[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

AI is exhausting the power grid. Tech firms are seeking a miracle solution.

Rare Van Halen Leicestershire, Donnington Park August 18, 1984 Valerie Bertinelli Cameo

If you need a Good Opening for black, use this.

"Arrogant Hunter Biden has never been held accountable — until now"

How Republicans in Key Senate Races Are Flip-Flopping on Abortion

Idaho bar sparks fury for declaring June 'Heterosexual Awesomeness Month' and giving free beers and 15% discounts to straight men

Son of Buc-ee’s co-owner indicted for filming guests in the shower and having sex. He says the law makes it OK.

South Africa warns US could be liable for ICC prosecution for supporting Israel

Today I turned 50!

San Diego Police officer resigns after getting locked in the backseat with female detainee

Gazan Refugee Warns the World about Hamas

Iranian stabbed for sharing his faith, miraculously made it across the border without a passport!

Protest and Clashes outside Trump's Bronx Rally in Crotona Park

Netanyahu Issues Warning To US Leaders Over ICC Arrest Warrants: 'You're Next'

Will it ever end?

Did Pope Francis Just Call Jesus a Liar?

Climate: The Movie (The Cold Truth) Updated 4K version

There can never be peace on Earth for as long as Islamic Sharia exists

The Victims of Benny Hinn: 30 Years of Spiritual Deception.

Trump Is Planning to Send Kill Teams to Mexico to Take Out Cartel Leaders

The Great Falling Away in the Church is Here | Tim Dilena

How Ridiculous? Blade-Less Swiss Army Knife Debuts As Weapon Laws Tighten

Jewish students beaten with sticks at University of Amsterdam

Terrorists shut down Park Avenue.

Police begin arresting democrats outside Met Gala.

The minute the total solar eclipse appeared over US

Three Types Of People To Mark And Avoid In The Church Today

Are The 4 Horsemen Of The Apocalypse About To Appear?

France sends combat troops to Ukraine battlefront

Facts you may not have heard about Muslims in England.

George Washington University raises the Hamas flag. American Flag has been removed.

Alabama students chant Take A Shower to the Hamas terrorists on campus.

In Day of the Lord, 24 Church Elders with Crowns Join Jesus in His Throne

In Day of the Lord, 24 Church Elders with Crowns Join Jesus in His Throne

Deadly Saltwater and Deadly Fresh Water to Increase

Deadly Cancers to soon Become Thing of the Past?

Plague of deadly New Diseases Continues

[FULL VIDEO] Police release bodycam footage of Monroe County District Attorney Sandra Doorley traffi

Police clash with pro-Palestine protesters on Ohio State University campus

Joe Rogan Experience #2138 - Tucker Carlson

Police Dispersing Student Protesters at USC - Breaking News Coverage (College Protests)

What Passover Means For The New Testament Believer

Are We Closer Than Ever To The Next Pandemic?

War in Ukraine Turns on Russia

what happened during total solar eclipse

Israel Attacks Iran, Report Says - LIVE Breaking News Coverage

Earth is Scorched with Heat

Antiwar Activists Chant ‘Death to America’ at Event Featuring Chicago Alderman

Vibe Shift

A stream that makes the pleasant Rain sound.


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Opinions/Editorials
See other Opinions/Editorials Articles

Title: Palin critics suffer from fear factor
Source: phillyburbs.com
URL Source: http://www.phillyburbs.com/news/new ... s-suffer-from-fear-factor.html
Published: Jul 5, 2010
Author: Dennis Miller
Post Date: 2010-07-06 00:15:38 by reaganisright
Keywords: moonbats, womenhaters, Libtards
Views: 263649
Comments: 430

The last presidential campaign, its election and each and every day since have crystallized the magic and malice of the national media. By working its magic, the media were able to keep Obama hidden in clear sight. His past was selectively chosen, his present was a manufactured eloquence of hope and change, his future was his transcendent ability to lead us to the land of milk and honey, and his gaffes were editorially retrofitted. The media took a virtual unknown and kept him unknown.

