[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"Analysis: The Final State of the Presidential Race"

He’ll, You Pieces of Garbage

The Future of Warfare -- No more martyrdom!

"Kamala’s Inane Talking Points"

"The Harris Campaign Is Testament to the Toxicity of Woke Politics"

Easy Drywall Patch

Israel Preparing NEW Iran Strike? Iran Vows “Unimaginable” Response | Watchman Newscast

In Logansport, Indiana, Kids are Being Pushed Out of Schools After Migrants Swelled County’s Population by 30%: "Everybody else is falling behind"

Exclusive — Bernie Moreno: We Spend $110,000 Per Illegal Migrant Per Year, More than Twice What ‘the Average American Makes’

Florida County: 41 of 45 People Arrested for Looting after Hurricanes Helene and Milton are Noncitizens

Presidential race: Is a Split Ticket the only Answer?

hurricanes and heat waves are Worse

'Backbone of Iran's missile industry' destroyed by IAF strikes on Islamic Republic

Joe Rogan Experience #2219 - Donald Trump

IDF raids Hezbollah Radwan Forces underground bases, discovers massive cache of weapons

Gallant: ‘After we strike in Iran,’ the world will understand all of our training

The Atlantic Hit Piece On Trump Is A Psy-Op To Justify Post-Election Violence If Harris Loses

Six Al Jazeera journalists are Hamas, PIJ terrorists

Judge Aileen Cannon, who tossed Trump's classified docs case, on list of proposed candidates for attorney general

Iran's Assassination Program in Europe: Europe Goes Back to Sleep

Susan Olsen says Brady Bunch revival was cancelled because she’s MAGA.

Foreign Invaders crisis cost $150B in 2023, forcing some areas to cut police and fire services: report

Israel kills head of Hezbollah Intelligence.

Tenn. AG reveals ICE released thousands of ‘murderers and rapists’ from detention centers into US streets

Kamala Harris Touts Mass Amnesty Offering Fast-Tracked Citizenship to Nearly Every Illegal Alien in U.S.

Migration Crisis Fueled Rise in Tuberculosis Cases Study Finds

"They’re Going to Try to Kill Trump Again"

"Dems' Attempts at Power Grab Losing Their Grip"

"Restoring a ‘Great Moderation’ in Fiscal Policy"

"As attacks intensify, Trump becomes more popular"

Posting Articles Now Working Here

Another Test

Testing

Kamala Harris, reparations, and guaranteed income

Did Mudboy Slim finally kill this place?

"Why Young Americans Are Not Taught about Evil"

"New Rules For Radicals — How To Reinvent Kamala Harris"

"Harris’ problem: She’s a complete phony"

Hurricane Beryl strikes Bay City (TX)

Who Is ‘Destroying Democracy In Darkness?’

‘Kamalanomics’ is just ‘Bidenomics’ but dumber

Even The Washington Post Says Kamala's 'Price Control' Plan is 'Communist'

Arthur Ray Hines, "Sneakypete", has passed away.

No righT ... for me To hear --- whaT you say !

"Walz’s Fellow Guardsmen Set the Record Straight on Veep Candidate’s Military Career: ‘He Bailed Out’ "

"Kamala Harris Selects Progressive Minnesota Governor Tim Walz as Running Mate"

"The Teleprompter Campaign"

Good Riddance to Ismail Haniyeh

"Pagans in Paris"

"Liberal groupthink makes American life creepy and could cost Democrats the election".


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Watching The Cops
See other Watching The Cops Articles

Title: Police Bodycam Footage Sheds Light on Girl’s Viral Beach Head-Pummeling
Source: RedState
URL Source: https://www.redstate.com/alexparker ... ce-beating-girl-emily-weinman/
Published: May 31, 2018
Author: Alex Parker
Post Date: 2018-05-31 22:10:39 by Tooconservative
Keywords: None
Views: 25551
Comments: 135

On Wednesday, New Jersey police released bodycam video which sheds light on the viral beating of a young girl by a beach officer.

