United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Lesbian couple get divorce after politically charged battle (editors note they weren't actually married as there is no such thing as homo pervert marriage)
Source:
MSN
URL Source: http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/le ... AZg8O?li=BBnbfcL&OCID=AVRES007
Published: May 11, 2017
Author: Sheila Burke
Post Date: 2017-05-11 08:12:59 by HomerBohn
Keywords: None
Views: 8558
Comments: 37
( In this June 24, 2016 photo, Erica Witt, left, cries as she is denied same-sex parenting rights during a Knox County Circuit Court hearing in Knoxville, Tenn. Judge Greg McMillan opined that because she is a woman who legally…
NASHVILLE, Tenn. — A judge has granted a divorce decree to a lesbian couple after a custody battle that was targeted by dozens of conservative Tennessee lawmakers who tried to intervene in the case.
Loading...
The same-sex divorce and custody case became a political flashpoint after a Knoxville judge initially ruled that one of the women had no parental rights to a child conceived by artificial insemination because she did not meet the legal definition of "husband."
The judge changed his mind, granted the divorce and approved a plan for Sabrina and Erica Witt to split custody. The attorneys for the two women did not respond to calls seeking comment Wednesday.
Their divorce came May 2 as the state Legislature was pushing through a bill that gay rights groups say encourages judges to deny rights to same-sex couples when defining words such as "husband" and "wife" or "father" and "mother."
The case of the two women whose marriage fell apart became not just a private family matter but one where state officials repeatedly butted in.
Dozens of Tennessee lawmakers filed court papers to intervene in the case. They were represented by the head of Family Action Council of Tennessee, which supports one-man, one woman marriage. The lawmakers argued that they had to protect their ability to set domestic policy.
However, Knox County Circuit Court Judge Greg McMillan repeatedly refused to let them intervene. The Tennessee attorney general's office also got involved in the divorce case, arguing that Tennessee law should not be interpreted in a way that runs afoul of the U.S. Supreme Court decision legalizing gay marriage.
One of the state's largest LGBT rights organizations says the legislators should have minded their own business and not interfered in one of the most important and personal decisions a couple can make.
"What's next?" Chris Sanders, executive director of the Tennessee Equality Project, asked. "Are they going to pick and choose other marriages and other divorces to get involved in? It's really startling."
But David Fowler, president of Family Action Council, said in an email that the judge was right the first time when he initially decided against one of the women and ruled that the Supreme Court decision on gay marriage couldn't be broadened in the Tennessee case.
The lawmakers are appealing the judge's decision denying them intervention in the case.
Fowler has said publicly that his organization is challenging the assumption that the Supreme Court ruling legalizing gay marriage changed state laws. It supported a newly enacted statute that tells Tennessee judges to use the "natural and ordinary meaning" of words that are otherwise undefined in state law. Those words include "husband" and "wife."
The new law tries to circumvent the protections that the U.S. Supreme court gave to same-sex couples, Sanders said.
Four married lesbian couples expecting children through artificial insemination filed a lawsuit Monday over concerns that the new law could strip them of their parental rights.
Poster Comment:
Two things decided to "make a child" to create a foundation for the pseudo "family" and "marriage". The child shares DNA with only one of them. There is no father in the picture for obvious reasons. The "Mothers" are angry, irrational violent man-hating feminists and lesbians. What could possibly go wrong?(1 image)
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: HomerBohn (#0)
Since the State of Tennessee never recognized their "marriage", they shouldn't be making decisions on their "divorce". Let the couple divorce in Washington, DC where they were married. What a f**king joke.
I wonder who gets custody of "the man in the fambly",and they also get the batteries and the battery charger?
In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
LOL !!!
Si vis pacem, para bellum Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God. Never Pick A Fight With An Old Man He Will Just Shoot You He Can't Afford To Get Hurt I am concerned for the security of our great nation; not so much because of any threat from without, but because of the insidious forces working from within." -- General Douglas MacArthur
In time, that will be remedied, unfortunately.
The kid needs to be taken away and put with normal people. The dykes should spend 25 years in prison for impersonating parents.
I'm for re-classifying acts of perversion as crimes. When a child is involved the penalties are doubled.
Liberals are a lot like Slinkys, they're good for nothing but they bring a smile to your face as you shove them down the stairs.
