[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated

Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit!

Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war

Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview

Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion

Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney.

Iceland Volcano Erupts For Third Time In 2 Months, State Of Emergency Declared

Tucker Carlson Interview with Vladamir Putin

How will Ar Mageddon / WW III End?

What on EARTH is going on in Acts 16:11? New Discovery!

2023 Hottest in over 120 Million Years

2024 and beyond in prophecy

Questions

This Speech Just Broke the Internet

This AMAZING Math Formula Will Teach You About God!

The GOSPEL of the ALIENS | Fallen Angels | Giants | Anunnaki

The IMAGE of the BEAST Revealed (REV 13) - WARNING: Not for Everyone

WEF Calls for AI to Replace Voters: ‘Why Do We Need Elections?’

The OCCULT Burger king EXPOSED

PANERA BREAD Antichrist message EXPOSED

The OCCULT Cheesecake Factory EXPOSED

Satanist And Witches Encounter The Cross

History and Beliefs of the Waldensians

Rome’s Persecution of the Bible

Evolutionists, You’ve Been Caught Lying About Fossils

Raw Streets of NYC Migrant Crisis that they don't show on Tv

Meet DarkBERT - AI Model Trained On DARK WEB

[NEW!] Jaw-dropping 666 Discovery Utterly Proves the King James Bible is God's Preserved Word

ALERT!!! THE MOST IMPORTANT INFORMATION WILL SOON BE POSTED HERE


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Bush Wars
See other Bush Wars Articles

Title: Petraeus To Face Soldier Complaints Over War Rules
Source: AP
URL Source: http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/storie ... _RULES?SITE=FLTAM&SECTION=HOME
Published: Jun 25, 2010
Author: ROBERT H. REID
Post Date: 2010-06-25 22:26:21 by Murron
Keywords: None
Views: 5100
Comments: 10

Petraeus To Face Soldier Complaints Over War Rules

By ROBERT H. REID, Associated Press Writer

June 25, 2010

KABUL, Afghanistan (AP) -- Crouched in a field of opium poppies, a young Marine lieutenant pleaded over the radio for an airstrike on a compound where he believed a sniper was firing at his troops. Request denied. Civilians might be inside and the Marines couldn't see a muzzle flash to be absolutely sure the gunman was there.

The lieutenant's frustration, witnessed by an Associated Press journalist in February in Marjah in southern Afghanistan, points to a Catch-22 dilemma facing the NATO force: how to protect troops against an enemy that lives - and fights - among the population without killing civilians and turning the people against the U.S.-led mission.

Those complaints from the ranks are among the issues facing Gen. David Petraeus - along with relations with a weak Afghan government and jittery allies; slow and uncertain progress on the battlefield; and frayed ties to the civilian side of the mission.

But among the most sensitive and important to the troops he commands and to supporters of the military at home will be whether to continue the rules laid down by his predecessor, Gen. Stanley McChrystal, that stress saving civilian lives but sometimes leave U.S. forces at greater risk.

Those rules, issued a year ago, helped make McChrystal a hero among many Afghans because they brought down the number of civilian casualties blamed on the NATO-led force. The rules were issued at a time of a rising tide of public anger over Afghan civilians killed by mistake in airstrikes and by heavy weapons such as cannons and mortars.

Down in the ranks, however, the rules are widely perceived as too restrictive, playing into the hands of the Taliban who appear keenly aware of the regulations. Some troops believe the rules cost American lives and force them to give up the advantage of overwhelming firepower to a foe who shoots and melts back into the civilian population.

At a Pentagon news conference Thursday, Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, hinted about possible changes in the rules when asked about troops who feel "they're being asked to fight with one hand tied behind their back."

"Any new commander, Gen. Petraeus included, will go in, assess his command, and what it is going to take to achieve the mission," Mullen said, adding that the general "certainly has the flexibility to make changes that he thinks are necessary."

But Mullen also said that doesn't "portend changes" in the rules. He noted that Petraeus, who was McChrystal's boss, is "very aware of the tactical directive" and was involved in approving it as commander of the U.S. Central Command, which is responsible for the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

The counterinsurgency strategy, which the military calls COIN, is based on protecting civilians and weaning them away from the insurgents.

