Watching The Cops
See other Watching The Cops Articles
Title: Police Bodycam Footage Sheds Light on Girl’s Viral Beach Head-Pummeling
Source:
RedState
URL Source: https://www.redstate.com/alexparker ... ce-beating-girl-emily-weinman/
Published: May 31, 2018
Author: Alex Parker
Post Date: 2018-05-31 22:10:39 by Tooconservative
Keywords: None
Views: 25549
Comments: 135
On Wednesday, New Jersey police released bodycam video which sheds light on the viral beating of a young girl by a beach officer. Wednesday’s footage of a cop punching a young girl in the head as he holds her face-down at the beach — and the confrontation which preceded the sandy grappling — serves as a compliment to the video which made headlines over the last few days. — Lexy (@HewittLexy) May 26, 2018 In the nine minutes of additional context, Wildwood police are seen engaging 20-year-old Emily Weinman as she soaks up sun with her 18-month-old daughter, a friend, and her daughter’s father. After discovering alcohol near her beach blankets, an officer orders her to take a Breathalizer test. “I know that didn’t come up positive. I didn’t take a drink of anything,” she says. One of the cops states she’s going to have to pour out her alcohol. Off-camera, either she or her friend explains, “We didn’t even drink alcohol. You’re allowed to carry alcohol if you’re under age. You are. You’re not allowed to drink it. And we’re not drinking it.” The officers tell the girls they’re guilty of “possession/consumption. Open display — you can see [the alcohol].” “Okay, you can see it,” one of the girls admits. “And we’re not drinking it.” The video goes silent for several seconds, seemingly muting more than just names. Emily states what she clearly believes are her rights: Then more exchange between Weinman and the cop: “She’s on her way. You can wait here.” … “What’s your last name?” “You don’t need my last name.” The boys in blue aren’t particularly impressed: “Don’t touch me!” “You’re about to get dropped.” She backs away. She appears to push at the officer’s chest as he closes in on her. The video then cuts to the maybe-100-pound-girl girl screaming as the cop mounts her and is holding her by the hair. She yells, “They’re choking me!” After more struggle, the cop warns, “That’s it,” and begins fist-smashing her in the head. Both the puncher and the punched are cursing. Weinman now faces multiple charges, including two counts of assault on a police officer. I can only imagine people are going to have very different opinions of the video. So much so, that I don’t want to even give mine. I’d prefer to simply read your thoughts in the Comments section below. I’ll share my view, nonetheless, as a catalyst: Firstly, in my opinion, the girl comes across as a self-entitled brat who could probably use being taken down a few notches. Secondly, the cop appears happy to abuse his power and beat a young girl in the head. This is not the job of law enforcement. It is not their charge, place, right, or job to teach people a lesson. Their job is only to enforce the law. With as little force as possible. In this case, at issue was a citation. Nothing more. Emily Weinman may be obnoxious. But that is not the business of a public servant who is paid to bring only his best to his position. Am I wrong? Am I right? Please tell me how. Check out my initial coverage of the viral video — and the ensuing commentary of RedState readers — here. And for another choking story, check out what MSNBC host Nicolle Wallace wants to do to Sarah Huckabee Sanders. And by all means, follow Alex Parker on Twitter. Poster Comment: The longer this went on, the more I was hoping someone would accidentally kick her in the head two or three times or just light her up with a Taser for a half-hour or so. I would never have the patience to be a cop and deal with these assholes constantly.
I was sleeping on the beach and I woke up to this.. i can’t believe it.. pic.twitter.com/UJE5Sy7E4G “I didn’t do anything to disrespect you. …You can’t lock me up. I didn’t disrespect you. … I didn’t do anything to you. You’re mad because you thought we were drinking.” “Where’s your aunt?” “Okay, that’s it. I’m done with you. (to the other officer) Do you have cuffs on you?” “Don’t f***ing touch me!…What are you doing?”
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-95) not displayed.
.
.
.
#96. To: A K A Stone (#94)
See? I told you that you were wrong. Now even Fred is agreeing with you. : )
Go pound sand, you misterwhite jr. son of a gun.
I'm talking specifically about the breathalyzer. If they want to arrest her for the alcohol then so be it. Like I said I'm only talking about the breathalyzer. I believe alcohol on the beach is against the law regardless of age. At least the beachs I've been on.
