[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"International court’s attack on Israel a sign of the free world’s moral collapse"

"Pete Hegseth Is Right for the DOD"

"Why Our Constitution Secures Liberty, Not Democracy"

Woodworking and Construction Hacks

"CNN: Reporters Were Crying and Hugging in the Hallways After Learning of Matt Gaetz's AG Nomination"

"NEW: Democrat Officials Move to Steal the Senate Race in Pennsylvania, Admit to Breaking the Law"

"Pete Hegseth Is a Disruptive Choice for Secretary of Defense. That’s a Good Thing"

Katie Britt will vote with the McConnell machine

Battle for Senate leader heats up — Hit pieces coming from Thune and Cornyn.

After Trump’s Victory, There Can Be No Unity Without A Reckoning

Vivek Ramaswamy, Dark-horse Secretary of State Candidate

Megyn Kelly has a message for Democrats. Wait for the ending.

Trump to choose Tom Homan as his “Border Czar”

"Trump Shows Demography Isn’t Destiny"

"Democrats Get a Wake-Up Call about How Unpopular Their Agenda Really Is"

Live Election Map with ticker shows every winner.

Megyn Kelly Joins Trump at His Final PA Rally of 2024 and Explains Why She's Supporting Him

South Carolina Lawmaker at Trump Rally Highlights Story of 3-Year-Old Maddie Hines, Killed by Illegal Alien

GOP Demands Biden, Harris Launch Probe into Twice-Deported Illegal Alien Accused of Killing Grayson Davis

Previously-Deported Illegal Charged With Killing Arkansas Children’s Hospital Nurse in Horror DUI Crash

New Data on Migrant Crime Rates Raises Eyebrows, Alarms

Thousands of 'potentially fraudulent voter registration applications' Uncovered, Stopped in Pennsylvania

Michigan Will Count Ballot of Chinese National Charged with Voting Illegally

"It Did Occur" - Kentucky County Clerk Confirms Voting Booth 'Glitch'' Shifted Trump Votes To Kamala

Legendary Astronaut Buzz Aldrin 'wholeheartedly' Endorses Donald Trump

Liberal Icon Naomi Wolf Endorses Trump: 'He's Being More Inclusive'

(Washed Up Has Been) Singer Joni Mitchell Screams 'F*** Trump' at Hollywood Bowl

"Analysis: The Final State of the Presidential Race"

He’ll, You Pieces of Garbage

The Future of Warfare -- No more martyrdom!

"Kamala’s Inane Talking Points"

"The Harris Campaign Is Testament to the Toxicity of Woke Politics"

Easy Drywall Patch

Israel Preparing NEW Iran Strike? Iran Vows “Unimaginable” Response | Watchman Newscast

In Logansport, Indiana, Kids are Being Pushed Out of Schools After Migrants Swelled County’s Population by 30%: "Everybody else is falling behind"

Exclusive — Bernie Moreno: We Spend $110,000 Per Illegal Migrant Per Year, More than Twice What ‘the Average American Makes’

Florida County: 41 of 45 People Arrested for Looting after Hurricanes Helene and Milton are Noncitizens

Presidential race: Is a Split Ticket the only Answer?

hurricanes and heat waves are Worse

'Backbone of Iran's missile industry' destroyed by IAF strikes on Islamic Republic

Joe Rogan Experience #2219 - Donald Trump

IDF raids Hezbollah Radwan Forces underground bases, discovers massive cache of weapons

Gallant: ‘After we strike in Iran,’ the world will understand all of our training

The Atlantic Hit Piece On Trump Is A Psy-Op To Justify Post-Election Violence If Harris Loses

Six Al Jazeera journalists are Hamas, PIJ terrorists

Judge Aileen Cannon, who tossed Trump's classified docs case, on list of proposed candidates for attorney general

Iran's Assassination Program in Europe: Europe Goes Back to Sleep

Susan Olsen says Brady Bunch revival was cancelled because she’s MAGA.

Foreign Invaders crisis cost $150B in 2023, forcing some areas to cut police and fire services: report

Israel kills head of Hezbollah Intelligence.


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Bush Wars
See other Bush Wars Articles

Title: US general [McChrystal] summoned to Washington
Source: ALJAZEERA.NET
URL Source: http://english.aljazeera.net/news/a ... 10/06/2010622111222326834.html
Published: Jun 22, 2010
Author: Staff
Post Date: 2010-06-22 07:56:15 by Fred Mertz
Keywords: None
Views: 109171
Comments: 99

The top US military commander in Afghanistan has been summoned to Washington after criticising the administration of Barack Obama, the US president, in a magazine article.

The White House recalled General Stanley McChrystal from Afghanistan on Tuesday to explain comments he made in a Rolling Stone magazine interview to be published on Friday, military officials said.

The order came after McChrystal apologised for the controversial comments in the profile, in which he is quoted denouncing a top diplomat while his aides dismiss Obama and mock his deputies.

