[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Merry Christmas

$10 Trillion Missing From Pentagon And No One — Not Even the DoD — Knows Where It Is

OPINION: The Damage the Freedom Caucus Has Done to the Young Trump Presidency, Republicans and the Country May Be Felt for Years

Trump shifts blame to Freedom Caucus

Poe says some members of Freedom Caucus would vote no against Ten Commandments

Latest Establishment Talking Point: Trump May Be Guilty of ‘Treason’

Who Owns Obamacare Now?

Disgusting: The Freedom Caucus Saves Obamacare Again

Trump: Democrats ‘Smiling’ Because Freedom Caucus ‘Saved Planned Parenthood’ and Obamacare

Trump shifts blame for health-care collapse to far right

The Freedom Caucus is at a crossroads

Kushner to lead White House innovation office (Bill Gates, Elon Musk, Ivanka, etc...)

The obsession of the House Freedom Caucus

Rep. Thomas Massie Is Voting for Trump

GOP congressman [Rep. Thomas Massie]: Trump could be one-term president if health bill passes

NBC's MTP Takes a Hatchet to ‘Area 51’ Freedom Caucus and Cruel GOP

Rep. Thomas Massie fires back at @POTUS over Planned Parenthood quip

Freedom Caucus holds Congress captive

The House Freedom Caucus is "so secretive that it will not disclose the names of its members."

METRO Marine who lost both legs in Afghanistan sworn in as cop

Why (almost) everyone hates the House Freedom Caucus

Pete King: Freedom Caucus to blame for failed healthcare bill

White House Opens Door to Democrats in Wake of Health-Bill Failure

First casualty for House Freedom Caucus after health care meltdown

Collapse of Obamacare repeal plan puts Freedom Caucus in complicated spot

Freedom Caucus chairman shrugs off Trump warning on 2018

Freedom Caucus thwarts Boehner, Ryan — and now Trump

Rep. Jim Jordan: Freedom Caucus ‘did country a favor” by keeping Obamacare

Freedom Caucus' Jordan: End ObamaCare blaming, ‘Let’s get to work’

'Art of the Deal' Healthcare Bill Failure a Way to Oust Paul Ryan and Achieve Full Repeal of Obamacare? (Conspiracy Theory)

How a secret Freedom Caucus pact brought down Obamacare repeal

Blue Privilege: Cop Gets Speeding Ticket After Running Over Innocent Man, Killing Him

Cops Go to Innocent Woman’s Home, Shoot Her Dog for No Reason, Take No Responsibility

Ohio Accidentally Legalized Running Red Lights, State Doesn’t Turn Into Chaos

Do Muslims Commit Most U.S. Terrorist Attacks?

A Pathetic Figure Worthy of Nothing but Our Contempt

Trump and the Republicans, Business as Usual

Ellen DeGeneres Will Leave Her Show This November To Campaign For Breakthrough Skincare Line! (Daily Barf)

Is Rick Perry a Raging Homophobe? Media Thinks So

Trump White House Releases “Treason” Evidence Against Hillary. TAKE HER DOWN

WATCH – Woman’s Food Stamp Card Rejected – Her Shocking Response is Going VIRAL

BREAKING: Hannity Drops Criminal BOMBSHELL on Judge Who Blocked Trump Travel Ban

HE DID IT! Famous Liberal ATTACKED Trump, So He DEPORTED HER -List of Communist Members in Congress Follows)

BREAKING : Kentucky Passes “Blue Lives Matter” Law!

What I Learned From “The Art Of The Deal”

Meet The “Neocons” That Every Libertarian Should Applaud And Embrace

enger Freedom Caucus didn't want to compromise

On Libertarian Arrogance

Exclusive — Discussion About GOP Replacement to Paul Ryan as Speaker of the House Intensifies in White House, Congress

Teen killed, 6 wounded in St. Louis shooting, police say


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: The War on Some Drugs
Source: Casey Research
URL Source: http://www.internationalman.com/articles/the-war-on-some-drugs
Published: Feb 13, 2017
Author: Doug Casey
Post Date: 2017-02-13 10:46:06 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 74
Comments: 2

Drugs are a charged subject everywhere. Longtime readers know that although I personally abstain from drugs and generally eschew the company of users, I think they should be 100% legal.

Few people consider how arbitrary the current prohibition is; up until the 1920s, heroin and cocaine were both perfectly legal and easily obtainable over the counter. Some people “abused” them, just like some today “abuse” fat and sugar (because they’re enjoyable).

But drugs are no more of a problem than anything else; life is full of problems. In fact, life isn’t just full of problems; life is problems. What is a problem? It’s simply the situation of having to choose between two or more alternatives. Personally, I believe in people being free to choose, and I rigorously shun the company of people who don’t.

Hysteria and propaganda aside, the fact is that most recreational drugs pose less of a health problem than alcohol, nicotine, or simple lack of exercise.