I'm not sure if all public beaches ban it though that is a safe bet. But a minor is always banned, on the beach or elsewhere. This girl isn't too bright or she wouldn't have been displaying it openly. It's bound to catch any cop's eye. And the girl looks like she could be in high school.
At least the beaches I've been on. Not sure if that's true. Canned beer is fine at some, bottled (glass) beer is a no-no for obvious reasons.
I started think about the 18mo infant. It would have been born in December 2016 or very early January 2017 to be 18 months old now. So she was 5-6 months pregnant in September 2016 when she committed some pretty serious crimes. Then when her daugher wasn't even a year old, she committed more crimes and paid $10,000 restitution and court costs and got 4 years probation. I think this is not a law-abiding person.
Heh -- this is one of the most widely emotional, polarizing threads here in a while. NORMALLY I'm very cynical about these types of possible over-officiousness. I will say that the initial reports were clearly way slanted toward the Witch in question. Story was spun AGAINST LE as usual. UNTIL the Wildwood PD released th body-cam. Drunken Witch is Guilty of several offenses. INCLUDING being an obnoxious attention-ho, disturbing the peace, incitement, lying her azz off, and assaulting a LE. I. FULLY. CHEERED. ON. HER. BEAT-DOWN. *My perspective*: Having worked at the Seaside NJ beaches for several years (back when), this kind of animal was simply carted away without all this phony fanfare. By screeching and screaming, she's tried to cover her own lawlessness to exploit the fake, "MEN ARE MEAN WOMEN-HATERS!" meme. (This is the type of selfish weaselly witch who would cry, "RAPE!!!" in public in you brushed against her.) As TC has documented above, this disrespectful witch was already ON PROBATION and NOT a good person. What we DON'T need: A bunch of these types of Dem-Leftist trouble-making anarchists pulling this BS in public as we're all trying to enjoy ourselves in peace.
So was busting minors for alcohol openly displayed a usual thing back when? Was this use of force something that surprised you or seemed typical for summer beach cops like these? [I assume you had seasonal cops back then too.]
I'll say. Fred even told me to go pound sand. My feelings were really hurt.
... and 18 years old. Any record of crimes committed prior to that -- and I'm guessing quite a few -- would be sealed. So, she's off to a running start and I'm sure we haven't heard the last of her, given her attitude towards the law and law enforcement. At least the kid has a father. No idea how that happened.
Yeah. I'm crying.
Cop: "Alcohol is not allowed on the beach. You're going to have to pour it out." No assault. No beating. No arrest. No YouTube video. No Facebook posting. I live a dull life. (But with no criminal record.)
Or she could have put it in a cooler or kept it out of sight. Then the cops would have had no probable cause to stop and get off the 4-wheeler to question her. Apparently, some people think you have a constitutional right to display that you have alcohol on a patrolled public beach even if you're a minor.
I guess she actually believed what she was saying -- as long as she's not drinking it, it's legal. Misdemeanor stupidity.
Yeah,that little thing assaulted those two fat cops and had them in fear of dey widdle lifes. Da poor bayabys! And all they did was attack her and thrown her to the ground and hit her in the head! She's a bully! A bully,ah tells ya! As for the rest of it,sounds like a typical example of the pigs overcharging to get a plea bargain conviction. IOW,police and judicial abuse of power and authority for profit and to cover their own incompetent asses.
In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
She says that twice. Can't she read? Maybe she thought it would be a good idea to write it twice so slow-witted people would understand it?
In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
I know i'm in the minority and you guys think the Supreme court is god like or something. I'm with you Pebbles. I consider a breathalyzer the same as a cavity search. The sound you are hearing is that of AKA nailing a framed copy of that post to his wall.
In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
Well, if she is correct and they never did actually confiscate the alcohol, then it would seem they have no physical evidence of M.I.P. All her lawyer has to do is say, "What alcohol? I see no alcohol in evidence". So she might get off on that charge. It could cause the D.A. to drop all the charges since that was the offense that set events in motion.
They didn't look fat. They'd only been on the job for a month or so. So they hadn't had time yet to bulk up on donuts and steroids.
New Jersey has been under Sharia Law since governor Crisco. It's mandatory in NJ now to beat women if they have alcohol, and aren't wearing a burqa.
