[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

The Victims of Benny Hinn: 30 Years of Spiritual Deception.

Trump Is Planning to Send Kill Teams to Mexico to Take Out Cartel Leaders

The Great Falling Away in the Church is Here | Tim Dilena

How Ridiculous? Blade-Less Swiss Army Knife Debuts As Weapon Laws Tighten

Jewish students beaten with sticks at University of Amsterdam

Terrorists shut down Park Avenue.

Police begin arresting democrats outside Met Gala.

The minute the total solar eclipse appeared over US

Three Types Of People To Mark And Avoid In The Church Today

Are The 4 Horsemen Of The Apocalypse About To Appear?

France sends combat troops to Ukraine battlefront

Facts you may not have heard about Muslims in England.

George Washington University raises the Hamas flag. American Flag has been removed.

Alabama students chant Take A Shower to the Hamas terrorists on campus.

In Day of the Lord, 24 Church Elders with Crowns Join Jesus in His Throne

In Day of the Lord, 24 Church Elders with Crowns Join Jesus in His Throne

Deadly Saltwater and Deadly Fresh Water to Increase

Deadly Cancers to soon Become Thing of the Past?

Plague of deadly New Diseases Continues

[FULL VIDEO] Police release bodycam footage of Monroe County District Attorney Sandra Doorley traffi

Police clash with pro-Palestine protesters on Ohio State University campus

Joe Rogan Experience #2138 - Tucker Carlson

Police Dispersing Student Protesters at USC - Breaking News Coverage (College Protests)

What Passover Means For The New Testament Believer

Are We Closer Than Ever To The Next Pandemic?

War in Ukraine Turns on Russia

what happened during total solar eclipse

Israel Attacks Iran, Report Says - LIVE Breaking News Coverage

Earth is Scorched with Heat

Antiwar Activists Chant ‘Death to America’ at Event Featuring Chicago Alderman

Vibe Shift

A stream that makes the pleasant Rain sound.

Older Men - Keep One Foot In The Dark Ages

When You Really Want to Meet the Diversity Requirements

CERN to test world's most powerful particle accelerator during April's solar eclipse

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: Sheriff Says He Won't Deploy Body Cameras Because He Doesn't Want His Deputies Criticized
Source: Tech Dirt
URL Source: https://www.techdirt.com/articles/2 ... -his-deputies-criticized.shtml
Published: Nov 27, 2017
Author: Tim Cushing
Post Date: 2017-12-01 18:20:31 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 909
Comments: 19

from the christ,-what-a-coward dept

Something's very wrong with Albuquerque-area law enforcement. The Albuquerque Police Department has been described as a "criminal enterprise." These words didn't come from an activist group or an enraged op-ed in the local paper, but rather from a departing District Attorney in a letter to the DOJ.

The DOJ is at least partially aware of the Albuquerque PD's criminal activities. Its 2014 investigation concluded APD officers routinely engaged in indiscriminate force deployment. Worse, those above the officers did almost nothing to curb misconduct and brutality. Beyond shooting citizens at an alarming rate, APD officers were found to be tampering with camera footage -- an accusation brought by a private employee of the department in an affidavit presented to a judge.

It seems the APD isn't the only law enforcement agency in the Albuquerque area prone to unchecked acts of violence. Nor is it the only one actively disinterested in any form of accountability. In the last four months, the Bernalillo Sheriff's Department deputies have shot nine people. One deputy -- Charles Coggins -- shot two people in 22 days, killing one of them.

In addition to the shootings, a deputy was caught on camera pointing a gun at a motorcyclist. This incident occurred while both the motorcyclist and the deputy were in motion, with the deputy pointing his gun out the passenger-side window. The deputy claimed he was "in fear of an immediate and impending battery." Hmm.

Oddly, the deputy did not pursue the biker, despite being in so much fear he felt compelled to point a loaded weapon at him. He also offered no details on how a motorcyclist performing a wheelie equated to "impending battery."

The nine shootings, along with this incident, have generated calls for greater accountability. The Sheriff's Office is being pressured to issue body cameras to deputies, but Bernalillo County Sheriff Manuel Gonzales isn't having it.

Gonzales says his department does not, and will not, wear body cameras because he believes the media will use the footage to falsely criticize officers.

"Gives a lopsided, one-sided story, which I think is a disservice to the whole community," Gonzales said.

This is an incredibly stupid statement. First, it's hard to believe footage captured and controlled by the Sheriff's Department somehow morphs into a "one-sided story" -- with that "side" not being the BCSD's -- the instant it ends up in anyone else's hands.

