[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

In Day of the Lord, 24 Church Elders with Crowns Join Jesus in His Throne

In Day of the Lord, 24 Church Elders with Crowns Join Jesus in His Throne

Deadly Saltwater and Deadly Fresh Water to Increase

Deadly Cancers to soon Become Thing of the Past?

Plague of deadly New Diseases Continues

[FULL VIDEO] Police release bodycam footage of Monroe County District Attorney Sandra Doorley traffi

Police clash with pro-Palestine protesters on Ohio State University campus

Joe Rogan Experience #2138 - Tucker Carlson

Police Dispersing Student Protesters at USC - Breaking News Coverage (College Protests)

What Passover Means For The New Testament Believer

Are We Closer Than Ever To The Next Pandemic?

War in Ukraine Turns on Russia

what happened during total solar eclipse

Israel Attacks Iran, Report Says - LIVE Breaking News Coverage

Earth is Scorched with Heat

Antiwar Activists Chant ‘Death to America’ at Event Featuring Chicago Alderman

Vibe Shift

A stream that makes the pleasant Rain sound.

Older Men - Keep One Foot In The Dark Ages

When You Really Want to Meet the Diversity Requirements

CERN to test world's most powerful particle accelerator during April's solar eclipse

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated

Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit!

Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war

Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview

Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion

Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney.

Iceland Volcano Erupts For Third Time In 2 Months, State Of Emergency Declared

Tucker Carlson Interview with Vladamir Putin


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Historical
See other Historical Articles

Title: 30 Years Ago Today, U.S. Shot Down a Passenger Plane Killing 290 Civilians and Covered It Up
Source: From The Trenches/FTP
URL Source: http://fromthetrenchesworldreport.c ... lians-and-covered-it-up/229263
Published: Jul 3, 2018
Author: Rachel Blevins
Post Date: 2018-07-03 12:36:30 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 3418
Comments: 30

Free Thought Project – by Rachel Blevins

On July 3, 1988, the United States killed 290 innocent Iranian civilians when it shot down Iran Air Flight 655—a tragic event that is not mentioned in history textbooks in school, and that is widely ignored in the context of current relations between the U.S. and Iran.

The scheduled flight was traveling from Tehran to Dubai, and there were 66 children on board, all of whom were killed, as no passengers or crew members survived the attack. The plane was shot down by the USS Vincennes, which was operating within Iranian territorial waters. It targeted the large Airbus A300 and then insisted that crew members mistook it for an F-14 fighter jet, despite the obvious difference in size.  

At the time, Iraq and Iran were engaged in a bitter war that was declared by Saddam Hussein on Sept. 22, 1980. The United States’ support for Iraq in the conflict is notable because it would later go on to overthrow Hussein in 2003.

The Iraq-Iran War was horrific, and in the eight years that it lasted, estimates claim that “at the very least half a million and possibly twice as many troops were killed on both sides, at least half a million became permanent invalids.” The cost of the war was around $228 billion and it resulted in more than $400 billion in damage.

The United States’ involvement stemmed from its support for Iraq, at a time when the Reagan Administration considered Iran to be a bitter enemy, and so it instead chose to support Hussein, in order to influence the conflict. As reports have noted, the U.S. used Iraq as “its surrogate for policy in the Persian Gulf region,” as it prevented the United Nations from imposing economic sanctions on Iraq, and defended the use of chemical weapons on Iranian civilians.

Then in 1988, the U.S. did the unthinkable by shooting down Iran Air Flight 655, which Iran claimed was a scheduled flight that was transmitting all of the necessary signals to show that it was a passenger plane and not a military aircraft. William C. Rogers III was the captain of the USS Vincennes during its first time at combat on that fateful day, and while he was controlling the U.S. Navy’s most expensive surface warship—which reportedly was powerful enough to shoot down up to 200 incoming missiles at once—he instead targeted a passenger plane.