Re-write the laws so that buggery is again a crime and a sin. Toss their perverted asses into prison.
Liberals are a lot like Slinkys, they're good for nothing but they bring a smile to your face as you shove them down the stairs.
Nice theory. Especially when you consider what laughingly passes for "normal people" these days. You need to ask yourself this,"If "normal" people were available to adopt that child and wanted to adopt that child,why didn't they?". You don't need to answer this question,but I am curious if you think a child is better off in a orphanage than as an adopted child of a homosexuals couple that want a child? In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
Ahhhh,"bring back the sex police!" That's a cry I haven't heard in decades. HAVE YOU LOST YOUR FREAKING MIND? In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
Just because someone humped your bumper against your will doesn't mean that consensual bumper-humping should be a crime. The crime was RAPE,not bumper humping,and rape is still and will always remain illegal. Unless of course you are a Kennedy,a Clinton,etc,etc,etc. In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
This is actually a disincentive to getting married for a gay man or a lesbian who is contributing their DNA to an offspring. If the marriage goes sour, they have to share the child or even lose it or, if they die, their partner can take the child away and cut off the DNA donor's own family from any contact. So if they just don't tie the knot, they have complete control over the child's custody in any event. This is not necessarily a win-win for gay marriage. It could lead to a decrease of some types of gay marriages once they realize what is involved.
I did mention a few years ago that divorce lawyers were glee when SCOTUS did their blanket law from the bench allowing gay marriage. Boom business for them.
It's certainly a lose-lose situation for the unfortunate offspring. He or she doesn't have parents, per se, rather he has two mentally disturbed perverts who are play acting the roles of father and mother. Further, these 'parents' are rapidly heading for a 'crack up' (npi) as they daily look in a mirror at themselves and eventually realize how filthy is their absurd method of lovemaking. Ingesting of bodily fluids as well as fecal matter causes more than mere indigestion. Liberals are a lot like Slinkys, they're good for nothing but they bring a smile to your face as you shove them down the stairs.
It shouldn't be lawful for two perverts to adopt a child let alone allow insemination.
Liberals are a lot like Slinkys, they're good for nothing but they bring a smile to your face as you shove them down the stairs.
Don't allow these faux marriages to happen! And deny insemination of one of the perverts in order to form a perverted 'family'.
Liberals are a lot like Slinkys, they're good for nothing but they bring a smile to your face as you shove them down the stairs.
Children should not be raised by sex perverts. That is what homosexuals are. If they try to raise kids they should be taken out back and shot. An orphanage would be preferable to any any every homo raising kids.
Good thing that's never the case with male and female couples,huh? Further, these 'parents' are rapidly heading for a 'crack up' (npi) as they daily look in a mirror at themselves and eventually realize how filthy is their absurd method of lovemaking. Ingesting of bodily fluids as well as fecal matter causes more than mere indigestion. You seem to have a strange fixation on that sort of thing for a man that doesn't seem to understand that some heterosexual couples do the same things. In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
Yeah,what this country needs is a strong government who will give the people all the rights they need,huh? You don't have the first clue as to how insane you sound,do you? In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
Be the first loon in your church to take a public stand,and announce right here and now that heterosexual couples that practice oral and/or anal sex should not be allowed to marry or have children. BTW,what would be your plan for homosexual women who are already pregnant when you become the new Maximum Leader of Nazimerika,forced abortions? In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
Lesbians are generally "cleaner" than either hetero couples or (especially) homo men. It somewhat spoils the argument you're trying to make. Do you disapprove of them more because they're perverted or because you consider their sexual habits unhygienic?
