Title: Mother, Air Force Vet Kidnapped, Sent to Rikers for Traveling in NY with Her Legal Texas Handgun Source:
Free Thought Project URL Source:http://thefreethoughtproject.com/mo ... veling-ny-legal-texas-handgun/ Published:Nov 26, 2017 Author:Matt Agorist Post Date:2017-11-26 12:46:53 by Deckard Keywords:None Views:9212 Comments:122
Robinson had harmed no one, had not taken anyones property and was merely traveling peacefully in her car when she was kidnapped by police and thrown into Rikers Island at the Rose M. Singer Center with violent armed robbers and murderers.
Robinson was driving from Texas to New York to bring her two children to spend some time with their father when she was arrested by the NYPD in the Bronx and charged with 265.03 FC (CRIM POSS WEAPON-2ND DEGREE C Felony) for having her legally purchased and licensed handgun in her glovebox.
Robinson, who spent five years on active duty, had secret military clearances and also has her active and valid Texas License to Carry.
According to Federal law, an individual is not restricted from transporting legally acquired firearms across state lines for lawful purposes except those explicitly prohibited by federal law to include convicted felons; persons under indictment for felonies; adjudicated mental defectives or those who have been involuntarily committed to mental institutions; illegal drug users; illegal aliens and most non-immigrant aliens; dishonorably discharged veterans; those who have renounced their U.S. citizenship; fugitives from justice; persons convicted of misdemeanor crimes of domestic violence; and persons subject to certain domestic violence restraining orders. Therefore, no federal permit is required (or available) for the interstate transportation of firearms.
Robinson does not fit any of the restricted person criteria as described above. However, having the gun in the glovebox is likely what the New York police have taken issue with.
Deanna Jo, loving mother of two adorable boys, Veteran, Activist and friend in liberty, was arrested in NYC on Nov 11 while traveling from Texas, when her self-defense handgun was discovered in her vehicle. Please help us free her from Rikers.
Two beautiful little boys are wondering where their mother is after the family of three traveled across the country from Texas to NYC so the children could spend time with their estranged father. Deanna Jo is a responsible mother and a veteran with military clearances and a Texas License to Carry. Concerned primarily with her childrens safety and posing no threat to any other person, Deanna Jo arrived at her destination, where her estranged husband took the children into his house then contacted police, who found her self-defense handgun in her vehicle.
No mother should be forced to leave behind her best means of self defense, yet the City of New York sends a clear message: We do not care about your Constitutional rights or your personal safety, and the only people who have guns here are criminals.
Now Deanna Jo sits in a cage at Rikers Island, stripped of her rights and incarcerated, and her children are missing her dearly. She needs to return to them so they can be with their mother. The city has basically told her that her life and the lives of her children are meaningless and that her right to protect them is trivial.
We are a group of friends who want to see Deanna Jo reunited with her children as soon as possible. This fund is to help us do that, plus assist with the legal battle to come.
The goal set on the fundraising page is $25,000 and as of this writing has reached $6,400. The Free Thought Project spoke with Second Amendment and free speech activist Michael Picard who bailed Robinson out on Friday. He told us that Robinson is going to fight the charges all the way as there was no victim of her alleged crime.
She served her country in the Air Force, and this is how New York serves her, Picard told TFTP.
Unfortunately for Robinson, this is the second time shes had an unjust experience with police. As TFTP reported at the time, Robinson was raided by police who were there to take her children over an alleged custody dispute. Robinson, who had a camera rolling at the time of the raid was seen pinned into a corner by Hunt County Deputy Josh Robinson who began beating the handcuffed 9-month pregnant woman as she screamed out in horror.
Deputy J. Robinson was subsequently no-billed by a Hunt County grand jury and has since been reinstated to full duty. Robinson was cleared of any wrongdoing and CPS later admitted there was no warrant.
If youd like to call Bronx District Attorney Darcel D. Clark, and peacefully express to him that this woman has been through enough and doesnt deserve to be locked in a cage for protecting herself and her children, you can so at this number: 718-590-2000. Also, if youd like to donate to her legal fees, you can do so at her Funded Justice page.
Robinson does not fit any of the restricted person criteria as described above. However, having the gun in the glovebox is likely what the New York police have taken issue with.
Kind of tough to protect herself when the gun is locked away in the trunk, don't you think? Of course, you cheer the State once again for their gun-grabbing policies and their making a law-abiding citizen a felon for not begging permission.
