[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"Analysis: The Final State of the Presidential Race"

He’ll, You Pieces of Garbage

The Future of Warfare -- No more martyrdom!

"Kamala’s Inane Talking Points"

"The Harris Campaign Is Testament to the Toxicity of Woke Politics"

Easy Drywall Patch

Israel Preparing NEW Iran Strike? Iran Vows “Unimaginable” Response | Watchman Newscast

In Logansport, Indiana, Kids are Being Pushed Out of Schools After Migrants Swelled County’s Population by 30%: "Everybody else is falling behind"

Exclusive — Bernie Moreno: We Spend $110,000 Per Illegal Migrant Per Year, More than Twice What ‘the Average American Makes’

Florida County: 41 of 45 People Arrested for Looting after Hurricanes Helene and Milton are Noncitizens

Presidential race: Is a Split Ticket the only Answer?

hurricanes and heat waves are Worse

'Backbone of Iran's missile industry' destroyed by IAF strikes on Islamic Republic

Joe Rogan Experience #2219 - Donald Trump

IDF raids Hezbollah Radwan Forces underground bases, discovers massive cache of weapons

Gallant: ‘After we strike in Iran,’ the world will understand all of our training

The Atlantic Hit Piece On Trump Is A Psy-Op To Justify Post-Election Violence If Harris Loses

Six Al Jazeera journalists are Hamas, PIJ terrorists

Judge Aileen Cannon, who tossed Trump's classified docs case, on list of proposed candidates for attorney general

Iran's Assassination Program in Europe: Europe Goes Back to Sleep

Susan Olsen says Brady Bunch revival was cancelled because she’s MAGA.

Foreign Invaders crisis cost $150B in 2023, forcing some areas to cut police and fire services: report

Israel kills head of Hezbollah Intelligence.

Tenn. AG reveals ICE released thousands of ‘murderers and rapists’ from detention centers into US streets

Kamala Harris Touts Mass Amnesty Offering Fast-Tracked Citizenship to Nearly Every Illegal Alien in U.S.

Migration Crisis Fueled Rise in Tuberculosis Cases Study Finds

"They’re Going to Try to Kill Trump Again"

"Dems' Attempts at Power Grab Losing Their Grip"

"Restoring a ‘Great Moderation’ in Fiscal Policy"

"As attacks intensify, Trump becomes more popular"

Posting Articles Now Working Here

Another Test

Testing

Kamala Harris, reparations, and guaranteed income

Did Mudboy Slim finally kill this place?

"Why Young Americans Are Not Taught about Evil"

"New Rules For Radicals — How To Reinvent Kamala Harris"

"Harris’ problem: She’s a complete phony"

Hurricane Beryl strikes Bay City (TX)

Who Is ‘Destroying Democracy In Darkness?’

‘Kamalanomics’ is just ‘Bidenomics’ but dumber

Even The Washington Post Says Kamala's 'Price Control' Plan is 'Communist'

Arthur Ray Hines, "Sneakypete", has passed away.

No righT ... for me To hear --- whaT you say !

"Walz’s Fellow Guardsmen Set the Record Straight on Veep Candidate’s Military Career: ‘He Bailed Out’ "

"Kamala Harris Selects Progressive Minnesota Governor Tim Walz as Running Mate"

"The Teleprompter Campaign"

Good Riddance to Ismail Haniyeh

"Pagans in Paris"

"Liberal groupthink makes American life creepy and could cost Democrats the election".


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

LEFT WING LOONS
See other LEFT WING LOONS Articles

Title: Please, God, Stop Chelsea Clinton from Whatever She Is Doing
Source: Vanity Fair
URL Source: http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017 ... ton-from-whatever-she-is-doing
Published: Apr 22, 2017
Author: T. A. Frank
Post Date: 2017-04-22 18:50:12 by HomerBohn
Keywords: None
Views: 17622
Comments: 62

The last thing the left needs is the third iteration of a failed political dynasty.

Amid investigations into Russian election interference, perhaps we ought to consider whether the Kremlin, to hurt Democrats, helped put Chelsea Clinton on the cover of Variety. Or maybe superstition explains it. Like tribesmen laying out a sacrifice to placate King Kong, news outlets continue to make offerings to the Clinton gods. In The New York Times alone, Chelsea has starred in multiple features over the past few months: for her tweeting (it’s become “feisty”), for her upcoming book (to be titled She Persisted), and her reading habits (she says she has an “embarrassingly large” collection of books on her Kindle). With Chelsea’s 2015 book, It’s Your World, now out in paperback, the puff pieces in other outlets—Elle, People, etc.—are too numerous to count.

One wishes to calm these publications: You can stop this now. Haven’t you heard that the great Kong is no more? Nevertheless, they’ve persisted. At great cost: increased Chelsea exposure is tied closely to political despair and, in especially intense cases, the bulk purchasing of MAGA hats. So let’s review: How did Chelsea become such a threat?