An investigation from Newsweek and ABC News referred to the tragedy as “the story of a naval fiasco, of an overeager captain, panicked crewmen, and the cover-up that followed,” which should never have happened, due to the fact that the U.S. was breaking international law with its presence in Iranian territorial waters when it shot down the plane:

“…Still lacking a clear target, Rogers radioed fleet headquarters and announced his intention to open fire. In Bahrain, Admiral Less’s staff was uneasy. Captain Watkins quizzed Rogers on his position and the bearing of the gunboats. Finally, he asked, ‘Are the contacts clearing the area?’ The question could have been a show stopper. Judging from later testimony, few in the Vincennes CIC that day believed that the ship was under attack. In fact, the gunboats were just slowly milling about—evidently under the impression that they were safe in their own territorial waters. Through the haze, it is doubtful that the low-slung launches could have even seen the Vincennes. Rogers, however, continued to argue for permission to shoot.”

To say that Captain Rogers was overeager in his quest to take down a target is an understatement, and reports later revealed that the “F-14 fighter jet” he claimed was descending was actually an Iranian airliner filled with innocent civilians that was ascending, and was well within the commercial air corridor.

The cover-up was executed by U.S. military officials who failed to interview key witnesses, and then later lied to Congress about the location of key military warships at the time of the attack. As the investigation from Newsweek noted, the U.S. Navy had mostly gotten away with covering up the incident until the Iranian government filed a lawsuit which “forced Washington to admit, grudgingly, that the Vincennes was actually in Iranian waters—although Justice Department pleadings still claim the cruiser was forced there in self-defense.”

The United States and Iran agreed to a settlement in the International Court of Justice in 1996. While the U.S. did recognize that “the aerial incident of 3 July 1988 as a terrible human tragedy and expressed deep regret over the loss of lives caused by the incident,” the U.S. was not required to admit legal liability or to formally apologize to Iran, and it later paid around $61.8 million—$213,103 per passenger—to the families of the victims.

Instead of firing or charging the U.S. military officials who were responsible for shooting down Iran Air Flight 655, the U.S. awarded Capt. Will Rogers III and Lt. Cmdr. Scott E. Lustig with special commendation medals for their “meritorious service” on the USS Vincennes in a display that completely ignored the tragedy they created and the nearly 300 innocent civilians they killed.

Free Thought Project

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Deckard (#0)

One year earlier, The USS Stark was hit by two Iraqi Exocet missiles. Thirty- seven United States Navy personnel were killed and twenty-one were injured.

Those were dangerous times.

misterwhite  posted on  2018-07-03   15:15:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Deckard (#0) (Edited)

Title: 30 Years Ago Today, U.S. Shot Down a Passenger Plane Killing 290 Civilians and Covered It Up

We didn't cover it up at all. It was covered extensively for weeks in American media.

The attack on the USS Liberty did get covered up. This shooting down of an airliner, not at all.

Tooconservative  posted on  2018-07-03   16:40:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Deckard (#0)

I was the Weapons Controil Officer on a sister ship of USS Stark in the Gulf in the interim between when the Stark was hit and the Vincennes shot down the jetliner.

The Gulf was a goat rodeo during that time. Iran and Iraq were in full hot war with each other, the Iraqis were hosing off Exocets while the Iranians were loosing mines and driving around gunboats.

We were escorting reflagged Kuwaiti oil tankers to keep them from getting blown up by both sides.

The Gulf is a bathtub, and the airfield whence Iranian military flights came was dual purpose military and civilian. At the speed of jets, there was very little time to decide anything.

I almost shot down a plane myself. The consequences of getting it wrong were calamitous in all directions.

Ir WAS a tragedy, and the CO of the VIncennes WAS relieved of command for it. But I have a great deal of sympathy for that captain and crew. I took a different decision under similar circumstances (but without gunboats present), and did not fire. But it was a guess. Had I been wrong, my inaction would have killed my shipmates and possibly me.