This woman was a threat to NO ONE except any bad guys who intended to do her harm.
Maybe you think women should be defenseless and count on the gooberment to protect them - I don't know.
But it sure seems that way.
This goes back to what I said on another thread to you - TPTB don't give a rat's ass whether you live or die.
She served her country in the Air Force, and this is how New York serves her
What a sad commentary on your Air Force career that you would refuse to allow a fellow Officer her Second Amendment rights.
Yes they were. You either lie or are very ignorant.
So you only say, and with no supporting factual evidence being presented by you .that is merely your personal opinion to which you are entitled.
As for me, I had rather deal with facts and not personal opinions.
So, I can show you factually where she violated the Federal law and she was arrested for doing that.
Then I will kindly ask that you please show me factually where her Second Amendment rights were violated?
If you can factually do that without injecting any personal opinions, then I will duly accept your thesis and sincerely apologize for ever doubting you.
Otherwise, I can only conclude that you are the one who is very ignorant.
Duh Duh It seems that you really dont know what constitutional law is, imbecile! So, here .please permit me to help you better understand by providing you with the Definition of Constitutional Law.
Here we go
Constitutional law refers to rights carved out in the federal and state constitutions. The majority of this body of law [constitutional law] has developed from state and federal supreme court rulings, which interpret their respective constitutions and ensure that the laws passed by the legislature do not violate constitutional limits. [Boldness and Underlining have been added for the learning impaired who have neurologically-based processing problems].
The majority of this body of law [constitutional law] has developed from state and federal supreme court rulings,
You are as full of shit as a Christmas goose.
Our Constitutional RIGHT to own and possess firearms PREDATES the federal government. It is the basis on which the federal government was formed and agreed to.
Which in NO way prevents you from voluntarily becoming the slave to a strong master that you want to be. That is also your Constitutional right.
The majority of this body of law [constitutional law] has developed from state and federal supreme court rulings, You are as full of shit as a Christmas goose.
Nah, I am not full of shit. I am just smarter than you are and since you cant come up with an intelligent rebuttal to prove the statement wrong .then all you have left is the low-intelligence ability to fling an insulting remark.
Oh, by the way .that is not my statement about how constitutional law developed .it came from the internet where constitutional lawyers and learned constitutional scholars presented information. I can take time to go look up the source, but with your abject closed biased mind .it would do no good to give a citation.
However, if you so strongly disagree with the statement, then perhaps you should take some time to look into it and if the statement is wrong .then enlighten us all and show us how constitutional law really developed.
Our Constitutional RIGHT to own and possess firearms PREDATES the federal government. It is the basis on which the federal government was formed and agreed to.
Duh, DUH .of course it does. But we were not in anyway discussing that .or at least I never was, I was discussing constitutional law and the origin thereof.
But since you brought it up, our constitutional right to own and possess firearms originated with the founding fathers. Want to know how the Founding Fathers dealt with the right to bear arms? Then you should read Post #37. Adult Warning: You may be shocked!
Which in NO way prevents you from voluntarily becoming the slave to a strong master that you want to be. That is also your Constitutional right.
Yep, and its your constitutional right to remain completely ignorant .but the reason why you want to exercise that constitutional right is something only you can understand.
Oh, by the way .that is not my statement about how constitutional law developed .it came from the internet where constitutional lawyers
Oh,well! That's different! We all KNOW the internet or lawyers would never lie to us,right?
But since you brought it up, our constitutional right to own and possess firearms originated with the founding fathers.
Are you REALLY THAT freaking ignorant? The Founding Fathers said it was a DIVINE RIGHT THAT ALL FREE MEN HAD AT BIRTH. The 2nd Amendment merely identified and codified it.
Oh,well! That's different! We all KNOW the internet or lawyers would never lie to us,right?
Of course they do. But you believe and support the lying shit Deckard posts from TFTP. What makes one lie different from another lie for you? Could it be that you display bias when you gather and remember information selectively? Hmmm
But you believe and support the lying shit Deckard posts from TFTP.
I do? I support Deckard when he posts something I agree with,and don't support him when he posts stuff I don't agree with. Deal with it.
What makes one lie different from another lie for you?
Now you are confusing me with you. A lie is a lie,period.
Could it be that you display bias when you gather and remember information selectively? Hmmm
Duhhhhh! Yes,I AM biased,because unlike you,*I* make up my own mind about what is right and what is wrong. I don't need party hacks to tell me what to think.