Wednesday’s footage of a cop punching a young girl in the head as he holds her face-down at the beach — and the confrontation which preceded the sandy grappling — serves as a compliment to the video which made headlines over the last few days.
I was sleeping on the beach and I woke up to this.. i can’t believe it.. pic.twitter.com/UJE5Sy7E4G

— Lexy (@HewittLexy) May 26, 2018

In the nine minutes of additional context, Wildwood police are seen engaging 20-year-old Emily Weinman as she soaks up sun with her 18-month-old daughter, a friend, and her daughter’s father.

After discovering alcohol near her beach blankets, an officer orders her to take a Breathalizer test. “I know that didn’t come up positive. I didn’t take a drink of anything,” she says.

One of the cops states she’s going to have to pour out her alcohol.

Off-camera, either she or her friend explains, “We didn’t even drink alcohol. You’re allowed to carry alcohol if you’re under age. You are. You’re not allowed to drink it. And we’re not drinking it.”

The officers tell the girls they’re guilty of “possession/consumption. Open display — you can see [the alcohol].”

“Okay, you can see it,” one of the girls admits. “And we’re not drinking it.”

The video goes silent for several seconds, seemingly muting more than just names.

Emily states what she clearly believes are her rights:
“I didn’t do anything to disrespect you. …You can’t lock me up. I didn’t disrespect you. … I didn’t do anything to you. You’re mad because you thought we were drinking.”

Then more exchange between Weinman and the cop:
“Where’s your aunt?”

“She’s on her way. You can wait here.”

“What’s your last name?”

“You don’t need my last name.”

The boys in blue aren’t particularly impressed:
“Okay, that’s it. I’m done with you. (to the other officer) Do you have cuffs on you?”

“Don’t touch me!”

“You’re about to get dropped.”

She backs away.
“Don’t f***ing touch me!…What are you doing?”

She appears to push at the officer’s chest as he closes in on her.

The video then cuts to the maybe-100-pound-girl girl screaming as the cop mounts her and is holding her by the hair. She yells, “They’re choking me!”

After more struggle, the cop warns, “That’s it,” and begins fist-smashing her in the head.

Both the puncher and the punched are cursing.

Weinman now faces multiple charges, including two counts of assault on a police officer.

I can only imagine people are going to have very different opinions of the video. So much so, that I don’t want to even give mine. I’d prefer to simply read your thoughts in the Comments section below.

I’ll share my view, nonetheless, as a catalyst:

Firstly, in my opinion, the girl comes across as a self-entitled brat who could probably use being taken down a few notches. Secondly, the cop appears happy to abuse his power and beat a young girl in the head.

This is not the job of law enforcement. It is not their charge, place, right, or job to teach people a lesson. Their job is only to enforce the law. With as little force as possible. In this case, at issue was a citation. Nothing more. Emily Weinman may be obnoxious. But that is not the business of a public servant who is paid to bring only his best to his position.

Am I wrong? Am I right? Please tell me how.

Check out my initial coverage of the viral video — and the ensuing commentary of RedState readers — here. And for another choking story, check out what MSNBC host Nicolle Wallace wants to do to Sarah Huckabee Sanders.

And by all means, follow Alex Parker on Twitter.

 


Poster Comment:

The longer this went on, the more I was hoping someone would accidentally kick her in the head two or three times or just light her up with a Taser for a half-hour or so.

I would never have the patience to be a cop and deal with these assholes constantly. (1 image)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-45) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#46. To: Tooconservative (#42)

Really? Let's take another example of a class of gun laws.

How many states in this country allowed civilians to carry a concealed handgun lawfully 50 years ago?

How many allow CCW now?

The underlying facts of a crime don't change but the laws change all the time, state by state.

And that is a fact.

