[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"International court’s attack on Israel a sign of the free world’s moral collapse"

"Pete Hegseth Is Right for the DOD"

"Why Our Constitution Secures Liberty, Not Democracy"

Woodworking and Construction Hacks

"CNN: Reporters Were Crying and Hugging in the Hallways After Learning of Matt Gaetz's AG Nomination"

"NEW: Democrat Officials Move to Steal the Senate Race in Pennsylvania, Admit to Breaking the Law"

"Pete Hegseth Is a Disruptive Choice for Secretary of Defense. That’s a Good Thing"

Katie Britt will vote with the McConnell machine

Battle for Senate leader heats up — Hit pieces coming from Thune and Cornyn.

After Trump’s Victory, There Can Be No Unity Without A Reckoning

Vivek Ramaswamy, Dark-horse Secretary of State Candidate

Megyn Kelly has a message for Democrats. Wait for the ending.

Trump to choose Tom Homan as his “Border Czar”

"Trump Shows Demography Isn’t Destiny"

"Democrats Get a Wake-Up Call about How Unpopular Their Agenda Really Is"

Live Election Map with ticker shows every winner.

Megyn Kelly Joins Trump at His Final PA Rally of 2024 and Explains Why She's Supporting Him

South Carolina Lawmaker at Trump Rally Highlights Story of 3-Year-Old Maddie Hines, Killed by Illegal Alien

GOP Demands Biden, Harris Launch Probe into Twice-Deported Illegal Alien Accused of Killing Grayson Davis

Previously-Deported Illegal Charged With Killing Arkansas Children’s Hospital Nurse in Horror DUI Crash

New Data on Migrant Crime Rates Raises Eyebrows, Alarms

Thousands of 'potentially fraudulent voter registration applications' Uncovered, Stopped in Pennsylvania

Michigan Will Count Ballot of Chinese National Charged with Voting Illegally

"It Did Occur" - Kentucky County Clerk Confirms Voting Booth 'Glitch'' Shifted Trump Votes To Kamala

Legendary Astronaut Buzz Aldrin 'wholeheartedly' Endorses Donald Trump

Liberal Icon Naomi Wolf Endorses Trump: 'He's Being More Inclusive'

(Washed Up Has Been) Singer Joni Mitchell Screams 'F*** Trump' at Hollywood Bowl

"Analysis: The Final State of the Presidential Race"

He’ll, You Pieces of Garbage

The Future of Warfare -- No more martyrdom!

"Kamala’s Inane Talking Points"

"The Harris Campaign Is Testament to the Toxicity of Woke Politics"

Easy Drywall Patch

Israel Preparing NEW Iran Strike? Iran Vows “Unimaginable” Response | Watchman Newscast

In Logansport, Indiana, Kids are Being Pushed Out of Schools After Migrants Swelled County’s Population by 30%: "Everybody else is falling behind"

Exclusive — Bernie Moreno: We Spend $110,000 Per Illegal Migrant Per Year, More than Twice What ‘the Average American Makes’

Florida County: 41 of 45 People Arrested for Looting after Hurricanes Helene and Milton are Noncitizens

Presidential race: Is a Split Ticket the only Answer?

hurricanes and heat waves are Worse

'Backbone of Iran's missile industry' destroyed by IAF strikes on Islamic Republic

Joe Rogan Experience #2219 - Donald Trump

IDF raids Hezbollah Radwan Forces underground bases, discovers massive cache of weapons

Gallant: ‘After we strike in Iran,’ the world will understand all of our training

The Atlantic Hit Piece On Trump Is A Psy-Op To Justify Post-Election Violence If Harris Loses

Six Al Jazeera journalists are Hamas, PIJ terrorists

Judge Aileen Cannon, who tossed Trump's classified docs case, on list of proposed candidates for attorney general

Iran's Assassination Program in Europe: Europe Goes Back to Sleep

Susan Olsen says Brady Bunch revival was cancelled because she’s MAGA.

Foreign Invaders crisis cost $150B in 2023, forcing some areas to cut police and fire services: report

Israel kills head of Hezbollah Intelligence.


