LEFT WING LOONS
See other LEFT WING LOONS Articles
Title: The Fascist Pope
Source:
Lew Rockwell
URL Source: https://www.lewrockwell.com/2017/05 ... ilorenzo/is-francis-a-fascist/
Published: May 1, 2017
Author: Thomas DiLorenzo
Post Date: 2017-05-01 06:24:36 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 1268
Comments: 7
Fresh off a hate-filled rant against populism (a.k.a. consent of the governed), Pope Francis recently delivered another mean-spirited, hateful diatribe about the “grave risks associated with the invasion of . . . libertarian individualism at high strata of culture and in university education.” He said this before the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, as reported by Breitbart.com. This is exactly the opposite of reality regarding university education: University education has been almost completely taken over by the pope’s fellow leftists whose true “religion” is cultural Marxism, or left-wing political correctness. He must be the only person on the planet who thinks universities are hotbeds of libertarianism. When it comes to spewing hatred toward free markets, economic freedom, limited constitutional government, and other non-socialist ideas, reality apparently has no relevance to Pope Francis. The pope is an Argentinian Peronist, which is to say, he is a fascist. Juan Peron was the fascist ruler of Argentina whose brand of national socialism involved restricted international trade, wage-and-price controls, seizure of private property, nationalized industries, and spending lavishly in fine Keynesian fashion by printing mountains of currency. The inevitable economic ruination led to his being deposed by a military coup in 1955, after which Argentina continued to print money for decades to bail out its disastrous government regime, creating 12,000 percent hyper-inflation by the 1980s. Only the “libertarian” ideas of the virtues of private property, markets, and economic freedom – the ideas that the pope routinely denounces with a passionate hatred – could have prevented the destruction of the Argentinian economy. He seems to think that the only problem with Peron was that he didn’t go far enough with his brand of socialism (fascism – “national” socialism in the twentieth-century German variety — being just another variety of socialism, as Friedrich Hayek explained in detail in The Road to Serfdom). In his latest attack on free societies the pope denounced libertarianism as a “selfish ideal” and a “fallacious paradigm that minimizes the common good.” Libertarianism teaches that “only the individual gives value to things,” said the Argentinian fascist. He then repeated every collectivist’s mantra that “the libertarian individual denies the value of the common good.” For good measure, he also threw in the standard leftist line that freedom supposedly causes the “marginalization of the more vulnerable majority.” Unlike the fate of the “vulnerable majority” in that Latin American socialist utopia of Venezuela, for instance. Of course, “the common good” is a completely meaningless phrase since it implies that there exists some kind of unanimous agreement on what it is. In reality, it is simply the opinion of totalitarian-minded statists like Pope Francis who use such language in an attempt to bully others into acquiescing in their statist ideology. It is an attempt at censorship, in other words. If you disagree with them, you are an enemy of society because you oppose “the common good,” as they define it, for allegedly selfish reasons. The notion that the “common good” should supersede all else was the hallmark idea of twentieth-century fascism. The “25-Point Program of the Nazi Party, published in 1925, proclaimed that the whole Nazi program was based on the principle, printed in all capital letters, of The twentieth-century fascists understood that they must first discredit the ideas of libertarianism, which were known as “classical liberalism,” before they could get a large portion of the public to embrace their brand of socialism. In his book, Fascism: Doctrine and Institutions (p. 10), Benito Mussolini wrote that “The fascist conception of life stresses the importance of the State and accepts the individual only in so far as his interests coincide with the State. It is opposed to classical liberalism [which] denied the State in the name of the individual” (emphasis added). This is identical to what Pope Francis said in his latest attack on the free society. Mussolini also pontificated that it was “unnatural” for government to protect individual rights, as classical liberalism, or libertarianism, contends. “The maxim that society exists only for the well-being and freedom of the individuals composing it does not seem to be in conformity with nature’s plans,” he wrote. “If classical liberalism spells individualism, then Fascism spells government,” wrote the Italian dictator. In The Road to Serfdom Hayek discusses the age-old collectivist hatred of “individualism” by reminding his readers that, historically, all classical liberals ever meant by “individualism” is simply respect for the individual, for individual human life in general, period. One would think that that is something a pope would embrace instead of denouncing in a speech in which he sounds more like a Vladimir Lenin or a Fidel Castro than the Vicar of Christ. These ideas of “old-fashioned [classical] liberalism” have been “shattered,” the Nazi theorist gloated. What “has to be done now is to get rid of these inherited political ideas . . . . Socialism must present a conscious and determined opposition to individualism.” Pope Francis would undoubtedly agree. 