There ARE no facts in your brain fart. It only proves that what people like YOU call "Facts" are temporary things that change with the wind.

AND.......WTF is up with your rabid approval of a state ALLOWING someone to enjoy a CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT?

Here is a little factoid for you,it is the nature of authorities,including cops and states to try to expand their power,and there is nothing they would forbid themselves from doing if it weren't for the US Constitution preventing them from overreaching.

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

sneakypete  posted on  2018-06-02   9:36:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#47. To: Tooconservative (#43)

Carrying is NOT consuming. Even you should be able to understand this.

So carrying narcotics is just fine as long as the cops don't observe you selling them or using them?

Alcohol is a powerful, addictive, regulated recreational drug.

If they are legal prescribed narcotics,the obvious answer is "YES!"

If they are illegal narcotics,as you so obviously want to imply,the answer is "No,and it would not be legal for them to be carried if the girls had been over 21,either.

Alcohol is a powerful, addictive, regulated recreational drug.

So what? Are you their daddy? Who died and gave you the authority to regulate who can and can not BE AROUND BUT NOT CONSUMING legal,tax-paid alcoholic beverages?

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

sneakypete  posted on  2018-06-02   9:39:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#48. To: Tooconservative (#44)

I saw no egregious use of force. The arresting officers acted lawfully based on what we have seen.

You are ok with a 200+ lb cop punching a minor female in the head that is on the ground?

Good to know.

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

sneakypete  posted on  2018-06-02   9:40:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#49. To: Fred Mertz, GrandIsland (#45)

You're an a-hole, like your homo friend FireIsland.

It's somewhat of an honor to be considered an a-hole by you.

I must be doing something right.

Tooconservative  posted on  2018-06-02   9:45:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#50. To: sneakypete (#48)

You are ok with a 200+ lb cop punching a minor female in the head that is on the ground?

Well, only if it is too inconvenient to just kick her in the head.

Tooconservative  posted on  2018-06-02   9:46:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#51. To: sneakypete (#46)

AND.......WTF is up with your rabid approval of a state ALLOWING someone to enjoy a CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT?

If she wants no interference from the state, then stay off patrolled state-owned property. Like the beach.

Tooconservative  posted on  2018-06-02   9:48:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#52. To: sneakypete (#47)

If they are illegal narcotics,as you so obviously want to imply,the answer is "No,and it would not be legal for them to be carried if the girls had been over 21,either.

. . .

So what? Are you their daddy? Who died and gave you the authority to regulate who can and can not BE AROUND BUT NOT CONSUMING legal,tax-paid alcoholic beverages?

You sure switched fast from "Of course, it's against the law" for narcotics and went to "you ain't their daddy" when it comes to alcohol.

Tooconservative  posted on  2018-06-02   9:51:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#53. To: nolu chan (#28)

We didn’t even drink alcohol. You’re allowed to carry alcohol if you’re under age. You are. You’re not allowed to drink it. And we’re not drinking it.”

This is why the cops say nothing when they're detaining someone and they ask, "What I do?"

Because if they tell them they start spouting bullshit like this.

misterwhite  posted on  2018-06-02   10:03:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#54. To: Tooconservative (#42)

How many states in this country allowed civilians to carry a concealed handgun lawfully 50 years ago?

It does demonstrate the radical changes of the character of our society.

50 years ago if you were carrying concealed it was assumed you were the bad guy carrying it for nefarious purposes. Why else would you have a concealed weapon?

Today, there are numerous examples of why people carry concealed for defensive, not offensive, purposes.

misterwhite  posted on  2018-06-02   10:20:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#55. To: misterwhite, sneakypete (#54)

Obviously I don't want to turn this into a CCW chat thread but it seemed like an example of radical changes in criminal law that have happened in a class of what were once uniformly serious crimes. In the case of CCW, the radical change in state laws has happened in just 25 years.