Well, sodomy is sodomy. The old morality laws from 50 years ago forbade hetero couples from sodomy the same as homo couples until 1962. Then states started reducing penalties for the sodomy laws or legalizing it for married or unmarried hetero couples. These laws were rarely enforced after WW II for hetero couples unless there was prostitution involved. Wiki has a nice chart detailing the state of sodomy laws in the various states for hetero and homo couples. In 2003, Lawrence v. Texas struck down all the remaining sodomy laws, paving the way for legalizing sodomy marriage. Four Harris County sheriff's deputies responded within minutes and Eubanks pointed them to the apartment. They entered the unlocked apartment toward 11 p.m. with their weapons drawn. In accordance with police procedures, the first to arrive, Joseph Quinn, took the lead both in approaching the scene and later in determining what charges to bring. He later reported seeing Lawrence and Garner having anal sex in the bedroom. A second officer reported seeing them engaged in oral sex, and two others did not report seeing the pair having sex. Lawrence repeatedly challenged the police for entering his home. Quinn had discretionary authority to charge them for a variety of offenses and to determine whether to arrest them. When Quinn considered charging them with having sex in violation of state law, he had to get an Assistant District Attorney to check the statutes to be certain they covered sexual activity inside a residence. He was told that Texas' anti-sodomy statute, the "Homosexual Conduct" law, made it a Class C misdemeanor if someone "engages in deviate sexual intercourse with another individual of the same sex".[17] The statute, Chapter 21, Sec. 21.06 of the Texas Penal Code, had been adopted in 1973 when the state revised its criminal code to end its proscription on heterosexual anal and oral intercourse.[18] Quinn decided to arrest Lawrence and Garner and charge them with having "deviate sex". In the separate arrest reports he filed for each, he wrote that he had seen the arrestee "engaged in deviate sexual conduct namely, anal sex, with another man".[19] Lawrence and Garner were held in jail overnight. At a hearing the next day, they pleaded not guilty to a charge of "homosexual conduct". They were released toward midnight.[20] Eubanks pleaded no contest to charges of filing a false police report. He was sentenced to 30 days in jail but released early.[21]
Well,that does sound fairer since it treats all citizens alike,but it's still un-Constitutional because it is not any of the governments business what two or more consenting adults do in the privacy of their homes or behind locked doors. In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
Both. You're not a lesbian are you? How healthy can eating shit be for one and lapping up vaginal secretions as part of a 'love' act? It sounds not only disgraceful and sinful, but very unhealthy as one should be careful about what they swallow. Who knows if the vagina someone is attracted to has been sanitized? Some lesbians are untidy. Liberals are a lot like Slinkys, they're good for nothing but they bring a smile to your face as you shove them down the stairs.
Snaky, you just fail to see the dangers in lapping up shit and secretions from a possibly untidy vagina. Heterosexual couples who engage in aberrant sex have an equal chance of disease due ingesting the above named substances.
Liberals are a lot like Slinkys, they're good for nothing but they bring a smile to your face as you shove them down the stairs.
There is another teaching, that masturbation, oral and anal sex are sinful. They are listed in order of unhealthiness. Since you mentioned abortion, it is worse than all three above.
LOL! You don't get out much,do you? "aberrant sex" is a sure tip-off. BTW,you sound like someone that is asexual. Which is fine,if that is what makes you happy to be that sort of sexual pervert. You can't hurt anyone else as long as you never gain political power,and you won't. In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
Which one is this? In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
Which one is this? Lesbianism? I assume, first and second.
I'm really not sure how much buttlicking the average lesbian does. I don't think I want to google that. Who indeed? LOL I assume you have to be joking. Otherwise, I want to hear a lot more about these properly sanitized vaginas. Sounds like a riot.
I'm really not sure how much buttlicking the average lesbian does. I don't think I want to google that. No problem. Just ask HomberBohn. I'm pretty sure he has both videos and 8x10 color glossies. BTW,is "Bohn" German for "Simpson"? That boy has sum problems. In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
Sleazy Pete probably has a hard drive full of downloaded perversion. He should hope there aren't any children included in his collection.
Liberals are a lot like Slinkys, they're good for nothing but they bring a smile to your face as you shove them down the stairs.
And you sound like a full-blown hairless boy lover.
Liberals are a lot like Slinkys, they're good for nothing but they bring a smile to your face as you shove them down the stairs.
And you sound jealous at the possibility. In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
I understand that is one of your fantasies,Precious,but I am hopelessly heterosexual. In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
Perhaps your a secret pervert; however you may be inclined, seek the services from a psychiatrist.
Liberals are a lot like Slinkys, they're good for nothing but they bring a smile to your face as you shove them down the stairs.
It's too bad that this website hasn't more attendees. Hopefully that will be remedied in short time. Meanwhile don't waste your time responding to anything I post. Liberals are a lot like Slinkys, they're good for nothing but they bring a smile to your face as you shove them down the stairs.