Furthermore, there's the inane assertion footage will be used only to "falsely" criticize officers. There's a good chance it may be used to criticize officers, but under no circumstances would every criticism be "false." This only draws attention to the statement Gonzales won't make: he doesn't want his officers to create footage that might be used to justly criticize officers.

What Gonzales wants is zero accountability. He doesn't want any outside entities to question his officers' actions or his disciplinary tactics. He wants to run an agency that takes the public's money but owes them nothing in return.

Body camera footage is hardly a band-aid for police misconduct. Footage is often buried deep behind legislative walls and release of it is sometimes left entirely to law enforcement agencies' discretion. When it is released, it's sometimes missing critical moments and/or features (like audio). Sometimes it's been captured from useless angles. Sometimes it's been edited.

On top of that, even the most damning footage can be made useless by frame-by-frame analysis -- a process that turns the recording into an abstraction that can be made to "show" whatever the person presenting it wants it to show. This tactic dates all the way back to the Rodney King beating more than 25 years ago.

And it's not as though the footage can't be exonerating as often as it is damning. But a lot of that depends on the mindset and actions of the officers wearing them. That's what Sheriff Gonzales is really worried about: the footage might show his officers are as out of control as the public believes they are. But imagine being in the Sheriff's shoes: holding so much power but so afraid of the people he serves.

(1 image)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Deckard (#0)

I suspect a "Consent decree" is the goal of all of this. I wouldn't have a job where I was under observation by camera. I quit truck driving over this, and would quit the police force too.

THIS IS A TAG LINE...Exercising rights is only radical to two people, Tyrants and Slaves. Which are YOU? Our ignorance has driven us into slavery and we do not recognize it.

jeremiad  posted on  2017-12-01   19:29:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: jeremiad (#1)

" I quit truck driving over this "

You drove a truck, and had a camera on you ?

I drove and had a Qualcom. But I never heard of a camera in a truck.

Si vis pacem, para bellum

Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God.

Never Pick A Fight With An Old Man He Will Just Shoot You He Can't Afford To Get Hurt

"If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went." (Will Rogers)

Stoner  posted on  2017-12-01   20:38:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Deckard (#0)

Something's very wrong with Albuquerque-area law enforcement.

Yea, obviously …

Albuquerque-area law enforcement is not tough enough on violent crimes.

The violent crime rate in Albuquerque increased by 15.5 percent.

The FBI reported rises in the rates of property and violent crime in New Mexico that was largely propelled by increases in the state's most populous city, Albuquerque.

The bureau's Crime in the United States report released on Monday indicated that violent crime increased by 6.8 percent and property crime increased by 6.2 percent across the state between 2015 and 2016.

Albuquerque saw violent crime increase by 15.5 percent and property crime rise by 13.3 percent while violent crime in Santa Fe rose by 4.18 percent and property crime went up by 4 percent.

Last year in Albuquerque, there were 6,245 reported instances of violent crime, which included murder and non-negligent manslaughter, rape, robbery, and aggravated assault. At the same time, 38,528 burglaries and larcenies were reported in the city.

/…./

https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/new-mexico/articles/2017-09-26/rising- new-mexico-crime-rates-propelled-by-albuquerque

Gatlin  posted on  2017-12-02   2:55:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Deckard (#0)

The Albuquerque Police Department has been described as a "criminal enterprise." These words didn't come from an activist group or an enraged op-ed in the local paper, but rather from a departing District Attorney in a letter to the DOJ.
The way I read this, and the only way I can read this unless someone shows me differently, is that after following the link in the introductory line to this article, the lady DA reacted like it was said in Exekiel 18:1-2 in that she was “eating sour grapes.” Because, she is apparently not commenting on the problem, she is admitting to being a part of the problem.

It seems that she went to the Grand Jury and failed to get indictments against two cops, thus giving a strong rebuttal to the old saying that “even the poorest of district attorneys can get an indictment on a ham sandwich from a grand duty.” She apparently failed in both cases to get an indictment against the cops and the police department then locked her of the next investigation. So, she decided to take her law books and run home to pout, but not before writing a strongly harsh letter to the DOJ condemning the APD.

I stand to be corrected if I read any of these actions wrong.

So what I see here so far, is the beginning of another sleazy dirt bag yellow journalism article….I shall continue reading to determine if this is true.

In the meantime …

Gatlin  posted on  2017-12-02   9:38:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Gatlin (#4)

What (Bernalillo County Sheriff) Gonzales wants is zero accountability. He doesn't want any outside entities to question his officers' actions or his disciplinary tactics. He wants to run an agency that takes the public's money but owes them nothing in return.

