[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"International court’s attack on Israel a sign of the free world’s moral collapse"

"Pete Hegseth Is Right for the DOD"

"Why Our Constitution Secures Liberty, Not Democracy"

Woodworking and Construction Hacks

"CNN: Reporters Were Crying and Hugging in the Hallways After Learning of Matt Gaetz's AG Nomination"

"NEW: Democrat Officials Move to Steal the Senate Race in Pennsylvania, Admit to Breaking the Law"

"Pete Hegseth Is a Disruptive Choice for Secretary of Defense. That’s a Good Thing"

Katie Britt will vote with the McConnell machine

Battle for Senate leader heats up — Hit pieces coming from Thune and Cornyn.

After Trump’s Victory, There Can Be No Unity Without A Reckoning

Vivek Ramaswamy, Dark-horse Secretary of State Candidate

Megyn Kelly has a message for Democrats. Wait for the ending.

Trump to choose Tom Homan as his “Border Czar”

"Trump Shows Demography Isn’t Destiny"

"Democrats Get a Wake-Up Call about How Unpopular Their Agenda Really Is"

Live Election Map with ticker shows every winner.

Megyn Kelly Joins Trump at His Final PA Rally of 2024 and Explains Why She's Supporting Him

South Carolina Lawmaker at Trump Rally Highlights Story of 3-Year-Old Maddie Hines, Killed by Illegal Alien

GOP Demands Biden, Harris Launch Probe into Twice-Deported Illegal Alien Accused of Killing Grayson Davis

Previously-Deported Illegal Charged With Killing Arkansas Children’s Hospital Nurse in Horror DUI Crash

New Data on Migrant Crime Rates Raises Eyebrows, Alarms

Thousands of 'potentially fraudulent voter registration applications' Uncovered, Stopped in Pennsylvania

Michigan Will Count Ballot of Chinese National Charged with Voting Illegally

"It Did Occur" - Kentucky County Clerk Confirms Voting Booth 'Glitch'' Shifted Trump Votes To Kamala

Legendary Astronaut Buzz Aldrin 'wholeheartedly' Endorses Donald Trump

Liberal Icon Naomi Wolf Endorses Trump: 'He's Being More Inclusive'

(Washed Up Has Been) Singer Joni Mitchell Screams 'F*** Trump' at Hollywood Bowl

"Analysis: The Final State of the Presidential Race"

He’ll, You Pieces of Garbage

The Future of Warfare -- No more martyrdom!

"Kamala’s Inane Talking Points"

"The Harris Campaign Is Testament to the Toxicity of Woke Politics"

Easy Drywall Patch

Israel Preparing NEW Iran Strike? Iran Vows “Unimaginable” Response | Watchman Newscast

In Logansport, Indiana, Kids are Being Pushed Out of Schools After Migrants Swelled County’s Population by 30%: "Everybody else is falling behind"

Exclusive — Bernie Moreno: We Spend $110,000 Per Illegal Migrant Per Year, More than Twice What ‘the Average American Makes’

Florida County: 41 of 45 People Arrested for Looting after Hurricanes Helene and Milton are Noncitizens

Presidential race: Is a Split Ticket the only Answer?

hurricanes and heat waves are Worse

'Backbone of Iran's missile industry' destroyed by IAF strikes on Islamic Republic

Joe Rogan Experience #2219 - Donald Trump

IDF raids Hezbollah Radwan Forces underground bases, discovers massive cache of weapons

Gallant: ‘After we strike in Iran,’ the world will understand all of our training

The Atlantic Hit Piece On Trump Is A Psy-Op To Justify Post-Election Violence If Harris Loses

Six Al Jazeera journalists are Hamas, PIJ terrorists

Judge Aileen Cannon, who tossed Trump's classified docs case, on list of proposed candidates for attorney general

Iran's Assassination Program in Europe: Europe Goes Back to Sleep

Susan Olsen says Brady Bunch revival was cancelled because she’s MAGA.

Foreign Invaders crisis cost $150B in 2023, forcing some areas to cut police and fire services: report

Israel kills head of Hezbollah Intelligence.