Why? Does reading it cut into your time downloading and watching homo porn? In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
#2. To: HomerBohn (#0)
#3. To: sneakypete (#2)
#4. To: HomerBohn (#0)
The child shares DNA with only one of them.
#5. To: HomerBohn (#0)
#6. To: A K A Stone (#5)
#7. To: misterwhite (#1)
#8. To: A K A Stone (#5)
The kid needs to be taken away and put with normal people.
#9. To: HomerBohn (#6)
I'm for re-classifying acts of perversion as crimes.
#10. To: HomerBohn (#7)
Re-write the laws so that buggery is again a crime and a sin.
#11. To: HomerBohn (#0)
#12. To: Tooconservative (#11)
#13. To: Tooconservative (#11)
This is not necessarily a win-win for gay marriage.
#14. To: sneakypete (#8)
#15. To: sneakypete (#9)
#16. To: sneakypete (#8)
#17. To: HomerBohn (#13)
It's certainly a lose-lose situation for the unfortunate offspring. He or she doesn't have parents, per se, rather he has two mentally disturbed perverts who are play acting the roles of father and mother.
#18. To: HomerBohn (#14)
It shouldn't be lawful for two perverts to adopt a child let alone allow insemination.
#19. To: A K A Stone (#16)
Children should not be raised by sex perverts. That is what homosexuals are.
#20. To: HomerBohn (#13)
Ingesting of bodily fluids as well as fecal matter causes more than mere indigestion.
#21. To: sneakypete, A K A Stone, nolu chan (#19)
Be the first loon in your church to take a public stand,and announce right here and now that heterosexual couples that practice oral and/or anal sex should not be allowed to marry or have children.
On September 17, 1998, John Geddes Lawrence Jr.,[10][11] a gay 55-year-old medical technologist, was hosting two gay acquaintances, Tyron Garner,[12] age 31, and Robert Eubanks,[13] 40, at his apartment in northeast Harris County, Texas,[14] east of the Houston city limits.[15] Lawrence and Eubanks had been friends for more than 20 years. Garner and Eubanks had a tempestuous on-again off-again romantic relationship since 1990. Lacking transportation home, the couple were preparing to spend the night. Eubanks, who had been drinking heavily, left to purchase a soda from a nearby vending machine. Apparently outraged that Lawrence had been flirting with Garner, he called police and reported "a black male going crazy with a gun" at Lawrence's apartment.[16] 
Tyron Garner & John Lawrence
#22. To: Tooconservative (#21)
Well, sodomy is sodomy. The old morality laws from 50 years ago forbade hetero couples from sodomy the same as homo couples until 1962. Then states started reducing penalties for the sodomy laws or legalizing it for married or unmarried hetero couples. These laws were rarely enforced after WW II for hetero couples unless there was prostitution involved.
#23. To: Tooconservative (#20)
Do you disapprove of them more because they're perverted or because you consider their sexual habits unhygienic?
#24. To: sneakypete (#17)
#25. To: sneakypete, A K A Stone (#19)
Be the first loon in your church to take a public stand,and announce right here and now that heterosexual couples that practice oral and/or anal sex should not be allowed to marry or have children.
#26. To: HomerBohn (#24)
(Edited)
Heterosexual couples who engage in aberrant sex have an equal chance of disease due ingesting the above named substances.
#27. To: A Pole (#25)
There is another teaching, that masturbation, oral and anal sex are sinful.
#28. To: sneakypete (#27)
"There is another teaching, that masturbation, oral and anal sex are sinful."
#29. To: HomerBohn (#23)
How healthy can eating shit be for one and lapping up vaginal secretions as part of a 'love' act?
Who knows if the vagina someone is attracted to has been sanitized?
#30. To: Tooconservative, HomerBohn (#29)
How healthy can eating shit be for one and lapping up vaginal secretions as part of a 'love' act?
#31. To: sneakypete (#30)
#32. To: sneakypete (#26)
#33. To: HomerBohn (#31)
leazy Pete probably has a hard drive full of downloaded perversion.
#34. To: HomerBohn (#32)
And you sound like a full-blown hairless boy lover.
#35. To: sneakypete (#34)
#36. To: sneakypete (#33)
#37. To: HomerBohn (#36)
Meanwhile don't waste your time responding to anything I post.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]