“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul

Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.

Deckard  posted on  2017-12-02   10:17:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Deckard (#5)

What (Bernalillo County Sheriff) Gonzales wants is zero accountability.

What your ideas support, is zero drug use and criminal accountability. Go fuck yourself, hypocrite. We are a nation of laws. No person will ever have 100% freedom... and no person will have ANY amount of freedom without law and order.

I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح

GrandIsland  posted on  2017-12-02   11:29:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: GrandIsland (#6)

We are a nation of laws.

Most laws go unenforced, so, for the most part, they are just hot aire ... similar to many of your laffable posts.

buckeroo  posted on  2017-12-02   11:50:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: GrandIsland (#6) (Edited)

We are a nation of laws.

Which don't apply to cops or scum like Hillary Clinton.

The DOJ is at least partially aware of the Albuquerque PD's criminal activities. Its 2014 investigation concluded APD officers routinely engaged in indiscriminate force deployment. Worse, those above the officers did almost nothing to curb misconduct and brutality. Beyond shooting citizens at an alarming rate, APD officers were found to be tampering with camera footage -- an accusation brought by a private employee of the department in an affidavit presented to a judge.

*****

Is tampering with evidence right or wrong?

“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul

Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.

Deckard  posted on  2017-12-02   13:35:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Deckard (#5) (Edited)

What (Bernalillo County Sheriff) Gonzales wants is zero accountability

I know you believe that because I have learned the way you think. I know you believe your statement because that is the thought process you have programmed your mind to follow. Cop hating is deeply involved in all aspects of your mental process. However, just because you think that Gonzales wants zero accountability doesn’t make it so….it doesn’t make it a fact.

Gonzles said: [A body cam] “gives a lopsided, one-sided story, which I think is a disservice to the whole community."

Maybe, just maybe he is right. Can you think that? Probably not….but at least try.

Here is a picture of Gonzales making his full statement from which the abbreviated quotation was taken out of context. Wouldn’t we love to hear EVERTHING Gonzales had to say before passing judgment on him restricting the use of body cameras by his deputies. I at least would and if you wouldn’t, then why not?

You probably wouldn’t like to hear the full statement by Gonzales because you have continually shown that you simply don’t think objectively. All you want to do is take a short extract of a full statement out of context and proclaim; “Ah Ha! Gonzales is just another asshole LEO who for no reason at all believes body cameras gives a lopsided, one-sided story, which I think is a disservice to the whole community….so I don’t like the bastard.” Am I right, this is you way of thinking? Of course I am right….you have displayed this to us all many times over.

A critic of Gonzales, Greg Williams who is president of the open government foundation had this to say about Gonzales not using body cameras: “It often justifies their position because it shows that they were doing their job in a correct way.”

Well, we all know from experiences here on LF that’s not true. Because we have seen instances where a cop’s body camera showed the cop was doing his job in a properly correct manner following departmental procedures as prescribed by law and yet the media and you cop-hating assholes still severely criticized him. Also, during trials, we have repeatedly learned that the cops’ body cameras have cause cops to be acquitted of all charges and still the media and you cop-hating assholes screamed these were injustices.

There are actually many documented cases where Gonzales is correct….that being, where the media and you asshole cop-hating anarchists use the footage to falsely criticize officers. Again, we have witnessed a number of those here on LF. Haven’t we? Sure we have!!!

There is no Federal, State, or County law that requires the Bernalillo County Sheriff’s deputies to wear body cameras. Until there is, then Sheriff Gonzales should be free to run his office to the satisfaction of the citizens of the Bernalillo County and if those citizens become displeased with his performance….they can vote him out of office.

BTW, I can do this same analysis of the incident surrounding the cop pointing the gun out the window, but I will not take time to fully do so now. I will only say he cop rightly felt he had justification. Because the picture doesn’t show and the author doesn’t specifically point that the Sheriff’s office received several calls that day about “a group of roughly 50 bikers racing and driving recklessly in the Heights and the bikers were flashing gang signs and intimidatingly surrounding the deputies as they tried to pull them over. The sheriff’s office said the deputy who pulled the gun was definitely in fear of an immediate and impending battery. Once again, the author took something entirely out of context and didn’t bother to present all the facts is his article. The author made the picture look like the passenger cop and the lone biker to his right were the only ones involved in the fray. Apparently, the 50 or so bikers split off in many different directions after the officer pulled his weapon and the officers felt a HIGH SPEED chase through a family neighborhood would be unsafe. Although the author did link to the original story….but then surely he knew that hardly anyone except a few truth seekers ever chase links so he was going to make the point he wanted to make.

