[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Communists in China are Afraid of Winnie the Pooh

Dragon-elephant showdown not inevitable

'Angel particle' discovery called milestone

Top 10 Chinese tech and engineering marvels

During Abbas's visit, China proposes peace through development in Middle East

After protests over Satanic monument, city removes all religious symbols from memorial

Conservative Anglicans are close to despair. Is the C of E about to split?

Hungary's leader: EU and Soros seek to "Muslimize" Europe

911- Flight 175 Was Not A Commercial Aircraft

Wall Street Journal writer Joseph Rago found dead in his apartment (34 years old)

WATCH: Cop Kills Unarmed Man for Walking Toward Him – Gets Job Back & Immunity

Veterans Turn To Marijuana To Ditch ‘Cocktail Of Drugs’ From The VA

Professor Rages "My University Treated Me Like A Criminal Over A Joke"

Did Elon Musk just confirm that the moon landings were faked?

New Hampshire Decriminalizes Simple Marijuana Possession, Foundation to Nullify Federal Prohibition

Anthony Scaramucci Expected to Be Named White House Communications Director

White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer Resigns After Trump Shakeup

First of Its Kind ‘Food Sovereignty’ Law Just Legalized Local Food Trade WITHOUT Govt

“I’ve Done A Bad Thing” 5-year-old Girl Bursts into Tears As Cops Fine Her for Lemonade Stand

Police Devise New Revenue Scam by Citing People Who Forget to Press Crosswalk Button

Billionaire GOP donor calls President Trump 'an abortion of a human being'

Here’s Who Will Lament — and Celebrate — the Plummeting U.S. Birth Rate

In Landmark Move, GOP Congress Calls Climate Change ‘Direct Threat’ to Security

John McCain Is a National Treasure

Second Monumental Arch of Titus

‘Oh, he just died’: Teens mock drowning man in disturbing video

Body Camera Video In Minneapolis Dog Shooting Released

The good people that Vic talks about needing welfare

Michigan Man Told To “Give Up Some Of Your Constitutional Rights” In Exchange For Adopting Grandson

Court Rules That Employees Can’t Be Fired For Medical Marijuana

Court Says Gov't Has To Do More Than Say It Doesn't Believe The Property Owners If It Wants To Keep The Cash It Seized

Megyn Kelly’s Bad News Just Keeps On Coming. She’s Screwed.

US Lawmakers Seek to Throw Citizens in Prison for Decades if They Boycott Israel

Police Claim Damond ‘Ambushed’ Cops-Unarmed in Pajamas-Family Blasts it as ‘Disinformation’

DUI-E Law Now Makes It Illegal to Text, Smoke and Even Eat While Driving

Taking Care of a Friend’s Dog For The Weekend? Better Have a License, NYC Says

DOJ Boss Promises The Return Of Everything That Didn't Work During The Last 40 Years Of Drug Warring

Orthodox Patriarch of Moscow - West is making a mistake

Breaking: O.J. Simpson granted parole

Antifa Leader Arrested in California for June 2016 Sacramento Riot

Bad Leadership 101: Toronto Man Builds Stairway for $550 Instead of $65,000 -- and the City Blocks It

This Poconos Property Manager Helped My Family Keep Our Vacation Home—Until Pennsylvania Shut Her Down

Jeff Sessions Marijuana Obsession vs Trump’s Pledge

Storage Cubby “Criminals”

John McCain diagnosed with Brain Cancer

Big Military Spending Boost Threatens Our Economy and Security

Girl at lemonade stand threatened by a man who said he'd call police for lack of a business license (misterwhite or Gatlin?)

Former Speaker of the House Let Out of Prison Early After Raping Children

Innocent Man Freed After Cop Seen on Own Body Cam Planting Drugs to Frame Him

Jilted Dentist Calls CPS on Mom


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

The Establishments war on Donald Trump
See other The Establishments war on Donald Trump Articles

Title: Experts: No Case Against Trump
Source: Breitbart
URL Source: http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern ... 7/05/17/experts-no-case-trump/
Published: May 17, 2017
Author: Breitbart News
Post Date: 2017-05-17 19:18:26 by cranky
Keywords: None
Views: 371
Comments: 6

While the GOP establishment, Democrats, and media have the knives out for President Donald Trump after his firing of ex-FBI Director James Comey—and the subsequent leaks from Comey associates portraying alleged conversations between the two—legal experts are skeptical that there is any case to be made for an “obstruction of justice.” Professor emeritus at Harvard Law School Alan Dershowitz writes in the New York Daily News that “on balance, the obstruction case against President Trump is not strong, as a matter of law”:

In more recent times, Presidents John Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson interacted with FBI director J. Edgar Hoover. It is only in subsequent years, especially since Watergate, that a wall of separation has divided the President and the FBI. But this wall is built largely on tradition and internal Justice Department guidelines, rather than on the criminal law.

