United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: No one is pettier than government.
Source:
Reason
URL Source: https://reason.com/blog/2017/11/29/ ... e-was-choked-defecated-himself
Published: Nov 29, 2017
Author: Ed Krayewsk
Post Date: 2017-12-01 05:42:15 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 2530
Comments: 49
A Michigan man claims that when he tried to pay a parking ticket in Royal Oak with pennies, a court officer responded by choking him. The attack led him to defecate, he says. The alleged assault was caught on surveillance tape. An attorney for Anthony Sevo says he intends to sue. Sevo was charged with disturbing the peace and assaulting an officer. He plead no contest on the first charge and the latter was dropped. "I don't think anyone paying in penny rolls, whether it's a preferred thing to do for a court clerk, warrants this type of this assaultive behavior and violation of constitutional rights," the lawyer told Fox's Detroit affiliate. The ticket was for just $10. Sevo said he was willing to pay with a credit card, but balked at the processing fee of $1.75—17.5 percent of his fine. By comparison, a 2013 settlement between credit card companies and businesses limited the "swipe fee" merchants could charge to 4 percent. If Royal Oak officials are worried about an influx of coin payers, it can buy an industrial coin counter for about $400. Otherwise, for the occasional coin payment far cheaper options are available. Coin and currency are legal tender for debts, public charges, and taxes. In Pennsylvania a few years ago, one small town learned that the federal regulation it was invoking to reject coin payments had in fact expired half a century earlier. As petty as trying to pay a $10 fine in pennies might be (and as far as paying with pennies goes, that's relatively mild—this year a Virginia man tried to pay $3,000 worth of car taxes in pennies), the government's actions are pettier. But why would anyone expect any different? The residents of Royal Oak don't have a choice of government. Sure, they can vote every few years, but the local bureaucracies remain in place irrespective of who wins. The 44th District Court, where the incident happened, doesn't have to worry about customer service because there's no competitive pressure. Whether or not you're satisfied with them, you're going to have to pay your fines there, and take it. 
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 28.
#1. To: Deckard (#0)
Coming from you, Deckard….that is a grossly absurd statement.
So...in Gatlin Bizarro World, using legal tender to pay a fine is un-American and should result in a beating by police? The ticket was for just $10. Sevo said he was willing to pay with a credit card, but balked at the processing fee of $1.75—17.5 percent of his fine. By comparison, a 2013 settlement between credit card companies and businesses limited the "swipe fee" merchants could charge to 4 percent. Should the city be charged with breaking the law and for usury?
I have time, I came back to respond and ask some clarification questions from you …
Uh….what law did the city break to be charged? Sevo said he was willing to pay with a credit card, but balked at the processing fee of $1.75—17.5 percent of his fine. By comparison, a 2013 settlement between credit card companies and businesses limited the "swipe fee" merchants could charge to 4 percent.
Sevo said he was willing to pay with a credit card, but balked at the processing fee of $1.75—17.5 percent of his fine. By comparison, a 2013 settlement between credit card companies and businesses limited the "swipe fee" merchants could charge to 4 percent. I asked you WHAT law and all you do is repeat the same post from which I asked you the question. What city, county, state or federal law was broken is HE DID NOT pay the processing fee? ERgo, I ask again: What law did the city break to be charged?
U.S. Department of the Treasury - Legal Tender Status The pertinent portion of law that applies to your question is the Coinage Act of 1965, specifically Section 31 U.S.C. 5103, entitled "Legal tender," which states: "United States coins and currency (including Federal reserve notes and circulating notes of Federal reserve banks and national banks) are legal tender for all debts, public charges, taxes, and dues." This statute means that all United States money as identified above are a valid and legal offer of payment for debts when tendered to a creditor. There is, however, no Federal statute mandating that a private business, a person or an organization must accept currency or coins as for payment for goods and/or services. Private businesses are free to develop their own policies on whether or not to accept cash unless there is a State law which says otherwise. For example, a bus line may prohibit payment of fares in pennies or dollar bills. In addition, movie theaters, convenience stores and gas stations may refuse to accept large denomination currency (usually notes above $20) as a matter of policy. H/T: Hondo
#30. To: Deckard (#28)
I am fully aware of all of that….but I simply don’t understand either what you are saying….or….what transpired between the guy and the clerk. I still cannot see where the city broke any law as you have stated. Help me … Did the clerk refuse to take the rolls of pennies for the ticket and the guy NEVER paid for the ticket with the rolls of pennies….but had to pay with paper currency, a check or something else? If the guy did not pay with the pennies, then what did he pay with? If the guy did pay with the pennies, then what law did the city break?
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest No one is pettier than government.
#2. To: Gatlin (#1)
#15. To: Deckard (#2)
So...in Gatlin Bizarro World, using legal tender to pay a fine is un-American and should result in a beating by police?
I didn’t read anything about an alleged BEATING by police….where did you get that from? The ticket was for just $10. Sevo said he was willing to pay with a credit card, but balked at the processing fee of $1.75—17.5 percent of his fine.
His right to refuse….so, what’s the problem here? Should the city be charged with breaking the law …?
Uh….what law did the city break to be charged? … breaking the law….for usury?
What is the LAW for usury and how did the city break the law?
#17. To: Gatlin (#15)
#19. To: Deckard (#17)
Uh….what law did the city break to be charged?
#28. To: Gatlin (#19)
ERgo, I ask again: What law did the city break to be charged?
Replies to Comment # 28.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 28.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]