According to a U.N. report, at least 2,412 civilians were killed last year - a 14 percent increase over 2008. But the percentage of those deaths caused by international and Afghan government forces dropped from 39 percent in 2008 to 25 percent last year, the U.N. said.

The U.N. attributed much of that decrease to the directive issued by McChrystal, who was dismissed this week for disparaging remarks that he and his aides made about senior members of the Obama administration to Rolling Stone magazine.

"Winning hearts and minds in (counterinsurgency warfare) is a coldblooded thing," McChrystal who was quoted in the article as telling an American soldier who expressed frustration about the rules. Trying to convince him, McChrystal said: "The Russians killed 1 million Afghans, and that didn't work."

To encourage that message, the command is considering presenting "Courageous Restraint Awards" to troops who displayed restraint in hostile situations.

"We routinely and systematically recognize valor, courage and effectiveness during kinetic combat operations," the command said in a recent statement. "In a COIN campaign, however, it is critical to also recognize that sometimes the most effective bullet is the bullet not fired."

The rules do not mean U.S. troops cannot rely on airpower, especially in the rugged east of the country where Taliban fighters are active but the population is smaller than in the agricultural areas of the ethnic Pashtun south - the main focus of the war.

On Wednesday, Air Force F-15E jets fired precision-guided missiles at insurgent positions in the eastern province of Kunar after gunmen attacked American ground troops, the Air Force said in a statement.

But the emphasis is on caution, and officers fear career damage if they mistakenly call for air or heavy weapons support and kill civilians in the process.

Last month, McChrystal reprimanded four American officers after an investigation found the rules were violated in a February airstrike that killed 23 Afghan civilians - including a woman and three children. Troops thought it was a Taliban convoy.

Anthony Cordesman, a scholar at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said the strategy in Afghanistan is adjusted regularly to respond to changes on the battlefield. But Cordesman also noted that Petraeus has been deeply involved in all aspects of the war, including the rules of battle.

"Gen. Petraeus has been in the loop during the formulation of these, has been sitting in on weekly satellite conferences, has been part of most of the major monthly and quarterly reviews," Cordesman said. "So this is not somebody coming to this with a new set of attitudes."

In 2007, when he commanded U.S. forces in Iraq, Petraeus said in an interview with National Public Radio that counterinsurgency warfare is about "protecting the Iraqi population" so that "your actions don't create more enemies than you take off the streets." That requires balancing the protection of the population against the risks to American lives.

Nevertheless, soldiers and Marines trained to fight complain that the generals are out of touch with the situation on the battlefield.

The rules, many of them believe, give the advantage to the Taliban.

Although details of the rules are classified, troops say they cannot fire on a suspected militant unless he is presenting a clear threat. Troops say, for example, if a fighting-age man emerges from a building from which they are taking fire, the soldiers cannot fire at him unless he is armed or they personally saw him drop a weapon.

What this means, some troops say, is that a Taliban militant can fire at them, then set aside his weapon and walk freely out of a compound, possibly toward a weapons cache in another location. It was unclear how often this has happened. Troops pinned down by insurgent bullets say they can't count on quick air support because it takes time to positively identify shooters.

During mop-up operations in Marjah in February, an AP reporter watched as Marines approached three military-age Afghan men standing near a motorcycle, the Taliban vehicle of choice. An old man insisted they were his sons, although all appeared to be the same age and did not resemble one another.

The Marines suspected they were Taliban who would fight them later. But the three were unarmed, so under the squad leader's interpretation of the rules, the Marines had no choice but to let them go.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Murron (#0)

Afghanistan is lost. It has been lost for years.

Fred Mertz  posted on  2010-06-25   22:42:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Fred Mertz (#1)

Afghanistan is lost. It has been lost for years.

It has been aptly named "The Graveyard of Empires". Even when it's been 'won' it doesn't stay that way for very long.

Making the world safe for United Fruit.

mininggold  posted on  2010-06-25   22:54:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: mininggold (#2)

It has been aptly named "The Graveyard of Empires". Even when it's been 'won' it doesn't stay that way for very long.

I don't know what got into this country thinking they could ever tame a people who have been fighting among themselves for thousands of years, and will continue till the end of time....

Goldi: "He is so offensive, he makes me dislike all people of his color."

Murron  posted on  2010-06-25   23:12:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Murron (#3)

I think it's the pipeline. Nothing else makes sense.