The Road to Serfdom: T... Best Price: $3.99 Buy New $5.77 
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Gatlin, hondo68, buckeroo (#0)
Is it any wonder that Gatlin's view about libertarianism is in lock-step with the fascist pope? why don't we talk about the fascist ideas of a church that still clings to its old way. You can't pin this on one man, but he should be espousing democracy, not ranting about rights and liberties. yes, the war in the middle east is tragic but it has nothing to do with liberty other than people who should be supported want it. Does he think Daesh is a libertarian organisation? surely he should be defeating them and organising relief from the vast wealth of his church
Thomas DiLorenzo can go to lewrockwell.com anytime he wants to and call Pope Francis “The Fascist Pope” and you can continue to ask “why should anyone listen to Pope Francis” all day long….but neither of those will change the fact that when you go check any list of the most powerful people in the world….you will always find Pope Francis in the top 10.
Gatlin agrees with the fascist Pope and shows once again that his political views are aligned with the Nazi Party (apparently): The notion that the “common good” should supersede all else was the hallmark idea of twentieth-century fascism. The “25-Point Program of the Nazi Party, published in 1925, proclaimed that the whole Nazi program was based on the principle, printed in all capital letters, of “COMMON GOOD BEFORE INDIVIDUAL GOOD.” “The Aryan is not greatest in his mental qualities,” Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf, “but in his noblest form he willingly subordinates his own ego to the community and, if the hour demands, even sacrifices it” (Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, Houghton Mifflin 1943 edition, p. 126). Contemporary fascists like Pope Francis (and Gatlin) continue to repeat this evil mantra. he is not powerful he is a moral voice
Not a moral voice at all. The Pope’s Creed Taken from an excerpt from George Neumayr’s book, The Political Pope: How Pope Francis Is Delighting the Liberal Left and Abandoning Conservatives. The pope read many books given to him by his boss at Hickethier-Bachmann Laboratory in Buenos Aires, where he worked. The “boss” to whom Pope Francis referred is Esther Ballestrino de Careaga. He has described her as a “Paraguayan woman” and a “fervent communist.” He considers her one of his most important mentors. “I owe a huge amount to that great woman,” he has said, saying that she “taught me so much about politics.” Learning about communism, he said, “through a courageous and honest person was helpful. I realized a few things, an aspect of the social, which I then found in the social doctrine of the Church.” The social aspect of communism = the social doctrine of the Church. Let that sink in. The pope has stated: “The Marxist ideology is wrong.” Yet he frequently exhorts action through government and political leaders toward redistributive ends. If this isn’t Marxism, it is a close cousin. Call it democratic communism. Yes, some will find that repetitive. It is safe to say – especially considering its short time on earth – that communism has been the most destructive political philosophy that the world has ever known; the devil’s Mt. Rushmore is still waiting for three other nominees. Nowhere did Jesus teach to initiate force or in any way use the Roman government to do good – to do evil in order to “bring out God’s righteousness more clearly….” To do good is the work of the Church, the body of Christ. It is a calling; it isn’t to be achieved at the end of a gun. The pope should do his job and lead Catholic Christians toward this calling. He should do it as Christ did it, without introducing the initiation of force. Conclusion No pope of Christ = the devil’s pope. well, there have been many of those, however reality must prevail, What do I mean by reality? The reality of the Christian world today is it is opposed by many forces, there is that word again. We can all stand in a corner and pray but as I recall victory was achieved when the faithfull marched out expecting victory. So we fight or just oppose evil and see the salvation of our God.
Only the “libertarian” ideas of the virtues of private property, markets, and economic freedom – the ideas that the pope routinely denounces with a passionate hatred – could have prevented the destruction of the Argentinian economy. He seems to think that the only problem with Peron was that he didn’t go far enough with his brand of socialism (fascism – “national” socialism in the twentieth-century German variety — being just another variety of socialism, as Friedrich Hayek explained in detail in The Road to Serfdom).
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#2. To: Deckard (#0)
#3. To: Deckard (#1)
(Edited)
The World's Most Powerful People:
And so, I say to you again …
#1 Vladimir Putin
#2 Donald Trump
#3 Angela Merkel
#4 Xi Jinping
#5 Pope Francis
#6 Janet Yellen
#7 Bill Gates
#8 Larry Page
#9 Narendra Modi
#10 Mark Zuckerberg
https://www.forbes.com/powerful- people/list/#tab:overall Like it or not, and you have made it abundantly that you don’t….that’s reality and you need to face it, Sport. Reality can become one of your best friends, if you will simply let it. Stop fighting it so hard. You can rest assuredly that when Pope Francis “warns against the ‘invasion’ of libertarianism” people are listening. If you want to seed libertarianism around the globe, you need to have the Pope as a friend.
Cue old Willie one more time …
#4. To: Gatlin (#3)
You can rest assuredly that when Pope Francis “warns against the ‘invasion’ of libertarianism” people are listening.
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#5. To: Gatlin (#3)
#6. To: paraclete, Gatlin (#5)
he is not powerful he is a moral voice
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#7. To: Deckard (#6)
No pope of Christ = the devil’s pope.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]