Just her voluntary testimony, on camera, that she illegally possessed it. Of course she could say she was just kidding. But the cop would say he didn't know that and based his subsequent actions on what he thought was a truthful statement by her at the time.
She was UNDERAGE. It was ILLEGAL and IMPOSSIBLE for her to lawfully POSSESS an alcoholic beverage. It was a not less than $500 offense. I posted the New Jersey statute.
Define "possess". Sounds to me like you think it is illegal for her to be on a beach,or maybe even in a state,where alcoholic beverages exist. Was she not a part of a family group,at least one of whom was an adult,who at that particular moment was in the water with her child?
In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
I posted the New Jersey statute. Try reading it. NJ Rev Stat § 2C:33-15 (2013) 1. a. Any person under the legal age to purchase alcoholic beverages who knowingly possesses without legal authority or who knowingly consumes any alcoholic beverage in any school, public conveyance, public place, or place of public assembly, or motor vehicle, is guilty of a disorderly persons offense, and shall be fined not less than $500.00. Was she underage? Was she in a public place? Did the police find the alcoholic beverage? Did she argue that it was legal for her to possess the alcoholic beverage? If either you or she need someone to define the word possess, a judge will do that for not less than $500.
Nope the "aunt" she claimed was on the way never showed. The baby daddy was playing in the water some distance away. You may have noticed she screamed for him a half-dozen times and it took him a minute or so to show up (seen in the tape by the cops yelling at him to back off).
But she says they didn't confiscate the alcohol as evidence. Maybe this will all blow up on an evidentiary challenge from her attorney. "What alcohol was my client alleged to possess, your honor?" Then the other charges probably evaporate.
Well,he was probably foolish enough to think there was no danger of his wife being attacked on a public beach in broad daylight.
In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
He was just a baby daddy, not a husband and has another 16.5 years of being on the hook financially for her baby. Assuming that it really is his baby and not some other guy's. IOW, he's a dumbass however you slice it.
So what?
In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
So: you were factually inaccurate. Neither he nor his Feckless Cunt baby mama had any lifetime commitment to each other.
That's just pathetic. Desperation in order to try to win a losing argument is never pretty,but you are taking it to new lows.
In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
The article describes him as "her daughter's father". Not a husband, not a fiancee. The child is an infant only 18mo old. And that makes him the baby daddy.
So what? In WHAT important way does that make any difference at all? How does it change anything?
In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
You were suggesting they were a pair with legal status or declared intentions. I was merely correcting this impression. They aren't married, they aren't engaged, she and her baby live with her mom, I think.
I was suggesting there was an adult of legal age to possess beer as a part of the group.
In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
There wasn't. She told the cops her "aunt" was on the way. The "aunt" never showed. She made a CreepBook post after that said she was M.I.P. and excusing it by saying the 90% of the minors on the beach were also M.I.P. Then she deleted the post but someone snapshotted it before she got it deleted.
Hey! You can't say "cunt". Oh, wait. Yes you can. I forgot that word is now an accepted part of American lexicon. Sorry. (But why do I have this nagging feeling that the word would still be taboo if a conservative comedian referred to Michelle's children that way?)
Well, you see yer Honor, I thought it was legal for me to have a gun as long as I didn't shoot it. And, uh, my aunt was on the way and she has a license. And, uh, just about everyone else had a gun.
Exactly. These ne'er-do-well Feckless Cunts will lie at the drop of a hat.
That is the first positive comment I have received from you in many moons.
#97. To: Tooconservative (#96)
#98. To: Tooconservative (#95)
#99. To: A K A Stone (#98)
I believe alcohol on the beach is against the law regardless of age.
#100. To: A K A Stone (#98)
I believe alcohol on the beach is against the law regardless of age.
#101. To: misterwhite (#84)
In September of 2016, she was arrested and charged with burglary, simple assault, criminal mischief, criminal trespass and recklessly endangering another person.
#102. To: Tooconservative, A K A Stone, Fred Mertz, GrandIsland, Dead Culture Watch, misterwhite (#96)
See? I told you that you were wrong. Now even Fred is agreeing with you. : )
#103. To: Liberator (#102)
Having worked at the Seaside NJ beaches for several years (back when), this kind of animal was simply carted away without all this phony fanfare.