This Camelot euphoria was interrupted by another unknown that stoked the malice of the media. Unexpectedly, a non-elite commoner caused a derangement syndrome with Obama and his media acolytes that came out of the clear blue; the source of their derangement ... Sarah Palin.

The media launched a D-Day scale invasion of Alaska. Its mission was not to report, but to search and destroy. Every nook and cranny of Palin's life and anyone and everyone associated with her was scrutinized. Nothing was off limits: having five children was improper, her children's names were ridiculed, her fifth child was portrayed as her grandchild, and her everyday life was depicted as trailer trash. The universal talking point was the vice presidential candidate is not only barefoot and pregnant, Palin is dumb.

Let's examine Palin's "dumbness." She more than held her own in the vice-presidential debate with Joe Biden. While campaigning, even with the cheap shots from a left-wing media wrapped in straightjackets of unchangeable political ideology, Palin's message and demeanor won the hearts and minds of more and more Americans. With a stronger running mate, the results may have been different. Now as a leader of the tea party movement, the media now suffer from another bout of derangement syndrome. Tea party members are touted as dumb, and Palin is dumb.

Money or more precisely, lack of money is a major problem in all too many states. As governor, Palin had an opposite track record than her counterparts in bastions of liberalism such as New York, New Jersey, California and Massachusetts. These states are financially belly up and will be turning to Washington for, what else, a bailout. Yet Alaska is financially solvent. Its biggest concern is trying to keep Washington away. But the media spin is Alaska is a state of dummies and Palin is dumb. Advertisement

Palin wrote a book that sold 2.2 million copies and, much to the New York Times' chagrin, was on its Bestseller List for 11 weeks. The Associated Press had eleven fact checkers dissect each word of her book and found nothing to stir up another personal assassination. Nancy Pelosi had a book published; it's sitting on the shelf of your local book store. Regardless of the incredible success of Palin's book, the media decision: Pelosi is smart, Palin's readers are dumb, and Palin is dumb.

Who is Sarah Palin? Wife, mother, grandmother, soldier's mom, soccer mom, working mom, who believes in God, the Constitution, American uniqueness, sanctity of life, family values, school choice and low taxes. And because of this she is dumb. Maybe there just happens to be a whole lot of moms who believe in the same things. Women, who from the time they get up to the time they go to bed, are constantly juggling the multiple roles and responsibilities that define them. How dumb they are? Or do they have to be a conservative, female politician to be dubbed dumb? Tea party moms, you're in the same boat.

Wendy Doniger, a professor at Chicago Divinity School, wrote "Her (Palin) greatest hypocrisy is her pretense that she is a woman." Coming from divinity school that doesn't sound too divine, but it does sound liberal. Maybe her definition of a woman would be Pelosi, Hillary Clinton, Barbara Boxer or Janet Napolitano. Mothers of Bucks County and beyond, do you align yourselves with these ladies who are proclaimed smart or with Sarah Palin who is ... well, you know?

There's a major disconnect with the media's derangement syndrome. If Sarah Palin is so dumb and inconsequential, why do they go out of their way to castigate her? Why waste the time? It's a one-word answer ... fear.


Never heard or read anything from Dennis Miller and I'm from the phillyburbs area. Pretty good piece of writing, maybe why they aren't sinking like the rest of the print media.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 351.

#6. To: reaganisright (#0)

This "argument" is the ROFLMAO moment of the debate. Why anyone would believes that ANYONE fears Palin is beyond anything containing a semblence of reason.

She was an ineffective mayor. She was an ineffective governor who quit her position because, IN HER OWN WORDS, she was ineffective and couldn't handle the scrutiny.

Everytime she opened her mouth she said something stupid. She couldn't handle two fluff interviews and the excuse that Katie Couric was laying in wait for her is laughable when you consider the fact that the question that tripped up the Virgin Mary was a simple inquiry into what media sources she used.