Tooconservative  posted on  2018-06-02   11:11:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#56. To: Tooconservative (#55) (Edited)

Obviously I don't want to turn this into a CCW chat thread

Especially after you bragged on the other thread how you stayed on-topic despite numerous posts.

"In the case of CCW, the radical change in state laws has happened in just 25 years."

The NRA deserves a lot of credit for that, I think. Plus the criminals, of course.

But the point is that there's no reason not to -- assuming you're a trained, responsible adult (even though most armed criminals aren't). It's hard to argue against self-defense, especially when that self-defense has the side effect of protecting others. Plus, no one knows you're armed, so they can't be offended.

Civilian open- carry is disconcerting. My nephew in Ohio open carries and when I'm there I feel unprepared for some upcoming shootout. Like, "What do you know that I don't know?"

The funny part is that he liked his girlriend's 9mm better as a carry weapon, so they swapped. But hers is powder blue and looks like a squirt gun. A 9mm squirt gun.

misterwhite  posted on  2018-06-02   12:22:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#57. To: misterwhite (#56) (Edited)

My nephew in Ohio open carries and when I'm there I feel unprepared for some upcoming shootout.

It's a right to carry but I really don't like open carry, don't like to see it. I don't even like to see cops wearing a holster.

If you want to carry, get a CCW and stop making gun-shy people nervous.

Of course, I'm sure I'm very much in the minority on this, at least on this forum. And I do live in a state with a fairly low barrier to get a CCW.

I also think that open-carry mostly hurts the gun rights cause more than it helps. I'm thinking of the rather aggressive open-carry nuts down in Texas especially. There's another bunch in California.

Tooconservative  posted on  2018-06-02   14:13:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#58. To: A K A Stone (#29)

If you lived a few years ago you wouldn't believe in germs and you would be telling deckard that it is a conspiracy theory that the world is not flat. 🍿

God is not ABSOLUTE. God is relative to your capability & capacity to survive.

buckeroo  posted on  2018-06-02   14:14:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#59. To: Tooconservative (#57)

It's a right to carry but I really don't like open carry, don't like to see it.

I get nervous at a gun store when I see gang-bangers (well, they look like gang-bangers) handling firearms. I have this strange feeling we'll be meeting again.

misterwhite  posted on  2018-06-02   14:18:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#60. To: Tooconservative (#57)

I also think that open-carry mostly hurts the gun rights cause more than it helps.

Only when it's done to intimidate. Just because you can do something doesn't mean you should.

misterwhite  posted on  2018-06-02   14:20:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#61. To: misterwhite (#59)

I get nervous at a gun store when I see gang-bangers (well, they look like gang-bangers) handling firearms. I have this strange feeling we'll be meeting again.

Statistically, you're more likely to face off in a gunfight against someone of your own race. This is true for both blacks and whites.

You are several percent more likely to be killed by a black man than a non-black.

So while your thought of fellow gunshop customers as possible assailants is ironic, outside of some improbable circumstances you are still much more likely to be in a gun fight with another white.

I think you probably do know all of this already. John Lott and others have posted some well-known studies on gun violence for some years and the results regarding interracial vs. intraracial shootings is pretty consistent.

Tooconservative  posted on  2018-06-02   14:25:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#62. To: Tooconservative, GrandIsland (#34)

I'm pretty sure he's breaking some laws down there.

Nope. And I am whistling DIXIE!

buckeroo  posted on  2018-06-02   14:32:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#63. To: Tooconservative (#51)

If she wants no interference from the state, then stay off patrolled state-owned property. Like the beach.

Ahhh,"The State" is your massa,and you are happy with that.

Good to know.

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

sneakypete  posted on  2018-06-02   14:46:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#64. To: Tooconservative (#52)

You sure switched fast from "Of course, it's against the law" for narcotics and went to "you ain't their daddy" when it comes to alcohol.

Well,Bubba,you specified ILLEGAL narcotics,and legal beer.