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Opinions/Editorials
See other Opinions/Editorials Articles

Title: Palin critics suffer from fear factor
Source: phillyburbs.com
URL Source: http://www.phillyburbs.com/news/new ... s-suffer-from-fear-factor.html
Published: Jul 5, 2010
Author: Dennis Miller
Post Date: 2010-07-06 00:15:38 by reaganisright
Keywords: moonbats, womenhaters, Libtards
Views: 267668
Comments: 430

The last presidential campaign, its election and each and every day since have crystallized the magic and malice of the national media. By working its magic, the media were able to keep Obama hidden in clear sight. His past was selectively chosen, his present was a manufactured eloquence of hope and change, his future was his transcendent ability to lead us to the land of milk and honey, and his gaffes were editorially retrofitted. The media took a virtual unknown and kept him unknown.

This Camelot euphoria was interrupted by another unknown that stoked the malice of the media. Unexpectedly, a non-elite commoner caused a derangement syndrome with Obama and his media acolytes that came out of the clear blue; the source of their derangement ... Sarah Palin.

The media launched a D-Day scale invasion of Alaska. Its mission was not to report, but to search and destroy. Every nook and cranny of Palin's life and anyone and everyone associated with her was scrutinized. Nothing was off limits: having five children was improper, her children's names were ridiculed, her fifth child was portrayed as her grandchild, and her everyday life was depicted as trailer trash. The universal talking point was the vice presidential candidate is not only barefoot and pregnant, Palin is dumb.

Let's examine Palin's "dumbness." She more than held her own in the vice-presidential debate with Joe Biden. While campaigning, even with the cheap shots from a left-wing media wrapped in straightjackets of unchangeable political ideology, Palin's message and demeanor won the hearts and minds of more and more Americans. With a stronger running mate, the results may have been different. Now as a leader of the tea party movement, the media now suffer from another bout of derangement syndrome. Tea party members are touted as dumb, and Palin is dumb.

Money or more precisely, lack of money is a major problem in all too many states. As governor, Palin had an opposite track record than her counterparts in bastions of liberalism such as New York, New Jersey, California and Massachusetts. These states are financially belly up and will be turning to Washington for, what else, a bailout. Yet Alaska is financially solvent. Its biggest concern is trying to keep Washington away. But the media spin is Alaska is a state of dummies and Palin is dumb. Advertisement

Palin wrote a book that sold 2.2 million copies and, much to the New York Times' chagrin, was on its Bestseller List for 11 weeks. The Associated Press had eleven fact checkers dissect each word of her book and found nothing to stir up another personal assassination. Nancy Pelosi had a book published; it's sitting on the shelf of your local book store. Regardless of the incredible success of Palin's book, the media decision: Pelosi is smart, Palin's readers are dumb, and Palin is dumb.

Who is Sarah Palin? Wife, mother, grandmother, soldier's mom, soccer mom, working mom, who believes in God, the Constitution, American uniqueness, sanctity of life, family values, school choice and low taxes. And because of this she is dumb. Maybe there just happens to be a whole lot of moms who believe in the same things. Women, who from the time they get up to the time they go to bed, are constantly juggling the multiple roles and responsibilities that define them. How dumb they are? Or do they have to be a conservative, female politician to be dubbed dumb? Tea party moms, you're in the same boat.

Wendy Doniger, a professor at Chicago Divinity School, wrote "Her (Palin) greatest hypocrisy is her pretense that she is a woman." Coming from divinity school that doesn't sound too divine, but it does sound liberal. Maybe her definition of a woman would be Pelosi, Hillary Clinton, Barbara Boxer or Janet Napolitano. Mothers of Bucks County and beyond, do you align yourselves with these ladies who are proclaimed smart or with Sarah Palin who is ... well, you know?

There's a major disconnect with the media's derangement syndrome. If Sarah Palin is so dumb and inconsequential, why do they go out of their way to castigate her? Why waste the time? It's a one-word answer ... fear.


Never heard or read anything from Dennis Miller and I'm from the phillyburbs area. Pretty good piece of writing, maybe why they aren't sinking like the rest of the print media.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 422.

#6. To: reaganisright (#0)

This "argument" is the ROFLMAO moment of the debate. Why anyone would believes that ANYONE fears Palin is beyond anything containing a semblence of reason.