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Opinions/Editorials
See other Opinions/Editorials Articles

Title: Palin critics suffer from fear factor
Source: phillyburbs.com
URL Source: http://www.phillyburbs.com/news/new ... s-suffer-from-fear-factor.html
Published: Jul 5, 2010
Author: Dennis Miller
Post Date: 2010-07-06 00:15:38 by reaganisright
Keywords: moonbats, womenhaters, Libtards
Views: 267489
Comments: 430

The last presidential campaign, its election and each and every day since have crystallized the magic and malice of the national media. By working its magic, the media were able to keep Obama hidden in clear sight. His past was selectively chosen, his present was a manufactured eloquence of hope and change, his future was his transcendent ability to lead us to the land of milk and honey, and his gaffes were editorially retrofitted. The media took a virtual unknown and kept him unknown.

This Camelot euphoria was interrupted by another unknown that stoked the malice of the media. Unexpectedly, a non-elite commoner caused a derangement syndrome with Obama and his media acolytes that came out of the clear blue; the source of their derangement ... Sarah Palin.

The media launched a D-Day scale invasion of Alaska. Its mission was not to report, but to search and destroy. Every nook and cranny of Palin's life and anyone and everyone associated with her was scrutinized. Nothing was off limits: having five children was improper, her children's names were ridiculed, her fifth child was portrayed as her grandchild, and her everyday life was depicted as trailer trash. The universal talking point was the vice presidential candidate is not only barefoot and pregnant, Palin is dumb.

Let's examine Palin's "dumbness." She more than held her own in the vice-presidential debate with Joe Biden. While campaigning, even with the cheap shots from a left-wing media wrapped in straightjackets of unchangeable political ideology, Palin's message and demeanor won the hearts and minds of more and more Americans. With a stronger running mate, the results may have been different. Now as a leader of the tea party movement, the media now suffer from another bout of derangement syndrome. Tea party members are touted as dumb, and Palin is dumb.

Money or more precisely, lack of money is a major problem in all too many states. As governor, Palin had an opposite track record than her counterparts in bastions of liberalism such as New York, New Jersey, California and Massachusetts. These states are financially belly up and will be turning to Washington for, what else, a bailout. Yet Alaska is financially solvent. Its biggest concern is trying to keep Washington away. But the media spin is Alaska is a state of dummies and Palin is dumb. Advertisement

Palin wrote a book that sold 2.2 million copies and, much to the New York Times' chagrin, was on its Bestseller List for 11 weeks. The Associated Press had eleven fact checkers dissect each word of her book and found nothing to stir up another personal assassination. Nancy Pelosi had a book published; it's sitting on the shelf of your local book store. Regardless of the incredible success of Palin's book, the media decision: Pelosi is smart, Palin's readers are dumb, and Palin is dumb.

Who is Sarah Palin? Wife, mother, grandmother, soldier's mom, soccer mom, working mom, who believes in God, the Constitution, American uniqueness, sanctity of life, family values, school choice and low taxes. And because of this she is dumb. Maybe there just happens to be a whole lot of moms who believe in the same things. Women, who from the time they get up to the time they go to bed, are constantly juggling the multiple roles and responsibilities that define them. How dumb they are? Or do they have to be a conservative, female politician to be dubbed dumb? Tea party moms, you're in the same boat.

Wendy Doniger, a professor at Chicago Divinity School, wrote "Her (Palin) greatest hypocrisy is her pretense that she is a woman." Coming from divinity school that doesn't sound too divine, but it does sound liberal. Maybe her definition of a woman would be Pelosi, Hillary Clinton, Barbara Boxer or Janet Napolitano. Mothers of Bucks County and beyond, do you align yourselves with these ladies who are proclaimed smart or with Sarah Palin who is ... well, you know?

There's a major disconnect with the media's derangement syndrome. If Sarah Palin is so dumb and inconsequential, why do they go out of their way to castigate her? Why waste the time? It's a one-word answer ... fear.


Never heard or read anything from Dennis Miller and I'm from the phillyburbs area. Pretty good piece of writing, maybe why they aren't sinking like the rest of the print media.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-317) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#318. To: A K A Stone (#316) (Edited)

So you think it is ok to fuck monkeys? Afterall you think you came from them.

No one believes that we "came from them" and to state that underscores an ignorance of evolution.

What is believed, and for which there is overwhelming evidence, is that at some point in the cycle, homo sapiens and simiiformes trace back to some form of pre-Hominidae form but from which both homo sapien and simiformes split separate and distinctive.

war  posted on  2010-07-07   7:58:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#319. To: no gnu taxes (#287)

By your logic, if unemployment rises from 1 to 1.5%, it has been a catastrophic year economically.

By your logic there is no logic.

