[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Trump Is Planning to Send Kill Teams to Mexico to Take Out Cartel Leaders

The Great Falling Away in the Church is Here | Tim Dilena

How Ridiculous? Blade-Less Swiss Army Knife Debuts As Weapon Laws Tighten

Jewish students beaten with sticks at University of Amsterdam

Terrorists shut down Park Avenue.

Police begin arresting democrats outside Met Gala.

The minute the total solar eclipse appeared over US

Three Types Of People To Mark And Avoid In The Church Today

Are The 4 Horsemen Of The Apocalypse About To Appear?

France sends combat troops to Ukraine battlefront

Facts you may not have heard about Muslims in England.

George Washington University raises the Hamas flag. American Flag has been removed.

Alabama students chant Take A Shower to the Hamas terrorists on campus.

In Day of the Lord, 24 Church Elders with Crowns Join Jesus in His Throne

In Day of the Lord, 24 Church Elders with Crowns Join Jesus in His Throne

Deadly Saltwater and Deadly Fresh Water to Increase

Deadly Cancers to soon Become Thing of the Past?

Plague of deadly New Diseases Continues

[FULL VIDEO] Police release bodycam footage of Monroe County District Attorney Sandra Doorley traffi

Police clash with pro-Palestine protesters on Ohio State University campus

Joe Rogan Experience #2138 - Tucker Carlson

Police Dispersing Student Protesters at USC - Breaking News Coverage (College Protests)

What Passover Means For The New Testament Believer

Are We Closer Than Ever To The Next Pandemic?

War in Ukraine Turns on Russia

what happened during total solar eclipse

Israel Attacks Iran, Report Says - LIVE Breaking News Coverage

Earth is Scorched with Heat

Antiwar Activists Chant ‘Death to America’ at Event Featuring Chicago Alderman

Vibe Shift

A stream that makes the pleasant Rain sound.

Older Men - Keep One Foot In The Dark Ages

When You Really Want to Meet the Diversity Requirements

CERN to test world's most powerful particle accelerator during April's solar eclipse

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Bible Study
See other Bible Study Articles

Title: Other Religious Writings Can They Be From God, Too?
Source: Answers In Genesis
URL Source: http://www.answersingenesis.org/art ... v2/n4/other-religious-writings
Published: Dec 8, 2009
Author: Bodie Hodge
Post Date: 2009-12-08 00:45:52 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 9634
Comments: 33

The answer seems too simple: other alleged divine writings are not from God because they are not among the 66 books of the Bible and, in fact, they contradict the Bible. A Presuppositional Approach

This is a “presuppositional” approach, which means to presuppose that God exists and that His Word, the Bible, is the truth. This is the starting point or axiom.

God never tried to prove His existence or prove that His Word is superior to other writings. God simply opens the Bible with a statement of His existence and says His Word is flawless (Genesis 1:1; Proverbs 30:5). The Bible bluntly claims to be the truth (Psalm 119:160), and Christ repeated this claim (John 17:17).

In fact, if God had tried to prove that He existed or that His Word was flawless, then any evidence or proof would be greater than God and His Word. But God knows that nothing is greater than His Word, and therefore He doesn’t stoop to our carnal desires for such proofs.

The Bible also teaches us to have faith that God exists and that having faith pleases Him (Hebrews 11:6). Accordingly, we are on the right track if we start with God’s Word.

So how do we know that other religious writings are not from God? God Will Not Contradict Himself

In the Bible, we read that God cannot lie (Titus 1:2; Hebrews 6:18). This is significant because it means that God’s Word will never have contradictions. Though skeptics have alleged that there are contradictions in the Bible, every such claim has been refuted. This is what we would expect if God’s Word were perfect.

Yet the world is filled with other “religious writings” that claim divine origin or that have been treated as equal to or higher than the Bible on matters of truth or guidelines for living. In other words, these writings are treated as a final authority over the Bible.

Any religious writing that claims divine inspiration or authority equal to the Bible can’t be from God if it has any contradictions: contradictions with the Bible, contradictions within itself, or contradictions with reality. Examples of Contradictions in Religious Writings

A religious writing can be tested by comparing what it says to the Bible (1 Thessalonians 5:21). God will never disagree with Himself because God cannot lie (Hebrews 6:18). When the Bible was being written and Paul was preaching to the Bereans (Acts 17:11), he commended them for checking his words against the Scriptures that were already written. If someone claims that a book is of divine origin, then we need to be like the Bereans and test it to confirm whether it disagrees with the 66 books of the Bible. Paul’s writings, of course, were Scripture (2 Peter 3:16).