"I extend my sincerest apology for this profile," McChrystal said in a statement issued ahead of the article's release.

"It was a mistake reflecting poor judgement and should never happened."

McChrystal, a former special operations chief, usually speaks cautiously in public and has enjoyed mostly sympathetic US media coverage since he took over the Nato-led force last year.

"Throughout my career, I have lived by the principles of personal honour and professional integrity. What is reflected in this article falls far short of that standard," he said.

Strategy debate

In the profile, McChrystal jokes sarcastically about preparing to answer a question referring to Joe Biden, the US vice-president, known to be a sceptic of the commander's war strategy.

He also told the magazine that he felt "betrayed" by Karl Eikenberry, the US ambassador to Kabul, in a White House debate over war strategy last year.

Referring to a leaked internal memo from Eikenberry that questioned McChrystal's request for more troops, the commander said that the ambassador had tried to protect himself for "for the history books".

"I like Karl, I've known him for years, but they'd never said anything like that to us before," McChrystal said in the article.

Eikenberry, himself a former commander in Afghanistan, had written to the White House saying Hamid Karzai, the Afghan president, was an unreliable partner and that a surge of troops could draw the US into an open-ended quagmire.

The article revisits the friction between the White House and the military last year as Obama debated whether to grant McChrystal's request for tens of thousands of reinforcements.

Al Jazeera's James Bays, reporting from Kabul, said that McChrystal managed to offend every single one of his key bosses with the statements in the article.

Our correspondent said that the Rolling Stone reporter managed to get high level access: "I met the reporter in Washington, DC, over a month ago after he came out of a meeting inside the White House with McChrystal's advisors.

"This incident shows the tensions that exist between the top advisors here in Afghanistan. What will happen now is how this agreement is viewed on Capitol Hill and on the Afghan street.

"The Taliban is also trying to win over the Afghan people. There is certainly very little disunity normally in the Taliban."

Further turmoil

Meanwhile, as foreign forces in Afghanistan marked another grim milestone in their war against the Taliban, signs of cracks in the alliance surfaced.

After 10 soldiers were killed in a single day, there was further turmoil for Nato as Britain announced that Sherard Cowper-Coles, its special envoy to Afghanistan, was taking "extended leave".

William Hague, Britain's foreign secretary, is to review the post of special envoy to Afghanistan, the BBC reported.

The news of Cowper-Coles's departure came amid reports that he had clashed with military officials over strategy, just a month ahead of a crucial international conference in the Afghan city of Kabul.

The Guardian newspaper reported there had been serious disagreements in recent months between Cowper-Coles and officials from Nato.

It said that Cowper-Coles was convinced the military-focused counter-insurgency effort was headed for failure and wanted talks with Taliban fighters to be a priority.

The Taliban, however, has so far rejected a plan drawn up at a landmark Kabul peace meeting to give jobs and money to those who lay down arms.

Last month they promised a new campaign of attacks on diplomats, lawmakers and foreign forces.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 66.

#8. To: Fred Mertz (#0)

McChrystal fucked up here. If you are going to trash the Commander in Chief, you resign first.

Badeye  posted on  2010-06-22   9:26:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Badeye (#8)

I don't see how he did that. He made an off the cuff remark about Obama seeming unprepared in their first meeting; that's not trashing the president IMO. Of course, I doubt McChrystal ever expected his comment to see the light of day.

Fred Mertz  posted on  2010-06-22   9:35:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Fred Mertz (#9)

Of course, I doubt McChrystal ever expected his comment to see the light of day.

Riiiight. He gave an interview to ROLLING STONE, and didn' think his comments (plural, freddie) wouldn't see the light of day....(eyes rolling)

Stick to taunting our host til you actually catch up on the details of this particular story, freddie.

Badeye  posted on  2010-06-22   9:38:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Badeye (#10)

Do you think he'll be fired?

Right now I don't think so.

Fred Mertz  posted on  2010-06-22   9:40:16 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Fred Mertz (#11) (Edited)

Do you think he'll be fired?

I think he should be.

I don't think Obama will, tho. I do expect the wheels to be set immediately into motion for his replacement and he resigns just before Labor Day when no one is paying attention to anything.

war  posted on  2010-06-22   9:56:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: war (#13)

I'll say around Thanksgiving time. I'm sure they already have his replacement selected though I'm not sure who it might be.

Fred Mertz  posted on  2010-06-22   10:02:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: Fred Mertz (#14) (Edited)

I find active duty officers going off the reservation to be one of the more disturbing aspects of "politics"...

war  posted on  2010-06-22   10:07:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: war (#15)

I find active duty officers going off the reservation to be one of the more disturbing aspects of "politics"...

If by "going off the tracks" you mean publicly protesting the orders,tactics,and strategy of their civilian masters,I disagree.

There is not only nothing wrong with it,but they have a OBLIGATION to do so.

Their loyalty is to the US Constitution,the country itself,and the men and women under their command,not any political leader.

sneakypete  posted on  2010-06-22   21:44:59 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: sneakypete (#18)

They swore an oath to the USCON under which the POTUS is their commander and their rules of behavior [UCMJ] are set by Congress.

