sea level wouldn't have to go up much to put Limbaugh's Florida mansion under water.
If I could, I would. I'd much rather see all that natural oil covering his beach.
"The ocean will take care of this on its own if it was left alone and left out there. It's natural. It's as natural as the ocean water is." - Rush Limbaugh
Our glaciers are growing, not melting More falsehoods from Al Gore Written by Robert Felix, Ice Age Now | 10 March 2010 "Almost all of the ice-covered regions of the Earth are melting — and seas are rising," said Al Gore in an op-ed piece in the New York Times on February 27. Both parts of Gore's statement are false. Never mind that Mr. Gore makes only passing reference to the IPCC's fraudulent claims that the Himalayan glaciers will all melt by 2035. ("A flawed overestimate," he explains.) Never mind that Mr. Gore dismisses the IPCC's fraudulent claims that the oceans are rising precipitously. ("Partly inaccurate," he huffs.) Never mind that Mr. Gore completely ignores the admission by the CRU's disgraced former director Phil Jones that global temperatures have essentially remained unchanged for the past 15 years. I'll let someone else dissect Gore's lawyering comments, and concentrate on just the one sentence about melting ice, because neither part of that sentence is true. Contrary to Gore's assertions, almost all of the ice-covered regions of the Earth are growing, not melting — and the seas are not rising. Let's look at the facts. If you click on the words "are melting" in Gore's article, you're taken to a paper by Michael Zemp at the University of Zurich. Mr. Zemp begins his paper by warning that "glaciers around the globe continue to melt at high rates." However, if you bother to actually read the paper, you learn that Zemp's conclusion is based on measurements of "more than 80 glaciers." Considering that the Himalayas boast more than 15,000 glaciers, a study of "more than 80 glaciers" hardly seems sufficient to warrant such a catastrophic pronouncement. Especially when you learn that of those 80 glaciers, several are growing. Growing. Not melting. "In Norway, many maritime glaciers were able to gain mass," Zemp concedes. ("Able to gain mass" means growing.) In North America, Zemp also concedes, "some positive values were reported from the North Cascade Mountains and the Juneau Ice Field." ("Displaying positive values" means growing.) Remember, we're still coming out of the last ice age. Ice is supposed to melt as we come out of an ice age. The ice has been melting for 11,000 years. Why should today be any different? I'm guessing that most Canadians and Northern Europeans are very happy that the ice has been melting. Unfortunately, that millenniums-long melting trend now appears to be changing. No matter how assiduously Mr. Gore tries to ignore it, almost all of the ice-covered regions of the Earth are now gaining mass. (Or, displaying positive values, if you will.) For starters, let's look at those Himalayan glaciers. In a great article, entitled "World misled over Himalayan glacier meltdown," Jonathan Leake and Chris Hastings show that the IPCC's fraudulent claims were based on "speculation" and "not supported by any formal research." As a matter of fact, many Himalayan glaciers are growing. In a defiant act of political incorrectness, some 230 glaciers in the western Himalayas - including Mount Everest, K2 and Nanga Parbat - are actually growing.
If you expect anyone to take you seriously you'll start including links to your articles. And stop making up your own titles to articles.
"The ocean will take care of this on its own if it was left alone and left out there. It's natural. It's as natural as the ocean water is." - Rush Limbaugh
If you were really ineterested in the link, it would have taken you about 2 seconds to google and find it. http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/20801
I have been around nearly three quarters of a century and I have been to several glaciers. They melt at the bottom in summer but the ice is added to the top in winter. The sea is about the same as when I was young. I can see no reason for such hysteria about some doomsday heat wave.
canadafreepress isn't a legitimate source. Do you have one that isn't from a loon site? Actually, knowing you, I'm sure you don't.
"The ocean will take care of this on its own if it was left alone and left out there. It's natural. It's as natural as the ocean water is." - Rush Limbaugh
Translation: You can't refute any of the facts in the article. This was the original source. http://www.iceagenow.com/
but the NYT is...(eyes rolling)
Obama's first all-by-his-lonesome budget, btw, calls for a $1.17 trillion deficit.
