United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Mother, Air Force Vet Kidnapped, Sent to Rikers for Traveling in NY with Her Legal Texas Handgun
Source:
Free Thought Project
URL Source: http://thefreethoughtproject.com/mo ... veling-ny-legal-texas-handgun/
Published: Nov 26, 2017
Author: Matt Agorist
Post Date: 2017-11-26 12:46:53 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 9101
Comments: 122
Robinson had harmed no one, had not taken anyone’s property and was merely traveling peacefully in her car when she was kidnapped by police and thrown into Riker’s Island at the Rose M. Singer Center with violent armed robbers and murderers. Robinson was driving from Texas to New York to bring her two children to spend some time with their father when she was arrested by the NYPD in the Bronx and charged with “265.03 FC (CRIM POSS WEAPON-2ND DEGREE C Felony)” for having her legally purchased and licensed handgun in her glovebox. Robinson, who spent five years on active duty, had secret military clearances and also has her active and valid Texas License to Carry. According to Federal law, an individual is not restricted from transporting legally acquired firearms across state lines for lawful purposes except those explicitly prohibited by federal law to include convicted felons; persons under indictment for felonies; adjudicated “mental defectives” or those who have been involuntarily committed to mental institutions; illegal drug users; illegal aliens and most non-immigrant aliens; dishonorably discharged veterans; those who have renounced their U.S. citizenship; fugitives from justice; persons convicted of misdemeanor crimes of domestic violence; and persons subject to certain domestic violence restraining orders. Therefore, no federal permit is required (or available) for the interstate transportation of firearms. Robinson does not fit any of the restricted person criteria as described above. However, having the gun in the glovebox is likely what the New York police have taken issue with. A Funded Justice page, started by James Gressett, reads: “Deanna Jo, loving mother of two adorable boys, Veteran, Activist and friend in liberty, was arrested in NYC on Nov 11 while traveling from Texas, when her self-defense handgun was discovered in her vehicle. Please help us free her from Rikers. Two beautiful little boys are wondering where their mother is after the family of three traveled across the country from Texas to NYC so the children could spend time with their estranged father. Deanna Jo is a responsible mother and a veteran with military clearances and a Texas License to Carry. Concerned primarily with her children’s safety and posing no threat to any other person, Deanna Jo arrived at her destination, where her estranged husband took the children into his house then contacted police, who found her self-defense handgun in her vehicle. No mother should be forced to leave behind her best means of self defense, yet the City of New York sends a clear message: “We do not care about your Constitutional rights or your personal safety, and the only people who have guns here are criminals.” Now Deanna Jo sits in a cage at Rikers Island, stripped of her rights and incarcerated, and her children are missing her dearly. She needs to return to them so they can be with their mother. The city has basically told her that her life and the lives of her children are meaningless and that her right to protect them is trivial. We are a group of friends who want to see Deanna Jo reunited with her children as soon as possible. The goal set on the fundraising page is $25,000 and as of this writing has reached $6,400. The Free Thought Project spoke with Second Amendment and free speech activist Michael Picard who bailed Robinson out on Friday. He told us that Robinson is going to fight the charges all the way as there was no victim of her alleged crime. “She served her country in the Air Force, and this is how New York serves her,” Picard told TFTP. Unfortunately for Robinson, this is the second time she’s had an unjust experience with police. As TFTP reported at the time, Robinson was raided by police who were there to take her children over an alleged custody dispute. Robinson, who had a camera rolling at the time of the raid was seen pinned into a corner by Hunt County Deputy Josh Robinson who began beating the handcuffed 9-month pregnant woman as she screamed out in horror. Deputy J. Robinson was subsequently no-billed by a Hunt County grand jury and has since been reinstated to full duty. Robinson was cleared of any wrongdoing and CPS later admitted there was no warrant. If you’d like to call Bronx District Attorney Darcel D. Clark, and peacefully express to him that this woman has been through enough and doesn’t deserve to be locked in a cage for protecting herself and her children, you can so at this number: 718-590-2000. Also, if you’d like to donate to her legal fees, you can do so at her Funded Justice page.