Perhaps the best way to start is by revisiting some of Chelsea’s major post-2008 forays into the public eye. Starting in 2012, she began to allow glossy magazines to profile her, and she picked up speed in the years that followed. The results were all friendly in aim, and yet the picture that kept emerging from the growing pile of Chelsea quotations was that of a person accustomed to courtiers nodding their heads raptly.

Here are Chelsea’s thoughts on returning to red meat in her diet: “I’m a big believer in listening to my body’s cravings.” On her time in the “fiercely meritocratic” workplace of Wall Street: “I was curious if I could care about [money] on some fundamental level, and I couldn’t.” On her precocity: “They told me that my father had learned to read when he was three. So, of course, I thought I had to too. The first thing I learned to read was the newspaper.” Take that, Click, Clack, Moo.

Chelsea, people were quietly starting to observe, had a tendency to talk a lot, and at length, not least about Chelsea. But you couldn’t interrupt, not even if you’re on TV at NBC, where she was earning $600,000 a year at the time. “When you are with Chelsea, you really need to allow her to finish,” Jay Kernis, one of Clinton’s segment producers at NBC, told Vogue. “She’s not used to being interrupted that way.”

Sounds perfect for a dating profile: I speak at length, and you really need to let me finish. I’m not used to interruptions.

What comes across with Chelsea, for lack of a gentler word, is self-regard of an unusual intensity. And the effect is stronger on paper. Unkind as it is to say, reading anything by Chelsea Clinton—tweets, interviews, books—is best compared to taking in spoonfuls of plain oatmeal that, periodically, conceal a toenail clipping.

Take the introduction to It’s Your World (Get Informed! Get Inspired! Get Going!). It’s harmless, you think. “My mom wouldn’t let me have sugary cereal growing up (more on that later),” writes Chelsea, “so I improvised, adding far more honey than likely would have been in any honeyed cereals.” That’s the oatmeal—and then comes the toenail:

I wrote a letter to President Reagan when I was five to voice my opposition to his visit to the Bitburg cemetery in Germany, because Nazis were buried there. I didn’t think an American president should honor a group of soldiers that included Nazis. President Reagan still went, but at least I had tried in my own small way.

Ah, yes, that reminds me of when I was four and I wrote to Senator John Warner about grain tariffs, arguing that trade barriers unfairly decreased consumer choice.

At first glance, of course, Chelsea seems to be boasting that at age five she was interpreting the news with the maturity of an adult. But we should consider whether it’s instead a confession that as an adult she still interprets the news with the maturity of—well, let’s just submit that perhaps she thinks what other people tell her to think. Which brings us to Chelsea’s Twitter feed.

Since Chelsea has 1.6 million followers, we can only conclude that some people enjoy ideas like “Yes. Yes. Yes. Closing the #wagegap is crucial to a strong economy.” And maybe there’s no sin in absorbing and exuding nothing but respectable Blue State opinion. But it’s another thing to insist on joining each day’s designated outrage bandwagon. Did we need to slap down a curmudgeonly Charlotte Rampling, age 71, for griping about #OscarsSoWhite activists? Yes, and here’s Chelsea: “Outrageous, ignorant & offensive comments from Rampling.” Is gender identity not going to be included on the 2020 census? Here’s Chelsea: “This is outrageous. No one should be invisible in America.” Not that there aren’t breaks for deeper thoughts: “Words without action are ... meaningless. Words with inaction are ... just words. Words with opposite action is ... hypocrisy.”

That is … beautiful.

The crude conventional wisdom is that Bill Clinton craved adoration and Hillary Clinton craved power. But Chelsea Clinton seems to have a more crippling want: fashionability—of the sort embraced by philanthropic high society. So you tell The New York Times that your dream dinner party would include James Baldwin, Shakespeare, Franz Kafka, Albert Camus, Jane Jacobs, and Jane Austen, and discussion would be about how “people and communities can evolve to be more inclusive, more kind, have a greater and broader sense of solidarity, while still respecting individual liberties; what provokes or blocks those changes; and what stories might resonate today to encourage us toward kindness, respect, and mutual dignity.” You almost have to bow down before someone who could host Shakespeare for dinner and make the agenda wind up sounding like a brochure for the Altria Group. At least Kafka would be on hand to capture the joy of the evening.

To find fault with the former First Daughter is to invite the wrath of thousands. Love of Chelsea correlates closely with love of Hillary, toward whom her fans have long felt an odd protectiveness, as if she were a stroke survivor regaining the power of speech rather than one of the most influential people in the world. That goes even more for Chelsea, who is often treated less like an independent 37-year-old multi-millionaire and more like the 12-year-old who still deserves to be left alone.

