Prominent conservatives and Republicans in Congress have been attacking RNC chair Michael Steele and calling for his ouster after Steeles recent comments that the war in Afghanistan cannot be won. Today on MSNBCs Morning Joe, conservative Pat Buchanan complained about the rights reaction. What bothers me is the effort here I think to force a position on the Republican Party before theyve gone through their primary process, Buchanan said, and addressed former Iraq Coalition Provisional Authority spokesman Dan Senor about the foolish right-wing charge to wage war in Iraq: BUCHANAN: What Im saying is, dont start purging a guy because he said something different. [...] You guys were wrong on Iraq and you got us into that.
You had all that intel on WMD and got us into an unnecessary war.
Times Mark Halperin came to Senors defense, asking, Why arent you asking him if were safer with Saddam Hussein gone? Yeah, thank you, Mark, Senor said, then asking Buchanan, Would we have been safer if Saddam Hussein were in power? Surprisingly, when Buchanan offered a suggestion as to why the U.S. is perhaps not safer, Senor called his argument legitimate:
BUCHANAN: We would be safer if we had those 4,000 guys back alive and the 35,000 wounded werent wounded.
SENOR: That is a real discussion and a very legitimate point and we should have it.