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

sneakypete  posted on  2018-06-02   14:47:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#65. To: misterwhite (#54)

50 years ago if you were carrying concealed it was assumed you were the bad guy carrying it for nefarious purposes.

HorseHillary! I knew several local businessmen that carried concealed weapons on a daily basis 50 years ago,and nobody thought anything of it.

Why else would you have a concealed weapon?

Uhhhh,to protect yourself from robbery and assault?

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

sneakypete  posted on  2018-06-02   14:49:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#66. To: sneakypete (#65)

HorseHillary! I knew several local businessmen that carried concealed weapons on a daily basis 50 years ago,and nobody thought anything of it.

I was at this country tavern out in the boonies about twenty years ago in the afternoon. The thing I noticed was this large .45 caliber revolver sitting next to the cash register against the wall, not the counter. The place had a reputation for rough types showing up. I doubt they were ever robbed though.

I think the name of it was The Black Cat. I had a beer or two with friends and a nice visit. Not sure if I'd want to be there after 11 p.m. though.

Fred Mertz  posted on  2018-06-02   15:13:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#67. To: sneakypete (#40)

Supposes she was with her family and carrying the beer because her father was carrying the umbrella and towels,and her mother was carrying something else?

Suppose you came back into reality, fag patriarch.

I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح

GrandIsland  posted on  2018-06-02   18:51:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#68. To: GrandIsland (#67)

Suppose you came back into reality, fag patriarch.

Suppose you eat shit and die,Fire Island?

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

sneakypete  posted on  2018-06-02   18:54:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#69. To: sneakypete (#68)

Suppose you eat shit and die,Fire Island?

Speaking of death... how old are you again?

I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح

GrandIsland  posted on  2018-06-02   20:16:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#70. To: Tooconservative (#35)

He made a lawful arrest and he was within his rights and his duty to uphold the laws.

Hondo68  posted on  2018-06-02   21:33:07 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#71. To: hondo68, Tooconservative (#70)

He made a lawful arrest and he was within his rights and his duty to uphold the laws.

The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any statute, to be valid, must be in agreement. It is impossible for a law which violates the Constitution to be valid.

This is succinctly stated as follows: 'All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.' Marbury vs. Madison, 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803) 'When rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them.'

“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul

Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.

Deckard  posted on  2018-06-02   22:22:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#72. To: sneakypete (#65)

Man, you gotta love how many ‘men’ are in this thread cheering a girl getting beat up by a guy. I bet they’re all tough guys too. Lol.

Maybe they beat their wives as well, wouldn’t surprise me, unless the only reason they don’t is because their wives could beat the hell outa them. What a country we live in now, eh?

'What kind of man gives cigarettes to trees?'

Dead Culture Watch  posted on  2018-06-03   1:02:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#73. To: Dead Culture Watch (#72)

Man, you gotta love how many ‘men’ are in this thread cheering a girl getting beat up by a guy. I bet they’re all tough guys too. Lol.

At what point was she actually beaten up? She struggled to resist arrest and got cuffed.

You sure do love to hurl those allegations though, a real petty liberal streak of accusation. Makes you feel morally superior apparently.

Tooconservative  posted on  2018-06-03   1:32:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#74. To: Deckard, misterwhite, GrandIsland, sneakypete (#71)

Blah-blah-blah. You think a Class II Jersey beach cop is going to deliberate like Oliver Wendell Holmes while trying to decide to make an arrest?

Before you declare this woman more holy than the Virgin Mary, let's look at some other reporting on her little hobbies.

Weinman, a Philadelphia native, whose Facebook page is filled with photos of her young daughter, is facing several felony charges that could result in several years in prison if found guilty.

Wildwood Police are referring Weinman to the Cape May prosecutor’s office on two counts of aggravated assault on a police officer, and charges of aggravated assault by spitting bodily fluids at/on a police officer, disorderly conduct, resisting arrest, obstruction and being a minor in possession of alcohol.