5% to 7.5% is a significant increase no matter how you spin it. 1% to 1.5% is not.

war  posted on  2010-07-07   8:09:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#320. To: no gnu taxes (#269)

http://www.google.com/search? source=ig&hl=en&rlz=&q=biden+wins+debate+polls&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=CsVbzu 240TMHEH4vwygS59LH_CwAAAKoEBU_QcHry

war  posted on  2010-07-07   8:11:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#321. To: no gnu taxes (#311) (Edited)

Do you believe in punctuated equilibrium as opposed to traditional Darwinism?

The gradualism of what you refer to as "traditional Darwinism" was always held suspect even by his peers. The evidence for punctuated equilibrium is much more compelling.

war  posted on  2010-07-07   8:28:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#322. To: A K A Stone (#291)

Ever heard of the creation museum in Kentucky?

Yep.

I have fossils on my property here far older than what fundementalist Christians claim is the earth's age, Stone.

Obama's first all-by-his-lonesome budget, btw, calls for a $1.17 trillion deficit.

Badeye  posted on  2010-07-07   8:55:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#323. To: A K A Stone (#291)

btw, I said millions, not billions.

Obama's first all-by-his-lonesome budget, btw, calls for a $1.17 trillion deficit.

Badeye  posted on  2010-07-07   8:56:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#324. To: go65 (#304)

It has doubled.

Obama's first all-by-his-lonesome budget, btw, calls for a $1.17 trillion deficit.

Badeye  posted on  2010-07-07   8:58:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#325. To: Badeye (#324)

It has doubled.

Only if you make up your own data Badeye.


Being a Republicans means you get to choose your own reality

go65  posted on  2010-07-07   9:28:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#326. To: go65 (#325)

Tell it to the record number of unemployed Americans TODAY.

Good luck.

Obama's first all-by-his-lonesome budget, btw, calls for a $1.17 trillion deficit.

Badeye  posted on  2010-07-07   9:37:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#327. To: go65 (#325)

Only if you make up your own data Badeye.

Not a problem.

To the first, your mother and sister both thought I was a great fuck. And eagerly accepted the two dollar tip on top of the five dollars they charge for the 'twofer' ... Badeye

Biff Tannen  posted on  2010-07-07   9:41:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#328. To: war (#319)

5% to 7.5% is a significant increase

And it's still significantly less than 10%, which was the actual argument.

no gnu taxes  posted on  2010-07-07   9:50:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#329. To: war (#321)

PUNCTUATED EQUILIBRIUM

An ad hoc hypothesis or alibi that claims the reason there are no known transitional forms in the fossil record is because evolutionary changes occur so quickly and the reason we can't see evolutionary changes in the laboratory is because they occur so slowly.

(because some people will believe anything)

no gnu taxes  posted on  2010-07-07   9:54:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#330. To: no gnu taxes (#328)

And it's still significantly less than 10%, which was the actual argument.

Unemployment went where it did from the momentum that had been estblished during Boy Blunder's last years in office. To argue otherwise is reveal a significant deficit in having a clue.

war  posted on  2010-07-07   9:55:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#331. To: no gnu taxes (#329)

"Punctuated equilibrium" is a rapid change in a species that orginates locally and then extends as groups interbreed causing speciation. It does not belie the existence of transitional fossils.

war  posted on  2010-07-07   9:58:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#332. To: war (#330)

Unemployment went where it did from the momentum

That wasn't the argument, so I am not even going to get into that discussion. Stay on topic.

no gnu taxes  posted on  2010-07-07   10:09:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#333. To: Abu el Banat (#327)

ABBA! I make up your tag lines!

(roaring with laughter)

Obama's first all-by-his-lonesome budget, btw, calls for a $1.17 trillion deficit.

Badeye  posted on  2010-07-07   10:18:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#334. To: war (#331)

I'm not sure how evolution got entered here (By skippy or stone, I guess), and I don't want to go here, really, but folks who want to talk about evolution as some kind of useful "science," make me laugh.

PE was started late ’70’s by a group of evolutionists who tried to resurrect the idea that evolution happened in big jumps. It was proposed to explain why the links required by gradual evolution have never been found. But the “big jumpers” were never able to explain how these big jumps could occur genetically, nor could they answer the crucial question about the first appearance of any "hopeful-monster": with what would it mate?

It's like global warming; they just make shit up to explain why they are always wrong.

no gnu taxes  posted on  2010-07-07   10:21:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#335. To: no gnu taxes (#332)

That wasn't the argument

Chuckles...sure it was...the "argument" was how was the economy that Obama inherited from your hero.

war  posted on  2010-07-07   10:44:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#336. To: no gnu taxes (#334) (Edited)

But the “big jumpers” were never able to explain how these big jumps could occur genetically...