Yes, absolutely pay the victims families generously, but I cannot condemn my colleague over on Vincennes who pushed the button, nor the Captain who made the fatal call.

When I made the opposite call in the middle of the night, I had already been in the Gulf for months. I knew what the zoo looked like. There had been alert after alert, alarm after alarm, attacks on ships, etc., but the battle space was “normalized”. VIncennes had only been there about two weeks when they faced their trial. They had not had time to acclimate.

Vicomte13  posted on  2018-07-03   17:22:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Tooconservative, Deckard, misterwhite (#2)

We didn't cover it up at all. It was covered extensively for weeks in American media.

Yes it was.

I guess there was an "official" attempt to quash the embarrassing details of a big mistake. Understandably so because it was a PR disaster. There was no attempt by MSM to provide any "cushion", especially since The Gipper was still President.

I'm trying to understand why THIS "30-YEARS AGO TODAY!" incident and reminder is suddenly of great concern? And why of ALL event from the past or present this specific retrospective/reminder needs to clutter our mind?

Could it be more CW2 fodder...to incite the Left-Dem "Resistance" and remind them of who their "enemy" is?

Liberator  posted on  2018-07-03   17:35:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Vicomte13, redleghunter, sneakypete, GrandIsland, tpaine (#3) (Edited)

When I made the opposite call in the middle of the night, I had already been in the Gulf for months. I knew what the zoo looked like. There had been alert after alert, alarm after alarm, attacks on ships, etc., but the battle space was “normalized”. VIncennes had only been there about two weeks when they faced their trial. They had not had time to acclimate.

Thanks for an intimate perspective of what that situation is actually like; The MSM LOVES to play Monday Morning QB in these types of volatile, dangerous precarious situations.

As you helped explain, the area was already a Hot Zone, paranoia and vigilance was already rife, and ANYONE could have made that kind of mistake.

The Gulf is a bathtub, and the airfield whence Iranian military flights came was dual purpose military and civilian. At the speed of jets, there was very little time to decide anything.

I almost shot down a plane myself. The consequences of getting it wrong were calamitous in all directions.

Ir WAS a tragedy, and the CO of the VIncennes WAS relieved of command for it. But I have a great deal of sympathy for that captain and crew.

And again, thanks for the perspective and honesty.

And now *I* also have a great deal of sympathy for the captain and crew. They didn't do it out of spite or malice...or even blatant sloppiness. S**t just happens. Same as in the case of Friendly Fire by artillery and aircraft...

Can you imagine had EVERY single FF case or mistaken calculations that turned out "badly" been scrutinized by MSM? We can't have LE or our military fearing mistakes; Hesitation = Death. The MSM doesn't care about that; They care only about sensationalizing and headlines for purely selfish/political reasons.

Liberator  posted on  2018-07-03   17:47:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Liberator (#5) (Edited)

I particularly sympathize with that missile officer, the guy who actually pressed the button. He has to live with the memory of what he did every day, and while he knows that he didn’t intend what happened, he rides airplanes, and sees the women and children around him, and knows that the people on that plane, including its pilots, didn’t do anything wrong either.

I know he is haunted by it because I’m haunted by it, and I took my finger off the button and didn’t push it. I have also agonized about my hesitation, about how I decided to guess in the last moments, to pause, to wait, as though some additional information was going to come. But no more was. The plane flew over in the dark, and we didn’t get hit by anything.

If we had been hit by a missile or an iron bomb, I would have been “the guy”, the officer who failed in the clinch, the guy who didn’t do his duty and cost 100 of his shipmates their lives. I might have committed suicide from the guilt.

The only way to “win” was to guess right. But the fact that it was a GUESS - well and truly a guess - relying on fate, the cosmos, God - JESUS! It’s a terrible thing that men are put in that position. I guess that’s why naval officers get paid the little bucks.

Vicomte13  posted on  2018-07-03   18:38:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Liberator (#4)

I'm trying to understand why THIS "30-YEARS AGO TODAY!" incident and reminder is suddenly of great concern?