Conan Doyle’s Sherlock Holmes (of whom I’m a great fan) was an aficionado of opium products. Sigmund Freud enjoyed cocaine. Churchill is supposed to have drunk a quart of whiskey daily. Dr. William Halsted, the father of modern surgery and co-founder of Johns Hopkins University, was a regular user throughout his long and illustrious career, which included inventing local anesthesia after injecting cocaine into his skin.

Insofar as recreational drugs present a problem, it arises partly from overuse, which is not only arbitrary but can be true of absolutely anything. The problem comes, however, mainly from the fact that they’re illegal.

Alcohol provides the classic example. It wasn’t much of a problem in the US before the enactment of Prohibition in 1920, and it hasn’t been one since its repeal in 1933. Making a product illegal artificially and unnecessarily turns both users and suppliers into criminals.

Because illegality makes any product vastly more expensive than it would be in a free market, some users resort to crime to finance their habits. Because of the risks and artificially reduced supply, the profits to the suppliers are necessarily huge—not the simple businessman’s returns to be had from legal products.

Just as Prohibition of the ’20s turned the Mafia from a small underground group of thugs into big business, the War on Drugs has done precisely the same thing for drug dealers. It’s completely insane and totally counterproductive.

Frankly, if you want to worry about drugs, it would be more appropriate to be concerned about the scores of potent psychiatric drugs from Ritalin to Prozac that are actively pushed in the US, often turning users into anything from zombies, to space cadets, to walking time bombs. But that’s another story more relevant to address at some point—likely years in the future when it’s again time to consider whether US drug stocks are buys.

The whole drill impresses me as being so perversely stupid as to border on the surreal. Insofar as the Drug War diminishes the supply of product, it raises prices. The higher the prices, the higher the profits. And the higher the profits, the greater the inducement to youngsters anxious to get into the game. The more successful it is in imprisoning people, the more people it draws into the business.

Meanwhile, a trumpeted “success” tends to increase funding from the US government. Some of that money succeeds in driving up prices to the benefit of producers, but a lot of it finds its way into the pockets of officials. That further entrenches corruption at all levels.

The only answer to the War on Drugs is the same as that to the equally stupid and destructive War on Demon Rum fought during the ’20s—a repeal of prohibition.

These are arguments entirely apart from the most important one, which deals with ethics. The question is really whether you have a right to control your own body and what you ingest. There’s little question that caffeine, cocaine, nicotine, heroin, alcohol, marijuana, sugar and a thousand other things aren’t good for you, at least not in quantity. But I can’t see how that’s anybody’s business but your own. Once it becomes a matter of state concern, then everything becomes an equally legitimate subject of state attention. Which is pretty much where we are today—well on the way to a police state.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Deckard (#0)

It's nice that you have these opinions Mr. Casey, but there is a very strong and simple counterargument to all of this, and it is this: the bulk of people do not agree that illegal drugs are no more dangerous than alcohol or cigarettes.

They hear those words bandied about, but they know from their own experience that it is not true. They know, generally from personal experience, that cigarettes are really just pretty much smoking a cup of coffee - that it's bad for the lungs over time and hard to quit, and it smells, but nothing more.

They know that a lot of alcohol will get you bombed, but that a reasonable amount is just pleasant, and part of a meal. People know that alcohol doesn't affect the mind much, until you've had a lot of it. They know this from personal experience.

And they know - huge numbers from personal experience, others from looking at the world and seeing and knowing stoners - that marijuana is a strong drug that affects the mind - and the other stuff is very powerful. They know how addictive these things are, because they see that once people start using them, even if those things are illegal and your life can be ruined from getting caught with them, they just don't stop using.

People don't want their children's minds or records ruined by association with illegal drugs, so they support the legal prohibition.

All through the article, it talks about how illegality drives the price up. That's true, but that's because people are addicted and won't (can't) stop, so they keep buying it EVEN THOUGH it's too expensive and dangerous to get, as opposed to just stopping with the drugs and going back to alcohol.

The people will commit the crimes and run the risk tells you that pot, just pot, is stronger than, and different from - and more hotly desired - than alcohol or tobacco.

We all know that it is, so we disregard the arguments that it isn't.

And in a republic, that's how it goes: the people get to set the rules. They have. The drug users need to get in line and stop using.

If they won't - and they won't because they're addicted, or defiant, or both - then the polity will do what polities always do when people defy them: they'll crush the defiant. That's why the drug laws are harsh. It isn't surprising that states full of wastrels vote to permit marijuana use against national law.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-02-13   11:14:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Deckard (#0)

"The question is really whether you have a right to control your own body and what you ingest."

No, the question is why is society forced to support your sorry ass with our tax dollars when you're sick, hungry and out of work because of what you ingest.

Now, once we are no longer forced to do that, maybe we'll consider legalization.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-02-13   12:05:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com