One of the most bizzarre moments in political history is her resignation "speech".

war  posted on  2010-07-06   8:12:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: war (#6)

Why anyone would believes that ANYONE fears Palin is beyond anything

You commies are afraid of Palin. No doubt. It is utter stupidity to say otherwise.

The monkey in the white house has nightmares about her.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-06   8:15:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: A K A Stone (#8) (Edited)

It's utter stupidity to believe that there is any fear of this women.

Again, EVERY TIME she opens her yap she tumbles in the polls. EVERY TIME she speaks there is never a positive outcome. She whored her family out so that she could achieve her own political goals.

The monkey in the white house has nightmares about her.

Boy Blunder left office in January of 2009.

You commies

ROFLMAO..."commies"...BWAHAHAHAHAHA...

I will say that Palin knows her audience. Thankfully, there aren't very many of you.

war  posted on  2010-07-06   8:18:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: war (#9)

Boy blunder moved in in 2009 dimwit. He and his chimp family.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-06   8:24:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: A K A Stone (#11) (Edited)

Obama - or anyone for that matter - COULD be a monkey and they'd still be doing better than your hero.

war  posted on  2010-07-06   8:27:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: The Tool (#13)

Obama - or anyone for that matter - COULD be a monkey and they'd still be doing better than your hero.

And you know this how, tool?

January 13, 2005 Urban Word of the Day

TOOL

One who lacks the mental capacity to know he is being used. A fool. A cretin. Characterized by low intelligence and/or self-steem.
That tool dosen't even know she's just using him.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2010-07-06   8:40:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: Jethro Tull (#14)

And you know this how

Being smarter than you is a good start.

The economy is no longer in the free fall it was left in when your Apeman left in 2009.

war  posted on  2010-07-06   8:43:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: war (#15)

Be honeset. Neither Jethro or myself supported Bush. You do support a known baby killer though. Shame.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-06   8:45:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: A K A Stone (#16)

Be honeset [sic]

I'm one of the most honest posters you have here. Had I to choose, tho, Fred and Skip and lucysmom and MG are equal. Maybe a slight edge to Fred and Skip, tho.

And you both voted for Bush...why hide it.

I didn't vote for Obama. I would have voted for Hillary.

war  posted on  2010-07-06   8:49:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: war (#17)

I'm one of the most honest posters you have here.

lol. Editing content of articles isn't exactly honest. Then you denied it at first.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-06   8:50:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: A K A Stone (#18) (Edited)

Then you denied it at first.

THAT is a lie. I NEVER denied it. YOU are lying.

war  posted on  2010-07-06   8:51:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: war (#19)

I didn't "change" anything.

And thanks for admitting one but you know that you do the other.

#67. To: war (#48) Keep hiding behind the bozo, bozo. (laughing) You've always been a world class pussy. Badeye posted on 2010-01-14 16:12:48 ET Reply Trace

war posted on 2010-06-10 11:33:32 ET Reply Trace Private Reply Edit

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-06   8:55:19 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: A K A Stone (#20) (Edited)

Right. I added a word. It didn't "change" anything.

war  posted on  2010-07-06   8:56:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: The Tool (#21)

Right. I added a word. It didn't "change" anything.

Just wow. I see you have NO CAPACITY to learn from a bone head move. If you don't think altering copyrighted material is changing it, your banning is looking better and better to me :P

Jethro Tull  posted on  2010-07-06   9:02:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: Jethro Tull (#27)

I'm sure it is. You're a power hungry pissant of a boy.

war  posted on  2010-07-06   9:07:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: The Tool (#28)

You're a power hungry pissant of a boy.

You poor, leftist oaf. Perhaps the Land of Internet chat rooms is a place for "power hungry" folks in your world, but for us living beyond the confines of a Long Island hovel, they're simply a place to chat (and in your case alter Bloomberg articles)

Jethro Tull  posted on  2010-07-06   10:04:53 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: Jethro Tull (#32) (Edited)

I'm not poor and I am quite nimble.