God, I hate yellow journalism….with a passion.

There is just no way of sedating the vicious anger spewed forth by you cop haters.

If only …

Gatlin  posted on  2017-12-02   15:42:01 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Gatlin, Lighten Up Francine (#9)

God, I hate yellow journalism….with a passion.

There is just no way of sedating the vicious anger spewed forth

Hondo68  posted on  2017-12-02   15:54:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Deckard (#8) (Edited)

We are a nation of laws.

Which don't apply to cops or scum like Hillary Clinton.

Your widely cast blanket statement is simply not true.

Check the Internet and you will find numerous cases where cops violated laws and were found guilty.

You cherry pick some cases where the cops were not charged or were not convicted because they did not violate the law….and try to use those few individual cases to cast a blanket of guilt over the entire LEO community.

You are a very biased individual with preconceived ideas about what justice is using your own defined guidelines. You are so wrong to be so biased.

As far as Hillary Clinton goes, you are premature in passing judgment since you don’t know what investigations are ongoing or the status of those ongoing investigations.

I know it is hard and next to impossible for you to take a realistic and objective approach to life….but at least you on occasion could try.

Gatlin  posted on  2017-12-02   15:54:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Deckard (#8) (Edited)

The DOJ is at least partially aware of the Albuquerque PD's criminal activities. Its 2014 investigation concluded APD officers routinely engaged in indiscriminate force deployment. Worse, those above the officers did almost nothing to curb misconduct and brutality. Beyond shooting citizens at an alarming rate, APD officers were found to be tampering with camera footage -- an accusation brought by a private employee of the department in an affidavit presented to a judge.

That is a vastly generalized statement presented without any facts whatsoever….not a single documented fact….from which you took umbrage and became so aggrieved to indignantly chastise the entire APD for what may have been only a very few cases which did result in trials and convictions or corrective actions.

You read anything that can in any way suggest wrong doing by a police department and you go into a huff to become completely miffed and try to get everyone’s nose put out of joint.

Why do you have such gross reactions and do you fell they are normal reactions?

Is tampering with evidence right or wrong?

Of course not right.

But do you know that evidence was tampered with….or do you only know that someone said evidence was tampered with, yet provided absolutely documentation to show it happened.

Did you actually read the investigation report and see evidence to support a conclusion? Of course you did not.

So, you assume the author is absolutely correct.

Which begs the question: Why do you believe only what you want to believe and do you think that is the right way to go through life?

Gatlin  posted on  2017-12-02   16:07:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Deckard (#0)

Sheriff Says He Won't Deploy Body Cameras Because He Doesn't Want His Deputies Criticized

Well,ain't THAT "SPECIAL"?

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

sneakypete  posted on  2017-12-03   19:18:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Deckard (#0) (Edited)

Doesn't Want His Deputies Criticized

Hmm.

The KGB, GRU, FSB, SS, Oprichni inquisitioners, the Khmer Rouge... and Sheriff Gonzalez - never like having their errors CONTRADICTed.

What would America's founders say about that state-established pattern of behavior?

VxH  posted on  2017-12-04   11:56:58 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: VxH (#14)

I’d rather see the whole of it presented rather than just a word blank filled in.

An Act for establishing religious Freedom.

Whereas, Almighty God hath created the mind free;

That all attempts to influence it by temporal punishments or burthens, or by civil incapacitations tend only to beget habits of hypocrisy and meanness, and therefore are a departure from the plan of the holy author of our religion, who being Lord, both of body and mind yet chose not to propagate it by coercions on either, as was in his Almighty power to do,

That the impious presumption of legislators and rulers, civil as well as ecclesiastical, who, being themselves but fallible and uninspired men have assumed dominion over the faith of others, setting up their own opinions and modes of thinking as the only true and infallible, and as such endeavouring to impose them on others, hath established and maintained false religions over the greatest part of the world and through all time;

That to compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions, which he disbelieves is sinful and tyrannical;

That even the forcing him to support this or that teacher of his own religious persuasion is depriving him of the comfortable liberty of giving his contributions to the particular pastor, whose morals he would make his pattern, and whose powers he feels most persuasive to righteousness, and is withdrawing from the Ministry those temporary rewards, which, proceeding from an approbation of their personal conduct are an additional incitement to earnest and unremitting labours for the instruction of mankind; That our civil rights have no dependence on our religious opinions any more than our opinions in physics or geometry,

That therefore the proscribing any citizen as unworthy the public confidence, by laying upon him an incapacity of being called to offices of trust and emolument, unless he profess or renounce this or that religious opinion, is depriving him injuriously of those privileges and advantages, to which, in common with his fellow citizens, he has a natural right,