She was an ineffective mayor. She was an ineffective governor who quit her position because, IN HER OWN WORDS, she was ineffective and couldn't handle the scrutiny.

Everytime she opened her mouth she said something stupid. She couldn't handle two fluff interviews and the excuse that Katie Couric was laying in wait for her is laughable when you consider the fact that the question that tripped up the Virgin Mary was a simple inquiry into what media sources she used.

One of the most bizzarre moments in political history is her resignation "speech".

war  posted on  2010-07-06   8:12:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: war (#6)

Why anyone would believes that ANYONE fears Palin is beyond anything

You commies are afraid of Palin. No doubt. It is utter stupidity to say otherwise.

The monkey in the white house has nightmares about her.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-06   8:15:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: A K A Stone (#8) (Edited)

It's utter stupidity to believe that there is any fear of this women.

Again, EVERY TIME she opens her yap she tumbles in the polls. EVERY TIME she speaks there is never a positive outcome. She whored her family out so that she could achieve her own political goals.

The monkey in the white house has nightmares about her.

Boy Blunder left office in January of 2009.

You commies

ROFLMAO..."commies"...BWAHAHAHAHAHA...

I will say that Palin knows her audience. Thankfully, there aren't very many of you.

war  posted on  2010-07-06   8:18:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: war (#9)

Boy blunder moved in in 2009 dimwit. He and his chimp family.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-06   8:24:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: A K A Stone (#11) (Edited)

Obama - or anyone for that matter - COULD be a monkey and they'd still be doing better than your hero.

war  posted on  2010-07-06   8:27:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: The Tool (#13)

Obama - or anyone for that matter - COULD be a monkey and they'd still be doing better than your hero.

And you know this how, tool?

January 13, 2005 Urban Word of the Day

TOOL

One who lacks the mental capacity to know he is being used. A fool. A cretin. Characterized by low intelligence and/or self-steem.
That tool dosen't even know she's just using him.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2010-07-06   8:40:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: Jethro Tull (#14)

And you know this how

Being smarter than you is a good start.

The economy is no longer in the free fall it was left in when your Apeman left in 2009.

war  posted on  2010-07-06   8:43:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: war (#15)

Be honeset. Neither Jethro or myself supported Bush. You do support a known baby killer though. Shame.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-06   8:45:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: A K A Stone (#16)

Be honeset [sic]

I'm one of the most honest posters you have here. Had I to choose, tho, Fred and Skip and lucysmom and MG are equal. Maybe a slight edge to Fred and Skip, tho.

And you both voted for Bush...why hide it.

I didn't vote for Obama. I would have voted for Hillary.

war  posted on  2010-07-06   8:49:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: war (#17)

I'm one of the most honest posters you have here.

lol. Editing content of articles isn't exactly honest. Then you denied it at first.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-06   8:50:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: A K A Stone (#18) (Edited)

Then you denied it at first.

THAT is a lie. I NEVER denied it. YOU are lying.

war  posted on  2010-07-06   8:51:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: war (#19)

I didn't "change" anything.

And thanks for admitting one but you know that you do the other.

#67. To: war (#48) Keep hiding behind the bozo, bozo. (laughing) You've always been a world class pussy. Badeye posted on 2010-01-14 16:12:48 ET Reply Trace

war posted on 2010-06-10 11:33:32 ET Reply Trace Private Reply Edit

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-06   8:55:19 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: A K A Stone (#20) (Edited)

Right. I added a word. It didn't "change" anything.

war  posted on  2010-07-06   8:56:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: The Tool (#21)

Right. I added a word. It didn't "change" anything.

Just wow. I see you have NO CAPACITY to learn from a bone head move. If you don't think altering copyrighted material is changing it, your banning is looking better and better to me :P

Jethro Tull  posted on  2010-07-06   9:02:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: Jethro Tull (#27)

I'm sure it is. You're a power hungry pissant of a boy.

war  posted on  2010-07-06   9:07:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: The Tool (#28)

You're a power hungry pissant of a boy.

You poor, leftist oaf. Perhaps the Land of Internet chat rooms is a place for "power hungry" folks in your world, but for us living beyond the confines of a Long Island hovel, they're simply a place to chat (and in your case alter Bloomberg articles)

Jethro Tull  posted on  2010-07-06   10:04:53 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: Jethro Tull (#32) (Edited)

I'm not poor and I am quite nimble.