Religious books, such as Islam’s Koran, Mormonism’s Book of Mormon, and Hinduism’s Vedas, contradict the Bible; and so they cannot be Scripture. For example, the Koran in two chapters (Sura 4:171 and 23:91) says God had no son, but the Bible is clear that Jesus is the only begotten Son of God (Matthew 26:63–64).

The Book of Mormon says in Moroni 8:8 that children are not sinners, but the Bible teaches that children are sinful, even from birth (Psalm 51:5). Few would dispute that the Vedas and other writings in Hinduism are starkly different from the Bible.

Also, such religious writings contain contradictions within themselves that are unanswerable without gymnastics of logic. In the Koran, one passage says Jesus will be with God in paradise (Sura 3:45) and another states that He will be in hell for being worshiped by Christians (Sura 21:98).

The Book of Mormon, prior to the 1981 change, says that American Indians will turn white when they convert to Mormonism (2 Nephi 30:6). If such writings were truly from God, such discrepancies couldn’t exist.

Since such alleged holy books are not from the perfect God, who are they from? They are from deceived, imperfect mankind. Mankind’s fallible reason is not the absolute authority. God and His Word are. Other books may have tremendous value, such as historical insight; but they are not the infallible Word of God.

The Bible warns that false philosophies will be used to turn people from the Bible (Colossians 2:8). So people need to stand firm on the Bible and not be swayed (1 Corinthians 15:58; 2 Thessalonians 2:15).

So there are two options: place our faith in the perfect, all-knowing God who has always been there, or trust in imperfect, fallible mankind and his philosophies. The Bible, God’s Holy Word, is superior to all other alleged holy books. God will never be wrong or contradict Himself. So start with the Bible and build your faith on its teachings so that you please Him. Quick Comparison

Click for Full Text!

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 23.

#2. To: A K A Stone, sneakypete (#0)

Archaeology, New Testament.

The science of archaeology has brought strong confirmation to the historicity of both the Old Testament (see ALBRIGHT, WILLIAM F.; ARCHAEOLOGY, OLD TESTAMENT) and the New Testament. Archaeological evidence for the reliability of the New Testament is overwhelming (see NEW TESTAMENT, DATING OF; NEW TESTAMENT, HISTORICITY OF). This evidence will be summarized in three parts: the historical accuracy of Luke, the testimony of secular historians, and the physical evidence relating to Christ’s crucifixion (see CHRIST, DEATH OF). Historical Accuracy of Luke. It was once thought that Luke, writer of the most historically detailed Gospel and of Acts, had concocted his narrative from the rambling of his imagination, because he ascribed odd titles to authorities and mentioned governors that no one knew. The evidence now points in exactly the opposite direction (see ACTS, HISTORICITY OF).

The Census in Luke 2:1–5. Several problems are involved in the statement that Augustus conducted a census of the whole empire during the reign of both Quirinius and Herod. For one, there is no record for such a census, but we now know that regular censuses were taken in Egypt, Gaul, and Cyrene. It is quite likely that Luke’s meaning is that censuses were taken throughout the empire at different times, and Augustus started this process. The present tense that Luke uses points strongly toward understanding this as a repeated event. Now Quirinius did take a census, but that was in A.D. 6, too late for Jesus’ birth, and Herod died before Quirinius became governor.

Was Luke confused? No; in fact he mentions Quirinius’ later census in Acts 5:37. It is most likely that Luke is distinguishing this census in Herod’s time from the more well-known census of Quirinius: “This census took place before Quirinius was governor of Syria.” There are several New Testament parallels for this translation.

Gallio, Proconsul of Achaia. This designation in Acts 18:12–17 was thought to be impossible. But an inscription at Delphi notes this exact title for the man and dates him to the time at which Paul was in Corinth (A.D. 51).

Lysanias, Tetrarch of Abilene. Lysanias was unknown to modern historians until an inscription was found recording a temple dedication which mentions the name, the title, and is in the right place. The inscription is dated between A.D. 14 and 29, easily compatible with the beginnings of John’s ministry, which Luke dates by Lysanias’ reign (Luke 3:1).

Erastus. In Acts 19:22, Erastus is named as a Corinthian who becomes a co- worker of Paul. If Luke were going to make up any names, this would seem to be the best place to do it. How would anyone know? In excavating Corinth, an inscription was found near the theater which reads, “Erastus in return for his aedileship laid the pavement at his own expense.” If these are the same men, then it explains why Luke would have included the detail that a prominent and wealthy citizen of Corinth had been converted and had given his life to the ministry.