That it tends only to corrupt the principles of that very Religion it is meant to encourage, by bribing with a monopoly of worldly honours and emoluments those who will externally profess and conform to it; That though indeed, these are criminal who do not withstand such temptation, yet neither are those innocent who lay the bait in their way;

That to suffer the civil magistrate to intrude his powers into the field of opinion and to restrain the profession or propagation of principles on supposition of their ill tendency is a dangerous fallacy which at once destroys all religious liberty because he being of course judge of that tendency will make his opinions the rule of judgment and approve or condemn the sentiments of others only as they shall square with or differ from his own;

That it is time enough for the rightful purposes of civil government, for its officers to interfere when principles break out into overt acts against peace and good order; And finally, that Truth is great, and will prevail if left to herself, that she is the proper and sufficient antagonist to error, and has nothing to fear from the conflict, unless by human interposition disarmed of her natural weapons free argument and debate, errors ceasing to be dangerous when it is permitted freely to contradict them:

Be it enacted by General Assembly that no man shall be compelled to frequent or support any religious worship, place, or ministry whatsoever, nor shall be enforced, restrained, molested, or burthened in his body or goods, nor shall otherwise suffer on account of his religious opinions or belief, but that all men shall be free to profess, and by argument to maintain, their opinions in matters of Religion, and that the same shall in no wise diminish, enlarge or affect their civil capacities. And though we well know that this Assembly elected by the people for the ordinary purposes of Legislation only, have no power to restrain the acts of succeeding Assemblies constituted with powers equal to our own, and that therefore to declare this act irrevocable would be of no effect in law; yet we are free to declare, and do declare that the rights hereby asserted, are of the natural rights of mankind, and that if any act shall be hereafter passed to repeal the present or to narrow its operation, such act will be an infringement of natural right.

Thomas Jefferson - January 16, 1786

Gatlin  posted on  2017-12-04   12:11:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Gatlin (#15)

I’d rather see the whole of it

But the whole of it doesn't fit on a meme -- a meme like the one that motivated you to find and post the whole of text of the Virginia Act for
Establishing Religious Freedom... The Virginia Act for Establishing Religious
Freedom that most American sheeple don't even know exists.
 
 


"...who, being themselves but fallible and uninspired men , have assumed dominion over the faith of others, setting up their own opinions and modes of thinking as the only true and infallible, and as such endeavoring to impose them on others, hath established and maintained false religions over the greatest part of the world, and through all time;
 
...
 
 that it is time enough for the rightful purposes of civil government, for its officers to interfere when principles break out into overt acts against peace and good order; and finally, that truth is great and will prevail if left to herself, that she is the proper and sufficient antagonist to error, and has nothing to fear from the conflict, unless by human interposition disarmed of her natural weapons, free argument and debate, errors ceasing to be dangerous when it is permitted freely to contradict them. "
 
"I HAVE SWORN UPON THE ALTAR OF GOD ETERNAL HOSTILITY TO EVERY FORM OF TYRANNY OVER THE MIND OF MAN"
--The Virginia Act For Establishing Religious Freedom
--Thomas Jefferson, 1786
 

VxH  posted on  2017-12-05   10:30:06 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: Gatlin (#9) (Edited)

There is just no way of sedating the vicious anger spewed forth by you cop haters.

Were Thomas Jefferson and the other Infidels of Every Denomination "cop haters"?

Sheriff of Rottingham: King illegal forest to pig wild kill in it a is!

Got https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki /Royal_forest ?

 

VxH  posted on  2017-12-05   10:32:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Gatlin, VxH (#9)

There is just no way of sedating the vicious anger spewed forth by you cop haters.

Cop-Hater Trump Attacked by Law Enforcement Over Anti-FBI Tweets

“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul

Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.

Deckard  posted on  2017-12-05   10:44:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: Deckard, VxH (#18) (Edited)

Cop-Hater Trump Attacked by [VERY FEW] Law Enforcement Over Anti-FBI Tweets

As you are continually pointing out, there is always a very small percentage of ignorant and ill-informed assholes in any organization or group.

The law of averages guarantees this will be true even in LEOs.

I usually get tired of your senile repetitive illogical postings.

But in this case, I compliment on you calling attention to this very small stupid irresponsible number of LEOs to show their bias and hatred.

There is no place for bias and hatred in any LEO agency.

You may now formally recognize this post as the “LF Post Of The Day.”

Gatlin  posted on  2017-12-05   17:06:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com