But let’s have a reality check. No one bothers George W. Bush’s daughter, Barbara Bush, who quietly works on her nonprofit, Global Health Corps. On the other hand, if you’re posing for magazine covers, granting interviews, doing book tours, placing your name on your parents’ multi-million-dollar foundation, and tweeting out daily to 1.6 million people, then—guess what—you’re a public figure. And if you’ve openly entertained the possibility of running for office if “it was something I felt called to do,” then assurances to the contrary aren’t quite good enough. You’re a public hazard.

God has decreed that American political dynasties decline sharply in suitability for office with each iteration. Call it the George H.W.-George W.-Jeb rule. Quit after the first iteration. Don’t trot out the second one. And, for the love of God, don’t trot out the third. Forgetting that rule harmed the Democratic Party in 2016 and blew up the Republican Party entirely. The Democratic Party is surprisingly cohesive these days, thanks to anti-Trump sentiment, so a Jeb-style destruction is unlikely. But never say never. If anyone could make it happen, Chelsea could.


Poster Comment:

A rather insightful piece regardless of the source. Frank appears as a foppish sort of writer, but there is much truth in what he says about this motor-mouthed, obnoxious brat offspring of two of the most evil beings to ever step foot in the White House, which they both disgraced.

It is abundantly clear that what all this splashing about of Chelsea means is that her bloody parents want a political career for this mouth.(1 image)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: HomerBohn (#0)

She got her father's looks and her mother's charm.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-04-22   19:18:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: HomerBohn (#0)

Please, God, Stop Chelsea Clinton from Whatever She Is Doing

God does not intervene in the affairs of mankind on the side of justice. If he did, he would have erased the multitude of shitheads of the world. If you want to stop he Chelseas, the Merkals, the Hillarys et al, start by reasoning a irrefutable refutation.

rlk  posted on  2017-04-22   20:53:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Vicomte13 (#1)

She got her father's looks and her mother's charm.

If by 'father', you mean "Webb Hubbell", I'd have to agree.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-04-23   9:21:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: rlk (#2)

. If you want to stop he Chelseas, the Merkals, the Hillarys et al, start by reasoning a irrefutable refutation.

Irrefutable:

Chelsea is the progeny of known psychopaths. Promoting her sorry ass to positions of power held by her parents would be attempting to relive very sad and dangerous chapters in America's history.

Liberals are a lot like Slinkys, they're good for nothing but they bring a smile to your face as you shove them down the stairs.

HomerBohn  posted on  2017-04-23   11:57:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: rlk (#2) (Edited)

God does not intervene in the affairs of mankind on the side of justice. If he did, he would have erased the multitude of shitheads of the world.

I disagree. Sometimes God does intervene, and immediately. Here are two examples for you:

The minute Princess Diana, in line to be the Queen of England, agreed to marry her Muslim boyfriend, and put his ring on her finger, she was immediately struck by the proverbial bolt of lightning.

When PM Ariel Sharon gave away the Gaza Strip to Muslims, and then said he was going to also give away half of the West Bank, he was immediately struck dead (i.e, brain-dead).

As for Chelsea, I don't know enough about her to say that anything like that will happen to her. But I will say this: Her dad is the false prophet of Revelation 19 who gave away Kosovo to the Muslims, and God is not about to let either Hillary or Chelsea or any other supporter of Bill Clinton become President ever again. You can take that to the bank.

interpreter  posted on  2017-04-24   8:41:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: interpreter (#5)

Jesus came to give life not snuff people out. Your theology is wholey your own.

A K A Stone  posted on  2017-04-24   9:17:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: interpreter (#5)

I disagree. Sometimes God does intervene, and immediately. Here are two examples for you:

The minute Princess Diana, in line to be the Queen of England, agreed to marry her Muslim boyfriend, and put his ring on her finger, she was immediately struck by the proverbial bolt of lightning.

When PM Ariel Sharon gave away the Gaza Strip to Muslims, and then said he was going to also give away half of the West Bank, he was immediately struck dead (i.e, brain-dead).

As for Chelsea, I don't know enough about her to say that anything like that will happen to her. But I will say this: Her dad is the false prophet of Revelation 19 who gave away Kosovo to the Muslims, and God is not about to let either Hillary or Chelsea or any other supporter of Bill Clinton become President ever again. You can take that to the bank.

Wow. I had no idea that God was so interested in petty politics.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-04-24   9:55:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Vicomte13 (#7) (Edited)

Wow. I had no idea that God was so interested in petty politics.

There is nothing petty about ruling the world, which is what we, God's Chosen People are supposed to be doing.