You on the other hand, held a government job that you quit at the earliest moment to rob the taxpayers of a pension that due to your years of corruption and usurpation of basic human rights should be witheld from you.

war  posted on  2010-07-06   10:07:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: The Tool (#33)

I'm not poor and I am quite nimble.

I'll take your word for it, Tool, but you are distinct liability with your reckless, article altering proclivity.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2010-07-06   10:21:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: Jethro Tull (#37) (Edited)

but you are distinct liability with your reckless, article altering proclivity.

Fuck off. Just about every thread on this - and on your and your girlfriend's site - is a copyright violation and you know it. So shove your sanctimony up your ass.

war  posted on  2010-07-06   10:24:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#44. To: The Tool (#39)

Fuck off

Tool, the difference being only YOU CHANGES copyrighted material. Just apologize for being a goof and move on, OK?

Jethro Tull  posted on  2010-07-06   10:35:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#49. To: Jethro Tull (#44)

Just about every thread on this - and on your and your girlfriend's site - is a copyright violation and you know it. So shove your sanctimony up your ass.

war  posted on  2010-07-06   10:42:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#54. To: The Tool (#49)

Tool, are you repeating yourself?

Is it that hard for you to acknowledge the jeopardy you put Stone in?

Jethro Tull  posted on  2010-07-06   10:50:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#55. To: Jethro Tull (#54)

There was zero jeopardy, dipshit.

Biff Tannen  posted on  2010-07-06   10:51:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#59. To: Abu el Banat (#55)

There was zero jeopardy, dipshit.

Ah, so Stone over reacted when he iced the Tool for a few days?

Jethro Tull  posted on  2010-07-06   10:54:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#61. To: Jethro Tull (#59)

Of course he did, dipshit.

Fred Mertz  posted on  2010-07-06   10:55:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#62. To: Fred Mertz (#61)

lol

Completely right.

It was the 4um retard and badeye joining forces to try and get war banned. They came pretty close too. I'm sure eventually they'll succeed and then stroll off into the cyber sunset with their chests puffed out in accomplishment.

Biff Tannen  posted on  2010-07-06   10:57:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#68. To: Abu el Banat (#62)

It was the 4um retard and badeye joining forces to try and get war banned.

False statement, ABBA.

I stated I thought the punishment for what the dwarf did was appropriate.

He'll eventually get his ass banned from here, you can see it coming. Just like its happened six other times in other forums, a one of em twice.

Predictable as the sun rising in the east.

Badeye  posted on  2010-07-06   11:09:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#72. To: Badeye, war (#68) (Edited)

He'll eventually get his ass banned from here,

You're probably right. All he has to do is come out in support of evolution and an earth older than 6000 years and he's a goner.

Skip Intro  posted on  2010-07-06   11:12:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#103. To: Skip Intro (#72)

You're probably right. All he has to do is come out in support of evolution and an earth older than 6000 years and he's a goner.

Nah. I will just point out the truth.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-06   11:43:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#109. To: A K A Stone (#103)

Nah. I will just point out the truth.

No, you'll point out your religious superstitions and pretend they're truth. It's a lot easier to do that than actually think.

Skip Intro  posted on  2010-07-06   11:47:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#290. To: Skip Intro (#109)

No, you'll point out your religious superstitions and pretend they're truth. It's a lot easier to do that than actually think.

There is no proof the earth is old. The proof is to the contrary.

Give me an example of something you know of that proves the earth is old. Go ahead I'm patiently waiting.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-06   20:46:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#292. To: A K A Stone (#290)

Give me an example of something you know of that proves the earth is old. Go ahead I'm patiently waiting.

Read a geology book. Learn how radiometric dating methods work and how they're used.

Or believe creation myths if that works for you. It really doesn't matter to me.

Skip Intro  posted on  2010-07-06   20:55:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#294. To: Skip Intro (#292)

Read a geology book. Learn how radiometric dating methods work and how they're used.

I'm still waiting on an answer. Can't you back up your big proclamations?

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-06   21:04:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#297. To: A K A Stone (#294)

I'm still waiting on an answer. Can't you back up your big proclamations?