Slavery happened 150 years ago and it's still being thrown in our faces.

misterwhite  posted on  2018-07-03   18:43:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Deckard (#0) (Edited)

A plane full of Mooslums. I'm just glad it wasn't a planeload of normal people from a peaceful nation.
Let them get paid off from the pallets of cash that corrupt dipshit Odumbass flew to them.

So how many Moo terrorists and terrorist larvae onboard did we accidentally kill as a bonus? Let's see THAT report.

Hank Rearden  posted on  2018-07-03   20:40:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Deckard (#0)

and there were 66 diaperhead children on board, all of whom were killed,

30 years later, not one passenger has screamed Allah Akbar... as they drive people over like Death Race 2000. Funny how that works.

Sympathy is between Shit & syphilis in the dictionary.

I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح

GrandIsland  posted on  2018-07-03   21:44:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Deckard (#0)

The cover-up was executed by U.S. military officials who failed to interview key witnesses, and then later lied to Congress about the location of key military warships at the time of the attack.

HorseHillary! The way *I* remember it is that it was known immediately that the cowardly Captain had shot down a civilian airliner,and he was immediately relieved from his command and his ship was ordered to return to the US,where he was booted out of the Navy and lost his retirement.

I personally think he should have done prison time,but that's just me.

Instead of firing or charging the U.S. military officials who were responsible for shooting down Iran Air Flight 655, the U.S. awarded Capt. Will Rogers III and Lt. Cmdr. Scott E. Lustig with special commendation medals for their “meritorious service” on the USS Vincennes in a display that completely ignored the tragedy they created and the nearly 300 innocent civilians they killed.

Free Thought Project

Once again I am calling HorseHillary. The CAPTAIN of any US Naval ship at sea is PERSONALLY held responsible for what any officer under his command does while in temporary command of the ship,and he was pretty much immediately "fired" from the Navy. As for the LCDR,I suspect he was the officer in charge of the combat information center,and had to take the fall for not clearing identifying the airliner as an airliner,or for not refusing the order to fire on it.

The Navy doesn't play games with this stuff unless the officer is a minority or a female,and used to not give them special allowances,either. I remember maybe 15 years ago the XO of a cruiser at sea opened the door to the Captains cabin to tell him something,and caught the Captain and the senior Chief of the ship having sex with one another. The ship was immediately recalled to it's home port,and both the Captain and the Chief were seen leaving it in civilian clothes because they KNEW they were out of the Navy.

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

sneakypete  posted on  2018-07-03   22:03:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: misterwhite (#1)

One year earlier, The USS Stark was hit by two Iraqi Exocet missiles. Thirty- seven United States Navy personnel were killed and twenty-one were injured.

Those were dangerous times.

True,but with the advanced radar and radio equipment they have aboard war ships,there is no excuse whatsoever for mistaking an airliner with a F-15 fighter.

The Captain was a coward that flat-out panicked and committed manslaughter against all those civilians aboard that airliner. IMNSHO,he should have served prison time for that mistake.

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

sneakypete  posted on  2018-07-03   22:06:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Liberator (#4)

I'm trying to understand why THIS "30-YEARS AGO TODAY!" incident and reminder is suddenly of great concern? And why of ALL event from the past or present this specific retrospective/reminder needs to clutter our mind?

Probably an effort to associate Trump with the guilt by the left.

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

sneakypete  posted on  2018-07-03   22:08:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Vicomte13 (#6)

I particularly sympathize with that missile officer, the guy who actually pressed the button. He has to live with the memory of what he did every day, and while he knows that he didn’t intend what happened, he rides airplanes, and sees the women and children around him, and knows that the people on that plane, including its pilots, didn’t do anything wrong either.

Correct me if I am wrong,but it's the Captain that gives the order to fire,not the missile officer.