Thank you! I went and looked at a website to see how my 2004 Toyota RAV stacked up. The main problems were 1999-2003. The author got all the way up to 'replacing the heroin laced blood with all new flush' type procedures. Fascinating. I do all the fluids/filters on my cars (1996 4Runner/2001 Corolla as well). The oil screen/pan author-"My best advice to you is to use good oil and change it often." And that's what I do. I change oil filters every time I change the oil. But I'll keep 'the screen' in mind if I ever get to a rack. And a chance to take the pan off. Thanx again. James
#29. To: war (#0)
#30. To: no gnu taxes, w.a.r. (#29)
How is it that every successive year is "the hottest on record." Shouldn't it be like a thousand degrees on average by now?
But I can't, so I won't.
#31. To: no gnu taxes (#29)
How is it that every successive year is "the hottest on record." Shouldn't it be like a thousand degrees on average by now?
Being a Republicans means you get to choose your own reality
#32. To: mcgowanjm (#27)
Explain the ice core scam again. Or just a source. Or rock/ash layers. Or Plate Tectonics.
Being a Republicans means you get to choose your own reality
#33. To: no gnu taxes (#29)
How is it that every successive year is "the hottest on record."
#34. To: go65 (#32)
#35. To: war (#33)
How is it that every successive year is "the hottest on record."
#36. To: mcgowanjm (#27)
Explain the ice core scam again. Or just a source.
#37. To: go65 (#31)
#38. To: eskimo, mcgowanjm (#36)
#39. To: no gnu taxes (#37)
#40. To: war (#38)
Debunked in 28...
#41. To: war, no gnu taxes (#39)
None of those links are about the full year.
#42. To: eskimo (#36)
#43. To: mcgowanjm (#40)
#44. To: war (#43)
(Edited)
No worries.
#45. To: mcgowanjm (#44)
Looking for some new tires.
#46. To: eskimo (#36)
#47. To: mcgowanjm (#42)
You can do better,...
#48. To: war (#45)
Michelins to Continentals on the Passat.
#49. To: mcgowanjm (#48)
#50. To: no gnu taxes (#37)
Being a Republicans means you get to choose your own reality
#51. To: go65 (#50)
#52. To: no gnu taxes (#51)
#53. To: Skip Intro (#52)
#54. To: no gnu taxes (#53)
Sea level is not changing in any way, " said Dr Mörner in an hour-long interview with Kim Greenhouse of "It's Rainmaking Time."
#55. To: no gnu taxes, skip intro (#53)
Mörner's claim that sea levels are not rising has been criticised for ignoring correctly calibrated satellite altimeter records, all of which show that sea levels are rising.
Being a Republicans means you get to choose your own reality
#56. To: no gnu taxes (#53)
(Edited)
John J. Clague
President, INQUA
#57. To: no gnu taxes (#53)
Dr Nils-Axel Mörner
#58. To: go65 (#55)
#59. To: Skip Intro (#52)
sea level rises.
But I can't, so I won't.
#60. To: Ignore Amos (#59)
After all, the sea level wouldn't have to go up much to put Limbaugh's Florida mansion under water.
#61. To: Skip Intro (#57)
#62. To: no gnu taxes (#61)
#63. To: Skip Intro (#62)
#64. To: Skip Intro (#52)
Meanwhile, the glaciers melt and sea level rises.
#65. To: no gnu taxes (#63)
#66. To: Skip Intro (#65)
canadafreepress isn't a legitimate source.
#67. To: no gnu taxes (#66)
canadafreepress isn't a legitimate source.
#68. To: war (#49)
If you own 2003-2006, the next time you change your oil, have them drop the pan. The screen over the pick-up gts clogged with sludge and eventually blocks the flow of oil. VW knows about the problem but will does zip to compensate if you have a blow up...as I did.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]