[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated

Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit!

Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war

Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview

Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion

Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney.

Iceland Volcano Erupts For Third Time In 2 Months, State Of Emergency Declared

Tucker Carlson Interview with Vladamir Putin

How will Ar Mageddon / WW III End?

What on EARTH is going on in Acts 16:11? New Discovery!

2023 Hottest in over 120 Million Years

2024 and beyond in prophecy

Questions

This Speech Just Broke the Internet

This AMAZING Math Formula Will Teach You About God!

The GOSPEL of the ALIENS | Fallen Angels | Giants | Anunnaki

The IMAGE of the BEAST Revealed (REV 13) - WARNING: Not for Everyone

WEF Calls for AI to Replace Voters: ‘Why Do We Need Elections?’

The OCCULT Burger king EXPOSED

PANERA BREAD Antichrist message EXPOSED

The OCCULT Cheesecake Factory EXPOSED

Satanist And Witches Encounter The Cross

History and Beliefs of the Waldensians

Rome’s Persecution of the Bible

Evolutionists, You’ve Been Caught Lying About Fossils

Raw Streets of NYC Migrant Crisis that they don't show on Tv

Meet DarkBERT - AI Model Trained On DARK WEB

[NEW!] Jaw-dropping 666 Discovery Utterly Proves the King James Bible is God's Preserved Word

ALERT!!! THE MOST IMPORTANT INFORMATION WILL SOON BE POSTED HERE


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

U.S. Constitution
See other U.S. Constitution Articles

Title: Trump Can Win Travel Ban Case at Supreme Court Simply by Enforcing It
Source: Breitbart
URL Source: http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern ... upreme-court-simply-enforcing/
Published: Jun 26, 2017
Author: Joel B Pollack
Post Date: 2017-06-26 14:44:29 by cranky
Keywords: None
Views: 1921
Comments: 6

Monday’s decision by the U.S. Supreme Court to lift the injunction against most of President Donald Trump’s “travel ban” is a major victory — and not just because he will be able to implement the policy, but because the case is only scheduled to be heard in the fall, i.e. in October at the earliest.

Because most of the controversial provisions of the executive order only last 90 days, Trump it could be fully implemented before the Court hears the case.

The Court is prevented from hearing disputes that are already moot. There must be an active case or controversy in order for challenges to the executive order to be heard. The second version of Trump’s executive order suspends travel from six terror-prone countries for 90 days, and suspends the refugee program for 120 days. Both of those deadlines could be reached before the Supreme Court hears oral arguments, and certainly before it issues a decision.

Some of Trump’s supporters might want to have the case heard, in order to clarify the legal principles on which his executive orders were based — namely, that the President of the United States has broad discretion over immigration and that the judiciary must show deference to the executive in matters of national security. They would also like to see the dubious legal reasoning of some lower court decisions — especially the idea that campaign rhetoric can be used to discern the intent behind presidential actions — tossed aside. But the risk of being shot down by the Court may simply not be worth the trouble, given the Court’s recent penchant for inventing bizarre new legal theories.

Trump can “win” simply by following through on the executive order, then declaring it fulfilled before the Court hears the various challenges to the case, cutting the Gordian Knot of legal theories and advancing his policies. (1 image)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: cranky (#0) (Edited)

Some of Trump’s supporters might want to have the case heard, in order to clarify the legal principles on which his executive orders were based — — — — — — — — namely, that the President of the United States has broad discretion over immigration and that the judiciary must show deference to the executive in matters of national security. They would also like to see the dubious legal reasoning of some lower court decisions — especially the idea that campaign rhetoric can be used to discern the intent behind presidential actions — tossed aside. But the risk of being shot down by the Court may simply not be worth the trouble, given the Court’s recent penchant for inventing bizarre new legal th theories.

This is true. But who better to challenge the courts than Trump -- some future McCain-type? A Jeb Bush-type?

The U.S. Supreme Court would think twice about playing games with Trump. There's already talk of a 9th Circuit shake- up.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-06-26   15:00:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: misterwhite (#1)

There's already talk of a 9th Circuit shake- up.

Please, lord, let it be so.

cranky  posted on  2017-06-26   16:12:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: cranky (#0)

Trump should extend the ban, as necessary, and keep some element alive, so that the traditional executive powers are very clearly upheld by the Supreme Court. That will put dry ice on any court that would seek to act politically to block him again.

The Supreme Court is Republican, and Trump should not be afraid to wield it when he's right, which he is in this case.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-06-26   16:59:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Vicomte13 (#3)

The Supreme Court is Republican, and Trump should not be afraid to wield it when he's right, which he is in this case.

Still, as he author pointed out 'given the Court’s recent penchant for inventing bizarre new legal theories', why risk it?

cranky  posted on  2017-06-26   17:06:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: cranky (#4)

Still, as he author pointed out 'given the Court’s recent penchant for inventing bizarre new legal theories', why risk it?

To establish the precedent. To clear the path for aggressive executive action by Trump. Flip the coin over to the other side: a series of big wins by Trump, using the Republican Supreme Court in this way, will establish a string of staggering Democrat defeats. Precedent will be established in a whole series of areas that will carve back the Democrat agenda, and make the Democrats afraid to "risk it" by going to court and losing more.

Seize BACK the judicial system from the Left and use it to unravel what they have done.

The court ruled today also that churches cannot be cut out of government funding for general projects such as playgrounds (in the example).

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-06-26   17:19:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Vicomte13 (#5)

To establish the precedent. To clear the path for aggressive executive action by Trump. Flip the coin over to the other side

Or some would say "roll the dice".

I still don't trust this scotus to get things right. Bizarre new legal theories are right up their alley.

cranky  posted on  2017-06-26   19:01:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com