#104. To: Liberator (#102)
Heh -- this is one of the most widely emotional, polarizing threads here in a while.
#105. To: Tooconservative (#101)
So she was 5-6 months pregnant in September 2016 ...
#106. To: Liberator (#102)
Heh -- this is one of the most widely emotional, polarizing threads here in a while.
#107. To: Tooconservative (#0)
One of the cops states she’s going to have to pour out her alcohol.
Me: "Oh, I didn't realize that. OK. I'm pouring it out."
Cop: "Thank you. Have a nice day."
#108. To: misterwhite (#107)
(Edited)
#109. To: Tooconservative (#108)
Apparently, some people think you have a constitutional right to display that you have alcohol on a patrolled public beach even if you're a minor.
#110. To: Tooconservative (#74)
Before you declare this woman more holy than the Virgin Mary, let's look at some other reporting on her little hobbies.
#111. To: misterwhite (#87)
anything could’ve been written down on that paper so I wouldn’t give it to him.
#112. To: Fred Mertz, A K A Stone (#92)
They searched her person. They searched her breath.
#113. To: sneakypete, misterwhite, Liberator (#110)
As for the rest of it,sounds like a typical example of the pigs overcharging to get a plea bargain conviction.
#114. To: sneakypete (#110)
Yeah,that little thing assaulted those two fat cops and had them in fear of dey widdle lifes.
#115. To: Fred Mertz, Sharia Beach Party (#97)
#116. To: Tooconservative (#113)
then it would seem they have no physical evidence of M.I.P.
#117. To: sneakypete (#38)
What makes you so sure she didn't have legal authority to possess it? Maybe she was carrying it for her adult friends,or just watching it for them?
#118. To: nolu chan (#117)
She was UNDERAGE. It was ILLEGAL and IMPOSSIBLE for her to lawfully POSSESS an alcoholic beverage. It was a not less than $500 offense. I posted the New Jersey statute.
#119. To: sneakypete (#118)
Define "possess". Sounds to me like you think it is illegal for her to be on a beach,or maybe even in a state,where alcoholic beverages exist.
2C:33-15 Possession, consumption of alcoholic beverages by persons under legal age; penalty.
#120. To: sneakypete, nolu chan (#118)
Was she not a part of a family group,at least one of whom was an adult,who at that particular moment was in the water with her child?
#121. To: nolu chan (#119)
If either you or she need someone to define the word possess, a judge will do that for not less than $500.
#122. To: Tooconservative (#120)
The baby daddy was playing in the water some distance away. You may have noticed she screamed for him a half-dozen times and it took him a minute or so to show up (seen in the tape by the cops yelling at him to back off).
#123. To: sneakypete (#122)
Well,he was probably foolish enough to think there was no danger of his wife being attacked on a public beach in broad daylight.
#124. To: Tooconservative (#123)
He was just a baby daddy, not a husband
#125. To: sneakypete (#124)
So what?
#126. To: Tooconservative (#125)
(Edited)
So: you were factually inaccurate. Neither he nor his Feckless Cunt baby mama had any lifetime commitment to each other.
#127. To: sneakypete (#126)
Desperation in order to try to win a losing argument is never pretty,but you are taking it to new lows.
#128. To: Tooconservative (#127)
The article describes him as "her daughter's father". Not a husband, not a fiancee. The child is an infant only 18mo old. And that makes him the baby daddy.
#129. To: sneakypete (#128)
(Edited)
#130. To: Tooconservative (#129)
You were suggesting they were a pair with legal status or declared intentions.
#131. To: sneakypete (#130)
I was suggesting there was an adult of legal age to possess beer as a part of the group.
#132. To: Tooconservative (#125)
Neither he nor his Feckless Cunt baby mama had any lifetime commitment to each other.
#133. To: Tooconservative (#131)
She told the cops her "aunt" was on the way.
#134. To: misterwhite, sneakypete (#133)
Well, you see yer Honor, I thought it was legal for me to have a gun as long as I didn't shoot it. And, uh, my aunt was on the way and she has a license. And, uh, just about everyone else had a gun.
#135. To: Tooconservative (#134)
These ne'er-do-well Feckless Cunts
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]