Sometimes God immediately strikes people dead for helping Muslims, the 7th head of Satan. Other times, as with Bill Clinton and his many followers (chiefly Hillary, but also Chelsea), the Revelation says they will experience "living" hell. That includes everyone who voted for Hillary, so be careful who you vote for.

interpreter  posted on  2017-04-25   8:50:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: HomerBohn (#4)

Chelsea is the progeny of known psychopaths. Promoting her sorry ass to positions of power held by her parents would be attempting to relive very sad and dangerous chapters in America's history.

Amen!

interpreter  posted on  2017-04-25   8:56:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: interpreter (#8)

There is nothing petty about ruling the world, which is what we, God's Chosen People are supposed to be doing.

Really?

Huh. I don't recall Jesus saying that anywhere. YHWH certainly never said that to the Hebrews.

So, where are you getting it?

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-04-25   14:55:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Vicomte13 (#10)

Really?

Huh. I don't recall Jesus saying that anywhere. YHWH certainly never said that to the Hebrews.

You are wrong on both counts. The Old Testament says in Genesis that a branch of the Jews will rule all the nations of the earth. That branch is Christianity.

And in the Gospels, Jesus said He would return when the sign of Christ appeared in the clouds in order to rule all of the world. The history books tell us that the sign of Christ (a Chi-Rho, the first two letters of Christ in Greek) appeared in the sky on Oct 27th, 312 AD when also Jesus appeared to Constantine and said "By this, conquer." And that's what Constantine promptly did. He put the sign on his labarum and then, riding a white horse and carrying a bow, he conquered all the known world for Jesus and the Church. And the history books tell us that Christianity has been the dominant force on Earth ever since that day.

After the Byzantine empire ruled the earth for a while, the Roman Catholic kings, who rode stout red horses and carried a great sword, ruled the earth for awhile.

Then King James appeared on the scene riding a black horse, and the British empire which conquered with economics ruled the earth for awhile.

Then George Washington appeared riding a very pale-looking horse named Blueskin and now we are ruling the earth. Our weapons bring hell and death to the enemies of Jesus. Isolationists (like Ron Paul and Rand Paul, et al) are crazy. We are not supposed to isolate ourselves from the world, we are supposed to be ruling it, and that is what Trump is now doing, with the help of the other Christian nations in NATO.

interpreter  posted on  2017-04-25   16:55:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: HomerBohn (#0)

Words with opposite action is ... hypocrisy.”

incompeTence

stupid is herediTary - congeniTal

unrepairable Too

love
boris

If you ... don't use exclamation points --- you should't be typeing ! Commas - semicolons - question marks are for girlie boys !

BorisY  posted on  2017-04-25   17:47:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: A K A Stone (#6) (Edited)

Jesus came to give life not snuff people out.

You are so wrong its not even funny. Jesus returned in 312 AD in order to snuff out all the bad guys. In 312 AD it was the 6th head of Satan--the pagan Roman empire that snuffed Jesus out (or tried to, that is). Payback is hell. Later, after Muslims, the 7th head of Satan, trampled the Holy Spot for 1260 years we snuffed them out (with some help from the Jews). At about the same time (at the end of the 1260 years), we snuffed out the 8th head of Satan (Hitler the antiChrist). Now we are having to snuff out Muslim militants again along with the whores (militant atheists like Mr. Un) in the final battle between good and evil. The Good News is, this time, after all the bad guys are thoroughly snuffed out (by Trump and the other Christian nations in NATO) there will be peace for a thousand years!

interpreter  posted on  2017-04-25   18:53:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: interpreter (#11)

The Old Testament says in Genesis that a branch of the Jews will rule all the nations of the earth.

No it doesn't. It says that nowhere in Genesis. It says nothing even remotely like that in Genesis.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-04-25   19:42:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: interpreter (#11) (Edited)

he conquered all the known world for Jesus and the Church.

No he didn't. The known world then included Sarmatia, Germania, Nubia, Ethiopia, Persia and Hibernia, none of which were conquered by Constantine.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-04-25   19:44:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: interpreter (#11)

Then King James appeared on the scene riding a black horse, and the British empire which conquered with economics ruled the earth for awhile.

The British Empire never ruled the Earth. They were the leading nation economically from 1815 until 1880. They had a substantial empire in the tribal hinterlands. But so did other great powers not subject to Britain.

The British never ruled the world, nor ever came particularly close to it. No nation ever has.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-04-25   19:46:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: interpreter (#11)

now we are ruling the earth.

We are? Seriously?

When World War II ended, the world was half-ruled by the Soviet Union.

We didn't win in Korea. We outright lost in Vietnam. we have gone through 11 Presidents with an embargo on Cuba. Fidel Castro is dead, of old age, but his brother still rules.

China is taking islands in the South China Sea, and we protest.

We don't like Assad, but he's still in power.

Your definition of "ruling the world" is pretty loose. So loose that "ruling the world" really means "we're the most prominent nation in the world, but we don't rule it".