This is not Weinman’s first run in with the law and not the first time she’s been combative, according to court documents. In September of 2016, she was arrested and charged with burglary, simple assault, criminal mischief, criminal trespass and recklessly endangering another person. In November of 2017, Weinman pleaded guilty to misdemeanor simple assault and misdemeanor “recklessly endangering another person.” She was sentenced to serve four years of probation and pay just under $10,000 in court costs and restitution.

I saw her spit at the cop but I didn't think she spit effectively enough to hit him, more likely got a little spit on her own boobs or the sand.

Tooconservative  posted on  2018-06-03   1:44:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#75. To: Tooconservative (#73) (Edited)

I don’t watch videos. Opening sentence in OP mentions a beating.

Maybe you don’t read what you post? By the way? I am morally superior. It just is what it is.

'What kind of man gives cigarettes to trees?'

Dead Culture Watch  posted on  2018-06-03   2:44:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#76. To: Dead Culture Watch (#75)

I don’t watch videos. Opening sentence in OP mentions a beating.

So, offered a chance to see the evidence yourself, you prefer to remain ignorant and form opinions based on slanted second-hand reporting.

Maybe you don’t read what you post? By the way? I am morally superior. It just is what it is.

Maybe being gullible or lazy is the source of your moral superiority.

Tooconservative  posted on  2018-06-03   3:43:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#77. To: Tooconservative (#74)

In November of 2017, Weinman pleaded guilty ... she was sentenced to serve four years of probation ...

So that means she has her probation revoked and she has to serve time for the 2017 crime in addition to these new charges?

I hope.

misterwhite  posted on  2018-06-03   7:57:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#78. To: Fred Mertz (#66)

I was at this country tavern out in the boonies about twenty years ago in the afternoon. The thing I noticed was this large .45 caliber revolver sitting next to the cash register ...

At that point I turn arond and find another bar.

misterwhite  posted on  2018-06-03   7:59:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#79. To: Deckard (#71)

Which New Jersey law violated the U.S. Constitution here?

misterwhite  posted on  2018-06-03   8:04:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#80. To: Dead Culture Watch (#72)

Man, you gotta love how many ‘men’ are in this thread cheering a girl getting beat up by a guy.

So you don't believe in gender equality?

misterwhite  posted on  2018-06-03   8:06:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#81. To: misterwhite, GrandIsland (#77) (Edited)

So that means she has her probation revoked and she has to serve time for the 2017 crime in addition to these new charges?

Judges in most states have flexibility and the probation laws vary. I have no idea what NJ does. I would think there would be some jail time.

Some additional info from Heavy.com:

You can read Weinman’s full, now-deleted Facebook post below:
So, I decide to go on the beach with my daughter, her father and friend. I had alcohol, it’s Memorial Day weekend and 90 percent of people are underage drinking on the beach, without a doubt. Two cops approach me on a their four wheelers and ask me and my friend how old we are, we gave them our ages. Then, we got breathalized, and it came back negative. I told them I wasn’t drinking and the alcohol was clearly closed/sealed, which the cops seen. They still stayed, the one cop following me when I walked away to go make a phone call after they did what they had to do.. like okay, they did their job and I cooperated🤔🤦🏻‍♀️ Therefore I asked them don’t they have something better to do as cops than to stop people for underage drinking on the beach, saying to that there’s so much more serious stuff going on the cop said, “I was gonna let you go but now I’ll write you up” and he asked my name.

I did not do anything wrong and anything could’ve been written down on that paper so I wouldn’t give it to him. At that point I was told if I don’t give it to him he’s going to arrest me. I told him I have my 18 month old daughter with me and there’s no need for all of it and that again, I’m not gonna give him my information knowing I didn’t do anything wrong. He told me he’s arresting me and started coming towards me to put handcuffs on me. I cautiously was backing up from him (facing him) and yelled for my daughters father. (he was playing in the ocean with our daughter at the time).. I tripped and fell and the cop tackled me to the ground and smashed my head into the sand. At that point I blacked out and fought any way possible trying to get up and push him off me. Thats when he head locked me me by his arm around my neck, punched on me in my head and then he head locked me again but this time choking me, I was gasping for ear.