This fund is to help us do that, plus assist with the legal battle to come.”
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-82) not displayed.
.
.
.
#83. To: sneakypete (#74)
I have no doubt that many things surprise you on a daily basis. Yea, you are absolutely right, Pete….many things do surprise me on a daily basis. I daily find that life is so full of unpredictable beauty and packed full of strange surprises. Sometimes the beauty is almost too much for me to handle. Do you know that feeling, Pete? Do you know when something is just too beautiful, Pete? Have you ever experienced a wonderful daily surprise that changed your for the better, Pete?
Moving along to continue educating you… While the American Revolution was great, it however did not sweep away the English common law….most now independent colonies still followed the English common law as it had been interpreted in the colonies prior to independence which included the ban on traveling armed in populated areas Shocking !!!
The Founding Fathers insured that the American colonies continued a variety of gun restrictions that evolved under English Common Law. Armed travel was limited to a few well-defined occasions such as assisting justices of the peace and constables. Members of the upper classes also had a limited exception to travel with arms. Concealable weapons such as handguns were subject to even more stringent restrictions. SInce the Founding Fathers and the now independent colonies elected to continue following most English common law….thusly, there was no general right for individuals armed travel when the Second Amendment was adopted and most certainly no right to travel with concealed weapons.Talk about gun control. Yep, the colonies had it really bad under the Founding Fathers. The traditional English restrictions on traveling armed persisted with one important change. American law recognized an exception to this prohibition for individuals who had a good cause to fear an imminent threat. Nonetheless, by the end of the century, prohibiting public carry was the legal norm, not the exception. Gasp !!!
You can demonize government power for gun control today all you want to and I will join with you at all times for that, but I will never let you ignorantly portray the times under the Founding Fathers were the best for gun ownership and freedom to carry. For in 1786, Boston acted on the legal principle established by the Founding Fathers in that it prohibited the storage of a loaded firearm in any domestic dwelling in the city. How ‘bout them apples, Pete. It would surely frost your ass today, if you had to obey the mandate set that the guns in your house had to be kept unloaded.
In addressing Second Amendment fanatics….I mean those die-hard fanatics uneducated on the Second Amendment….I will continue to point out that the:
You really have obtained a previously undiscovered level of "dumb ass",ain't ya? In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
BullBush! Complete and total. In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
Gatlin: "I can say that I have never found any reason not to support any law that the federal government has enacted so far in my life." Gatlin: "I can say that I have never found any reason not to support any law that the federal government has enacted so far in my life." But you now choose to conveniently ignore and leave that qualifier out so you can present a BIASED statement portraying a false conclusion….as you and your asshole God TFTP always do. Everything is always FALSE with you bias-driven assholes! ***snicker***
Well...you've had several thousands of "moments" to reflect on which laws you do not support. I gave you 4 in the original post that you could very well have expressed your opposition to. Abortion, gay marriage, the assault weapons ban in 1994, NSA spying on American citizens. Doesn't matter to you - the State is your god. Not a peep from the head canary as of yet. Perhaps - however The Declaration of Independence would indicate that "to everything there's a season". When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation. We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. If the signers of the Declaration were alive today, it's a pretty safe bet they would agree that "it's time to shoot the bastards". I continue to be very much shocked at some of your disputing assumptions which are absolute sanctities only to you where they will forever remain quite improbable propositions delivered in the dishonorable heat of defiance and indignation. All of this is to say that based on what the signers of the Declaration did during their day, you are a stupid fool to believe you can predict what the signers of the Declaration of Independence would do today. Get frigging real….asshole. Quit trying to predict what dead people from long ago would do today and clean up your own act to properly conduct yourself in your own actions.