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

sneakypete  posted on  2018-07-03   22:10:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: sneakypete (#12)

Probably an effort to associate Trump with the guilt by the left.

Bingo.

Dicktard has no shame.

I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح

GrandIsland  posted on  2018-07-03   22:11:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: sneakypete (#13)

At 2:30 in the morning the Captain has just been summoned out of sleep in his cabin and is clueless and disoriented. He is relying completely on the judgment of his TActical Action Officer and Weapons Control Officer to quickly tell him the situation and what needs to b done, and as, at jet speeds in a body of water that is only 30 miles across the decision time is literally seconds after the Captain arrives in Combat Information Center - if he arrives at all. That’s why the authority is delegated: all men must sleep, and at jet speeds in the Gulf there is no TIME.

The TAO is senior to the WCO (who actually pushes the button), but on ships with small Officer complements, the need to have a TAO on duty at all times in a combat zone means that all of senior officers do their turn in the watch rotation, but some, such as the Combat Systems Officer, are very strong at the role, while others, such as the Chief Engineer, are weaker at it: it is not their primary area of expertise. When the TAO is not a combat systems Officer, he will rely very heavily on the judgment and experience of the WCO, if the WCO is Himself a combat systems expert.

In the particular circumstance to which I am referring, the strongest WCO, the experienced Missile Officer, was paired with the weakest TAO, the Chief Engineer, specifically to have balance. The Captain Himself only got to CiC, in his underwear, within a minute before the decision to fire had to be made. Essentially the Captain deferred to the TAO because there was no time to develop situational awareness: the plane was detected at about 22 miles, and was closing at jet speed. The TAO has all of his information from the WCO and was relying on him.

The principal of command is command by negation. The junior officer says what he is doing, and he does it unless the senior officer says “No”.

In this case the WCO said “Firing Chaff”, and the TAO did not countermand, so he fired chaff. Then he prepared to fire a Surface-to-air missile by bringing it up on the missile launcher rail. He was not countermanded.

Then he watched the radar closure of the target, as did the TAO, and the Captain, for the few short seconds after he came into combat. The WCO has his finger on the button and fire control locked on, tracking the target, but he did not make the firing recommendation, the TAO, relying on the WCO, did not independently order weapons fired, and the groggy Captain relied on his team.

Vicomte13  posted on  2018-07-03   22:53:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: sneakypete, Deckard (#10)

Instead of firing or charging the U.S. military officials who were responsible for shooting down Iran Air Flight 655, the U.S. awarded Capt. Will Rogers III and Lt. Cmdr. Scott E. Lustig with special commendation medals for their “meritorious service” on the USS Vincennes in a display that completely ignored the tragedy they created and the nearly 300 innocent civilians they killed.

Free Thought Project

Once again I am calling HorseHillary. The CAPTAIN of any US Naval ship at sea is PERSONALLY held responsible for what any officer under his command does while in temporary command of the ship,and he was pretty much immediately "fired" from the Navy.

TFTP got one right.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Vincennes_(CG-49)

Iran Air Flight 655

On 3 July 1988, Vincennes, under the command of Captain Will Rogers III, was on patrol when it was reported that Iranian Revolutionary Guard gun boats had attacked a Pakistani merchant vessel. Vincennes deployed one of her helicopters to investigate. Shortly thereafter Rogers ordered his ship to move off station 50 miles (80 km) to the north. The destroyer flotilla commander ordered Vincennes to return to her original station. Vincennes's helicopter had followed the Revolutionary Guard gunboats into Iranian waters, and while maintaining contact with the boats, came under gunfire from the Iranians.

The helicopter crew reported that they had come under fire and with that report, Rogers turned his ship around and, with the frigate Elmer Montgomery, moved to intercept the gunboats. By doing so, Vincennes crossed into Iranian waters herself. As the US ships approached, the Iranian gunboats maneuvered, in what Rogers claimed was a threatening fashion. Rogers requested permission to fire and permission was granted by command, without knowing that Vincennes had crossed into Iranian waters. Vincennes and Elmer Montgomery commenced fire upon the gunboats at 9:43 a.m., scoring several hits on the gunboats, sinking two and damaging another.