Yes, i know I should’ve gave him my name.. I was partly wrong in a way but I was scared; Like I said I didn’t do anything wrong and anything could’ve been written on that paper, the whole situation was iffy and I didn’t trust it.. especially being aware of the fact of how grimy law enforcement can be now a days. & honestly, I can say if I took even a sip, then I would’ve gave them my information and called it a day; I’m underage, so I know better. But this whole situation was handled wrongly and blew out of proportion all because these pigs didn’t do their jobs the way they were TRAINED to do so. maybe that’s just how they train them nowadays, who knows with the world we live in today🤷🏻‍♀️

Now, I’m over here with a sore body, banging headache and the thought of ever trusting a police officer again if anything were to happen in the future. That’s what we call them for right?🤦🏻‍♀️ We are supposed to feel safe and trust our police officers for anything. Oh, did I mention that they didn’t even take the beer (like they’re supposed to since we were underage) and finish getting my friends info?? They obviously were there to stir the pot. I know I’m not the first this happened too and definitely am sure that I will not be the last!!

So she admits that it was her alcohol and defends it by alleging that 90% of the young people on the beach were also minors in possession. The mayor was interviewed too, "Troiano told local media underage drinking is a problem. 'I don’t understand why it seems to be that this is a God-given right that they can come here and drink underage,' he said." Obviously, this is another major beach with problems of rising lawlessness as we have seen around the country in recent years.

Wildwood Chief of Police Robert N. Regalbuto told local media, “From what I see on the video and only on the video, from not even talking to the officers, I think they did a decent job.”

Cannon, Nillman and Jordan are seasonal cops. Earning just $10 an hour, NJ.com says, they’re called Class II officers who get the same training as police recruits. To qualify for the job they must be 18, have a high school diploma and pass a background check.

In its initial statement Sunday, the department said it has “received reports of a video on various social media sources, regarding an incident that occurred on the Wildwood beach yesterday afternoon with our officers.”

So these are just summer beach cops, with minimal police training. Security guards with a badge. Maybe they're hoping to hired by a PD. You kinda notice the police chief is trying to be supportive but maybe he's not fighting for these seasonal cops like he would for his full-timers.

Like any police incident, the who/what/where/when starts to give you a better picture of the incident. I'm not sure whether it's ordinary or not for seasonal beach cops to be as aggressive as this. Maybe some of the public resentment is due to the fact that they are seasonal cops, not full-time cops or deputies who have a lot more training.

Tooconservative  posted on  2018-06-03   8:42:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#82. To: Tooconservative (#0)

I just watched a few seconds. Did they get a search warrant for that breathalyzer.

You constitutionally need one. You know that right?

A K A Stone  posted on  2018-06-03   8:47:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#83. To: A K A Stone (#82)

You constitutionally need one. You know that right?

I don't think you can cite a Supreme Court opinion to support that. I've never heard that before.

It is moot anyway. She gave the breath sample as requested. Apparently, so did her friend though you don't really see that.

Tooconservative  posted on  2018-06-03   8:50:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#84. To: A K A Stone (#82)

Did they get a search warrant for that breathalyzer. You constitutionally need one.

She was a minor in possession of alcohol. That gave them probable cause to test her.

But it's a moot point. They asked and she voluntarily complied. Twice, I think.

misterwhite  posted on  2018-06-03   9:01:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#85. To: Tooconservative (#83)

Supreme court decisions lol. I'm talking about the true law the constitution. Not a bunch of freaks opinions.

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

A K A Stone  posted on  2018-06-03   9:02:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (86 - 135) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com