You on the other hand, held a government job that you quit at the earliest moment to rob the taxpayers of a pension that due to your years of corruption and usurpation of basic human rights should be witheld from you.

war  posted on  2010-07-06   10:07:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: The Tool (#33)

I'm not poor and I am quite nimble.

I'll take your word for it, Tool, but you are distinct liability with your reckless, article altering proclivity.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2010-07-06   10:21:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: Jethro Tull (#37) (Edited)

but you are distinct liability with your reckless, article altering proclivity.

Fuck off. Just about every thread on this - and on your and your girlfriend's site - is a copyright violation and you know it. So shove your sanctimony up your ass.

war  posted on  2010-07-06   10:24:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#44. To: The Tool (#39)

Fuck off

Tool, the difference being only YOU CHANGES copyrighted material. Just apologize for being a goof and move on, OK?

Jethro Tull  posted on  2010-07-06   10:35:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#49. To: Jethro Tull (#44)

Just about every thread on this - and on your and your girlfriend's site - is a copyright violation and you know it. So shove your sanctimony up your ass.

war  posted on  2010-07-06   10:42:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#54. To: The Tool (#49)

Tool, are you repeating yourself?

Is it that hard for you to acknowledge the jeopardy you put Stone in?

Jethro Tull  posted on  2010-07-06   10:50:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#55. To: Jethro Tull (#54)

There was zero jeopardy, dipshit.

Biff Tannen  posted on  2010-07-06   10:51:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#59. To: Abu el Banat (#55)

There was zero jeopardy, dipshit.

Ah, so Stone over reacted when he iced the Tool for a few days?

Jethro Tull  posted on  2010-07-06   10:54:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#61. To: Jethro Tull (#59)

Of course he did, dipshit.

Fred Mertz  posted on  2010-07-06   10:55:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#62. To: Fred Mertz (#61)

lol

Completely right.

It was the 4um retard and badeye joining forces to try and get war banned. They came pretty close too. I'm sure eventually they'll succeed and then stroll off into the cyber sunset with their chests puffed out in accomplishment.

Biff Tannen  posted on  2010-07-06   10:57:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#68. To: Abu el Banat (#62)

It was the 4um retard and badeye joining forces to try and get war banned.

False statement, ABBA.

I stated I thought the punishment for what the dwarf did was appropriate.

He'll eventually get his ass banned from here, you can see it coming. Just like its happened six other times in other forums, a one of em twice.

Predictable as the sun rising in the east.

Badeye  posted on  2010-07-06   11:09:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#72. To: Badeye, war (#68) (Edited)

He'll eventually get his ass banned from here,

You're probably right. All he has to do is come out in support of evolution and an earth older than 6000 years and he's a goner.

Skip Intro  posted on  2010-07-06   11:12:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#103. To: Skip Intro (#72)

You're probably right. All he has to do is come out in support of evolution and an earth older than 6000 years and he's a goner.

Nah. I will just point out the truth.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-06   11:43:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#109. To: A K A Stone (#103)

Nah. I will just point out the truth.

No, you'll point out your religious superstitions and pretend they're truth. It's a lot easier to do that than actually think.

Skip Intro  posted on  2010-07-06   11:47:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#290. To: Skip Intro (#109)

No, you'll point out your religious superstitions and pretend they're truth. It's a lot easier to do that than actually think.

There is no proof the earth is old. The proof is to the contrary.

Give me an example of something you know of that proves the earth is old. Go ahead I'm patiently waiting.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-06   20:46:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#292. To: A K A Stone (#290)

Give me an example of something you know of that proves the earth is old. Go ahead I'm patiently waiting.

Read a geology book. Learn how radiometric dating methods work and how they're used.

Or believe creation myths if that works for you. It really doesn't matter to me.

Skip Intro  posted on  2010-07-06   20:55:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#294. To: Skip Intro (#292)

Read a geology book. Learn how radiometric dating methods work and how they're used.

I'm still waiting on an answer. Can't you back up your big proclamations?