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-04-25   20:05:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Vicomte13 (#14)

No it doesn't. It says that nowhere in Genesis. It says nothing even remotely like that in Genesis.

You act like you have never read the Bible and have no idea what it says. Genesis says Israel (Jacob) prophesied that a branch of the Jews, represented by Ephraim, will grow over the wall (meaning the borders of Israel) and grow into a "multitude of nations." The Jews certainly have not become a multitude of nations. Only Christians have. Duh! And most all of the Churches that I have ever attended teach that (and I have attended many Churches). So I don't know how any Christian wouldn't know that.

interpreter  posted on  2017-04-25   20:34:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: Vicomte13 (#15)

No he didn't. The known world then included Sarmatia, Germania, Nubia, Ethiopia, Persia and Hibernia, none of which were conquered by Constantine.

The pagan Roman Empire that Constantine conquered ruled every known continent, or at least the Roman Emperors said they did. But it is true that some Provinces, like the Province of Asia did not include all of Asia. However, Constantine and his successors greatly extended the Roman Empire until it did include the countries you're talking about. So I stand by what I said. I do not say anything that isn't true.

interpreter  posted on  2017-04-25   21:00:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Vicomte13 (#16)

The British never ruled the world, nor ever came particularly close to it. No nation ever has.

When I say the British Empire "ruled the Earth," I mean that the British Empire was the dominant force on Earth, and they ruled whatever they wanted to rule, and no one ever stopped them until George Washington, the 4th horseman, appeared on the scene. But the really amazing thing is, like the Revelation indicates, they rarely had to fire a shot because they mostly conquered with economics. That is, they invented capitalism in case you didn't know it, and formed companies to go into many underdeveloped countries and make lots of money for the king. That did not work out so well in America however because of George Washington.

interpreter  posted on  2017-04-25   21:14:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: interpreter (#13)

Jesus returned in 312 AD

No he didn't liar.

A K A Stone  posted on  2017-04-25   22:02:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: Vicomte13 (#17) (Edited)

We are? Seriously?

When World War II ended, the world was half-ruled by the Soviet Union.

We didn't win in Korea. We outright lost in Vietnam. we have gone through 11 Presidents with an embargo on Cuba. Fidel Castro is dead, of old age, but his brother still rules.

China is taking islands in the South China Sea, and we protest.

We don't like Assad, but he's still in power.

Your definition of "ruling the world" is pretty loose. So loose that "ruling the world" really means "we're the most prominent nation in the world, but we don't rule it".

You have left out the fact that we won WW II by conquering both Hitler and Japan. Several countries helped us conquer Hitler, but it was primarily the US. And yes because Moscow helped us a little bit, we voluntarily gave the "great whore" a lot of the spoils. But it was not because she actually conquered all those countries.

As for Korea, we did stop North Korea from conquering South Korea, so in a way, we won. And we could have easily conquered North Korea if we had wanted to. We also could have won in Viet Nam if we had wanted to. But because of false prophets such as Jane Fonda, et al, we pulled out. The fact is, we can conquer whatever and whoever we want to, because we have weapons that are superior to anyone else's. It's just that some US Presidents were pussyfoots and hesitated to use them. But my main point is, Trump is not afraid to use them, and I predict that soon we will rule the Earth as never before. He will take out Assad and ISIS and Mr. UN and he'll probably have to also take out the President of Iran before it's over. When all of the forces of Satan are removed, the US and the other Christian nations in NATO will be able to rule the Earth unhindered for a thousand years!

My other point is, no other conqueror before or since has ever rode such a pale- looking horse like Washington's "Blueskin."

interpreter  posted on  2017-04-26   0:01:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: interpreter (#19)

The Roman Empire never, ever included Sarmatia, Hibernia, Nubia, Ethiopia or Persia. Not ever.

:Part of Germany was part of Rome for a time, but eventually Rome was conquered by the Germans.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-04-26   0:13:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: interpreter (#20)

I mean that the British Empire was the dominant force on Earth, and they ruled whatever they wanted to rule, and no one ever stopped them until George Washington, t

Joan of Arc stripped them of all of their provinces in France.

The British got themselves crushed in Afghanistan and never ruled it.

They never dared provoke Russia too much, because the Russians could descend on India and they knew it.

The British Empire was important. It did not even come close to ruling the world. And it did not go wherever it wanted and do whatever it wanted.

Example: the British wanted to enter into the American Civil War on the Confederate side, but they dared not do it because the Russians had sided with the Union, and were ready to make war on them in India if they did.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-04-26   0:16:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: interpreter (#20)

That is, they invented capitalism in case you didn't know it,

They didn't.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-04-26   0:17:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: A K A Stone (#21)

No he didn't liar.