While Vincennes was firing on the Iranian gunboats, confusion reigned aboard the ship as the tracking of aircraft in the area had become muddled, between Vincennes and other U.S. ships, and on Vincennes itself. Crucially, Vincennes misidentified an Iran Air Airbus A300 civilian airliner, Iran Air Flight 655, as an attacking F-14 Tomcat fighter aircraft. The Iran Air Flight 655 was climbing at the time, and her IFF transponder was on the Mode III civilian code rather than on the purely military Mode II, as recorded by Vincennes's own shipboard Aegis Combat System. Vincennes fired two radar-guided missiles and shot down the Iranian civilian airliner over Iranian airspace in the Strait of Hormuz, killing all 290 passengers and crew on board.

The Iranian government has maintained that Vincennes knowingly shot down the civilian aircraft. Iran Air Flight IR655 flew every day out of Bandar Abbas—a civil as well as military airport—on a scheduled passenger flight to Dubai using established air lanes. The Italian navy and another U.S. warship, the frigate Sides, confirmed that the plane was climbing—not diving to attack—at the time of the missile strike. The U.S. radio warnings were only broadcast on 121.5 MHz, not air traffic control frequencies and mistakenly identified the altitude and position of the plane, so the Airbus crew, if they were monitoring "guard," could have misinterpreted the warnings as referring to another aircraft. Captain David Carlson of Sides later said that the destruction of the airliner "marked the horrifying climax to Rogers' aggressiveness".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_C._Rogers_III

Iran Air 655

On July 3, 1988, the Vincennes shot down Iran Air Flight 655 with two radar seeking missile salvo of SM-2MR missiles. Iran Air 655, carrying 290 passengers, had been airborne for seven minutes when the missiles hit approximately 8 miles (13 km) from the Vincennes. The airliner crashed into the Persian Gulf 6.5 miles (10.5 km) east of Hengham Island (26°37.75'N 56°1'E). All 290 on-board including 66 children and 16 crew perished. At the time of the incident, the Vincennes was inside Iranian territorial waters and engaged in small arms combat with several Iranian surface craft, and one of its LAMPS III Seahawk helicopters had drawn warning fire during flight operations.

A subsequent US report by Rear Admiral William Fogarty, titled Formal Investigation into the Circumstances Surrounding the Downing of Iran Air Flight 655 on July 3, 1988,[8] noted that Captain Rogers received some faulty information that he used to make the decision to fire. Specifically, he was told the aircraft was identified as an Iranian Air Force F-14 Tomcat descending in an attack profile, and that it was identifying itself with secondary surveillance radar / IFF mode-II codes exclusively used by military aircraft. The investigation noted that Rogers was focused on the ongoing surface engagement and was only aware of the inbound aircraft for less than four minutes. It also pointed out that Rogers thought that he had increased burden to act since he was also assigned to protect the frigate USS Elmer Montgomery (FF-1082). The investigation also concluded that Rogers acted in a prudent manner based on the information available to him, and the short time frame involved. He also acted within the prescribed rules of engagement for USN warship captains in that situation.

Other independent investigations into the incident have presented a different picture. John Barry and Roger Charles of Newsweek magazine claimed that Rogers was overeager for combat, that he started the fight with Iranian gunboats, and then followed them into Iranian territorial waters. Barry and Charles also accused the U.S. government of a cover-up.

Some other sources lay some of the blame on the complexity of the technology and the great expense of the warship. An analysis of the events by the International Strategic Studies Association described the deployment of an AEGIS cruiser into that zone as irresponsible, and the Association thought that the great expense of his warship had played a major part in setting a low threshold for opening fire.