Not unless you're willing to do a little work on your own.

Really, we may as well be arguing about whether the sun rises in the west or the east.

Skip Intro  posted on  2010-07-06   21:06:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#300. To: Skip Intro (#297)

Really, we may as well be arguing about whether the sun rises in the west or the east.

I think we can probably agree that the sun rises in the east and sets in the west. You do know that I assume?

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-06   21:09:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#301. To: A K A Stone (#300)

I think we can probably agree that the sun rises in the east and sets in the west.

Well, that's a start.

Now why don't you tell me how old the earth is and why?

BTW, how old is the moon?

Skip Intro  posted on  2010-07-06   21:12:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#302. To: Skip Intro (#301)

You said the earth was millions. Back it up. Quit trying to turn the table.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-06   21:22:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#303. To: A K A Stone (#302)

You said the earth was millions.

I said it's billions of years old. It took people thousands of years to finally figure that out. I'm not going to try to teach you on a chat site.

If you're really curious, look for yourself. It's not like it's a government secret.

Skip Intro  posted on  2010-07-06   21:27:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#307. To: Skip Intro (#303)

I said it's billions of years old. It took people thousands of years to finally figure that out. I'm not going to try to teach you on a chat site.

Sounds like your religion is evolution. You can't explain it you just believe it but don't know why. Even though all science says it didn't happen. Sad so many in our society fall pray to stupid arguments and don't even look into it. I pity you.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-06   21:58:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#308. To: A K A Stone (#307)

Sounds like your religion is evolution...

Even though all science says it didn't happen.

How'd you get from the age of the earth to evolution?

All science? What, exactly, do you know about science?

Skip Intro  posted on  2010-07-06   22:02:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#309. To: Skip Intro (#308)

Because all you guys use circular reasoning to justify your faith in outdated dogma.

Are you saying you don't believe in evolution?

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-06   22:05:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#310. To: A K A Stone (#309)

Are you saying you don't believe in evolution?

Of course I do. What do you believe in?

Skip Intro  posted on  2010-07-06   22:07:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#311. To: Skip Intro (#310)

Are you saying you don't believe in evolution?

Of course I do. What do you believe in?

Do you believe in punctuated equilibrium as opposed to traditional Darwinism?

no gnu taxes  posted on  2010-07-06   22:12:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#321. To: no gnu taxes (#311) (Edited)

Do you believe in punctuated equilibrium as opposed to traditional Darwinism?

The gradualism of what you refer to as "traditional Darwinism" was always held suspect even by his peers. The evidence for punctuated equilibrium is much more compelling.

war  posted on  2010-07-07   8:28:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#329. To: war (#321)

PUNCTUATED EQUILIBRIUM

An ad hoc hypothesis or alibi that claims the reason there are no known transitional forms in the fossil record is because evolutionary changes occur so quickly and the reason we can't see evolutionary changes in the laboratory is because they occur so slowly.

(because some people will believe anything)

no gnu taxes  posted on  2010-07-07   9:54:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#331. To: no gnu taxes (#329)

"Punctuated equilibrium" is a rapid change in a species that orginates locally and then extends as groups interbreed causing speciation. It does not belie the existence of transitional fossils.

war  posted on  2010-07-07   9:58:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#334. To: war (#331)

I'm not sure how evolution got entered here (By skippy or stone, I guess), and I don't want to go here, really, but folks who want to talk about evolution as some kind of useful "science," make me laugh.

PE was started late ’70’s by a group of evolutionists who tried to resurrect the idea that evolution happened in big jumps. It was proposed to explain why the links required by gradual evolution have never been found. But the “big jumpers” were never able to explain how these big jumps could occur genetically, nor could they answer the crucial question about the first appearance of any "hopeful-monster": with what would it mate?

It's like global warming; they just make shit up to explain why they are always wrong.

no gnu taxes  posted on  2010-07-07   10:21:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#336. To: no gnu taxes (#334) (Edited)

But the “big jumpers” were never able to explain how these big jumps could occur genetically...