Look...I have respect for both his uniform and his rank and I have respect for his opinions as well. I just get uneasy. What happens when we get a general who can convince soldiers under his command that the USCON is just a "goddammed piece of paper"? He has to be fired. And then given a parade.

war  posted on  2010-06-22   22:12:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: war (#20)

They swore an oath to the USCON under which the POTUS is their commander and their rules of behavior [UCMJ] are set by Congress.

PARTIALLY true. They swear a oath to the country and the US Constitution. There is no such thing as a loyalty oath to a president.

sneakypete  posted on  2010-06-23   10:20:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: sneakypete (#29)

I never said that there was.

Again, the USCON - to which they've sworn the oath - designates POTUS their Commander in Chief and the same USCON designates the Congress as the rule making body for the military. What does the UCMJ demand in this regard?

war  posted on  2010-06-23   10:30:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: war (#31)

What does the UCMJ demand in this regard?

The maximum is dismissal, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement for 1 year.

lucysmom  posted on  2010-06-23   10:52:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: lucysmom (#35)

What does the UCMJ demand in this regard? The maximum is dismissal, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement for 1 year.

WRONG!

We do NOT live in the leftist police state that you admire so much. We live in a free country (barely) where the military take loyalty oaths to the Constitution,not a political leader.

Your idols Adolph,Mao, and Uncle Joe had the system you think we have and that you admire,though.

sneakypete  posted on  2010-06-23   11:10:16 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: sneakypete (#39)

WRONG!

The UCMI has been around since the founding fathers and that's what it says.

Your idols Adolph,Mao, and Uncle Joe had the system you think we have and that you admire,though.

What a pile of poop!

lucysmom  posted on  2010-06-23   11:22:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#41. To: lucysmom (#40)

WRONG! The UCMI has been around since the founding fathers and that's what it says.

You don't have the first bleeping clue about what the UMCJ says.

Just in case your communist mind is still confused,US Military members are NOT slaves and they do NOT owe their allegiance to any political leader.

sneakypete  posted on  2010-06-23   13:20:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#42. To: sneakypete (#41)

You don't have the first bleeping clue about what the UMCJ says.

888. Art. 88. Contempt toward officials

Any commissioned officer who uses contemptuous words against the President, the Vice President, Congress, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of a military department, the Secretary of Homeland Security, or the Governor or legislature of any State, Territory, Commonwealth, or possession in which he is on duty or present shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

http://www.armystudyguide.com/content/army_board_study_guide_topics/military_justice/punitive-articles-of-the-.shtml

lucysmom  posted on  2010-06-23   14:10:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#55. To: lucysmom (#42)

Any commissioned officer who uses contemptuous words against the President, the Vice President, Congress, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of a military department, the Secretary of Homeland Security, or the Governor or legislature of any State, Territory, Commonwealth, or possession in which he is on duty or present shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

That is un-Constitutional as hell and will never stand if they try to enforce it. The MOST they can do is order a officer to resign his or her commission.

It is also relatively new because it mentions Boy Jorge's Office of Reich Security.

sneakypete  posted on  2010-06-23   23:45:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#60. To: sneakypete, lucysmom, badeye (#55)

That is un-Constitutional as hell and will never stand if they try to enforce it. The MOST they can do is order a officer to resign his or her commission.

She's right per Article 88 of the UCMJ.

However, you are right in terms of politics. Nobody is going to prosecute McChrystal.

go65  posted on  2010-06-24   11:29:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#66. To: go65 (#60)

That is un-Constitutional as hell and will never stand if they try to enforce it. The MOST they can do is order a officer to resign his or her commission. She's right per Article 88 of the UCMJ.

However, you are right in terms of politics. Nobody is going to prosecute McChrystal.

Article 88 will get tossed the very first time they try to prosecute anybody on it. The Nuremberg Trials after WW-2 settled that one.

How can Article 88 stand when ALL soldiers,even enlisted privates,are taught they have a DUTY to ignore illegal orders?

Not to mention the legal rights subordinate officers have to not only disobey orders from their superiors,but to relive them of command and assume their command if the subordinate officer thinks the commanding officer has either became mentally incompetent or is on a illegal course of action.

sneakypete  posted on  2010-06-24   14:27:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 66.

#68. To: sneakypete (#66)

You understand the difference between refusing to obey an order you believe to be illegal and granting an interview to Rolling Stone?

war  posted on  2010-06-24 14:29:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#76. To: sneakypete (#66)

Article 88 will get tossed the very first time they try to prosecute anybody on it. The Nuremberg Trials after WW-2 settled that one.

Members of the military have been prosecuted, about 122 of them; usually though they are just invited to resign.

From the article, it appears that McChrystal has all the social grace and maturity of a high school football player in the locker room.

lucysmom  posted on  2010-06-24 15:00:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 66.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com