In 2004, Marita Turpin and Niek du Plooy of the Centre for Logistics and Decision Support partially attributed the accident to an expectancy bias introduced by the Aegis Combat System and faulted the design and "unhelpful user interface" as contributing to the errors of judgment.

Rogers was personally criticized for being overly aggressive by Commander David Carlson, commanding officer of the USS Sides, a second ship that was under the tactical control of Rogers at the time of the incident. Carlson claimed that the downing of Iran Air 655 marked the "horrifying climax to Capt. Rogers' aggressiveness, first seen four weeks ago". He was referring to incidents on June 2, 1988, when he claimed that Rogers brought the Vincennes too close to an Iranian frigate that was searching a bulk carrier, that he launched a helicopter too close to Iranian small boats, and that he fired upon a number of small Iranian military boats instead of directing another, smaller warship to do so. In disagreeing with Rogers' decision – citing the high cost of the cruiser relative to that of the frigates attached to the group – Carlson posited, "Why do you want an AEGIS cruiser out there shooting up boats? It wasn't a smart thing to do."

The USS Vincennes, with Rogers remaining in command, completed the remainder of her scheduled deployment to the Pacific and Indian Oceans, and she returned to Naval Station San Diego on October 25, 1988. During the voyage home on September 22, 1988, the Vincennes rescued 26 Vietnamese boat people adrift in the South China Sea.

Rogers remained in command of the USS Vincennes until May 27, 1989. In 1990, Capt. Rogers was awarded the Legion of Merit decoration "for exceptionally meritorious conduct in the performance of outstanding service as commanding officer ... from April 1987 to May 1989." The award was given for his service as the Commanding Officer of the Vincennes, and the citation made no mention of the downing of Iran Air 655.

nolu chan  posted on  2018-07-04   0:07:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: , Y'ALL (#0)

While the U.S. did recognize that “the aerial incident of 3 July 1988 as a terrible human tragedy and expressed deep regret over the loss of lives caused by the incident,” the U.S. was not required to admit legal liability or to formally apologize to Iran, and it later paid around $61.8 million—$213,103 per passenger—to the families of the victims.

. ----------------------- The United States and Iran agreed to the settlement above in the International Court of Justice in 1996.

Trans World Airlines Flight 800 (TWA 800) was a Boeing 747-100 that exploded and crashed into the Atlantic Ocean near East Moriches, New York, on July 17, 1996

---- Coincidence? -----

tpaine  posted on  2018-07-05   11:13:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: tpaine (#17)

No. Both cases were probably Navy accidents.

Vicomte13  posted on  2018-07-05   16:31:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: Vicomte13 (#18)

Coincidence? -----

No. Both cases were probably Navy accidents.

First, an American mistake. -------- Then, a mistaken retaliation by Iranian navy forces?

tpaine  posted on  2018-07-06   12:15:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: tpaine (#19)

Then, a mistaken retaliation by Iranian navy forces?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TWA_Flight_800

Witness interviews

An FBI witness statement summary (with personal information redacted)

Although there were considerable discrepancies between different accounts, most witnesses to the accident had seen a "streak of light" that was unanimously described as ascending, moving to a point where a large fireball appeared, with several witnesses reporting that the fireball split in two as it descended toward the water. There was intense public interest in these witness reports and much speculation that the reported streak of light was a missile that had struck TWA 800, causing the airplane to explode. These witness accounts were a major reason for the initiation and duration of the FBI's criminal investigation.

Approximately 80 FBI agents conducted interviews with potential witnesses daily. No verbatim records of the witness interviews were produced; instead, the agents who conducted the interviews wrote summaries that they then submitted. Witnesses were not asked to review or correct the summaries. Included in some of the witness summaries were drawings or diagrams of what the witness observed. Witnesses were not allowed to testify at the court hearings.