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-06   21:04:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#297. To: A K A Stone (#294)

I'm still waiting on an answer. Can't you back up your big proclamations?

Not unless you're willing to do a little work on your own.

Really, we may as well be arguing about whether the sun rises in the west or the east.

Skip Intro  posted on  2010-07-06   21:06:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#300. To: Skip Intro (#297)

Really, we may as well be arguing about whether the sun rises in the west or the east.

I think we can probably agree that the sun rises in the east and sets in the west. You do know that I assume?

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-06   21:09:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#301. To: A K A Stone (#300)

I think we can probably agree that the sun rises in the east and sets in the west.

Well, that's a start.

Now why don't you tell me how old the earth is and why?

BTW, how old is the moon?

Skip Intro  posted on  2010-07-06   21:12:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#302. To: Skip Intro (#301)

You said the earth was millions. Back it up. Quit trying to turn the table.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-06   21:22:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#303. To: A K A Stone (#302)

You said the earth was millions.

I said it's billions of years old. It took people thousands of years to finally figure that out. I'm not going to try to teach you on a chat site.

If you're really curious, look for yourself. It's not like it's a government secret.

Skip Intro  posted on  2010-07-06   21:27:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#307. To: Skip Intro (#303)

I said it's billions of years old. It took people thousands of years to finally figure that out. I'm not going to try to teach you on a chat site.

Sounds like your religion is evolution. You can't explain it you just believe it but don't know why. Even though all science says it didn't happen. Sad so many in our society fall pray to stupid arguments and don't even look into it. I pity you.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-06   21:58:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#308. To: A K A Stone (#307)

Sounds like your religion is evolution...

Even though all science says it didn't happen.

How'd you get from the age of the earth to evolution?

All science? What, exactly, do you know about science?

Skip Intro  posted on  2010-07-06   22:02:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#309. To: Skip Intro (#308)

Because all you guys use circular reasoning to justify your faith in outdated dogma.

Are you saying you don't believe in evolution?

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-06   22:05:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#310. To: A K A Stone (#309)

Are you saying you don't believe in evolution?

Of course I do. What do you believe in?

Skip Intro  posted on  2010-07-06   22:07:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#316. To: Skip Intro (#310)

Of course I do. What do you believe in?

So you think it is ok to fuck monkeys? Afterall you think you came from them.

Do you want a banana?

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-07   7:20:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#354. To: A K A Stone (#316)

So you think it is ok to fuck monkeys? Afterall you think you came from them.

You're even stupider than I thought.

Skip Intro  posted on  2010-07-07   14:09:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#372. To: Skip Intro (#354)

So you think it is ok to fuck monkeys? Afterall you think you came from them.

You're even stupider than I thought.

You said you put your faith in evolution. Evolution falsely teaches that we come from monkeys. So you shouldn't have a problem with the question.

Again do you fuck monkeys?

If you don't, do you think it would be acceptable and if not why.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-07   16:45:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#377. To: A K A Stone (#372)

Evolution falsely teaches that we come from monkeys.

No it doesn't.

Geez, where do you get your information, the Scopes Monkey Trail?

Skip Intro  posted on  2010-07-07   19:15:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#381. To: Skip Intro (#377)

Evolution teaches we evolved from Piltdown man.

Or maybe it was Nebraska man.

no gnu taxes  posted on  2010-07-07   20:41:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#384. To: no gnu taxes (#381)

Evolution teaches we evolved from Piltdown man.

You don't have a clue what evolutionary biology is about.

Best to stick to Ron Paul, Bush worship, and Obama hatred. Those are your areas of expertise.

Skip Intro  posted on  2010-07-07   21:33:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#386. To: Skip Intro (#384)

Evolution teaches we evolved from Piltdown man.

You don't have a clue what evolutionary biology is about.

Why don't you tell me what you think it's all about, so I can have a good laugh as you try to explain it? D Do you want me to give you some crib notes to pro-evolution websites so you can get your talking points together?

no gnu taxes  posted on  2010-07-07   21:55:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#387. To: no gnu taxes (#386)

Why don't you tell me what you think it's all about

Why should I waste my time doing that? Believe whatever you want.

Just remember, science gave us airplanes. Religion gave us people who fly airplanes into buildings.