Sure they did. Stop reading whackjob creationist sites which blatantly LIE about what science, i.e. evolutionary biology, has discovered.

Then you can pick up a science magazine. They've been dumbed down over the last few years with you in mind. You'd also learn that there is a similar body of theory, well supported, which is called "Quantum Evolution".

war  posted on  2010-07-07   10:47:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#337. To: war (#335)

The argument was which was a worse year economically to live in -- 2008 or 2010.

no gnu taxes  posted on  2010-07-07   10:48:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#338. To: no gnu taxes (#337)

The argument was which was a worse year economically to live in -- 2008 or 2010.

2010 by any measure.

war  posted on  2010-07-07   10:49:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#339. To: no gnu taxes (#337)

That was clearly settled.

Obama's first all-by-his-lonesome budget, btw, calls for a $1.17 trillion deficit.

Badeye  posted on  2010-07-07   10:50:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#340. To: war (#336)

But the “big jumpers” were never able to explain how these big jumps could occur genetically...

Sure they did.

So you will have no problem describing precisely how this is supposed to have happened?

The only answer ever given is more bullshit speculative theories that have zero usefulness in the real world.

For the record, the wackos you refer to fully believe in adaptation and speciation. They just don't believe in the bullshit. They will fully accept the idea that Poodles, German Shepherds, coyotes and foxes have a common ancestor. However there is nothing to support the idea that poodles and leopards, much less tunas do.

Other than bullshit speculation, that is.

no gnu taxes  posted on  2010-07-07   11:00:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#341. To: war (#338)

The argument was which was a worse year economically to live in -- 2008 or 2010.

2010 by any measure.

So for all your machinations to the contrary, it all boils down to your agreeing with badeye over goat boy on the matter?

no gnu taxes  posted on  2010-07-07   11:04:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#342. To: no gnu taxes (#340)

So you will have no problem describing precisely how this is supposed to have happened?

I'm not an evolutionary biologist.

Feel free to explain to me how to install a 6 inch ducted oven fan including running the line from the electric service.

Thanks.

For the record, the wackos you refer to fully believe in adaptation and speciation.

No they don't and you just proved that they don't.

Given that "life" at the onset was one amino acid chain bumping into another, it's a given that there is a common origin of ALL species. Reagan shared 98.4% of his DNA with his buddy Bonzo. There is no way that happens without common origin.

war  posted on  2010-07-07   11:06:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#343. To: no gnu taxes (#341)

So for all your machinations to the contrary, it all boils down to your agreeing with badeye over goat boy on the matter?

I have no idea what that means.

war  posted on  2010-07-07   11:07:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#344. To: war (#342)

For the record, the wackos you refer to fully believe in adaptation and speciation.

No they don't and you just proved that they don't.

Uh, yes they do, and they believe in it adamantly to support their faith. For example:

_______________________________________

Q: Can speciation occur quickly?

A: If the account of Noah’s Ark in the Bible is true, then two of every kind of land animal (and seven of some) came off Noah’s Ark in the Middle East. For instance, two members of the dog kind walked off the Ark. Then, as the number of dogs increased, eventually the population split up and different groups formed.

As the gene pool was split up, different combinations of genes—inherited from the original dogs—would end up in different groups. Thus, different species would form, such as dingoes, wolves, and so on.

Evolutionists have often insisted that such a process happens slowly, and therefore, the Bible can’t be right when it says that the land animals came off the Ark only about 4,300 years ago.

But in the journal Science, a report stated:

“These examples say that natural selection can cause a population to change very quickly and hint that speciation could [occur] very quickly …”

Once again, true operational science confirms the biblical history. The account of Noah’s Ark in the Bible fits with real observations, including natural selection and speciation.

http://www.answersingenesis.org/e-mail/archive/AnswersWeekly/2007/0721.asp

no gnu taxes  posted on  2010-07-07   11:20:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#345. To: A K A Stone (#317) (Edited)

s that supposed to be clever?

Do you fuck monkeys?

Does you pastor know you entertain those ideas? What's with your nasty BS everytime you're caught in a corner?

Do you let your children read this forum?

Have you ever heard of Prions?