You're delusional. Well...you've had several thousands of "moments" to reflect on which laws you do not support. I have had several thousands of “moments” to reflect, but I am using those important moments to continue growingly enrich myself with successful swing trading in this wonderfully incomparable and unprecedented stock market with its upward movement action that our great President, The Right Honorable Donald J. Trump has caused for us. I will however take a “moment” here and now to graciously say: Thank you, President Trump. Right now I am quite busy with only another hour of trading and I need to make another couple of “thou”. So, if it is a peep you want from your esteemed recognition of the almighty head canary ….then here is your peep: THERE….take that peep, then go and continue to fuck yourself.
You will no doubt be surprised to learn studies have shown that there are much higher instances of mental disorder in creative geniuses than in the general population. And while it's impossible to be completely sure of a correct diagnosis of a historical figure, that hasn’t stopped researchers from making educated guesses. I can provide you with a speculative look at the mental health of 11 of history's big thinkers when I have time between my stock market action. Oh, not that I would ever try to compare myself to any one of them….although I will graciously permit you to freely do so.
I believe the scientific term is "Bat Shit Crazy". In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
Are you declaring yourself to be a "creative Genius"? In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
Are you declaring yourself to be a "creative Genius"? Sure looks that way to me. Many of whom used marijuana and/or other mind-altering drugs. Of course, I don’t follow and associate with strung-out and doped-up riff raff like you continually do. Speaking of riff raff, are you still hanging out with hondope? I have him on bozo, so if you are staying in contact with him….say, “Hi”.
Are you declaring yourself to be a "creative Genius"? Sure looks that way to me. Modesty prevents me from answering your question … I did assume that question applied to me.
I just remembered that Sigmund Freud used cocaine more than a personal indulgence; he highly regarded it as a veritable wonder drug. It messed his mind up so much that today many refer to a fuck up as a “Freudian slip”. They do so when they try to gloss over a parapraxis….an error in speech, memory, or physical action that is interpreted as occurring due to the interference of an unconscious subdued wish or internal train of thought. You know the feeling of having many times committing a parapraxis….I have seen you do it often.
Successful Marijuana Users Who Prove The Person Matters More Than The Plant William Shakespeare Queen Victoria James Monroe George Bush Carl Sagan Louisa May Alcott Francis Crick -(Francis Crick was of two scientists (the other was James Watson) who earned the Nobel Prize for discovering DNA in 1962. Oliver Sacks Stephen Ray Gould Bill Gates Kary Mullis (A 1993 Nobel Laureate in chemistry for his DNA research on the polymerase chain reaction) Steve Jobs Margaret Mead Richard Feynman Sarah Palin Lincoln Chafee John Hickenlooper (current Governor of Colorado) Martha Stewart Michael Bloomberg Rush Limbaugh Clarence Thomas You forgot Bill Clinton, used but didn't inhale!
You wasted your time and went to all that trouble to post this shit to me. “Sad.”
I did take time to look up one of the names on the list. Thanks for the good laugh …
Since you wanted to show shining examples of “greatly successful people” who smoked marijuana you forget the “biggest” poster boy for YOUR product of all times: So, here he is … LMAO @ …
"Speculative"???? Isn't that another way of saying "wild-assed guess/brain fart"? Why not say you can give a speculative look at Bubbette! Clinton and Helen Thomas that proves they are super model material? In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
Gatlins claim above, is an opinion, undocumented. Gatlin is a liar, unable to post his proofs.
Sarge has always been a liar.
I know of NO scotus opinion that addressed the issue above. It's constitutionality is very unlikely. Once again, gatlin is parroting an opinion as a truth.