Skip Intro  posted on  2010-07-07   21:57:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#388. To: Skip Intro (#387)

Just remember, science gave us airplanes.

Fine, what do you think a "scientific" belief in evolution will accomplish?

Do you even know what you are talking about?

What is your background?

I wish there was a genuine evolionist biologist who would come on here and openly defend their belief.

no gnu taxes  posted on  2010-07-07   22:04:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#391. To: no gnu taxes (#388)

I wish there was a genuine evolionist biologist who would come on here and openly defend their belief.

It's not a "belief", it's a theory. Because of that, it takes a little work on your part to try to follow it.

You're the one who bases everything on belief, which requires no mental effort at all.

Skip Intro  posted on  2010-07-07   22:29:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#403. To: Skip Intro (#391)

It's not a "belief", it's a theory.

It's a belief. Totally faith based. There's no evidence whatsoever that an amoeba will evolve into a gazelle.

no gnu taxes  posted on  2010-07-08   9:42:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#406. To: no gnu taxes (#403) (Edited)

There's no evidence whatsoever that an amoeba will evolve into a gazelle.

That's not the way it works Eric.

Skip Intro  posted on  2010-07-08   11:29:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#408. To: Skip Intro (#406)

There's no evidence whatsoever that an amoeba will evolve into a gazelle.

That's not the way it works Eric.

Of course not.

Except that you nor any other evolution proponents actually know how it's supposed to work.

no gnu taxes  posted on  2010-07-08   11:45:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#410. To: no gnu taxes (#408) (Edited)

Except that you nor any other evolution proponents actually know how it's supposed to work.

It's a theory. As a theory it's done a pretty good job. Is it perfect? No, but then theories are constantly being challenged, tested and modified.

What's your theory? I don't believe I've seen it posted here yet.

Skip Intro  posted on  2010-07-08   11:50:53 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#414. To: Skip Intro (#410)

As a theory it's done a pretty good job.

A pretty good job of what? What benefits has it brought to mankind?

no gnu taxes  posted on  2010-07-08   11:57:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#415. To: no gnu taxes (#414)

The prgress of a society has always been tied to the progress of science.

war  posted on  2010-07-08   11:58:53 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#417. To: war (#415)

What science?

Evolution is a tautology, the same as creationism.

The conclusion was reached before any evidence was obtained. When the evidence doesn't support what is believed is needed to support that conclusion, it is rationalized away.

It's no different than middle age astronomers simply adding more and more epicycles to their models to support the notion of a geoocentric universe.

no gnu taxes  posted on  2010-07-08   12:07:56 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#420. To: no gnu taxes (#417) (Edited)

The conclusion was reached before any evidence was obtained.

Bullshit.

Darwin had reams of evidence for Origin of the Species.

war  posted on  2010-07-08   12:10:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#422. To: war (#420)

Darwin had reams of evidence for Origin of the Species.

I doubt you read any of the "wacko" links I provided, or you would know that's already been discussed.

To summarize, the churches of Darwin's day believed in the secular Greek philosophy that the species had never changed throughout the existence of life. The Bible, however, does not teach this.

Darwin, to his credit, observed, that yes, species did change over time based on their surroundings. He wasn't the only one to make such observations, just the most famous.

However, Darwin, without basis, extrapolated this out to suggesting that all life evolved in such manner, and their is simply no basis for this.

Today, even young earth creationists would actually agree with about everything Darwin observed in his studies.

no gnu taxes  posted on  2010-07-08   12:20:53 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 422.

#423. To: no gnu taxes (#422) (Edited)

However, Darwin, without basis, extrapolated this out to suggesting that all life evolved in such manner, and their is simply no basis for this.

AGain, Darwin had REAMS of evidence for this. You are simply lying.

Transmutation of species was a hypothesis that was at least 150 years old and was embraced mostly by botanists [who were the closest thing to being genticists atthe time and of which Darwin was one] by the time Darwin set sale.

The repression of science, the denial of science, the outright lying about scientific discoveries has ALWAYS been a top 3 goal of religion.

Today, even young earth creationists would actually agree with about everything Darwin observed in his studies.

Observation is an element of scientific method, Paddy.

war  posted on  2010-07-08 12:26:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 422.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com