"See in my line of work, you got to keep repeating things over and over and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the propaganda." --- George W. Bush (Rochester NY, 5-24-2005)

mininggold  posted on  2010-07-07   11:21:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#346. To: no gnu taxes (#341)

rotflmao

Obama's first all-by-his-lonesome budget, btw, calls for a $1.17 trillion deficit.

Badeye  posted on  2010-07-07   11:21:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#347. To: no gnu taxes (#344)

The dogs were already there and the animals were taken in mostly 7's according to Genesis.

As I said, you're reading whackjob sites which make no sense.

war  posted on  2010-07-07   11:21:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#348. To: war (#347)

The dogs were already there

already where?

the animals were taken in mostly 7's

The writer said some were taken in 7s. It was only "clean" animals, and these were presumably taken in greater numbers for food purposes. Since there are a lot more unclean than clean, the vast majority were taken in pairs. Dogs, being unclean, would have been taken as just a pair.

no gnu taxes  posted on  2010-07-07   11:30:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#349. To: no gnu taxes (#348)

Dogs, being unclean...

Existed in more than one form...the passage says "every beast".

war  posted on  2010-07-07   11:36:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#350. To: war (#349)

Dogs, being unclean...

Existed in more than one form...the passage says "every beast".

Since the passage is not specific as to what "every beast (or animal)" means, one can only speculate as to what it does.

The Bible refers to animals as to "kinds." Two "canines" would fit this requirement.

Good "wacko" discussion here:

http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/am/v4/n1/species-change

no gnu taxes  posted on  2010-07-07   11:59:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#351. To: war (#349)

Existed in more than one form...the passage says "every beast".

More Jewish mythology. Written so it can be interpreted a hundred ways thereby keeping the focus on the Old rather than the New Testament.

"See in my line of work, you got to keep repeating things over and over and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the propaganda." --- George W. Bush (Rochester NY, 5-24-2005)

mininggold  posted on  2010-07-07   12:56:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#352. To: no gnu taxes (#348)

already where?

Here...on earth...which according to Genesis they came "from the earth"...

war  posted on  2010-07-07   14:05:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#353. To: no gnu taxes (#350) (Edited)

Since the passage is not specific as to what "every beast (or animal)" means, one can only speculate as to what it does.

Exactly.

And there is a possibility that since it is known the ancient Semetic people ATE dogs, that they may have been considered clean by Noah who, having lived before Abraham and Moses. was pre-Leviticus and kosher law.

This conversation is akin to arguing how much of the witch's house in Hansel and Gretel was cookies and how much was candy.

war  posted on  2010-07-07   14:07:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#354. To: A K A Stone (#316)

So you think it is ok to fuck monkeys? Afterall you think you came from them.

You're even stupider than I thought.

"The ocean will take care of this on its own if it was left alone and left out there. It's natural. It's as natural as the ocean water is." - Rush Limbaugh

Skip Intro  posted on  2010-07-07   14:09:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#355. To: no gnu taxes (#344)

If the account of Noah’s Ark in the Bible is true

It isn't. End of story.

"The ocean will take care of this on its own if it was left alone and left out there. It's natural. It's as natural as the ocean water is." - Rush Limbaugh

Skip Intro  posted on  2010-07-07   14:11:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#356. To: war (#353)

And there is a possibility that since it is known the ancient Semetic people ATE dogs, that they may have been considered clean by Noah who, having lived before Abraham and Moses. was pre-Leviticus and kosher law.

The author of the Book Of Genesis certainly knew what clean and unclean was, even if it didn't exist at the time of Noah and was simply giving accounts off God's commandment. Clean and unclean animals only mean one thing anywhere in the Bible.

It's certainly possible Noah was eating dog, because after they exited the ark, God specifically gave them the freedom to eat of all animals. Although, if he pointedly gave them such freedom at that time, it would tend to imply they didn't have such freedom before.

no gnu taxes  posted on  2010-07-07   14:18:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#357. To: no gnu taxes (#356)

The author of the Book Of Genesis certainly knew what clean and unclean was

But Noah didn't.

war  posted on  2010-07-07   14:24:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#358. To: no gnu taxes (#356)

The author of the Book Of Genesis certainly knew what clean and unclean was, even if it didn't exist at the time of Noah and was simply giving accounts off God's commandment. Clean and unclean animals only mean one thing anywhere in the Bible.

Who was the author and when was it written?

"See in my line of work, you got to keep repeating things over and over and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the propaganda." --- George W. Bush (Rochester NY, 5-24-2005)

mininggold  posted on  2010-07-07   14:29:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (359 - 430) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com