It thus follows that when evaluating the possibility of criminal charges having been committed by President Trump — the alleged obstruction of justice — this historical context must be considered.

Additionally, constitutional issues regarding the power of the President to direct the FBI would only be raised if the facts established that anyone other than the President — a lay citizen — would be guilty of obstruction of justice in a comparable situation. That conclusion might well depend on what, precisely, the President asked the FBI director to do.

In the New York Times, author and professor of constitutional law at Florida International University College of Law Elizabeth Price Foley states that President Trump’s alleged statements to Comey do not constitute an obstruction of justice. “Indeed, if they did, virtually every communication between criminal defense lawyers and investigators would be a crime,” she writes:

Section 1510 of Title 18 of the United States Code addresses obstruction of criminal investigations. It is a narrow statute, criminalizing only willful acts “by means of bribery” that have the effect of obstructing the communication of information about crimes to federal investigators. Even assuming Mr. Comey’s memo is accurate, there is no indication that President Trump willfully attempted to bribe the F.B.I. director. As the Supreme Court stated in United States v. Sun-Diamond Growers of California, “for bribery there must be a quid pro quo — a specific intent to give or receive something of value in exchange for an official act.”

There is no evidence of a quid pro quo. Even assuming, for the sake of argument, that Mr. Trump intended an implied offer of continued employment in exchange for Mr. Comey’s dismissal of the Flynn investigation, it would be implausible for Mr. Comey to construe it as such. Mr. Comey was aware that he was an at-will employee who could be fired by the president at any time, for any reason. Indeed, when President Obama endorsed Hillary Clinton for president in June 2016 — during the height of the F.B.I.’s investigation into Secretary Clinton’s private email server — it would have been similarly implausible for Mr. Comey to construe Mr. Obama’s pro-Clinton remarks as an implicit offer of continued employment, in exchange for dropping the Clinton investigation. Even though Mr. Comey dropped the investigation one month later, he presumably knew that although it would please both Mr. Obama and Mrs. Clinton, it would not insulate him from being fired.

But even if one adopted an unprecedentedly broad conception of bribery, Mr. Trump’s purported statement still would not violate Section 1510. The statute is designed to preserve the free flow of information, prohibiting only acts that obstruct investigators’ access to information. Bribery of a potential witness, for example, is behavior prohibited by Section 1510. But telling the F.B.I. director that someone is a “good guy” and expressing the hope that an investigation will cease does not obstruct the free flow of information.

Dershowitz also appeared on CNN Wednesday to say “nobody will ever indict the sitting president for obstruction of justice.”

(1 image)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: cranky (#0)

Dershowitz also appeared on CNN Wednesday to say “nobody will ever indict the sitting president for obstruction of justice.”

HotAir's CNN clip:

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-05-17   19:43:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: cranky (#0)

Assume Comey has a memo in which he contemporaneously claims that President Trump wrongfully and criminally attempted to coerce or influence him in the performance of his duties, Comey's failure to promptly report such misconduct to the proper authority in the DOJ would be an offense of his own, one that would render him disbarrable.

For what lawful purpose was Comey saving the alleged material until after he was fired?

Was this matter being stored in a SCF? Did Comey carry it with him in his travels, or how did he retrieve it after he was fired while he was in California?

nolu chan  posted on  2017-05-17   19:48:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: nolu chan (#2)

Assume Comey has a memo in which he contemporaneously claims that President Trump wrongfully and criminally attempted to coerce or influence him in the performance of his duties, Comey's failure to promptly report such misconduct to the proper authority in the DOJ would be an offense of his own, one that would render him disbarrable.

For what lawful purpose was Comey saving the alleged material until after he was fired?

Was this matter being stored in a SCF? Did Comey carry it with him in his travels, or how did he retrieve it after he was fired while he was in California?

Good questions.

I hope Chaffetz asks them after he gets to use his subpoena pen.

cranky  posted on  2017-05-17   19:59:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Tooconservative (#1)

HotAir's CNN clip:

Thanks!

cranky  posted on  2017-05-17   20:00:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: cranky (#0)

hillory losT

panT shiT liberals

all goT a load

love
boris

If you ... don't use exclamation points --- you should't be typeing ! Commas - semicolons - question marks are for girlie boys !

BorisY  posted on  2017-05-18   0:57:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: nolu chan (#2)

For what lawful purpose was Comey saving the alleged material until after he was fired?

Hoover used to record conversations to blackmail politicians. Don't think Comey is that intelligent or manipulative to actually execute such a scam.

However, holding information which should have been reported immediately is as you say a crime of its own.

redleghunter  posted on  2017-05-18   1:39:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com