SInce the Founding Fathers and the now independent colonies elected to continue following most English common law….thusly, there was no general right for individuals armed travel when the Second Amendment was adopted and most certainly no right to travel with concealed weapons.Talk about gun control. Yep, the colonies had it really bad under the Founding Fathers. The traditional English restrictions on traveling armed persisted with one important change. American law recognized an exception to this prohibition for individuals who had a good cause to fear an imminent threat. Nonetheless, by the end of the century, prohibiting public carry was the legal norm, not the exception. It appears that gatlin is reposting the opinions of who? ---- Sounds to me like it could from a notorious socialistic 'history of the USA' by a guy called Howard? Zinn? In any case, consider the source, LF's most notorious phony..
No such 'legal principle was established by the Founding Fathers'. Unable to post the proofs, gatlin continues to post his anti-gun opinions, and outright lies.
Large scale? Bullshit.. Post your proofs. More gatlin lies.. What is he trying to accomplish with this antigun tirade?
It has NOT been shown by you and it has NOT been adequately documented that the signers of the Declaration were in favor of and enacted more stringent gun control laws that anything we have in existence today.. Poor gatlin is completely delusional.. -- He's believing his own phony rhetoric.
I daily find that life is so full of unpredictable beauty and packed full of strange surprises. Sometimes the beauty is almost too much for me to handle. Your idol Charles Mansion is DEAD, get over it! Lying won't bring your soul mate back, so just stop.
I'm not so sure he knows it,though. I think he just believes anything that pops into his head. In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
He has a screw loose in the noggin' ... that is certain.
It has NOT been shown by you and it has NOT been adequately documented that the signers of the Declaration were in favor of and enacted more stringent gun control laws that anything we have in existence today.. Why are you such a coward?
I am however, vastly surprised you even knew how to spell Einstein’s name.
#84. To: sneakypete (#83)
#85. To: sneakypete (#84)
#86. To: sneakypete (#85)
#87. To: sneakypete (#86)
The Founding Fathers engaged in large-scale disarmament of the civilian populating during the American Revolution. The right to bear arms was conditional on swearing a loyalty oath to the government. Individuals who refused to swear such an oath were disarmed.
The notion that the Second Amendment was understood to protect a right to take up arms against the government is absurd. Indeed, the Constitution itself defines such an act as treason.
#88. To: Gatlin (#81)
More importantly, It doesn’t bode well for you to try to cover up TRUTH by attempting to cloak “all men are created equal” and hide one of the biggest lies ever told by a Founding Father who was a SLAVE ONWER…a lie written into the Declaration Of Independence.
#89. To: Gatlin (#84)
While the American Revolution was great, it however did not sweep away the English common law….most now independent colonies still followed the English common law as it had been interpreted in the colonies prior to independence which included the ban on traveling armed in populated areas
#90. To: Gatlin, sneakypete (#86)
You can demonize government power for gun control today all you want to and I will join with you at all times for that,
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#91. To: Deckard (#90)
You can demonize government power for gun control today all you want to and I will join with you at all times for that,
Gatlin also said: “… that I can recall at this moment.”
#92. To: Gatlin (#91)
(Edited)
Gatlin also said: “… that I can recall at this moment.”
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#93. To: GrandIsland (#52)
That's called ANARCHY.
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#94. To: Gatlin (#87)
The notion that the Second Amendment was understood to protect a right to take up arms against the government is absurd.
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#95. To: Deckard (#94)
If the signers of the Declaration were alive today, it's a pretty safe bet they would agree that "it's time to shoot the bastards".
Since it has been shown by me and it has been adequately documented that the signers of the Declaration were in favor of and enacted more stringent gun control laws that anything we have in existences today….it’s a pretty safe bet that you don’t know what the fuck you are talking about and your assumption is grossly absurd since it is well known that you as an extremely biased skeptic of current governmental authority have an uncontrollable blind hatred for the enforcement of laws.
#96. To: Gatlin (#95)
Since it has been shown by me and it has been adequately documented that the signers of the Declaration were in favor of and enacted more stringent gun control laws that anything we have in existences today…
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#97. To: Deckard (#92)
Gatlin also said: “… that I can recall at this moment.”
