United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Black Gun Owner Will Give Birth in Prison After Trying to Protect 2-Year-Old Daughter from Assailant
Source:
Reason
URL Source: https://reason.com/blog/2018/05/02/ ... owner-will-give-birth-in-priso
Published: May 2, 2018
Author: Robby Soave
Post Date: 2018-05-03 06:05:56 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 887
Comments: 9
Siwatu-Salama Ra is a 26-year-old black mother who watched in horror as an angry assailant—a neighbor with whom Ra had a dispute—deliberately crashed her vehicle into Ra's car while Ra's two-year-old daughter was playing inside. Ra removed her unloaded, legally purchased handgun from the glove box and brandished it, scaring the neighbor off. The assailant, Channel Harvey, was never charged. Ra was arrested for felonious assault. She is now serving a mandatory two-year-sentence, even though Michigan is a Stand Your Ground state and Ra was clearly defending her family on her own property. Ra is pregnant, and she is expected to give birth in prison. The Detroit Metro Times, The Root, and Democracy Now! have all reported on the overwhelming criminal justice failures on display here. The jury in Ra's trial evidently ended deliberations early in order to wrap the case up before a major snowstorm hit—and that's not even the craziest thing about this case. The Detroit Police Department apparently treated Harvey as the victim, even though she rammed Ra's car, for the sole reason that Harvey beat Ra to the station and filed a police report first. According to Ra's attorney, Victoria Burton-Harris, Ra and Harvey's nieces attended school together. These two girls had a disagreement; Ra contends that Harvey's niece beat up Ra's niece at school. On that basis, Ra decided that Harvey's niece wasn't welcome at the Ra household anymore. Harvey brought her over anyway. As Burton-Harris told Democracy Now!: Siwatu called her sister herself and found out from her sister that there was no permission given for this young lady to be at the family home that day visiting, and therefore Siwatu informed the young lady that she needed to call her mother to come back and pick her up.... And so, the mother arrived about 10 minutes later to pick the child up. She was very upset, irate even. She pulled back up to Siwatu's family's home. She started yelling, using profanity. She was very angry. She started demanding answers. "Why can't my child be here? These girls have made up. Your niece has come to my home over the last two weeks. I don't understand." And she testified at trial that she thought she had a right to be on that property and to demand answers as to why her child was not welcome there. And that's where this incident started. Harvey refused to leave, according to Burton-Harris, and eventually drove her car into Ra's, which was parked on the street with Ra's two-year-old daughter inside it. At this point, Ra feared for her child's safety—and also the safety of her own mother, who was on the front porch. Harvey continued to move her car forward and backward in an aggressive manner. Finally, Ra retrieved her handgun and brandished it at Harvey. Harvey then used her cell phone to take a picture of Ra holding the gun and raced off to the police station, where she filed a police report. Ra also filed a report, but Detroit police consider the first person to file a report to be the victim in a dispute. The Detroit Police Department has not responded to Reason's request for comment, but according to the Detroit Metro Times, multiple police detectives confirmed that this policy exists, including at the trial. Again, Michigan residents enjoy the legal right to use a firearm to defend themselves and their property. But since Harvey complained first, investigators didn't give proper weight to Ra's side of the story. Bafflingly, the authorities decided that Ra wasn't engaged in self-defense at all but was instead engaged in the commission of a crime. She was charged with two counts of felony assault: one against Harvey, and one against Harvey's daughter, who was in Harvey's car. Ra was arguably denied the right to a fair trial as well: The jury was told the trial would likely only last two days, but it didn't begin deliberations until midway through Thursday—the fourth day. The forecast called for a blizzard on Friday, and the judge told the jury that it would return to court regardless of the weather if it didn't arrive at a decision. (It's worth noting that the court did close on Friday.) Burton-Harris adds that the jury wasn't aware that Ra would receive a two-year prison sentence were she found guilty of any of the felony firearm charges because juries aren't informed of mandatory sentences. When the jury began deliberations with the snowstorm looming, it could be heard hotly debating the case from the jury room, Burton-Harris says. Still, it quickly came to a decision—guilty on one charge of felonious assault against Harvey, acquittal on a second felonious assault charge against Harvey's daughter, and guilty on the felony firearm possession charge. This decision obviously makes no sense. How could a jury conclude that Ra's self-defense explanation was sufficient to dismiss the charge of assaulting Harvey's daughter, but insufficient to dismiss the charge of assaulting Harvey herself? A jury looking forward to a three-day weekend was apparently disinclined to consider this contradiction. Michigan's mandatory minimum sentencing guidelines require a two-year sentence, which means that Ra will have to give birth in jail. Her attorneys asked the court to delay her sentence until after the pregnancy was over, but this request was denied. The Sierra Club and Black Lives Matter have expressed serious concerns about how this case was handled. Given that it involves a legal gun owner protecting her family and her property, it would be nice to see the National Rifle Association speak up as well. Ra doesn't belong in prison for any length of time, let alone the next two years of her young children's lives. Siwatu-Salama Ra used a legally purchased firearm to protect her family. She was sentenced to 2 years in prison.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Deckard (#0)
Guilty by jury... it’s how we roll. Race bait somewhere else, Dicktard.
I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح
I get it - only whites have the right to self defense. Can you possibly be any more of a colossal asshole? Oh, get this: Ra also filed a report, but Detroit police consider the first person to file a report to be the victim in a dispute. Is that how "justice" works - first come first served? Michigan residents enjoy the legal right to use a firearm to defend themselves and their property. Yet you would deny that right because you don't like blacks. Yeah - you're a real champion of the law, aren't you?
More libtarded, snowflake RACE BAITING. The verdict had nothing to do with skin color, and if this CONVICT can prove it did, this CONVICT can appeal. Aside from that, she’s guilty by A JURY OF PEER. Shut your race baiting libtard MSM shit spreader.
I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح
Michigan residents enjoy the legal right to use a firearm to defend themselves and their property. First come - first served is not justice.
The woman is a black activist. I can't find all the facts in the case, but I am skeptical about this SJW's story.
If she is, so what? Is she not entitled to protect her family?
These activist types tend to have a sense of entitlement. They feel they can do what they want because everybody else is wrong and they are right. I'm skeptical that her motive was protecting her family. Anyway she knew the guy and knew where he lived. It's not like it was some scary stranger.
I checked a few stories on the net from various sources to try to get alternate perspectives. The only item in the write up above that seems inaccurate is that the incident occurred on Ra's mother's property, not her own. But it seems the charges had nothing to do with that discrepancy. Apparently Ra kept the gun in the glovebox of her car, but again, she wasn't charged with anything related to that. Ra's an environmental activist, and there have been protest movements on her behalf, apparently. From what I've read so far, it seems she was undeservingly screwed on at least one level, if not 2 or 3.
Not exactly. She's an activist for environmental justice. Which means that if a factory is located within 5 miles of where any black person lives, it is only located there because of racism. She's just another flim flam shakedown character.
When the jury began deliberations with the snowstorm looming, it could be heard hotly debating the case from the jury room, Burton-Harris says. Still, it quickly came to a decision—guilty on one
#2. To: GrandIsland (#1)
Guilty by jury... it’s how we roll. Race bait somewhere else,
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#3. To: Deckard (#2)
only whites have the right to self defense.
#4. To: GrandIsland (#3)
(Edited)
The verdict had nothing to do with skin color,
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#5. To: Deckard (#0)
#6. To: no gnu taxes (#5)
The woman is a black activist.
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#7. To: Deckard (#6)
#8. To: no gnu taxes, Deckard (#7)
#9. To: Pinguinite (#8)
Ra's an environmental activist
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]