Fred Mertz  posted on  2010-06-25   23:15:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Fred Mertz (#4)

I think it's the pipeline. Nothing else makes sense.

I could be wrong, but I think it's 'DRUGS'...this government has gone out of its way to protect areas that grow and deal in it...

Goldi: "He is so offensive, he makes me dislike all people of his color."

Murron  posted on  2010-06-25   23:26:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Murron, *Flotilla Party* (#0)

Those rules, issued a year ago, helped make McChrystal a hero among many Afghans because they brought down the number of civilian casualties blamed on the NATO-led force.

With Petraeus they can get rid of the restraint to fire medal.

-----------------------------------------------------------
Toss: ADL,CAIR and the Vatican into the pit they belong in.

WhiteSands  posted on  2010-06-25   23:28:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Murron (#0)

We are losing in Afghanistan right now. There is no reasonable dispute of this reality. That doesn't mean we will lose however. War means killing, and there are two absolutes in war since the beginning of time. 1) There are always friendly fire deaths. 2) There are always civilian deaths. No way to avoid either givne the nature of war.

Its seductive to say 'Afghanistan is the graveyard of Empires'. Its easy to say 'The Soviets lost there and we will to.'

Neither apply to this specific circumstance. We aren't an 'empire' we are not Imperialists. Never have been. Never will be. We are not trying to 'take' Afghanistan for ourselves, our nation's 'personal use'.

We're trying to ensure we don't end up with another nation/state there that provides safe harbor for terrorists. The best way is to get a stable government in place, that rules via the will of the Afghan population.

Can that be realized? I have my doubts, just like everybody else. but we have to try. Because if we don't, it virtually guarantees a return of the Taliban. I think everybody in the forum agrees on this.

We either help acheive a relatively stable democracy there...or we will end up back there a decade from now.

Just my honest opinion.

As for the ROE. An American soldier's life is worth more to me than a Afghan civilian. Period. If they need an airstrike. call it in. If they need a gunship, call it in. If they need whatever...make it rain.

If it saves a single American soldier's life, DO IT. We've lost more troops there in the past 15 months trying to make 'nice war' then we did the proceeding seven or so years. Enough of that bullshit. Liberal war theory is getting our troops killed in numbers that are intolerable given the firepower available if the gloves come off. It horrific. Its terrible.

Thats why its call 'war'. You either make war to WIN, or you should not be making war at all. Didn't we learn this with JFK and LBJ and Nixon in Vietnam?

Learning a man that tried to destroy your company just got sentence to 18 months in prison, and fined $600,000 will make ya a happy happy man. What a great day. Now, all I have to do is select the right card to send him in prison lol.

Badeye  posted on  2010-06-26   9:07:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Badeye (#7) (Edited)

We've been losing Afghanistan since your hero abandoned it because there were no photo ops.

THIS is the history of Afghanistan, Boofer: Invasion and overthrow...then...the cockroaches melt into the woodwork which, in this case, are the remote mountains and villages. We are fighting a people who have a looooong history of war both offensive and defensive in nature.

Your hero moronically allowed all of the traditional escape routes to be left untouched when he "invaded". Russia put close to 100K troops on the ground there and couldn't win at a time when we were routinely told that their military was BETTER than ours. How in the hell did Boy Blunder believe he was going to "win" there with ~25K troops?

#67. To: war (#48) Keep hiding behind the bozo, bozo. (laughing) You've always been a world class pussy. Badeye posted on 2010-01-14 16:12:48 ET Reply Trace I'm biased, obviously, given the shit I'm subjected to daily here from the anti groupie. Badeye posted on 2010-06-10 11:34:31 ET Reply Trace Private Reply

war  posted on  2010-06-26   10:27:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Badeye (#7)

As for the ROE. An American soldier's life is worth more to me than a Afghan civilian. Period. If they need an airstrike. call it in. If they need a gunship, call it in. If they need whatever...make it rain.

Didn't work for the Russians, isn't working well for the Israelis.

lucysmom  posted on  2010-06-26   10:28:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: lucysmom (#9)

Didn't mention either.

News Update: Owe-bama ordered eggs and toast for breakfast. ABC/NBC/CBS/MSNBC/CNN all agree the decision to avoid bagels was 'Brilliant!' (eyes rolling)

Badeye  posted on  2010-06-27   15:55:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com