All of the history books say that Jesus returned in 312 AD (or at least they used to all say that before history was rewritten in recent years in order to not offend the atheists, Muslims, and Buddhists, etc. that LBJ very foolishly allowed to come into our nation back in 1965. But there are still a few historians and a few older textbooks that dare to tell the truth. And that makes you the liar.

interpreter  posted on  2017-04-26   0:23:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: interpreter (#22)

ou have left out the fact that we won WW II by conquering both Hitler and Japan. Several countries helped us conquer Hitler, but it was primarily the US. And yes because Moscow helped us a little bit, we voluntarily gave the "great whore" a lot of the spoils. But it was not because she actually conquered all those countries.

Oh good Lord. Russia was the primary power that conquered Germany. 85% of German casualties were suffered on the Russian Front, and delivered by the Soviet Union. We assisted the Soviet Union in conquering Germany, not the other way around. We did not GIVE the USSR anything. They TOOK it in the process of conquering Germany.

The war ended on the line that the Soviet and American troops met. What were we going to do in 1945? Attack the Soviet Union? It would have been madness. There would have been millions dead. The Germans surprised them in 1941, but once the Bear got armed up and moving, they crushed the Germans under the massive weight of armor and air and so many troops. The Soviets pinned and mauled the Nazis, while the Western Allies brought up the rear.

Had the Soviets attached us in 1945, with airpower and the Allied forces, we probably would have been able to hold the line and stop them. But if we had attacked them, to try to take Berlin and Eastern Europe from us, they would have pulped our forces.

We didn't "let" the Soviets keep anything. We were allies that needed each other.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-04-26   0:24:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: interpreter (#26)

All of the history books say that Jesus returned in 312 AD

They do, eh? Who knew?

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-04-26   0:25:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: interpreter (#22)

The fact is, we can conquer whatever and whoever we want to, because we have weapons that are superior to anyone else's.

No, we can't. Russia is just as powerful as we are. They have 9000 nuclear weapons and are just as capable of exterminating us completely as we are them. We both know it, and neither side is crazy or suicidal, and so we've kept the peace. It has been a cold peace at times, but peace nevertheless, because for Russia and America to fight is to invite armageddon. The US cannot defeat Russia, nor Riussia the US. Neither is strong enough. We can wipe each other out. What victory is that?

It is true that there is nobody else that could completely destroy us. The third most powerful nation in the world is France, because they have the third most nuclear weapons. They could probably kill a third of us, but we'd still "win" and they'd all die. Britain could also deliver a nasty nuclear punch, but would lose. China has much less capability against the US.

So yes, I agree that we could take on MOST of the world. But not Russia. We are not more powerful than Russia, and we do not have the ability to conquer Russia, We merely have the capability to destroy Russia, even as they wipe us out.

And that would be a dumb thing to do. The first two nations into space are too smart to wipe themselves out over spleen. The Germans and Japanese probably would have committed national suicide on the roll of a dice, but the Americans and Russians are smarter and cooler headed and would never do that.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-04-26   0:32:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: Vicomte13 (#25)

"That is, they invented capitalism in case you didn't know it"

They didn't.

You not only know nothing about the Bible, but obviously you also know nothing about Great Britain and/or capitalism. Before England changed the rules, it was illegal for anyone in a Christian nation to charge interest on a loan. On the day England changed that law, capitalism was born. I thought everyone in the world knew that. That is definitely in all the history books but you have obviously not read a history book either.

interpreter  posted on  2017-04-26   0:36:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: Vicomte13 (#29) (Edited)

No, we can't. Russia is just as powerful as we are. They have 9000 nuclear weapons and are just as capable of exterminating us completely as we are them. We both know it, and neither side is crazy or suicidal, and so we've kept the peace. It has been a cold peace at times, but peace nevertheless, because for Russia and America to fight is to invite armageddon. The US cannot defeat Russia, nor Riussia the US. Neither is strong enough. We can wipe each other out. What victory is that?

It is true that there is nobody else that could completely destroy us. The third most powerful nation in the world is France, because they have the third most nuclear weapons. They could probably kill a third of us, but we'd still "win" and they'd all die. Britain could also deliver a nasty nuclear punch, but would lose. China has much less capability against the US.

So yes, I agree that we could take on MOST of the world. But not Russia. We are not more powerful than Russia, and we do not have the ability to conquer Russia, We merely have the capability to destroy Russia, even as they wipe us out.

And that would be a dumb thing to do. The first two nations into space are too smart to wipe themselves out over spleen. The Germans and Japanese probably would have committed national suicide on the roll of a dice, but the Americans and Russians are smarter and cooler headed and would never do that.