Within days of the crash the NTSB announced its intent to form its own witness group and to interview witnesses to the crash. After the FBI raised concerns about non-governmental parties in the NTSB's investigation having access to this information and possible prosecutorial difficulties resulting from multiple interviews of the same witness, the NTSB deferred and did not interview witnesses to the crash. A Safety Board investigator later reviewed FBI interview notes and briefed other Board investigators on their contents. In November 1996, the FBI agreed to allow the NTSB access to summaries of witness accounts in which personally identifying information had been redacted and to conduct a limited number of witness interviews. In April 1998, the FBI provided the NTSB with the identities of the witnesses but due to the time elapsed a decision was made to rely on the original FBI documents rather than reinterview witnesses.

The witnesses unanimously described something ascending to the plane and then the explosion.

nolu chan  posted on  2018-07-06   12:42:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: nolu chan, Y'ALL (#20)

The witnesses unanimously described something ascending to the plane and then the explosion.

I saw a network feed tape the night of the crash that showed that same streak of light ascending. --- It was taken from a fixed camera at a party, taping the festivities. The camera was pointed out to sea and showed the streak behind some partygoers who then rushed to the deck railing and pointed to it, and the explosion that folllwed.

Never saw that tape again. --- ,By morning. the story had shifted to the internal explosion bit..

tpaine  posted on  2018-07-06   13:15:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: tpaine (#21)

I saw a network feed tape the night of the crash that showed that same streak of light ascending.

Some of the eyewitnesses were surf-casters on the beach or fishermen on the water. My late brother lived on that side of the island near Moriches, was a surf-caster, and knew several of the witnesses. He related that he was told they saw something go up and meet the plane and go boom. It is more than curious how the witnesses were frozen out of the proceedings.

As for the Iranian incident, I do not see how they accidentally mistook an ascending AirBus squawking on a civilian frequency as a descending F-14 Tom Cat squawking on a military-only frequency.

nolu chan  posted on  2018-07-06   13:31:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: tpaine (#19)

Iranian Navy forces on Long Island? Nah. Accidental downing in US waters by the US Navy.

Vicomte13  posted on  2018-07-06   13:39:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: nolu chan (#22)

As for the Iranian incident, I do not see how they accidentally mistook an ascending AirBus squawking on a civilian frequency as a descending F-14 Tom Cat squawking on a military-only frequency.

Do you want to know? I can explain it to you. It will take time to do, and the subject is raw and I'm not in a mood to debate it, but if you want to know I will tell you exactly how it happened, because I almost shot down the same flight a couple of months earlier under similar circumstances.

Vicomte13  posted on  2018-07-06   13:41:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: nolu chan (#22)

It is more than curious how the witnesses were frozen out of the proceedings.

Not curious at all, if you've been following how the govt lies as long as I have.

tpaine  posted on  2018-07-06   13:42:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: Vicomte13 (#24)

I'm not in a mood to debate it, but if you want to know I will tell you exactly how it happened,

Your explaination earlier on another thread was good enough for me...

What do you think of my idea about f!ight 800,_-- that it was an Iranian retaliation?

tpaine  posted on  2018-07-06   13:50:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: tpaine (#26)

What do you think of my idea about f!ight 800,_-- that it was an Iranian retaliation?

Could be. I think it was a US Navy accident.

Vicomte13  posted on  2018-07-06   14:51:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: tpaine (#25)

Not curious at all, if you've been following how the govt lies as long as I have.

I'm pretty sure I experienced that up close and personal before you.

nolu chan  posted on  2018-07-06   19:17:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: nolu chan (#28)

tpaine, ---- Not curious at all, if you've been following how the govt lies as long as I have.

I'm pretty sure I experienced that up close and personal before you. ----- nolu

My first experience was in December of 1957, when govt agents lied about some of my activities in the German black market. --- They tried to inflate my misdemeanors into felonies.. --- Of which I was acquitted..

Your experience?

tpaine  posted on  2018-07-06   20:41:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: tpaine (#29)

My first experience was in December of 1957....

My only experience in 1957 was grammar school.

nolu chan  posted on  2018-07-10   11:24:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com