Sure they did. Stop reading whackjob creationist sites which blatantly LIE about what science, i.e. evolutionary biology, has discovered.

Then you can pick up a science magazine. They've been dumbed down over the last few years with you in mind. You'd also learn that there is a similar body of theory, well supported, which is called "Quantum Evolution".

war  posted on  2010-07-07   10:47:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#340. To: war (#336)

But the “big jumpers” were never able to explain how these big jumps could occur genetically...

Sure they did.

So you will have no problem describing precisely how this is supposed to have happened?

The only answer ever given is more bullshit speculative theories that have zero usefulness in the real world.

For the record, the wackos you refer to fully believe in adaptation and speciation. They just don't believe in the bullshit. They will fully accept the idea that Poodles, German Shepherds, coyotes and foxes have a common ancestor. However there is nothing to support the idea that poodles and leopards, much less tunas do.

Other than bullshit speculation, that is.

no gnu taxes  posted on  2010-07-07   11:00:53 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#342. To: no gnu taxes (#340)

So you will have no problem describing precisely how this is supposed to have happened?

I'm not an evolutionary biologist.

Feel free to explain to me how to install a 6 inch ducted oven fan including running the line from the electric service.

Thanks.

For the record, the wackos you refer to fully believe in adaptation and speciation.

No they don't and you just proved that they don't.

Given that "life" at the onset was one amino acid chain bumping into another, it's a given that there is a common origin of ALL species. Reagan shared 98.4% of his DNA with his buddy Bonzo. There is no way that happens without common origin.

war  posted on  2010-07-07   11:06:16 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#344. To: war (#342)

For the record, the wackos you refer to fully believe in adaptation and speciation.

No they don't and you just proved that they don't.

Uh, yes they do, and they believe in it adamantly to support their faith. For example:

_______________________________________

Q: Can speciation occur quickly?

A: If the account of Noah’s Ark in the Bible is true, then two of every kind of land animal (and seven of some) came off Noah’s Ark in the Middle East. For instance, two members of the dog kind walked off the Ark. Then, as the number of dogs increased, eventually the population split up and different groups formed.

As the gene pool was split up, different combinations of genes—inherited from the original dogs—would end up in different groups. Thus, different species would form, such as dingoes, wolves, and so on.

Evolutionists have often insisted that such a process happens slowly, and therefore, the Bible can’t be right when it says that the land animals came off the Ark only about 4,300 years ago.

But in the journal Science, a report stated:

“These examples say that natural selection can cause a population to change very quickly and hint that speciation could [occur] very quickly …”

Once again, true operational science confirms the biblical history. The account of Noah’s Ark in the Bible fits with real observations, including natural selection and speciation.

http://www.answersingenesis.org/e-mail/archive/AnswersWeekly/2007/0721.asp

no gnu taxes  posted on  2010-07-07   11:20:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#347. To: no gnu taxes (#344)

The dogs were already there and the animals were taken in mostly 7's according to Genesis.

As I said, you're reading whackjob sites which make no sense.

war  posted on  2010-07-07   11:21:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#348. To: war (#347)

The dogs were already there

already where?

the animals were taken in mostly 7's

The writer said some were taken in 7s. It was only "clean" animals, and these were presumably taken in greater numbers for food purposes. Since there are a lot more unclean than clean, the vast majority were taken in pairs. Dogs, being unclean, would have been taken as just a pair.

no gnu taxes  posted on  2010-07-07   11:30:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#349. To: no gnu taxes (#348)

Dogs, being unclean...

Existed in more than one form...the passage says "every beast".

war  posted on  2010-07-07   11:36:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#351. To: war (#349)

Existed in more than one form...the passage says "every beast".

More Jewish mythology. Written so it can be interpreted a hundred ways thereby keeping the focus on the Old rather than the New Testament.

mininggold  posted on  2010-07-07   12:56:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 351.

        There are no replies to Comment # 351.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 351.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com