There is a little bit of validity in what you are saying, but let me remind you that Russia is now a Christian nation and that Trump and Putin are friends now. So there is no reason for Putin to attack the US, and no reason for Trump to attack Moscow. So you are making a totally moot point. I said we could conquer whoever we want to, and the fact is, we don't want to conquer Moscow. Maybe the Democrats want to, but not Trump. And like you yourself said, Putin and Trump are "cooler headed."

interpreter  posted on  2017-04-26   0:51:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: Vicomte13 (#27) (Edited)

Oh good Lord. Russia was the primary power that conquered Germany. 85% of German casualties were suffered on the Russian Front, and delivered by the Soviet Union. We assisted the Soviet Union in conquering Germany, not the other way around. We did not GIVE the USSR anything. They TOOK it in the process of conquering Germany.

The war ended on the line that the Soviet and American troops met. What were we going to do in 1945? Attack the Soviet Union? It would have been madness. There would have been millions dead. The Germans surprised them in 1941, but once the Bear got armed up and moving, they crushed the Germans under the massive weight of armor and air and so many troops. The Soviets pinned and mauled the Nazis, while the Western Allies brought up the rear.

Had the Soviets attached us in 1945, with airpower and the Allied forces, we probably would have been able to hold the line and stop them. But if we had attacked them, to try to take Berlin and Eastern Europe from us, they would have pulped our forces.

We didn't "let" the Soviets keep anything. We were allies that needed each other.

I don't know what history book(s) you've been reading, but most history books say that D-Day was the turning point of WW II. And that is also what the Revelation says. On D- Day, 200 million horses (under the hood) were unleashed on the antiChrist (Hitler) and the third of the Earth aligned with him. The riders on the horses are said to be wearing breastplates of red, white and blue which is very obviously referring to US soldiers. You can believe anything you want to, but as for me, I choose to believe the Bible (see the 6th trumpet prophecy).

interpreter  posted on  2017-04-26   1:16:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: Vicomte13 (#28)

"All of the history books say that Jesus returned in 312 AD"

They do, eh? Who knew?

Obviously not you. I suspect that you are pretty young and have never read a real history book that tells the truth and has not been rewritten to appease the atheists and pagans who are offended by the truth. All of the history books when I went to school said that Jesus returned in 312 AD, on Oct. 27th when the sign of Christ appeared in the sky and Jesus appeared to St. Constantine. And you have probably heard futurists say that Jesus is coming back in the future (our future) whereas Jesus said umpteen times that he would return quickly and with speed. To say that He didn't is to call Jesus a liar.

interpreter  posted on  2017-04-26   1:31:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: Vicomte13 (#24)

Joan of Arc stripped them of all of their provinces in France.

The British got themselves crushed in Afghanistan and never ruled it.

They never dared provoke Russia too much, because the Russians could descend on India and they knew it.

The British Empire was important. It did not even come close to ruling the world. And it did not go wherever it wanted and do whatever it wanted.

Example: the British wanted to enter into the American Civil War on the Confederate side, but they dared not do it because the Russians had sided with the Union, and were ready to make war on them in India if they did.

I suppose that next you are going to tell me that King James and most of the other British kings did not ride black racing horses (which of course is what Britain and the British kings are famous for). And I don't know of any other king(s) before or since who ever rode a black horse. Do you?

interpreter  posted on  2017-04-26   1:45:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: interpreter (#34)

I would tell you that kings ride many horses, and that their color is irrelevant.

Whether King James' horse was black or not, I cannot say. I do know that he was a notorious homosexual, running after the men of his court.

I would tell you that the history books you've read are cracked if they tell you that Constantine conquered the whole known world. He did nothing of the kind. The greatest Roman conqueror after Julius Caesar was Trajan, a pagan, who took the Empire to its greatest extent in 117 AD when he led the Roman forces to conquer Mespotamia. They never went into Persia.

But I can see that the ideas you have are very dear to you, so I will leave them, and you be.

If you think Le Pen will be elected, you have a disappointment coming.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-04-26   6:20:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: interpreter (#26)

No all the history books don't say that you liar. You false prophet. You false teacher.

Name one person who lived a thousand years. You cannot because you are a dumb ass liar.

Tell us idiot who was resurrected. Those are some of the things that will happenot when Jesus returns.

Just as it is certain you go to a Luke warm faggot church. It is also a fact that there was no teturn of Jesus to date.

So get your head out of your ass and stop worshipping Constantine.

A K A Stone  posted on  2017-04-26   7:10:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: Vicomte13 (#35)

King James wasn't a fag. But you would vote for left wing extremists who love abortion. I'm talking of course about how you would vote for a witch who consults with evil spirits and worships abortion over a true christian like Ted Cruz. And your reason is sick. Because hillary would be better in your mind because she will steal the fruits of God's people's labor and give it to someone who refuses to work and had 10 abortions.

Catholics don't follow the teachings of christ. You make an idol out of stealing and giving to someone who didn't earn or deserve it. It is quite an anti christian philisophy. Especially considering that Jesus very plainly taught in a language a second grader can understand. That being that if you don't work you dont eat. U less you are disabled in some way.

