United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: NBC News Confirms Hillary Covered Up MAJOR Sex Scandal. ARREST HER!
Source:
The Washington Feed
URL Source: http://washingtonfeed.com/watch-nbc ... or-sex-scandal-arrest-her.html
Published: Mar 30, 2017
Author: Staff
Post Date: 2017-04-29 00:58:55 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 2356
Comments: 15
It doesn’t matter how many investigations she blocks or how many scandals she tries to cover up — we all know Hillary Clinton is guilty as sin. According to an NBC News report released in 2013, while Hillary Clinton was secretary of state, she stopped the investigation into a pedophile ring of elites in the State Department. She did this to protect the careers of an ambassador and other officials and prevent a scandal. This news report came when NBC still had a shred of integrity instead of being the liberal lap dogs we know them as today. They presented several memos that came from the State Department to back up their claims of the cover-up of the elite pedophile ring. NBC pointed to the allegations without fear, trying to get to the bottom of the scandal — this is something many news sites are unwilling or incapable of doing in this age of political correctness. It’s a sad fact, but it’s one we have to live with for now. “There is an old saying in Washington that the cover-up is worse than the crime, but in this case both parts of it are disturbing,” stated Chuck Todd in the interview. They were asking the hard questions, showing the ties to Clinton and the officials who participated in the pedophilia and prostitution. According to the reports, the State Department officials ordered the investigators to “cease the investigation” into the conduct of the ambassador and others. This is a prime example of the influence that the corrupt elite have in this country. Back in the golden age of news reporting, the media would report the truth of horrible crimes to the American people, regardless of the backlash. That’s what our media sites are supposed to do. But now, they fail to report on anything negative that the Democrats do. Despite what Hillary Clinton wants covered up, President Trump is here to get to the bottom of it. Trump has called for a federal investigation into the pedophile scandals surrounding the State Department elites and the human trafficking crimes associated with them. Our president has promised to end the “horrific, really horrific crimes taking place,” and this is something Obama failed to do or even focus on. No doubt, if Hillary had won, she would have continued to ignore such issues. Donald Trump held a short press conference with human trafficking experts, announcing that both the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Justice, along with other agencies, would be putting in more personnel and resources to investigate these crimes. Trump is focused on putting a stop to the horrible sex crimes that have been taking place in this country, something the Democrats have refused to stop or actually take an active part in. It’s sickening, and it’s no wonder Trump is calling for the swamp to be drained. It’s time to uncover the horrible truth of the left and uncover the true guilt of Hillary Clinton and the rest of the leftist elites.
var RevContentSolo = { button_text: 'Find Out More'};
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 10.
#1. To: Deckard, CT Freaks (#0)
(Edited)
Protesters outside White House demand ‘Pizzagate’ investigation. Several dozen people assembled outside the White House Saturday to demand an investigation into the unfounded Internet rumor known as “Pizzagate.” Wearing T-shirts and holding banners defending the conspiracy theory — which falsely linked Hillary Clinton to an alleged child-sex-trafficking ring operating out of a D.C. pizza parlor — protesters took turns climbing onto an elevated stage in Lafayette Square to demand politicians and mainstream news media take their claims seriously. Click HERE to read the remainder of the article. More Reports - Fake News Onslaught Targets Pizzeria as Nest of Child-Trafficking A detailed conspiracy theory known as "Pizzagate" holds that a pedophile ring is operating … Pizzagate: From rumor, to hashtag, to gunfire in D.C.
Interestesting. Prove a negative. I thought the principle of the MSM was, "When we have proof, we'll publish it." Now it seems to be, "We'll print whatever the f**k we want and will rectract it (on page 23) only when you provide proof we're wrong." I'm with Trump on this. The USSC needs to overturn New York Times Co. v. Sullivan. Hold the media responsible.
Negatives are simple to prove.
I know the myth of "you can't prove a negative" circulates throughout the nontheist community, and it is good to dispel myths whenever we can. As it happens, there really isn't such a thing as a "purely" negative statement, because every negative entails a positive, and vice versa. Thus, "there are no crows in this box" entails "this box contains something other than crows" (in the sense that even "no things" is something, e.g. a vacuum). "Something" is here a set restricted only by excluding crows, such that for every set S there is a set Not-S, and vice versa, so every negative entails a positive and vice versa. And to test the negative proposition one merely has to look in the box: since crows being in the box (p) entails that we would see crows when we look in the box (q), if we find q false, we know that p is false. Thus, we have proved a negative. Of course, we could be mistaken about what we saw, or about what a crow is, or things could have changed after we looked, but within the limits of our knowing anything at all, and given a full understanding of what a proposition means and thus entails, we can easily prove a negative in such a case. This is not "proof" in the same sense as a mathematical proof, which establishes that something is inherent in the meaning of something else (and that therefore the conclusion is necessarily true), but it is proof in the scientific sense and in the sense used in law courts and in everyday life. So the example holds because when p entails q, it means that q is included in the very meaning of p. Whenever you assert p, you are also asserting q (and perhaps also r and s and t). In other words, q is nothing more than an element of p. Thus, all else being as we expect, "there are big green Martians in my bathtub" means if you look in your bathtub you will see big green Martians, so not seeing them means the negative of "there are big green Martians in my bathtub." Negative statements often make claims that are hard to prove because they make predictions about things we are in practice unable to observe in a finite time. For instance, "there are no big green Martians" means "there are no big green Martians in this or any universe," and unlike your bathtub, it is not possible to look in every corner of every universe, thus we cannot completely test this proposition--we can just look around within the limits of our ability and our desire to expend time and resources on looking, and prove that, where we have looked so far, and within the limits of our knowing anything at all, there are no big green Martians. In such a case we have proved a negative, just not the negative of the sweeping proposition in question. So sayeth Richard Carrier, and he continues on here. Now, if you understand all that and can explain it to me in 10 words or less….I will be much obliged.
There are no replies to Comment # 10. End Trace Mode for Comment # 10.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Kori and Danielle Hayes at a March 25 “Pizzagate” protest outside the White House.
#5. To: Gatlin (#1)
"Until #Pizzagate is proven to be false, it'll remain a srory."
#9. To: misterwhite (#5)
#10. To: A K A Stone, misterwhite (#9)
Negatives are simple to prove.
Replies to Comment # 10.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]