Not a peep from the head canary as of yet.
#98. To: Deckard (#96)
(Edited)
You're delusional.
#99. To: Deckard, Gatlin (#96)
You're delusional.
#100. To: Gatlin (#98)
You will no doubt be surprised to learn studies have shown that there are much higher instances of mental disorder in creative geniuses than in the general population.
#101. To: sneakypete (#100)
You will no doubt be surprised to learn studies have shown that there are much higher instances of mental disorder in creative geniuses than in the general population.
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#102. To: Gatlin (#98)
I can provide you with a speculative look at the mental health of 11 of history's big thinkers...
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#103. To: Deckard (#102)
(Edited)
Many of whom used marijuana and/or other mind-altering drugs.
None of the 11 I am referring to ever did.
#104. To: Deckard (#101)
(Edited)
You will no doubt be surprised to learn studies have shown that there are much higher instances of mental disorder in creative geniuses than in the general population.
#105. To: Deckard (#102)
Many of whom used marijuana and/or other mind-altering drugs.
#106. To: Gatlin (#105)
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#107. To: Deckard (#106)
#108. To: Deckard (#106)
#109. To: Deckard (#106)
(Edited)
It was the last name on the list and I only happen to notice it as I made my post to you.
Here is what I learned about Clarence Thomas … This is someone you have labeled as aSuccessful Marijuana User who admittedly “smoked marijuana several times” [meaning more than two but only a few times] in college and believes “it was a mistake and never repeated it.”
This admitted to mistake by Thomas who never repeated it again is such an inconsequential matter that it has absolutely no relevancy in any way to making Thomas a successful person because of the foolish youthful mistake of smoking a few joints.
#110. To: Deckard (#106)
#111. To: Gatlin (#98)
I can provide you with a speculative look at the mental health of 11 of history's big thinkers
#112. To: Gatlin, Y'ALL (#80)
--- all of the colonies under the Founding Fathers [except of course the Quaker-dominated Pennsylvania which blocked the creation of a militia] mandated a requirement that each of the colonies specifically keep track of ALL privately owned weapons.
#113. To: tpaine, tater (#112)
#114. To: Gatlin, Y'ALL (#84)
While the American Revolution was great, it however did not sweep away the English common law….most now independent colonies still followed the English common law as it had been interpreted in the colonies prior to independence which included the ban on traveling armed in populated areas
#115. To: Gatlin (#85)
---- The Founding Fathers insured that the American colonies continued a variety of gun restrictions that evolved under English Common Law. Armed travel was limited to a few well-defined occasions such as assisting justices of the peace and constables. Members of the upper classes also had a limited exception to travel with arms. Concealable weapons such as handguns were subject to even more stringent restrictions.
#116. To: Gatlin (#86)
--- in 1786, Boston acted on the legal principle established by the Founding Fathers in that it prohibited the storage of a loaded firearm in any domestic dwelling in the city.
#117. To: Gatlin, Y'ALL (#87)
The Founding Fathers engaged in large-scale disarmament of the civilian populating during the American Revolution. The right to bear arms was conditional on swearing a loyalty oath to the government. Individuals who refused to swear such an oath were disarmed.
#118. To: Gatlin, Y'ALL (#95)
Since it has been shown by me and it has been adequately documented that the signers of the Declaration were in favor of and enacted more stringent gun control laws that anything we have in existences today ----
#119. To: Gatlin, Helter Skelter Lying, Charles Mansion, tater, *Bill of Rights-Constitution* (#83)
#120. To: buckeroo (#113)
Sarge has always been a liar.
#121. To: sneakypete, tater (#120)
#122. To: Gatlin is posting elsewhere again, --- while cowardly ignoring legitimate questions. (#118)
Gatlin, --- Since it has been shown by me and it has been adequately documented that the signers of the Declaration were in favor of and enacted more stringent gun control laws that anything we have in existences today ----
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]