A K A Stone  posted on  2017-04-26   7:17:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: BorisY (#12)

I was just thinking this. What a coincidence.

Liberals are a lot like Slinkys, they're good for nothing but they bring a smile to your face as you shove them down the stairs.

HomerBohn  posted on  2017-04-26   8:30:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: Vicomte13 (#35)

I would tell you that kings ride many horses, and that their color is irrelevant.

Whether King James' horse was black or not, I cannot say. I do know that he was a notorious homosexual, running after the men of his court.

I would tell you that the history books you've read are cracked if they tell you that Constantine conquered the whole known world. He did nothing of the kind. The greatest Roman conqueror after Julius Caesar was Trajan, a pagan, who took the Empire to its greatest extent in 117 AD when he led the Roman forces to conquer Mespotamia. They never went into Persia.

But I can see that the ideas you have are very dear to you, so I will leave them, and you be.

If you think Le Pen will be elected, you have a disappointment coming.

First, the color of the horses the 4 horsemen ride and the weapons they carry are very, very relevant because that is main way we can easily identify them. And if you google images of King James, they ALL show him riding a black horse, and ALL world history books say that King James, together with the Archbishop of Canterbury who had to OK it, invented capitalism, i.e, charging interest. Plus, for today's reader who has a computer equipped with software that draws vectors (or Great Circles) that can point to even cities on the other side of the Earth, both Canterbury and London, the British lamp and stand are very accurately identified by the "starguide" that Jesus provided in ch. 1 to very accurately identify ALL of the good things foretold and thereby remove any doubt as to what most any prophecy is referring to.

Constantinople is also very accurately pointed to by the foolproof starguide Jesus gives us, removing any doubt as to who the first horseman is. Likewise, New York City, Philadelphia, and Washington DC, the 3 historical capitals of the US, are very accurately pointed to by another vector of the starguide, like 3 ducks in a row. So there is absolutely no possible way I could be wrong about the 4 horsemen because the starguide is foolproof.

So those are the three ways anyone can easily identify the 4 horsemen (provided you have a PC that can draw great circles). And if you don't have one, I suggest you buy one and plug in the coordinates of the 7 Asian cities the Revelation is addressed to, and plot the 21 vectors they form that point to all 21 of the 21 good things foretold.

There are also bad vectors that point to the bad things foretold, but that's a whole different subject. I am just spoon-feeding you a little bit of knowledge for now. If you want to know everything about everything in the Revelation, you need to buy my book, The Revelation:a Historicist View which is available at Amazon and Barnes and Nobles, and at some Christian bookstores like Christianbooks.com

interpreter  posted on  2017-04-26   9:43:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: A K A Stone (#36) (Edited)

No all the history books don't say that you liar. You false prophet. You false teacher.

Name one person who lived a thousand years. You cannot because you are a dumb ass liar.

Tell us idiot who was resurrected. Those are some of the things that will happenot when Jesus returns.

Just as it is certain you go to a Luke warm faggot church. It is also a fact that there was no teturn of Jesus to date.

So get your head out of your ass and stop worshipping Constantine.

OK, I will gladly tell you all those things.

1) Many scientists are saying that someone born this year will live to be a thousand years old because of all the advances in medicine, etc.

2) Many scientists are saying that a martyr will be resurrected from the dead very soon, possibly this year, and it will be performed on the battlefield by US doctors in Baghdad, in the epicenter of the Battle of Ar Mageddon as the Revelation also signifies. It will be made possible by a "biosyncrisity" drug called LY which preserves a dead soldier's brain and other vital organs until he can be taken to the hospital (in the Green Zone in Baghdad) and there be operated on and brought back to life. It tastes sour or vinegary, and is very probably the same drug that was given to Jesus on the cross.

The Revelation signifies that those two things will happen this year, or possibly early next year. And at the same time (this year), a 24th Christian nation (Montenegro) will join NATO, and after all the nations not wearing a wedding garment (atheist and Muslim nations) are kicked out, and all Muslim militants (ISIS,etc.) are defeated, the 24 Christian nations in NATO will rule the Earth unhindered by Satan for a thousand years just as prophesied.

So I suggest you get your head out of your ass and start praising God because it all happens this year or at the latest early next year.

PS, while some Episcopal churches may be lukewarm "faggot" Churches, the church I attend most definitely is not one of them. My church is very hot for Jesus and has produced both me and Jerry Kramer who is probably the most hottest on fire for Jesus person in the world. With God's help, we have both converted thousands of people. I convert hard-core atheist criminals (in Texas jails mostly but also, with my book, atheists all over the world) and he is in Iraq converting thousands of Muslim refugees.

interpreter  posted on  2017-04-26   10:29:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (41 - 62) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com