In addition to these, Luke gives correct titles for the following officials: Cyprus, proconsul (13:7–8); Thessalonica, politarchs (17:6); Ephesus, temple wardens (19:35); Malta, the first man of the island (28:7; Yamauchi, 115–19). Each of these has been confirmed by Roman usage. In all, Luke names thirty- two countries, fifty-four cities, and nine islands without an error. This led the prominent historian Sir William Ramsay to recant his critical views:

"I began with a mind unfavorable to it [Acts], for the ingenuity and apparent completeness of the Tübingen theory had at one time quite convinced me. It did not lie then in my line of life to investigate the subject minutely; but more recently I found myself often brought into contact with the book of Acts as an authority for the topography, antiquities, and society of Asia Minor. It was gradually borne in upon me that in various details the narrative showed marvelous truth." [Ramsay, 8]

In full agreement, Roman historian A. N. Sherwin-White says, “For Acts the confirmation of historicity is overwhelming. . . . Any attempt to reject its basic historicity must now appear absurd. Roman historians have long taken it for granted” (Sherwin-White, 189). The critical theories spawned in the early 1800s that persist today are left without substantiation. Archaeologist William F. Albright says, “All radical schools in New Testament criticism which have existed in the past or which exist today are pre-archaeological, and are therefore, since they were built in der Luft [in the air], quite antiquated today” (Albright, 29). Geisler, N. L. (1999). Baker encyclopedia of Christian apologetics. Baker reference library (46–47). Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Books.

GarySpFC  posted on  2009-12-08   2:52:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: GarySpFC (#2)

Archaeology, New Testament.

Superstition ain't science,and when archeologists dig up copies of "The Weekly World News" 2000 years from now and prove that Elvis really did exist,that won't be proof that he impregnated the Loch Ness Monster.

BUT.....,there is nothing preventing you from creating a "Religious Issues" or "Religious History" ping list and pinging this thread with that.

I'll even go so far as to say it would be a popular ping list.

sneakypete  posted on  2009-12-08   5:48:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: sneakypete (#3)

Superstition ain't science,

No it isn't. But when the Bible makes a claim then it is backed up by archelogical evidence. Then that becomes physical support for the words found in Gods word the Bible. Then when that is multiplied several times or hundreds of times it adds even more support.

But no science can't prove or disprove the Bible. There is much scientific evidence to support the claims in the Bible and very little or none to support the man made theory of evilution.

It is impossible to please God without faith.

A K A Stone  posted on  2009-12-08   7:36:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: A K A Stone (#4)

No it isn't. But when the Bible makes a claim then it is backed up by archelogical evidence.

Religion is based on faith,not science. Finding a wall or a temple,or finding the 300 AD version of The National Enquirer or WND may be archeology,but it doesn't prove any of the miracles written about were true.

That's why I suggested he start a "Religion" or even a "Religious History" ping list. Most people are believers,and it would probably result in popular threads. Especially a ping list related to Religious History.

BTW,you are the site owner. You want to be the co-owner of all the ping lists I created? That way if you ban me,I die,or I just thrown my computer out in the yard one day,you can take over the ping lists and look for new co-owners,and the ping lists don't just hang there forever without anybody being able to ping to them.

sneakypete  posted on  2009-12-08   9:03:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: sneakypete (#8)

Superstition ain't science,and when archeologists dig up copies of "The Weekly World News" 2000 years from now and prove that Elvis really did exist,that won't be proof that he impregnated the Loch Ness Monster.

Granted, superstition is not science, but are we dealing with superstition?

BUT.....,there is nothing preventing you from creating a "Religious Issues" or "Religious History" ping list and pinging this thread with that.

I have always respected your right to reject the Bible and Christ, and never once attacked your views. My ping was to show the veracity of Luke, the historian's statement, which he ties together with 6 recorded events on the same day. For that and other reasons Luke is considered one of the greatest historians.

Religion is based on faith,not science.

I will challenge your statement. Faith is NOT a leap into the dark, rather it is an action based on the confidence one has in the object of their belief. Do you have confidence in a parachute opening is an example. Likewise, please do not confuse scientific and historical evidence. The former can be repeated in a laboratory, whereas the latter cannot. Historical evidence can be used to prove an event took place. Additionally, the scientific method can and is applied to both theology and history. That is why theology is known as the Queen of Science.

I will respect your right to avoid all religious issues and not ping you on this subject.

GarySpFC  posted on  2009-12-08   14:13:19 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 23.

#25. To: GarySpFC (#23)

I will respect your right to avoid all religious issues and not ping you on this subject.

Create a Religious History ping list,and ping away. I can ignore pings if I'm busy or not interested,and there is a chance I might sometimes be interested in such a thread if it is based mostly on history and not so much on faith. I probably won't post on it,but I will lurk and read.

sneakypete  posted on  2009-12-08 16:29:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 23.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com